About Amy Coney Barrett Traitorous move?

Amy Coney Barrett just voted in favor of allowing Biden's federal border agents to dismantle razor fencing set up by Texas agents to stop illegals immigrants entering America.

The vote was 5-4. She was the deciding vote. What a nightmare.


Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says, in response to the Supreme Court's ruling, he will continue to defend Texas' constitutional authority to secure the border and prevent the Biden administration from destroying our property.

Since the Biden Administration ignored SCOTUS rulings, (along with the Constitution) I would surmise Abbott might Also.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on January 23, 2024, 06:23:37 AMSince the Biden Administration ignored SCOTUS rulings, (along with the Constitution) I would surmise Abbott might Also.

My thoughts as well! Force the Govt to make the next move and block the at every turn through the court system.
That's how they do it to us, delay, delay until we back down. Make them feel the heat for a change.

I have been digesting the reaction to the SCOTUS ruling that the Biden administration could take down the barriers installed by the State of Texas. Many are disappointed and that is a very understandable position. However, as of country of laws the court got it right in my view.

Our laws places the responsibility of protecting our borders clearly on the federal government. As I see it the law is on the side of the Biden administration. The problem comes from the administration abdicating its responsibility to enforce the law.

I think Abbott will do what he can to slow it down, but I don't see much until Trump is back in office. Roberts and Barrett really put the screws to us.

Quote from: Possum on January 23, 2024, 10:24:59 AMI think Abbott will do what he can to slow it down, but I don't see much until Trump is back in office. Roberts and Barrett really put the screws to us.

I think most of us expected Roberts to screw us, but Amy just showed her true colors.

Wait, What, Abbot grew balls?

Texas National Guard DEFIES SUPREME COURT RULING, installs more razor wire and barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass Texas..

DEVELOPING..


https://twitter.com/i/status/1749898506087596175

https://twitter.com/i/status/1749560228927139865

Quote from: Solar on January 23, 2024, 07:14:25 PMWait, What, Abbot grew balls?

Texas National Guard DEFIES SUPREME COURT RULING, installs more razor wire and barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass Texas..

DEVELOPING..


https://twitter.com/i/status/1749898506087596175

Wild ass guess, the nomination for '28 has just been declared WIDE OPEN. 

Quote from: Possum on January 24, 2024, 05:27:59 AMWild ass guess, the nomination for '28 has just been declared WIDE OPEN. 

 

Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2024, 08:40:19 AM 

Although Abbott has not declared for a national run, I can not but think he is looking into it. He is probably more inclined to make this a national issue than Joe, and he should be able to delay action from the government for at least a year, at which time Joe will long gone. There are very few topics Joe wants in the news right now, immigration ain't one of them, which does give Abbott somewhat of a advantage. As far as the '28 run, I do not see one candidate who ran against Trump who bettered their chances for '28. We did not see anyone showcase their strengths, we only saw them expose their weaknesses. 28 is wide open, someone could start now to lay groundwork.

And keep in mind, this is just my own thoughts, not a whole lot goes into them at times. I have seen no reports that he is running or wants to. I just see what is going on at the border with the wire as either desperation for a solution, or politics as usual. I can not see Biden wanting to see this in the news every night. I think Abbott knows this.

Quote from: Possum on January 24, 2024, 08:54:23 AMAlthough Abbott has not declared for a national run, I can not but think he is looking into it. He is probably more inclined to make this a national issue than Joe, and he should be able to delay action from the government for at least a year, at which time Joe will long gone. There are very few topics Joe wants in the news right now, immigration ain't one of them, which does give Abbott somewhat of a advantage. As far as the '28 run, I do not see one candidate who ran against Trump who bettered their chances for '28. We did not see anyone showcase their strengths, we only saw them expose their weaknesses. 28 is wide open, someone could start now to lay groundwork.

And keep in mind, this is just my own thoughts, not a whole lot goes into them at times. I have seen no reports that he is running or wants to. I just see what is going on at the border with the wire as either desperation for a solution, or politics as usual. I can not see Biden wanting to see this in the news every night. I think Abbott knows this.

Same here, just my thoughts...       After getting Trump wrong in 2016, I find it easier to look on the outside of the box.

Ohhh, oh were referring to 2028. Has anyone even broached that subject yet? Use whole numbers for this tired old brain.
Yeah, the Razer wire and SCOTUS did more to embolden the right as it exposed another Deepstate sellout within our ranks, which begs the question, what does the left have on Barrett?
Nearly 20% of the electorate will be gone by 2028 and replaced with god only knows what.
As for Abbot, he has always been someone known to drag his feet waiting for think tank results to come in before saying anything.
After Trump announces his Veep, then we'll know where the future lies, be it Sarah Huckabee, or Kari lake, even Tucker, each of these people connect to other potential candidates. Hell, even Vivek comes with weird baggage, but I'd count Abbot out of the running over his connection to the old guard GOP war mongers.

After getting Trump wrong in 2016, I find it easier to look on the outside of the box.    

Quote from: Solar on January 23, 2024, 01:06:42 PMI think most of us expected Roberts to screw us, but Amy just showed her true colors.

Amy also voted to not investigate the fraud in the 2020 election.
No doubt because her father was deeply involved in carrying out the fraud in Wisconsin!

Quote from: je_freedom on January 24, 2024, 12:01:57 PMAmy also voted to not investigate the fraud in the 2020 election.
No doubt because her father was deeply involved in carrying out the fraud in Wisconsin!

Good memory! I knew there was another issue that exposed her for the Deepstate plant she is.

Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2024, 09:13:52 AMSame here, just my thoughts...       After getting Trump wrong in 2016, I find it easier to look on the outside of the box.

Ohhh, oh were referring to 2028. Has anyone even broached that subject yet? Use whole numbers for this tired old brain.
Yeah, the Razer wire and SCOTUS did more to embolden the right as it exposed another Deepstate sellout within our ranks, which begs the question, what does the left have on Barrett?
Nearly 20% of the electorate will be gone by 2028 and replaced with god only knows what.
As for Abbot, he has always been someone known to drag his feet waiting for think tank results to come in before saying anything.
After Trump announces his Veep, then we'll know where the future lies, be it Sarah Huckabee, or Kari lake, even Tucker, each of these people connect to other potential candidates. Hell, even Vivek comes with weird baggage, but I'd count Abbot out of the running over his connection to the old guard GOP war mongers.

After getting Trump wrong in 2016, I find it easier to look on the outside of the box.    

  First off, I like Abbott, and will vote for him again, for governor. That is not so much a endorsement as the result of one cold hard fact that Texas will never have a conservative win the parties nomination. But you nailed it, he still tests the waters before too many decisions. But, after Bush, it will take an exceptional conservative candidate before I will vote for a fellow Texan again. I was fooled bad on how he would govern. I think Abbott would be better, but I would need proof and there isn't any as of now.