You can't make this crap up folks. Rachel Maddow of MSNBC defense from a lawsuit brought on by ONN, Rachel Maddow told the courts that she was a liar and can't be held accountable to tell the truth. The kicker is the judge believed her lies and threw out ONN lawsuit............

A Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is a Fake News Fabulist and Not a Journalist

The $10 million suit was a defamation case, where OAN stated that Maddow had slandered the network on-air when she declared it was an outlet of ''paid Russian propaganda''. What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.

READ MORE HERE...........
https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2020/05/28/845430/

this.......unbelievable.  LOLOLOLOL

Does anyone know if that was Mr Madcow's lead story for Friday?

''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.

Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 03:54:25 AM
''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.

Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".

Agree they're in "no way reasonable" especially as concerns political and cultural matters, but one of the greatest bafflements in my life is the fact that all the liberals I know are very intelligent. Some extremely so. The dearest liberal to my heart is an adored and loved relative. She's brilliant and has distinguished herself in two different medical fields.

And will leave the room in a huff when any liberal tropes are even faintly challenged.

If we could figure out the disconnect, we could reach them. It's my greatest desire ... find the key.

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 03:54:25 AM
''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.

Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".

I call bullshit on Judge Cynthia Bashant. You can't have it both ways. You can't be telling the truth by putting words in other people mouths (in this case ONN) to hurt the President of the United States of America on national TV than turn around and say you lied on national TV to defend yourself in a lawsuit in the court of law.

It was okay for Schiff, Nadler, and Piglosi to use leaking material from the liberal media to impeach President Trump as truth but in a lawsuit the liberal media are liars and should not be trusted to tell the truth about President Trump..........BULLSHIT...........!

People like Judge Cynthia Bashant are the problem not the Rachel Maddows of the world. The same way the voters are the problems not the people they elect.

Quote from: Rebecca on May 30, 2020, 05:19:55 AM
Agree they're in "no way reasonable" especially as concerns political and cultural matters, but one of the greatest bafflements in my life is the fact that all the liberals I know are very intelligent. Some extremely so. The dearest liberal to my heart is an adored and loved relative. She's brilliant and has distinguished herself in two different medical fields.

And will leave the room in a huff when any liberal tropes are even faintly challenged.

If we could figure out the disconnect, we could reach them. It's my greatest desire ... find the key.

Education does not equate IQ. Many of these people c an't even change the tire on their own car, let alone make coffee. They mastered the art of memory, as in test taking.

Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 06:50:07 AM
I call bullshit on Judge Cynthia Bashant. You can't have it both ways. You can't be telling the truth by putting words in other people mouths (in this case ONN) to hurt the President of the United States of America on national TV than turn around and say you lied on national TV to defend yourself in a lawsuit in the court of law.

It was okay for Schiff, Nadler, and Piglosi to use leaking material from the liberal media to impeach President Trump as truth but in a lawsuit the liberal media are liars and should not be trusted to tell the truth about President Trump..........BULLSHIT...........!

People like Judge Cynthia Bashant are the problem not the Rachel Maddows of the world. The same way the voters are the problems not the people they elect.

Yep, she did exactly what Roberts pulled in getting Commiecare passed. Fact is, Madcow represents MSNBC, a so called new network and should have been held to the same standard.
OANN will win on appeal.

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 07:12:03 AM
Yep, she did exactly what Roberts pulled in getting Commiecare passed. Fact is, Madcow represents MSNBC, a so called new network and should have been held to the same standard.
OANN will win on appeal.

To this day I don't know how Roberts got away with that. I guess he doesn't understand what branch of government he works in. It was my understanding that only legislators can rewrite a law that they passed. I guess that's a "Supreme" example of legislating From the Bench but why no one calls them on it is beyond me. Does anyone know, did they actually send the bill back to Congress to make the changes in order for him to make that ruling?

Quote from: Dirtbomb on May 30, 2020, 10:40:15 AM
To this day I don't know how Roberts got away with that. I guess he doesn't understand what branch of government he works in. It was my understanding that only legislators can rewrite a law that they passed. I guess that's a "Supreme" example of legislating From the Bench but why no one calls them on it is beyond me. Does anyone know, did they actually have to send the bill back to the legislator to make the changes in order for him to make that ruling?

I've no idea, I just know this is beyond the purview of SCOTUS.
I'm still hoping someone will challenge the sawed off shotgun law, another unconstitutional move by the court.

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 07:09:22 AM
Education does not equate IQ. Many of these people c an't even change the tire on their own car, let alone make coffee. They mastered the art of memory, as in test taking.

Solar I respectfully disagree and here is why (unless I'm missing something). Your everyday Joes and Janes aren't watching the MSNBC and CNN of the world. They are going about their busy lives and have no time for that load of bullshit. They might find clips of their bullshit on social media but to watch a whole segment, I don't think so.

IMO...the people that are watching the Rachel Maddow shows are social type of people i.e. LGBTQ, abortionist, feminist, pussy hat wearers etc, etc. They understand they are being lied to but they need the Rachel Maddow of the world to justify what they themselves believe.

Anyway MSNBC defense worked and it's a damn same.

Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 10:47:10 AM
Solar I respectfully disagree and here is why (unless I'm missing something). Your everyday Joes and Janes aren't watching the MSNBC and CNN of the world. They are going about their busy lives and have no time for that load of bullshit. They might find clips of their bullshit on social media but to watch a whole segment, I don't think so.

IMO...the people that are watching the Rachel Maddow shows are social type of people i.e. LGBTQ, abortionist, feminist, pussy hat wearers etc, etc. They understand they are being lied to but they need the Rachel Maddow of the world to justify what they themselves believe.

Anyway MSNBC defense worked and it's a damn same.

Yeah, I think you missed the point.

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 11:13:09 AM
Yeah, I think you missed the point.

Nope....the Judge did..........

Oh by the way Conservative Hardliner News looks awesome..............

Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 11:37:48 AM
Nope....the Judge did..........

Oh by the way Conservative Hardliner News looks awesome..............

Yes, Taxed has been working hard to get it up to date.

Here's the lyin' liberal media trying to pass a bold face lie as truth. I said it once and I'll say it again.........the democrats impossible dream is to make a lie truth.

I believe it time to stop calling the media "fake news" and start calling them what they really are...........LIARS.............!

NYT Removes Fake Anecdote About Medical Intern Dying of Coronavirus

The New York Times has removed a section of a story it published in April that falsely reported that a 26-year-old medical intern had died from coronavirus.

The story, titled "I'm an E.R. Doctor in New York. None of Us Will Ever Be the Same. A Covid diary: This is what I saw as the pandemic engulfed our hospitals," included the story of the young man's death.

On Tuesday, the Times ran an editor's note dated May 26, 2020, explaining the error:

READ MORE HERE.........
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/05/27/nyt-removes-part-of-story-that-falsely-reported-viral-death-of-medical-intern/



https://twitter.com/ZacBissonnette/status/1265731575335043072