Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 11:47:20 AMNo, its highly highly unlikely and once something is unlikely enough it becomes statistically impossible. Thats why its NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. You dont understand math do you?

I DO understand math. That's  why I understand the the number of counties argument doesn't hold water.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:48:39 AMIf electoral votes were given based on square miles won, Trump would be the undisputed winner. As long as electoral votes are given based on popular vote, the argument for number of counties won cannot exist.

          yes it can and it does. Its impossible for Biden to have won so few counties and still be president, as we have just shown you. In fact is strongly suggests cheating in the few counties which strayed from the national attitude. Plus if you look at a map of illegal immigration it suspiciously aligns with the counties biden 'won'.

Remember, its impossible for biden to have won based on many belweathers.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:50:48 AMI DO understand math. That's  why I understand the the number of counties argument doesn't hold water.

If you understand math then why is this sailing so far over your head? Biden could not have won so few counties and still win the presidency. Thats science.

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 11:52:17 AMIf you understand math then why is this sailing so far over your head? Biden could not have won so few counties and still win the presidency. Thats science.

Yes, he can specifically because the population of those counties is about 50% MORE than the counties won by Trump.

It would be highly, highly unlikely that the candidate who's counties had 50% LESS population actually won.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:58:50 AMYes, he can specifically because the population of those counties is about 50% MORE than the counties won by Trump.

It would be highly, highly unlikely that the candidate who's counties had 50% LESS population actually won.

But again, THATS NOT THE POINT. The population is not why it is impossible for biden to have won.

Its shows biden couldnt win because there is no way that less than 15% of the counties would magically be 180degrees opposite the majority of the country.




Now, will you address all those other reasons in the picture that biden couldnt have won? Will you address the science showing its mathematically and statistically impossible for biden to have won? Or will you focus on this one little thing to try to derail the topic?

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 12:02:58 PMBut again, THATS NOT THE POINT. The population is not why it is impossible for biden to have won.

Its shows biden couldnt win because there is no way that less than 15% of the counties would magically be 180degrees opposite the majority of the country.




Now, will you address all those other reasons in the picture that biden couldnt have won? Will you address the science showing its mathematically and statistically impossible for biden to have won? Or will you focus on this one little thing to try to derail the topic?

Why would I waste my time addressing the other parts of the picture when I've already proven that it uses faulty reasoning?

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:58:50 AMYes, he can specifically because the population of those counties is about 50% MORE than the counties won by Trump.

It would be highly, highly unlikely that the candidate who's counties had 50% LESS population actually won.

Ok lets look at this a different way.

I notice your source is looking at total population which is including ILLEGALS. They are not looking at VOTERS.


Also are we talking the popular vote or the electoral college vote?

If popular then it is entirely possible for trump to have won 49% of those big counties and 100% of all the remaining counties, thus winning the popular vote.

If you are talking about the electoral college, well thats not based on population but on states, so the number of counties WOULD MATTER because they make up more of the states.

So the source is bunk either way you look at it.



Besides look at that one about ohio, iowa, and florida. Its obviously not literally impossible for someone to win the presidency without those states, yet it is statistically impossible to do so, and its NEVER HAPPENED.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 12:12:39 PMWhy would I waste my time addressing the other parts of the picture when I've already proven that it uses faulty reasoning?

AHAHAHA so you admit your strategy is to try to find one little thing wrong and to blow that up to make it seem like the entire thing is wrong! 
        you trolls NEED to come up with strategies which arent right out of the textbook.

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 12:16:47 PMAHAHAHA so you admit your strategy is to try to find one little thing wrong and to blow that up to make it seem like the entire thing is wrong! 
        you trolls NEED to come up with strategies which arent right out of the textbook.

What I've said is:

• The argument for counties won being evidence of a stolen election is baseless
• You picture has already proven itself to be unreliable, so I don't see any reason to continue to spend time on it.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 12:21:09 PMWhat I've said is:

• The argument for counties won being evidence of a stolen election is baseless
• You picture has already proven itself to be unreliable, so I don't see any reason to continue to spend time on it.

Your mind simply ABOUNDS with logical fallacies.

1) I just showed you how the counties are evidence that biden could not have won the electoral vote since the counties make up the most of the various states.

2) Even if you proved one claim wrong that doesnt magically prove the rest wrong. Make a choice are you taking it as a whole or as individual claims.

You seem to want to take it as an individual claim to try to prove it wrong but then want to take the picture as a whole to simply write off the other claims without addressing them.      Such OBVIOUS trolling!

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:18:40 AMThere isn't data on it.  It's taking into consideration the logistical challenges of having to process millions/tens of millions of fake ballots.  There isn't just one ballot used across the country.  Even within states there are variations based on unique candidates or propositions for counties.  Depending on where I live, the polling location down the street may have different options on it.

You also have to account for the different ballot counting machines.  Dominion obviously isn't the only ballot counting machine, but the counting machines used in elections have security measures and will reject ballots that don't have required markings.  Dominion machines have software included that has to be used to print the ballots so the machines will accept them - otherwise they are rejected. I assume that other ballot counting machines have something similar.

IF you're able to somehow acquire the needed software AND correctly recreate the unique ballots for a given state/county, now you have to actually print millions/tens of millions of ballots and transport them, unnoticed to the counting locations and get them to the people who you trust to not rat you out for using fraudulent ballots, all while avoiding the watchful eye of those involved in the handling of ballots, from start to finish, and other party observers.

Translation: "I was talking out of my ass and had nothing", so yeah, I retract my claim!

Is that what you were going to say?          

Quote from: Solar on August 24, 2021, 12:40:30 PMTranslation: "I was talking out of my ass and had nothing", so yeah, I retract my claim!

Is that what you were going to say?          

I believe there are obvious logistical limitations to committing voter fraud using paper ballots. That may be a limitation of an ability to harvest ballots/commit mail fraud - there are only so many available and so many that can be realistically collected - and there are logistical limitations on the ability to create fake ballots, which has been an allegation of believers in the steal, as well as the reason Cyber Ninjas is looking for bamboo fibers in the AZ ballots.

My belief in those limitations, and an ability to prove it via a link of some sort, are different things.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 12:46:56 PMI believe there are obvious logistical limitations to committing voter fraud using paper ballots. That may be a limitation of an ability to harvest ballots/commit mail fraud - there are only so many available and so many that can be realistically collected - and there are logistical limitations on the ability to create fake ballots, which has been an allegation of believers in the steal, as well as the reason Cyber Ninjas is looking for bamboo fibers in the AZ ballots.

My belief in those limitations, and an ability to prove it via a link of some sort, are different things.

And there you go again, ignoring the real election fraud of changing votes via a modem.
Your need to myopically view only one part of fraud is a mental handicap that will continue to keep you in the dark of how the Marxist DNC committed a coup.

You can no longer deny what they're trying to do to this country, so it begs the question. Why in the Fuck do you continue your attempt to run block for these communists?

President Trump made no "deal" with the Taliban but, Democrats will continue to accuse him of it. It's just like Democrats keep trying to claim that President Trump was a "Russian Spy". President Trump WASN'T but, that doesn't matter to the Dems. They hope to discredit President Trump and tax the snot out the average American as well as spend money that the U.S. government doesn't have.

The Dems just keep lying and fabricating.

Quote from: RV on August 24, 2021, 01:07:53 PMPresident Trump made no "deal" with the Taliban but, Democrats will continue to accuse him of it. It's just like Democrats keep trying to claim that President Trump was a "Russian Spy". President Trump WASN'T but, that doesn't matter to the Dems. They hope to discredit President Trump and tax the snot out the average American as well as spend money that the U.S. government doesn't have.

The Dems just keep lying and fabricating.

Good point, PB really derailed the thread.
And notice that those emails showing that the russian spy thing was all made up with zero evidence are just ignored by the left.
They really believe that if they repeat it enough then enough people will believe it to make it reality.
Like PB repeating the covid nonsense over and over to try to make it real.