Gordon Chang, author of "Nuclear North Korea" said on FOX that we should call out China for being complicit in these attacks.  North Korea does not have an internet infrastructure.  What it has is based in China and NK's most elite cyber warriors are based in the city of Chongqing China permanently, with China's knowledge.

He also said that China's new stealth aircraft is our F-35 and our technology.  Guess how they got it.

Quote from: Solar on December 21, 2014, 04:13:00 PM
What has Jessica Chambers to do with this thread?

It was game on when topconservative and treehouse published social media selfies of Disciples in that county linking  the gas station to ISSIS, Yemen, and organized crime through Buffalo and to New York.  These revelations ripped through the Facebook community.
     Anonymous entered the fray very soon after.  Anonymous We Are Legion chose Twitter as the platform for its presence. Anonyomous hacked social media accounts and produced a mapping program that laid out the gang structure. When the Disciples scrubbed accounts, Anon hacked the archives. About this time, the FBI rode into town.  Anon then shifted focus to financial tracking.
     This can all be followed on Twitter using the names I supplied.

Quote from: Darth Fife on December 21, 2014, 01:57:46 PM
Has anyone noticed the pattern of those who are "targeted" by Anonymous?

Corporations... certain portions of the military... Conservative individuals and institutions...

And has anyone noticed how the seem to be everywhere all at once and have access to just about anything and everything?

I wonder, is this really the work of an individual, or a group of individuals who are just incredibly computer savvy? Really?

Has anyone noticed that the Federal Government is not really bending over backwards to try and stop these hackers?

Stay with me on this...

We all know the Government wants to control the Internet just like it controls just about everything else in this country. So far, their efforts have been foiled at every step of the way. The internet remains a wide open forum for the exchange of information and ideas. And that just drives the Statists bonkers!

What better way to get people to voluntarily accept regulation of the internet that to create a crisis - let's say a rouge "organization" hacking into people's private computer information.

Allow me to quote H.L. Mencken...

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

The only thing I might change is the word "imaginary". I'd replace it with manufactured by the government.

Now, along with all of those questions, I've posed, indulge me as I ask just one more...

Who has a facility that can (and does) intercept every electronic communication that occurs in this, "Land of the Free"?

I would submit to the forum here, that the Government not only knows who Anonymous is/are I'd think they are on the Government payroll!

Darth

Darth don't know about anonymous, but I do find it odd that suddenly now. On our local news here we find a story about a former Cincy police officer. Who was fired for trying to stop another officer whom she believed was abusing a "suspect". Is now suing for severance and retirement money.

Why is it that we have heard zero about this until now?

Now when suddenly to hear that same media tell it, it's just A ok to hate the cops, everyone hates the cops, and the cops are the bad evil guys and gals.

The whole thing makes me sick.

BUT given the msm complicity with the Obammy, in perpetrating out and out lies to the American people in the past.

And

Given The Obammy has taken other plays out the Nazi party handbook.

And

Given that The Obammy in the past has called for nationalizing the police, arming them as well as the military, training them as well as we do our military, and oh yeah, have them answer to the President and the President alone.

I so find it odd that this story only now suddenly comes to light.

Quote from: Dori on December 22, 2014, 09:26:34 AM
Gordon Chang, author of "Nuclear North Korea" said on FOX that we should call out China for being complicit in these attacks.  North Korea does not have an internet infrastructure.  What it has is based in China and NK's most elite cyber warriors are based in the city of Chongqing China permanently, with China's knowledge.

He also said that China's new stealth aircraft is our F-35 and our technology.  Guess how they got it.

Probably true, because information is for-sale on their border as well as for smuggled goods like cellphones;

http://www.nkeconwatch.com/category/economic-reform/black-markets/

If the U.S. is behind these recent outage of North Korea's Internet, I'd be willing to give Obama props for that!



Darth

Quote from: Darth Fife on December 25, 2014, 01:10:19 PM
If the U.S. is behind these recent outage of North Korea's Internet, I'd be willing to give Obama props for that!



Darth

A pimple on an elephant's ass. Do something significant like arming the Kurds to fight ISIS.

Quote from: Darth Fife on December 21, 2014, 01:57:46 PM
Has anyone noticed the pattern of those who are "targeted" by Anonymous?
Corporations... certain portions of the military... Conservative individuals and institutions...
And has anyone noticed how the seem to be everywhere all at once and have access to just about anything and everything?
I wonder, is this really the work of an individual, or a group of individuals who are just incredibly computer savvy? Really?
Has anyone noticed that the Federal Government is not really bending over backwards to try and stop these hackers?
Stay with me on this...
We all know the Government wants to control the Internet just like it controls just about everything else in this country. So far, their efforts have been foiled at every step of the way. The internet remains a wide open forum for the exchange of information and ideas. And that just drives the Statists bonkers!
What better way to get people to voluntarily accept regulation of the internet that to create a crisis - let's say a rouge "organization" hacking into people's private computer information.
Allow me to quote H.L. Mencken...
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
The only thing I might change is the word "imaginary". I'd replace it with manufactured by the government.
Now, along with all of those questions, I've posed, indulge me as I ask just one more...
Who has a facility that can (and does) intercept every electronic communication that occurs in this, "Land of the Free"?
I would submit to the forum here, that the Government not only knows who Anonymous is/are I'd think they are on the Government payroll!
Darth

         These are good points. I always thought of Anonymous as an anti-capitalist, pro communist initiative that received money from people like George Soros.  I am betting there is big money riding on America's going over the cliff -- buy America short and then do what you can to speed up the process. It is a win win, really. One scenario, no crash, but American taxpayers work another 8 out of  52 to pay interest on the bonds, held by global bankers and Chinese. Scenario Two. there is a crash and all the short sellers on Wall Street break the bank.
          Either way, crazies like Obama. Bush, and Clinton in the WH is a plus.
           
          I was shocked when Amnonymous, or spmeone claiming to be (how's that?)
jumped into the jessica chambers case. Your post provides me woith a new outlook as I
follow that development.

Quote from: red_dirt on December 26, 2014, 12:25:46 PM
         These are good points. I always thought of Anonymous as an anti-capitalist, pro communist initiative that received money from people like George Soros.  I am betting there is big money riding on America's going over the cliff -- buy America short and then do what you can to speed up the process. It is a win win, really. One scenario, no crash, but American taxpayers work another 8 out of  52 to pay interest on the bonds, held by global bankers and Chinese. Scenario Two. there is a crash and all the short sellers on Wall Street break the bank.
          Either way, crazies like Obama. Bush, and Clinton in the WH is a plus.
           
          I was shocked when Amnonymous, or spmeone claiming to be (how's that?)
jumped into the jessica chambers case. Your post provides me woith a new outlook as I
follow that development.

That's the thing, who is anonymous? Is it one group, or is it hundreds of different groups using the moniker as a way of avoiding govt detection, while being able to claim they got caught the first time they hacked Fed computers?
Point is, one anonymous may be an entirely different group with an entirely different focus/agenda, so I wouldn't simply assume there is only one anonymous in existence.

I too wondered about the Soros connection at one time.

Quote from: Solar on December 26, 2014, 12:36:38 PM
That's the thing, who is anonymous? Is it one group, or is it hundreds of different groups using the moniker as a way of avoiding govt detection, while being able to claim they got caught the first time they hacked Fed computers?
Point is, one anonymous may be an entirely different group with an entirely different focus/agenda, so I wouldn't simply assume there is only one anonymous in existence.

I too wondered about the Soros connection at one time.

Many of the anonymous network members are private individuals all over the world, ranging from people with good hacking skills and just people with ping cannons being involved for personal reasons. From the little I have read they range from libertarians too anarcho-syndicalists. But I don't really know as this is only what I would Call lower tier information.

I wouldn't be surprised if many or all of the top members of anonymous are on the government payroll as Darth suggested, it reminds me of the Government 2.0 movement in United Kingdom where government employees, mostly IT administrators but also officials creates intentional bugs, problems and delays with the infrastructure in order to create not just a greater demand for their own expertize but also internal and external demands for reforming the government. Revolution from within.

Quote from: Mountainshield on December 26, 2014, 12:49:03 PM
Many of the anonymous network members are private individuals all over the world, ranging from people with good hacking skills and just people with ping cannons being involved for personal reasons. From the little I have read they range from libertarians too anarcho-syndicalists. But I don't really know as this is only what I would Call lower tier information.

I wouldn't be surprised if many or all of the top members of anonymous are on the government payroll as Darth suggested, it reminds me of the Government 2.0 movement in United Kingdom where government employees, mostly IT administrators but also officials creates intentional bugs, problems and delays with the infrastructure in order to create not just a greater demand for their own expertize but also internal and external demands for reforming the government. Revolution from within.

Exactly the point. It tends to run the full spectrum, from anarchist/commie, to Libertarians, and everything in between.

      Kind of coincidental, in the Chambers case Anonymous hacked gang members Facebook accounts and text conversations, then announced they were proceeding to follow the money, ostensibly by hacking the bank accounts. Who, other than the Utah Data Center could have this ability? 
      Suddenly, shelving the 4th becomes "a good thing."  Darth could be on to something.

Here is a summary of some things that have come out of this investigation:

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/27/a-mississippi-burning-the-curious-case-of-jessica-lane-chambers/

Quote from: red_dirt on December 27, 2014, 07:07:41 PM
Here is a summary of some things that have come out of this investigation:

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/27/a-mississippi-burning-the-curious-case-of-jessica-lane-chambers/

So, Jessica Chambers hanged out With Vice Lords and or terrorist Affiliated Networks?

This Jessica Chambers reminds me of who killed Laura Palmer, with even darker plotline 

Quote from: Darth Fife on December 21, 2014, 01:57:46 PM
Has anyone noticed the pattern of those who are "targeted" by Anonymous?

Corporations... certain portions of the military... Conservative individuals and institutions...

And has anyone noticed how the seem to be everywhere all at once and have access to just about anything and everything?

I wonder, is this really the work of an individual, or a group of individuals who are just incredibly computer savvy? Really?

Has anyone noticed that the Federal Government is not really bending over backwards to try and stop these hackers?

Stay with me on this...

We all know the Government wants to control the Internet just like it controls just about everything else in this country. So far, their efforts have been foiled at every step of the way. The internet remains a wide open forum for the exchange of information and ideas. And that just drives the Statists bonkers!

What better way to get people to voluntarily accept regulation of the internet that to create a crisis - let's say a rouge "organization" hacking into people's private computer information.

Allow me to quote H.L. Mencken...

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

The only thing I might change is the word "imaginary". I'd replace it with manufactured by the government.

Now, along with all of those questions, I've posed, indulge me as I ask just one more...

Who has a facility that can (and does) intercept every electronic communication that occurs in this, "Land of the Free"?

I would submit to the forum here, that the Government not only knows who Anonymous is/are I'd think they are on the Government payroll!

Darth

You just made the list!  I wonder who actually will be rounded up first; folks like you and me or those syncophants who enabled the Dictatorship to come to fruition?  (aka: the usefule idiots of Achademia and the meida..and Anonymous persons known who are part of this cabal)

Quote from: red_dirt on December 27, 2014, 07:07:41 PM
Here is a summary of some things that have come out of this investigation:

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/27/a-mississippi-burning-the-curious-case-of-jessica-lane-chambers/

The one question that keeps knocking at my brain is, Mississippi so corrupt, that Marshals had to take over the investigation?