As a matter of fact. If we don't want cheating, why would we train non-professional poll watchers to open up and calibrate the voting machines? Particularly in democrat controlled swing states.

Why wouldn't the machines be calibrated and sealed before they went to the voting booths?

Once there, they should be completely tamper proof.

No cheating went on...................my ass.

Quote from: Yawn on November 12, 2012, 02:33:33 PM
Sections of Philadelphia.  If it's not fraud but simply a RACIAL thing, that brings up a whole new set of problems.  Can that group be trusted with the vote if they're 100% tied to such an anti-American idiotology?


In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

Did you really want some non-drinking square named Willard as president anyways? Obama is no black jesus, but at least he's the devil we know.

Quote from: Solar on November 12, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
I wonder if they meant electoral votes?

I mispoke, Yawn posted what I meant, in 59 voting divisions, Mitt got 0 votes. 

Does anyone here actually accept that Romney didn't get at least one vote, in 59 different election districts. If so, then the Dems have got you beaten, because that means you're willing to accept as "understandable" the most outrageous vote fraud.

Quote from: mdgiles on November 12, 2012, 04:32:58 PM
Does anyone here actually accept that Romney didn't get at least one vote, in 59 different election districts. If so, then the Dems have got you beaten, because that means you're willing to accept as "understandable" the most outrageous vote fraud.

I don't accept it. I think the cheating was wide spread and coordinated.

Unfortunately, what we think doesn't matter. Not in any meaningful way.

The DNC is full of liars and cheaters, and the GOP is full of spineless cowards. Where do we go from here?

Quote from: RightIsRight on November 12, 2012, 03:46:01 PM
Did you really want some non-drinking square named Willard as president anyways? Obama is no black jesus, but at least he's the devil we know.

Ummm yes.
Better than a druggie. You seem to think people that respect their bodies are to be viewed a freaks?

Quote from: RightIsRight on November 12, 2012, 03:46:01 PM
Did you really want some non-drinking square named Willard as president anyways? Obama is no black jesus, but at least he's the devil we know.

First of all using alcohol as some sort of litmus test is really vapid and overall dumb. Secondly most of what Obama wrote in his books have turned out to be lies so no we do not know him.

Quote from: Solar on November 12, 2012, 06:36:46 PM
Ummm yes.
Better than a druggie. You seem to think people that respect their bodies are to be viewed a freaks?

This kid keeps calling Romney a square, a term I though died in 1964 and thinks this...



Is cool....

Now I am reading that 9 districts in Cleveland had zero votes for Romney as well.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/odd-romney-got-zero-votes-in-59-precincts-in-philly-9-in-ohio/

Quote from: JustKari on November 12, 2012, 07:27:37 PM
Now I am reading that 9 districts in Cleveland had zero votes for Romney as well.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/odd-romney-got-zero-votes-in-59-precincts-in-philly-9-in-ohio/

So. If the people in those precincts, that voted for Romney, were to come forward and testify under oath, we would not only have proof of cheating, but how much.

The sad part is, that if they were to testify, they would probably all be killed in drive-by shootings.

QuoteThe sad part is, that if they were to testify, they would probably all be killed in drive-by shootings.

I expected this. But it is still funny.

Quote from: redlom xof on November 13, 2012, 04:53:19 AM


I expected this. But it is still funny.

Well, I sure am happy that you are happy but shouldn't you be saving some of that "popcorn" for the first of the year when you will be on the same diet that the rest of us will be on?  It's called a starvation diet and when we get thru paying out the yazoo for taxes, you'll be hard pressed to find a bag of popcorn.   

Quote from: kramarat on November 13, 2012, 02:54:06 AM
So. If the people in those precincts, that voted for Romney, were to come forward and testify under oath, we would not only have proof of cheating, but how much.

The sad part is, that if they were to testify, they would probably all be killed in drive-by shootings.

Ever read Glenn Reynolds on "preference cascades"? The interesting thing is how people often self censor themselves, assuming that they - and they alone - differ with the "regime" And it would be "unhealthy" to make their disagreement known. Of course there were people who voted for Romney, if for no other reason than contrariness or personal dislike of the other guys supporters. BUT, they still have to live in the same neighborhood, so they would - no doubt - consider it the better part of valor, to keep their "heretical" voting patterns to themselves.

Quote from: Solar on November 12, 2012, 06:36:46 PM
Ummm yes.
Better than a druggie. You seem to think people that respect their bodies are to be viewed a freaks?

Are you suggesting Obama is a druggie? I suspect you're lying. I'm also positive. You're welcome to prove me wrong though.

Quote from: RightIsRight on November 13, 2012, 07:11:41 PM
Are you suggesting Obama is a druggie? I suspect you're lying. I'm also positive. You're welcome to prove me wrong though.

Of course he's a druggie.