Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 17, 2012, 09:23:34 PM
DUDE, you cons all vote in lock step!

How is that any different than a getto neighborhood all voting the same.

Point scored, Liberal!

Had you spent any time at this board, you'd be well aware that cons differ on any number of topics. The variety of opinion during the Republican primary debates, and over elections is always vast. It's one of the problems the right has - drawing together these vastly different elements during the election process.

Quote from: mdgiles on November 18, 2012, 05:30:55 AM
Had you spent any time at this board, you'd be well aware that cons differ on any number of topics. The variety of opinion during the Republican primary debates, and over elections is always vast. It's one of the problems the right has - drawing together these vastly different elements during the election process.

He does have a point. Most of us voted for McCain even though we didn't didn't want to.

Unfortunately for him, the point he made has nothing to do with this conversation. We're talking entire voting precincts, in which not one person voted for Romney, which seems extremely strange.

If he wants to make a point and clap himself on the back, I'd like to see the maps of precincts in which Romney got all of the votes and not one person voted for Obama. Which would also be very strange...............but I don't think it happened.

Quote from: kramarat on November 18, 2012, 05:46:02 AM
He does have a point. Most of us voted for McCain even though we didn't didn't want to.

Unfortunately for him, the point he made has nothing to do with this conversation. We're talking entire voting precincts, in which not one person voted for Romney, which seems extremely strange.

If he wants to make a point and clap himself on the back, I'd like to see the maps of precincts in which Romney got all of the votes and not one person voted for Obama. Which would also be very strange...............but I don't think it happened.

Imagine Romney had won, and there were 59 precincts in Utah, where Obama got not one vote. Would we be hearing about that day and night or what?

Quote from: mdgiles on November 18, 2012, 06:04:34 AM
Imagine Romney had won, and there were 59 precincts in Utah, where Obama got not one vote. Would we be hearing about that day and night or what?

The democrats would be recounting votes for the next 2 years, and the media would be a permanent fixture in those precincts.

Quote from: kramarat on November 18, 2012, 05:46:02 AM
He does have a point. Most of us voted for McCain even though we didn't didn't want to.

Here I was thinking Kram has come to his senses.

THEN you go on to say crazy things again.

QuoteUnfortunately for him, the point he made has nothing to do with this conversation. We're talking entire voting precincts, in which not one person voted for Romney, which seems extremely strange.

Since you guys still don't accept that Romney LIED his way to defeat i don't find it hard to believe that you don't accept this either.
You know Bush got ZERO votes in some of these districts as well.

You GOP need to get your acts together and fix this.  Black people HATE you, as the vote shows.

QuoteIf he wants to make a point and clap himself on the back, I'd like to see the maps of precincts in which Romney got all of the votes and not one person voted for Obama. Which would also be very strange...............but I don't think it happened.

There may be, but WE (liberals) don't care.

I have better things to do than search for conspiracy issues.
THAT is a conservative JOB!

Perhaps Romney got his ASS handed to him in Philly because HIS message SUCKED to anyone that is NOT White.

That thought too painful to accept?

59 districts doing a coordinated fraud makes MORE sense to you?
Were there NO GOP observers there?  What NO black GOP in Philly?

So maybe that answers the question right there.

There are NO GOP blacks (or whites who dared to go there) to observe the election in Philly's 59 districts.

It's all the conservatives own fault. Time to Grow a pair and deal with IT!

Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 19, 2012, 12:34:43 PM
Here I was thinking Kram has come to his senses.

THEN you go on to say crazy things again.
Since you guys still don't accept that Romney LIED his way to defeat i don't find it hard to believe that you don't accept this either.
You know Bush got ZERO votes in some of these districts as well.

You GOP need to get your acts together and fix this.  Black people HATE you, as the vote shows.
There may be, but WE (liberals) don't care.

I have better things to do than search for conspiracy issues.
THAT is a conservative JOB!

Perhaps Romney got his ASS handed to him in Philly because HIS message SUCKED to anyone that is NOT White.

That thought too painful to accept?

59 districts doing a coordinated fraud makes MORE sense to you?
Were there NO GOP observers there?  What NO black GOP in Philly?

So maybe that answers the question right there.

There are NO GOP blacks (or whites who dared to go there) to observe the election in Philly's 59 districts.

It's all the conservatives own fault. Time to Grow a pair and deal with IT!

And Obama lied his way to victory?

QuotePerhaps Romney got his ASS handed to him in Philly because HIS message SUCKED to anyone that is NOT White.

That thought too painful to accept?

So only whites believe in being productive and useful citizens who CONTRIBUTE THEIR FAIR SHARE?  That may be true in these areas of large urban centers, but it's hardly true of ALL minorities.

And you really don't see how RACIST! the liberal really is, do you?

Quote from: Yawn on November 19, 2012, 01:07:35 PM
So only whites believe in being productive and useful citizens who CONTRIBUTE THEIR FAIR SHARE?  That may be true in these areas of large urban centers, but it's hardly true of ALL minorities.

And you really don't see how RACIST! the liberal really is, do you?

Interesting.

Not trying to derail the thread but a quick side trip, maybe:

What is the definition of a minority?

Responding to this:

QuotePerhaps Romney got his ASS handed to him in Philly because HIS message SUCKED to anyone that is NOT White.

That thought too painful to accept?

Sorry you missed it.

Just realized, that I'm accused of "derailing" my own thread!  Thanks for the laugh

Quote from: The Boo Man... on November 19, 2012, 12:40:46 PM
And Obama lied his way to victory?

Well no he didn't.

The "Fact checking" organizations ripped Romney a new one, every debate along with a large number of his ads.
the JEEP lie being why he lost Ohio, IMHO.

The worst Obama ever got is twisting some facts or leaving certain details out of the discussion.

Shall i start listing the 27 lies from the first debate?

Quote from: Yawn on November 19, 2012, 01:07:35 PM
So only whites believe in being productive and useful citizens who CONTRIBUTE THEIR FAIR SHARE? 

NO SILLY CONSERVATIVE.

these kind of thoughts is why you guys are scratching your head, going
"Why did we loose???"

You guys are SO out of touch with reality, all the while thinking you have your finger on the pulse of America!

Ya right!
AND romney is going to win in a Landslide.

Don't you get IT, yet?

THEY LIED TO YOU!!

Quote from: Yawn on November 10, 2012, 05:08:53 PM
I hate to sound like an angry lib from 2000, but there's NO doubt in my mind.  Thanks to leads from a few here and other places, I have NO doubt that this election was "won" through fraud.  Within a few days I'll have enough evidence gathered that I'll be comfortable with contacting some of the Tea Party orgs and the decent Congressmen and women.

This needs to be exposed and even if it changes nothing for the next 2 to 4 years, I want a large segment of the AMERICAN People to see Obama as illegitimate.  I'm disgusted with this guy and his party.

I will boycott UNION made products in support of AMERICA.  These Obama supporters will not make another dime off me! 

Please do share this "evidence" with the forum. We are all curious.

Quote from: Just_the_facts_mamm on November 19, 2012, 06:36:04 PM
Well no he didn't.

The "Fact checking" organizations ripped Romney a new one, every debate along with a large number of his ads.
the JEEP lie being why he lost Ohio, IMHO.

The worst Obama ever got is twisting some facts or leaving certain details out of the discussion.

Shall i start listing the 27 lies from the first debate?

Funny, factcheck.org lists a ton of lies from your Great One, they even had to stretch to get the "lies" equal by claiming that because Romney couldn't explain his tax plan in his two minute allotted time, even though Obama didn't show any plan until after the third debate.  AND, the Jeep statement was not a falsehood, a division of Jeep is moving to China, how long (oh wise one  ) do you think it will take government motors to realize it is cheaper to build all of them in China once the lines ate already there?

Quote"Perhaps Romney got his ASS handed to him in Philly because HIS message SUCKED to anyone that is NOT White."

I have to assume that you yourself are black (like I've been for all of my 65 years). If not then this is just another case of a racist, arrogant, condescending, "honkie" - and I hope you take the use of that phrase as an insult; telling black people how he believes they should think! 

Quote from: mdgiles on November 20, 2012, 09:40:24 AM
I have to assume that you yourself are black (like I've been for all of my 65 years). If not then this is just another case of a racist, arrogant, condescending, "honkie" - and I hope you take the use of that phrase as an insult; telling black people how he believes they should think! 

You have to admit that you are the most minor of minorities.

A conservative Black man? You might as well be an Albino as well.  Just as common.

Romney's message was not conducive to anyone with a decent IQ, regardless of color. but they effected the minorities MORE than the middle class Honkies.

BUT, Our discussion here is about WHY Romney got NO votes in certain districts in Philly.

Because he message SUCKED!

Not because of a MASSIVE voter fraud that no one has any proof of, just plenty of whining!

Pathetic.