Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:18:40 AMThere isn't data on it

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 09:12:11 AMEven if you believe he cheated, there's a mathematical limit on how much he could have cheated, which means he still got a shit load of votes despite the fact that he was not a good candidate.

Supply data or retract your statements.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on August 18, 2021, 04:57:41 AMTranslation;  How can we blame the Afghanistan Debacle on Trump instead of the babbling fool Joe

Since everything that happens in the world is usually a long term issue, I am pretty sure that Obama shares some of the fault.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:18:40 AMThere isn't data on it.  It's taking into consideration the logistical challenges of having to process millions/tens of millions of fake ballots.  There isn't just one ballot used across the country.  Even within states there are variations based on unique candidates or propositions for counties.  Depending on where I live, the polling location down the street may have different options on it.

You also have to account for the different ballot counting machines.  Dominion obviously isn't the only ballot counting machine, but the counting machines used in elections have security measures and will reject ballots that don't have required markings.  Dominion machines have software included that has to be used to print the ballots so the machines will accept them - otherwise they are rejected. I assume that other ballot counting machines have something similar.

IF you're able to somehow acquire the needed software AND correctly recreate the unique ballots for a given state/county, now you have to actually print millions/tens of millions of ballots and transport them, unnoticed to the counting locations and get them to the people who you trust to not rat you out for using fraudulent ballots, all while avoiding the watchful eye of those involved in the handling of ballots, from start to finish, and other party observers.

Quote from: taxed on August 24, 2021, 09:58:43 AMPlease post this data.  If you don't, you will be getting a time out if I have to ask for it repeatedly.

This is not the data taxed ask for.  Only more poo flinging as always.  You made the statement now back it up!

Quote from: walkstall on August 24, 2021, 10:54:15 AMThis is not the data taxed ask for.  Only more poo flinging as always.  You made the statement now back it up!

Ok. I'll retract it. 

Now, should I expect a retraction on the claims I've seen about the number of counties won being a evidence of fraud, based on what I posted in this thread?

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:59:05 AMOk. I'll retract it. 

Now, should I expect a retraction in the claims I've seen about the number of counties won being a evidence of fraud?

If we stick to in person voting, there will be no chance of voting fraud by mail. In fact, given actual evidence, we can't even get our political fliers to be delivered by USPS.

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on August 24, 2021, 11:12:09 AMIf we stick to in person voting, there will be no chance of voting fraud by mail. In fact, given actual evidence, we can't even get our political fliers to be delivered by USPS.

The question of how fraud is done isn't limited to mail-in voting and is also independent of the "number of counties" argument which has been debunked in this thread.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:01:58 AMOne of the favorite examples of math evidence of cheating is that Biden won so few counties. Fewest of any president, I believe, or at least fewer than Obama; I'm still not sure how that became the standard, but whatever.

What people fail to realize is that the number of counties, in this case, isn't important because a single large county can be more populous than the combination of many smaller counties in the same state:

Biden-won counties are home to 67 million more Americans than Trump-won counties

oe Biden is stepping into his role as the nation's 46th president with a contentious political environment and a deeply divided electorate. Some of Biden's detractors point to his razor-thin wins over Donald Trump in several battleground states as evidence that his November victory was far from dominant, despite the fact that Biden won the popular vote by a margin exceeding 7 million, among 159 million votes cast.

Another way of looking at Biden's victory is to focus on the total populations residing in the counties that Biden and Trump won. From that perspective, 67 million more people lived in counties won by Biden (197.9 million) than in those won by Trump (130.3 million). This is the largest difference in two major presidential candidate's county-won populations since 1996, when Bill Clinton bested Bob Dole.



https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/01/21/a-demographic-contrast-biden-won-551-counties-home-to-67-million-more-americans-than-trumps-2588-counties/

Sorry dear, your pathetic excuses dont muddy the big picture.

Its literally impossible for biden to have won.
https://rumble.com/vlemwt-bidens-win-is-mathematically-impossible.html

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 10:59:05 AMOk. I'll retract it. 

Now, should I expect a retraction on the claims I've seen about the number of counties won being a evidence of fraud, based on what I posted in this thread?

No, because all it shows is that they are more populous. Thats not the point. The point is that the counties trump won are BELLWEATHER, as in you have to win them to win. Its not like one yuge county is going to vote against all the others. If anything this proves there was cheating in that yuge county. Plus look at that pic above, the counties argument was never alone but to be taken as part of a greater whole of evidences proving biden couldnt win.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:16:35 AMThe question of how fraud is done isn't limited to mail-in voting and is also independent of the "number of counties" argument which has been debunked in this thread.

I never said it is limited to mail-in voting.

As long as Democrats are alive, they will lie, cheat, and steal. That's why everything is left-wing controlled like education, media, social media, entertainment, and politics.

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 11:18:42 AMNo, because all it shows is that they are more populous. Thats not the point. The point is that the counties trump won are BELLWEATHER, as in you have to win them to win. Its not like one yuge county is going to vote against all the others. If anything this proves there was cheating in that yuge county. Plus look at that pic above, the counties argument was never alone but to be taken as part of a greater whole of evidences proving biden couldnt win.

I'm not talking about the big picture or being part of a greater whole. I'm talking about the argument about number of counties won.

The Electoral Votes are distributed by state and they are distributed based on who wins the POPULAR vote in that state. Biden's counties had a population that was nearly 70 million higher than Trumps, so there is no basis for number of counties being evidence of voter fraud unless Electoral Votes are distributed based on the number of counties won and not the number of votes a candidate gets.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:32:19 AMI'm not talking about the big picture or being part of a greater whole. I'm talking about the argument about number of counties won.

The Electoral Votes are distributed by state and they are distributed based on who wins the POPULAR vote in that state. Biden's counties had a population that was nearly 70 million higher than Trumps, so there is no basis for number of counties being evidence of voter fraud unless Electoral Votes are distributed based on the number of counties won and not the number of votes a candidate gets.

You are missing the point. Its just not possible for a few huge counties to vote so hard one way and for all the small ones to vote so hard the other way. It shows there must be cheating in the big counties.

And like I said, that argument was NEVER USED ALONE. You are trying a bait and switch. "One of the favorite examples of math evidence of cheating is that Biden won so few counties." Was NEVER a stand alone argument that our side used. It was ALWAYS put forth with all the other belweathers in that pic above. You dont get to lose the forest thru the trees, LOL

Maybe this will help...

See, trump won more of america than biden.

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 11:35:56 AMYou are missing the point. Its just not possible for a few huge counties to vote so hard one way and for all the small ones to vote so hard the other way. It shows there must be cheating in the big counties.

And like I said, that argument was NEVER USED ALONE. It was ALWAYS put forth with all the other belweathers in that pic above. You dont get to lose the forest thru the trees, LOL

"Its just not possible for a few huge counties to vote so hard one way and for all the small ones to vote so hard the other way."

If you agree that math is real and legitimate, then is is 100% possible.

Quote from: p1tchblack on August 24, 2021, 11:45:30 AM"Its just not possible for a few huge counties to vote so hard one way and for all the small ones to vote so hard the other way."

If you agree that math is real and legitimate, then is is 100% possible.

No, its highly highly unlikely and once something is unlikely enough it becomes statistically impossible. Thats why its NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. You dont understand math do you?

Quote from: T Hunt on August 24, 2021, 11:40:12 AMMaybe this will help...

See, trump won more of america than biden.

If electoral votes were given based on square miles won, Trump would be the undisputed winner. As long as electoral votes are given based on popular vote, the argument for number of counties won cannot exist.