Well here ya go lefties....a few weeks ago you were having kitten over  Maggie Thatcher (And the USA) coddling SE Asian Dictator Pol Pot.

Now the head of the Military Junta that controls Burma shows up in DC and will likely try to con His lordship out of several billion taxpayer dollars in order to lay off murdering ethnic Muslims 


http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/05/15/obama-burma-myanmar-then-sein-aung-san-suu-kyi/2162851/

Quote from: BILLY Defiant on May 19, 2013, 09:54:33 PM
Well here ya go lefties....a few weeks ago you were having kitten over  Maggie Thatcher (And the USA) coddling SE Asian Dictator Pol Pot.

Now the head of the Military Junta that controls Burma shows up in DC and will likely try to con His lordship out of several billion taxpayer dollars in order to lay off murdering ethnic Muslims 


http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/05/15/obama-burma-myanmar-then-sein-aung-san-suu-kyi/2162851/

Well with all the crap going on in DC oleBlamer needed a friend!

OMFG!!!
Where does one start? By meeting with this dictator, he legitimizes his govt, we in turn legitimize communism in it's crudest form.
Tell me these aren't the words of a commie sympathizer?

Caitlin Hayden, spokeswoman for the National Security Council, said that

"While we are not changing our policy to officially adopt 'Myanmar,' we believe that showing respect for a government that is pursuing an ambitious reform a government that is pursuing an ambitious reform agenda is an important signal of support for its efforts and our desire to help the transformation succeed. 

Birds of a feather.....!  Well you know the rest.

Quote from: Solar on May 20, 2013, 05:26:44 AM
OMFG!!!
Where does one start? By meeting with this dictator, he legitimizes his govt, we in turn legitimize communism in it's crudest form.
Tell me these aren't the words of a commie sympathizer?

Caitlin Hayden, spokeswoman for the National Security Council, said that

"While we are not changing our policy to officially adopt 'Myanmar,' we believe that showing respect for a government that is pursuing an ambitious reform a government that is pursuing an ambitious reform agenda is an important signal of support for its efforts and our desire to help the transformation succeed.

No human sacrafice is too great for attaining utopia on earth.
Ethnic cleansing and racism under communism is perfectly legitimate it would seem. The end justifies the means etc.

What I dont understand is how the average happygolucky socialist rationalizes this. Is appeasement still socialist policy even after Hitler?

Quote from: Mountainshield on May 20, 2013, 05:46:12 AM
No human sacrafice is too great for attaining utopia on earth.
Ethnic cleansing and racism under communism is perfectly legitimate it would seem. The end justifies the means etc.

What I dont understand is how the average happygolucky socialist rationalizes this. Is appeasement still socialist policy even after Hitler?

That's the sad part, the happy go lucky lib is clueless as to what ramifications this carries, most don't even realize communism is still a threat.
To me, that's the scariest part, evil thrives among the ignorant, it's why they don't understand retaining our culture is so damned important, why laws regarding immigration are so important, they are piers in our foundation, take this away, and communism will be there to save the lost souls from their own demise.

What the libs don't understand, is the commie is in the House, speeding our demise in the fast lane.

You guys are acting as if this is the first time we have had negotiations with a tyrannical regime ...

Our history has shown we don't really care what style of government we deal with, the only question is will they serve our purpose.

Sometimes I really do wonder what makes a socialist, or parasites in general. Some is I think is genetic/genealogical but most of it is culture, but even then there has to be some failure in their brain chemistry for them to see the evidence of corruption and totalitarianism communism brings and come to the conclusion that this is either a good or insignificant.

I.e to use a reference from popular culture how can a socialist watch Rambo the movie by Stallone where he is in Burma, then see Obama legitimize and appease this regime and not think something is very wrong?

Are you referring to me ? If you are, I didn't say nothing was wrong about it.

Quote from: redlom xof on May 20, 2013, 06:17:45 AM
You guys are acting as if this is the first time we have had negotiations with a tyrannical regime ...

Our history has shown we don't really care what style of government we deal with, the only question is will they serve our purpose.

For this administration? Of course not, it's now common place in this marxist administration.
If you actually knew the history of Burna, you wouldn't have tried to run block for Hussein.
Study, it's an excellent defense against the ignorant.

It was not a block. Just a statement that this is not something that Obama has magically decided the US should start doing. This also shouldn't come as a surprise that Obama would do this, he has no problem dealing with leaders who have blood on their hands.

Obama is continuing our foreign policy that we have been playing for decades.

QuoteStudy, it's an excellent defense against the ignorant.

Absolutely.

Quote from: redlom xof on May 20, 2013, 06:41:20 AM
It was not a block. Just a statement that this is not something that Obama has magically decided the US should start doing. This also shouldn't come as a surprise that Obama would do this, he has no problem dealing with leaders who have blood on their hands.

Obama is continuing our foreign policy that we have been playing for decades.

Absolutely.

Wrong! He's taken it to new levels never seen before.
Case in point, Libya.

Quote from: redlom xof on May 20, 2013, 06:30:21 AM
Are you referring to me ? If you are, I didn't say nothing was wrong about it.

I was writing that post before you had posted.

But I dont understand your argument, appeasment of dictators should never be government policy no matter the administration. What happened to "never again" liberal stance? I guess it was just a fad or not relevant when it is committed by communists. This blatant relativism that symbolizes the left become more than just sad when it is genocide we are talking about. Stating that previous administrations were bad does not excuse for this appeasment of one of the most brutal genocidal regimes on earth.

QuoteWrong! He's taken it to new levels never seen before.
Case in point, Libya

Indeed, I shows we can call sanction of genocide as Obama policy at this point.

How so ?

What makes Obama's 'bad guys' any worse than say Pinochet of Chile or Suharto of Indonesia or the Taliban 'government' of Afghanistan ?

Quote from: redlom xof on May 20, 2013, 06:51:41 AM
How so ?

What makes Obama's 'bad guys' any worse than say Pinochet of Chile or Suharto of Indonesia or the Taliban 'government' of Afghanistan ?

Why is the question who is worse?