You can't make this crap up folks. Rachel Maddow of MSNBC defense from a lawsuit brought on by ONN, Rachel Maddow told the courts that she was a liar and can't be held accountable to tell the truth. The kicker is the judge believed her lies and threw out ONN lawsuit............ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
A Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is a Fake News Fabulist and Not a Journalist
The $10 million suit was a defamation case, where OAN stated that Maddow had slandered the network on-air when she declared it was an outlet of ''paid Russian propaganda''. What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.
READ MORE HERE...........
https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2020/05/28/845430/
this.......unbelievable. LOLOLOLOL
Does anyone know if that was Mr Madcow's lead story for Friday?
''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.
Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".
Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 03:54:25 AM
''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.
Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".
Agree they're in "no way reasonable" especially as concerns political and cultural matters, but one of the greatest bafflements in my life is the fact that all the liberals I know are very intelligent. Some extremely so. The dearest liberal to my heart is an adored and loved relative. She's brilliant and has distinguished herself in two different medical fields.
And will leave the room in a huff when any liberal tropes are even faintly challenged.
If we could figure out the disconnect, we could reach them. It's my greatest desire ... find the key.
Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 03:54:25 AM
''The Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context," Bashant added, essentially acknowledging the ''fake-news'' aspect of the Maddow broadcast.
Does this judge not realize we're talking about libs here? Her entire audience on any given night hits an accumulative IQ of 70.
Libs are in no way "Reasonable".
I call bullshit on Judge Cynthia Bashant. You can't have it both ways. You can't be telling the truth by putting words in other people mouths (in this case ONN) to hurt the President of the United States of America on national TV than turn around and say you lied on national TV to defend yourself in a lawsuit in the court of law.
It was okay for Schiff, Nadler, and Piglosi to use leaking material from the liberal media to impeach President Trump as truth but in a lawsuit the liberal media are liars and should not be trusted to tell the truth about President Trump..........BULLSHIT...........!
People like Judge Cynthia Bashant are the problem not the Rachel Maddows of the world. The same way the voters are the problems not the people they elect.
Quote from: Rebecca on May 30, 2020, 05:19:55 AM
Agree they're in "no way reasonable" especially as concerns political and cultural matters, but one of the greatest bafflements in my life is the fact that all the liberals I know are very intelligent. Some extremely so. The dearest liberal to my heart is an adored and loved relative. She's brilliant and has distinguished herself in two different medical fields.
And will leave the room in a huff when any liberal tropes are even faintly challenged.
If we could figure out the disconnect, we could reach them. It's my greatest desire ... find the key.
Education does not equate IQ. Many of these people c an't even change the tire on their own car, let alone make coffee. They mastered the art of memory, as in test taking.
Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 06:50:07 AM
I call bullshit on Judge Cynthia Bashant. You can't have it both ways. You can't be telling the truth by putting words in other people mouths (in this case ONN) to hurt the President of the United States of America on national TV than turn around and say you lied on national TV to defend yourself in a lawsuit in the court of law.
It was okay for Schiff, Nadler, and Piglosi to use leaking material from the liberal media to impeach President Trump as truth but in a lawsuit the liberal media are liars and should not be trusted to tell the truth about President Trump..........BULLSHIT...........!
People like Judge Cynthia Bashant are the problem not the Rachel Maddows of the world. The same way the voters are the problems not the people they elect.
Yep, she did exactly what Roberts pulled in getting Commiecare passed. Fact is, Madcow represents MSNBC, a so called new network and should have been held to the same standard.
OANN will win on appeal.
Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 07:12:03 AM
Yep, she did exactly what Roberts pulled in getting Commiecare passed. Fact is, Madcow represents MSNBC, a so called new network and should have been held to the same standard.
OANN will win on appeal.
To this day I don't know how Roberts got away with that. I guess he doesn't understand what branch of government he works in. It was my understanding that only legislators can rewrite a law that they passed. I guess that's a "Supreme" example of legislating From the Bench but why no one calls them on it is beyond me. Does anyone know, did they actually send the bill back to Congress to make the changes in order for him to make that ruling?
Quote from: Dirtbomb on May 30, 2020, 10:40:15 AM
To this day I don't know how Roberts got away with that. I guess he doesn't understand what branch of government he works in. It was my understanding that only legislators can rewrite a law that they passed. I guess that's a "Supreme" example of legislating From the Bench but why no one calls them on it is beyond me. Does anyone know, did they actually have to send the bill back to the legislator to make the changes in order for him to make that ruling?
I've no idea, I just know this is beyond the purview of SCOTUS.
I'm still hoping someone will challenge the sawed off shotgun law, another unconstitutional move by the court.
Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 07:09:22 AM
Education does not equate IQ. Many of these people c an't even change the tire on their own car, let alone make coffee. They mastered the art of memory, as in test taking.
Solar I respectfully disagree and here is why (unless I'm missing something). Your everyday Joes and Janes aren't watching the MSNBC and CNN of the world. They are going about their busy lives and have no time for that load of bullshit. They might find clips of their bullshit on social media but to watch a whole segment, I don't think so.
IMO...the people that are watching the Rachel Maddow shows are social type of people i.e. LGBTQ, abortionist, feminist, pussy hat wearers etc, etc. They understand they are being lied to but they need the Rachel Maddow of the world to justify what they themselves believe.
Anyway MSNBC defense worked and it's a damn same.
Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 10:47:10 AM
Solar I respectfully disagree and here is why (unless I'm missing something). Your everyday Joes and Janes aren't watching the MSNBC and CNN of the world. They are going about their busy lives and have no time for that load of bullshit. They might find clips of their bullshit on social media but to watch a whole segment, I don't think so.
IMO...the people that are watching the Rachel Maddow shows are social type of people i.e. LGBTQ, abortionist, feminist, pussy hat wearers etc, etc. They understand they are being lied to but they need the Rachel Maddow of the world to justify what they themselves believe.
Anyway MSNBC defense worked and it's a damn same.
Yeah, I think you missed the point. :biggrin:
Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2020, 11:13:09 AM
Yeah, I think you missed the point. :biggrin:
Nope....the Judge did.......... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh by the way Conservative Hardliner News looks awesome.............. :thumbsup:
Quote from: Bronx on May 30, 2020, 11:37:48 AM
Nope....the Judge did.......... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh by the way Conservative Hardliner News looks awesome.............. :thumbsup:
Yes, Taxed has been working hard to get it up to date.
Here's the lyin' liberal media trying to pass a bold face lie as truth. I said it once and I'll say it again.........the democrats impossible dream is to make a lie truth.
I believe it time to stop calling the media "fake news" and start calling them what they really are...........LIARS.............!
NYT Removes Fake Anecdote About Medical Intern Dying of Coronavirus
The New York Times has removed a section of a story it published in April that falsely reported that a 26-year-old medical intern had died from coronavirus.
The story, titled "I'm an E.R. Doctor in New York. None of Us Will Ever Be the Same. A Covid diary: This is what I saw as the pandemic engulfed our hospitals," included the story of the young man's death.
On Tuesday, the Times ran an editor's note dated May 26, 2020, explaining the error:
READ MORE HERE.........
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/05/27/nyt-removes-part-of-story-that-falsely-reported-viral-death-of-medical-intern/
https://twitter.com/ZacBissonnette/status/1265731575335043072
Quote from: Bronx on May 29, 2020, 06:55:24 PM
You can't make this crap up folks. Rachel Maddow of MSNBC defense from a lawsuit brought on by ONN, Rachel Maddow told the courts that she was a liar and can't be held accountable to tell the truth. The kicker is the judge believed her lies and threw out ONN lawsuit............ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
A Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is a Fake News Fabulist and Not a Journalist
The $10 million suit was a defamation case, where OAN stated that Maddow had slandered the network on-air when she declared it was an outlet of ''paid Russian propaganda''. What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.
READ MORE HERE...........
https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2020/05/28/845430/
That's the same defense the on-air personalities at FoxNews use. Seems fair enough that she got away with it as they do as well...
Quote from: joesixpack on May 31, 2020, 09:19:19 AM
That's the same defense the on-air personalities at FoxNews use. Seems fair enough that she got away with it as they do as well...
Really? Show me the case! LINK?
Quote from: joesixpack on May 31, 2020, 09:19:19 AM
That's the same defense the on-air personalities at FoxNews use. Seems fair enough that she got away with it as they do as well...
Do you really believe in "what's good for the goose, is good for the gander"? Things being equal across the board?
Quote from: joesixpack on May 31, 2020, 09:19:19 AM
That's the same defense the on-air personalities at FoxNews use. Seems fair enough that she got away with it as they do as well...
You have to back up your claim Joe "One Can". Put your money where your mouth is.
Quote from: Bronx on May 31, 2020, 11:17:06 AM
You have to back up your claim Joe "One Can". Put your money where your mouth is.
He can't, he had nothing from the start, but as a lib, he had to take the Marxist side. :lol:
Quote from: Solar on May 31, 2020, 11:32:28 AM
He can't, he had nothing from the start, but as a lib, he had to take the Marxist side. :lol:
NBC gets caught lying again............. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1266092746403729410
Quote from: Solar on May 31, 2020, 09:23:29 AM
Really? Show me the case! LINK?
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sean-hannity-the-whole-newspaper_n_5c651a10e4b0233af971861e
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/im-not-a-journalist-hannity-defends-himself-from-claims-hes-a-trump-trumpeter
I know of no business that leaves any kind of money in the register/cash drawer when the store is closed. Even closed registers are empty during business hours.
Quote from: joesixpack on May 31, 2020, 05:09:34 PM
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sean-hannity-the-whole-newspaper_n_5c651a10e4b0233af971861e
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/im-not-a-journalist-hannity-defends-himself-from-claims-hes-a-trump-trumpeter
FAIL!!! Handititi is a Urinalist not a Journalist, he's a RINO opportunist! He didn't even finish college.
Maddow on the other hand is an actual "AHEMM" journalist.
Rachel Maddow "came out" as gay at age 17 when a Stanford freshman. She was the first openly gay American to be awarded a Rhodes Scholarship, and the first openly gay journalist to anchor a major U.S. news program.
Accolades and Honors
For her efforts as a political journalist, Rachel Maddow has been awarded:
2010 Walter Cronkite Faith & Freedom award. Past recipients include Tom Brokaw, Larry King, and the late Peter Jennings.
2009 - Nomination for "Outstanding Achievement in News and Information" by the Television Critics Association, the only cable news program accorded the honor
2009 - Gracie Award by the American Women in Radio, Television
March 28, 2009 - Proclamation of Honor from the California State Senate
https://www.thoughtco.com/rachel-maddow-profile-3325654
Want to play again, winner take all? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: joesixpack on May 31, 2020, 05:09:34 PM
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sean-hannity-the-whole-newspaper_n_5c651a10e4b0233af971861e
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/im-not-a-journalist-hannity-defends-himself-from-claims-hes-a-trump-trumpeter
Damn it son all you're telling us is you really don't know the difference between an opinion and someone straight out lying.
I'm embarrassed for you.
Quote from: Bronx on May 31, 2020, 07:11:09 PM
Damn it son all you're telling us is you really don't know the difference between an opinion and someone straight out lying.
I'm embarrassed for you.
Rachel Maddiw, Chris Matthews, Glenn Beck and Shawn Hannity are opinion shows.
They opine on the news.
I'll let you all have the last word. The verdict is already in
Quote from: joesixpack on June 01, 2020, 12:21:59 AM
Rachel Maddiw, Chris Matthews, Glenn Beck and Shawn Hannity are opinion shows.
They opine on the news.
I'll let you all have the last word. The verdict is already in
There are some differences in the aforementioned, Mathews is a known idiot, Glenn Beck is a historian and quite brilliant.
Madcow would claim to have inside sources and lead her audience to believe, that at any moment the hammer was going to come down on Trump.
That went on since before he was elected..
Then you have Mourning Joe and Mika, two more known frauds, on the same network. Doesn't Brian Williams work there? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: joesixpack on June 01, 2020, 12:21:59 AM
Rachel Maddiw, Chris Matthews, Glenn Beck and Shawn Hannity are opinion shows.
They opine on the news.
I'll let you all have the last word. The verdict is already in
You have no choice but let the truth have the last words. The truth is not a choice, it's fact, and I'm about it hit you with the truth.
Now Sherlock....her defense was she's a liar and should be NOT be trusted to tell the truth and the Judge took her for her word that she's a liar right after she told them she's a friggin' liar and can't be trusted.
If she would have stated I think or in my opinion that ONN is a "paid Russian propaganda" news outlet then she would have stated her opinion. She stated ONN IS (fact) a "paid Russian propaganda" news outlet, she stated it as fact, as the truth. This is where the judge came in basically saying she's a liar and you shouldn't trust her to tell the truth.
Once again you democrats impossible dream is to make a lie truth...not today, not tomorrow, not on my watch Joe drunk on one can of beer.
Once again you have no clue between opinion and lying.
...................................... :thumbsup:
Oops! Rachel Maddow's ratings continue to nosedive on MSNBC
You would think that people on the left might tune in to MSNBC's Rachel Maddow's show to get more liberal propaganda on the riots but you would be wrong:
MSNBC's most popular program, "The Rachel Maddow Show," continued in May its extended nosedive in the cable news ratings, and some critics say it's because the show's eponymous host has spent the past several years misleading viewers.
Maddow finished the month of May behind five different Fox News programs in total viewership, including non-primetime shows "The Five" and "Special Report with Bret Baier."
Maddow's performance in May was even more alarming among the key demographic of adults age 25-54, where she averaged 455,000 viewers to finish tied for No. 7 in cable news, behind five different Fox News shows and even one program on MSNBC's fellow liberal network CNN.
https://therightscoop.com/oops-rachel-maddows-ratings-continue-to-nosedive-on-msnbc/