http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/08/14/hank-johnson-pushes-to-limit-military-surplus-for-local-cops-as-ferguson-unrest-continues/ (http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/08/14/hank-johnson-pushes-to-limit-military-surplus-for-local-cops-as-ferguson-unrest-continues/)
Never let an auxiliary member of the race industry miss a chance to promote unrest. Her we have John Lewis to asking Obama to nationalize the guard to "protect" the protesters. How about protecting law abiding citizens and business owners from the thugs? How convenient to declare martial law. Then old Hank (Guam might tip over) Johnson wants to disarm local constabulary by not providing necessary equipment to quell idiocy. Does anyone else see where this going with Obama in the WH and the federal agencies being armed?
Both these fools are poverty pimps at best. The area's they represent here in Georgia are cellpools. All they do is take, take, and take never helping at all. Wait let me correct myself before I go to far. They both help in lip service never in action. These two should be embarrassed on the way they represent their voters.
John Lewis your a taker. Hank Johnson, well your just a damn fool.
Quote from: Bronx on August 14, 2014, 12:58:48 PM
Both these fools are poverty pimps at best. The area's they represent here in Georgia are cellpools. All they do is take, take, and take never helping at all. Wait let me correct myself before I go to far. They both help in lip service never in action. These two should be embarrassed on the way they represent their voters.
John Lewis your a taker. Hank Johnson, well your just a damn fool.
Hank's constituents are the same that kept Cynthia McKinney in office so they deserve what they get.
Rand Paul wrote some editorial for TIME about not militarizing police forces.
DaisyJane :huh:
Quote from: DaisyJane on August 14, 2014, 02:24:29 PM
Rand Paul wrote some editorial for TIME about not militarizing police forces.
DaisyJane :huh:
Ok there are 60 articles on Rand Paul editorial. Copying a net address and pasting it is not that hard.
TIME-5 hours ago
http://time.com/3111474/rand-paul-ferguson-police/ (http://time.com/3111474/rand-paul-ferguson-police/)
Quote from: supsalemgr on August 14, 2014, 12:05:09 PM
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/08/14/hank-johnson-pushes-to-limit-military-surplus-for-local-cops-as-ferguson-unrest-continues/ (http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/08/14/hank-johnson-pushes-to-limit-military-surplus-for-local-cops-as-ferguson-unrest-continues/)
Never let an auxiliary member of the race industry miss a chance to promote unrest. Her we have John Lewis to asking Obama to nationalize the guard to "protect" the protesters. How about protecting law abiding citizens and business owners from the thugs? How convenient to declare martial law. Then old Hank (Guam might tip over) Johnson wants to disarm local constabulary by not providing necessary equipment to quell idiocy. Does anyone else see where this going with Obama in the WH and the federal agencies being armed?
You know I just got in daisy's case for conflating the peaceful protesters with the looters. This; "all blacks are thugs", group guilt, crap is getting old.
Quote from: DaisyJane on August 14, 2014, 02:24:29 PM
Rand Paul wrote some editorial for TIME about not militarizing police forces.
DaisyJane :huh:
Ahhh...Rand Paul the running man.
Quote from: mdgiles on August 14, 2014, 03:19:48 PM
You know I just got in daisy's case for conflating the peaceful protesters with the looters. This; "all blacks are thugs", group guilt, crap is getting old.
I in no way was referring to all Blacks. The term "thugs" isolates the peaceful demonstrators from those doing the trashing and looting.
Quote from: mdgiles on August 14, 2014, 03:19:48 PM
You know I just got in daisy's case for conflating the peaceful protesters with the looters. This; "all blacks are thugs", group guilt, crap is getting old.
We've had this argument about 100 times....but just for old time's sake....
When somebody says "thugs", it's referring to the 900 or 9000 or whatever the number may be, that's looting pillaging raping and generally being violent a-holes.
Not "ALL" of anything.
If the group happens to be pretty homogenous, well that's their / your damned problem, not mine.
You don't have anything negative to say, about the massive # of people going crazy and destroying and injuring everything/ everyone in their path ?
I kinda sorta resent being told what I'm saying, especially when it's a damned lie about what I'm saying. Just saying.
Quote from: supsalemgr on August 14, 2014, 01:37:21 PM
Hank's constituents are the same that kept Cynthia McKinney in office so they deserve what they get.
Oh God....now there was a liberal idiot I just could not stand.
Had to turn the damn t.v. off every time she was on. Stupid liberal couldn't even speak English, and no I am not talking about the queen's English here either.
I mean she couldn't even speak, the bastardized, slang, American ghetto-ebonics English correctly. I always wondered how it was she had managed to stay in office.
When she was stupid, even by California liberal standards.
Now I know, her "constituents" were just more stupid, than the liberals in California who keep Pelosi for example in office.
As for declaring martial law, and nationalizing the national gaurd.
Obama would love nothing more....see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ecDxMQcsLg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ecDxMQcsLg)
He's long called for a national police force which is just as trained, funded, and armed as the Military and which answers to him (the President).
We've seen this before in history too, S.S. sound familiar anyone?