Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 28, 2020, 10:24:51 AM
It's not that I really disagree with that. There are ALOT of people that need to be held accountable for the whole situation. I really don't have any sympathy for the 2 that were killed or the other idiot that was shot. This whole situation is bad on both sides and could have very easily been avoided. There is no doubt the rioter are wrong and have no right or excuse to do what they are doing. I doesn't give vigilantes a right to do anything either.

But either way isnt carrying a firearm when you are under 18 a misdemeanor, not a felony? Or am I wrong?

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 28, 2020, 10:13:19 AM
He's no hero. He's a stupid kid that made bad decisions that got 2 people killed. He's a felon and deserves to be charged as such. He was involved in a fel9ny to get the rifle he illegally possessed. He had no right to have that firearm by law. He expected trouble and he got it by his own actions. He involved himself 8n a situation that was none of his business. Rittenhouse is not a hero. He did nothing heroic. He's nothing more than another criminal.

I have asked this before, had those two, now deceased men, not chased Rittenhouse with the intent to harm, would they still be alive? You see, it was their actions that led to their death, not the fact that Rittenhouse was there. You keep slandering Rittenhouse by calling him a criminal and a felon when he has not been found guilty of anything.

K.C. seems to be focusing on punishing the guy defending himself, and not the three people who had the intent to cause chaos and deadly harm.

I say again:

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on September 23, 2020, 01:50:40 PM
Whose side are you on?

Quote from: Possum on September 28, 2020, 10:59:36 AM
I have asked this before, had those two, now deceased men, not chased Rittenhouse with the intent to harm, would they still be alive? You see, it was their actions that led to their death, not the fact that Rittenhouse was there. You keep slandering Rittenhouse by calling him a criminal and a felon when he has not been found guilty of anything.

Well said. That's the point being overlooked, Rittenhouse was simply protecting himself, it was the actions of three rioters that created their own problems.
I'm sure their previous victims are celebrating their deaths.

Quote from: Possum on September 28, 2020, 10:59:36 AM
I have asked this before, had those two, now deceased men, not chased Rittenhouse with the intent to harm, would they still be alive? You see, it was their actions that led to their death, not the fact that Rittenhouse was there. You keep slandering Rittenhouse by calling him a criminal and a felon when he has not been found guilty of anything.

You're right about the attackers. It can also be said they would still be alive if Rittenhouse didn't commit a felony by getting a rifle and going out to somewhere he shouldn't have been. I couldn't care less about the ass holes that got shot. It doesn't change the fact that Rittenhouse's life has been drastically changed for the worse and possibly tiuned by his own very stupid decisions. Rittenhouse is not a hero. He is a criminal.

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 28, 2020, 11:29:13 AM
You're right about the attackers. It can also be said they would still be alive if Rittenhouse didn't commit a felony by getting a rifle and going out to somewhere he shouldn't have been. I couldn't care less about the ass holes that got shot. It doesn't change the fact that Rittenhouse's life has been drastically changed for the worse and possibly tiuned by his own very stupid decisions. Rittenhouse is not a hero. He is a criminal.

Again, what has he been convicted of??? Had Rittenhouse been just a few months older would you still be calling him a criminal? Would you still find him guilty? Would you still be blaming him for the deaths of these two thugs? Would you still say the deaths of these two men was the result of someone else having a gun?

Quote from: Possum on September 28, 2020, 12:00:07 PM
Again, what has he been convicted of??? Had Rittenhouse been just a few months older would you still be calling him a criminal? Would you still find him guilty? Would you still be blaming him for the deaths of these two thugs? Would you still say the deaths of these two men was the result of someone else having a gun?

Nothing yet
Yes. Even if he was over 18 he still is an accomplice to a felony.
Yes
Yes

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 28, 2020, 12:14:49 PM
Nothing yet
Yes. Even if he was over 18 he still committed a felony.
Yes
Yes

How would he have commited a felony? If he was 18 he would have been legally carrying a firearm?

Quote from: American Loving Norwegian on September 28, 2020, 12:17:43 PM
How would he have commited a felony? If he was 18 he would have been legally carrying a firearm?

He illegally borrowed a firearm. Not the firearm he illegally borrowed.
It doesn't matter anyway because he is not 18yo. He's 17yo.

Quote from: Killer Clouds on September 28, 2020, 12:19:52 PM
He illegally borrowed a firearm. Not the firearm he illegally borrowed.
It doesn't matter anyway because he is not 18yo. He's 17yo.

does a 17 year old have a right to self defense

Quote from: Possum on September 28, 2020, 01:52:11 PM
does a 17 year old have a right to self defense

Yes