Quote from: Yawn on November 12, 2012, 02:33:33 PM
Sections of Philadelphia.  If it's not fraud but simply a RACIAL thing, that brings up a whole new set of problems.  Can that group be trusted with the vote if they're 100% tied to such an anti-American idiotology?


In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

do we know if these precincts use e-voting machines?

it's very hard to change paper ballots.

e-voting machines can be hacked and votes can be flipped. It would still be very difficult to do without getting caught but it is possible. And some e-voting machines have no paper trail.

QuoteActually there are several cases of this reported as well, when Obama votes switched to Romney.
"Pa. machine switched vote from Obama to Romney"

I knew that one was going to come up.........

If I was part of the Obama cheat team, I would tell the poll workers, that for every 10-20 machines that were rigged for Obama, make sure to rig 1 for Romney. That way, when people start raising eyebrows, we wil be able to say that the problem worked in both directions.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on November 13, 2012, 09:24:30 PM
This kid is becoming a problem.

Which kid?

Quote from: kramarat on November 14, 2012, 02:26:50 AM
I knew that one was going to come up.........

If I was part of the Obama cheat team, I would tell the poll workers, that for every 10-20 machines that were rigged for Obama, make sure to rig 1 for Romney. That way, when people start raising eyebrows, we wil be able to say that the problem worked in both directions.

Yeah, but that is because you would be concerned about getting caught - Obama isn't bothered with such trivialities!

Quote from: Darth Fife on November 14, 2012, 06:24:53 AM
Yeah, but that is because you would be concerned about getting caught - Obama isn't bothered with such trivialities!

That's what he's got the DNC for. They may be completely dishonest, but they aren't stupid.

Since this ZERO vote thing happened in 08 as well, seems like it's normal.

These are poor areas and GOP policies SUCK.  Why would they vote against their own best interest?
Medicare Vouchers, gutting SS, giving the rich more tax cuts.
that's just too hard to not vote for!

"In 2008, McCain got zero votes in 57 Philadelphia voting divisions. That was a big increase from 2004, when George W. Bush was blanked in just five divisions."

http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law/3

Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 14, 2012, 10:01:21 AM
Since this ZERO vote thing happened in 08 as well, seems like it's normal.

These are poor areas and GOP policies SUCK.  Why would they vote against their own best interest?
Medicare Vouchers, gutting SS, giving the rich more tax cuts.
that's just too hard to not vote for!

"In 2008, McCain got zero votes in 57 Philadelphia voting divisions. That was a big increase from 2004, when George W. Bush was blanked in just five divisions."

http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law/3

Interesting. So don't you find it racist and bigoted to hold the belief that any ethnic group would all act in a monolithic manner. I find that's falling back on old of insulting stereotypes of "those" people all thinking, and all behaving, perhaps even all "looking" alike.

Quote from: mdgiles on November 14, 2012, 10:33:52 AM
Interesting. So don't you find it racist and bigoted to hold the belief that any ethnic group would all act in a monolithic manner. I find that's falling back on old of insulting stereotypes of "those" people all thinking, and all behaving, perhaps even all "looking" alike.

Exactly, he would rather fall back on profiling, than admit that he actually proves my point.  Obama is smart enough to keep his fingers out of it, Axelrod is dirty enough to dig in up to shoulders, and he was campaign manager in both 08 and 12.

Quote from: mdgiles on November 14, 2012, 10:33:52 AM
Interesting. So don't you find it racist and bigoted to hold the belief that any ethnic group would all act in a monolithic manner. I find that's falling back on old of insulting stereotypes of "those" people all thinking, and all behaving, perhaps even all "looking" alike.

Because Romney gets toasted, you cons call it racists?

Perhaps they voted for THEIR benefit and not for some guy who is obviously a racist, silver spoon baby, who LIES constantly and wants to tax you but give tax cuts to the rich!

Why did you vote for Romney?  Because you thought he would benefit YOU, if elected.

People in Philly, no different.
the fact that you can't or won't accept it, is part of the reason Romney LOST.
Lack of intellect.

Quote from: JustKari on November 14, 2012, 11:02:59 AM
Exactly, he would rather fall back on profiling,

Tell me con, how my pointing out that 57 districts voted ZERO for McCain, is falling back on profiling?
Do I need a foil hat to understand this comment?

Quotethan admit that he actually proves my point. 

Tell me how I proved your point?
You make little sense.

Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 14, 2012, 11:14:55 AM
Because Romney gets toasted, you cons call it racists?

Perhaps they voted for THEIR benefit and not for some guy who is obviously a racist, silver spoon baby, who LIES constantly and wants to tax you but give tax cuts to the rich!

Why did you vote for Romney?  Because you thought he would benefit YOU, if elected.

People in Philly, no different.
the fact that you can't or won't accept it, is part of the reason Romney LOST.
Lack of intellect.

No, I call it racist when you believe that any group of people are all going to act in a like manner, just because they belong to the same economic, social or ethnic group.
What's really saddening, is that someone who believes himself to be "progressive" would indulge in the type of thinking you folks normally accuse us "Archie Bunkers" on the right of engaging in.
Unless - of course - your admitting to the right wing belief that progressives are incapable of seeing people as individuals?

Quote from: mdgiles on November 14, 2012, 11:42:53 AM
No, I call it racist when you believe that any group of people are all going to act in a like manner, just because they belong to the same economic, social or ethnic group.

DUDE, you cons all vote in lock step!

How is that any different than a getto neighborhood all voting the same.

Point scored, Liberal!

Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 17, 2012, 09:23:34 PM
DUDE, you cons all vote in lock step!

How is that any different than a getto neighborhood all voting the same.

Point scored, Liberal!

Actually, that is not true.  Unlike dems, cons will sit out an election if the person running is far enough away from what we want (McCain) OR in the case of libertarians who are considerd conservative, vote third party in measurable amounts.  The only group that seems to consistently vote in lock step, no matter how horrible the candidate, is the dems.

It's funny how when someone on this site backs up their arguments with solid facts and does the research to prove it they become a "PROBLEM" if their view is in opposition to whom their corresponding with.

Quote from: hoosier on November 18, 2012, 12:51:56 AM
It's funny how when someone on this site backs up their arguments with solid facts and does the research to prove it they become a "PROBLEM" if their view is in opposition to whom their corresponding with.

It's funny how some loser with two posts, can get a self inflated sense of importance when taking pot shots, yet never actually taking solid aim.
But that's pretty much the M/O of every lib, just throw shit against the wall in hopes it's adherent.