Please play the video...
https://news.grabien.com/story-dnc-chair-candidates-bash-white-people-racially-charged-foru
Is there not a law against this type of behavior?
Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2017, 05:42:42 AM
Is there not a law against this type of behavior?
The woman should think about getting a very dark tan like b o then she will fit in.
Quote from: walkstall on January 24, 2017, 05:51:40 AM
The woman should think about getting a very dark tan like b o then she will fit in.
I thought Rachel Dolezal proved the only thing you needed was identificaion with the minority.
Seriously, what she is doing is illegal, I just can't remember the law, I think it falls under social unrest, inciting a riot.
The problem we face today, is one party knows the other will never challenge them on their racist behavior, so they just keep pushing the bounds of normalcy, to where attacking white people is set to become fashionable.
This is soooo going to backfire on the left...
Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2017, 06:21:35 AM
Seriously, what she is doing is illegal, I just can't remember the law, I think it falls under social unrest, inciting a riot.
The problem we face today, is one party knows the other will never challenge them on their racist behavior, so they just keep pushing the bounds of normalcy, to where attacking white people is set to become fashionable.
This is soooo going to backfire on the left...
In my opinion the inciting a riot laws changed in Ferguson
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MLlDzWt7TPc
In my opinion a new precedence was set then
So white people need to shut up... except for her?
I've said it so many times, Marxists hate nothing more than being inflicted with their own Marxism.
First she says her job is to listen and then in the next sentence her job is to shut people up. :rolleyes:
Quote from: The Boo Man... on January 24, 2017, 06:02:48 PM
First she says her job is to listen and then in the next sentence her job is to shut people up. :rolleyes:
Only white people... I mean, except for her... but other white people. She's OK.
Why was Jehmu Greene wearing a tarp?
Quote from: The Boo Man... on January 24, 2017, 08:25:33 PM
Why was Jehmu Greene wearing a tarp?
She has an interest in a tent making company and is their lead model.
Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2017, 05:42:42 AM
Is there not a law against this type of behavior?
8 years of non-enforcement for violent law opens the door to all sorts of bad behavior.
Quote from: Hoofer on January 25, 2017, 05:07:25 PM
8 years of non-enforcement for violent law opens the door to all sorts of bad behavior.
Arrrrgh!!! Excellent point, Precedent, some think it makes law.
Quote from: supsalemgr on January 25, 2017, 04:36:34 AM
She has an interest in a tent making company and is their lead model.
So, wearable tents with pockets. Interesting.
Quote from: Solar on January 25, 2017, 05:30:12 PM
Arrrrgh!!! Excellent point, Precedent, some think it makes law.
In theory, law is based on precedent.
What do we do about something? How have we handle it before.
What do we do about this new situation? What's it like? How have we handled that?
Changing the precedent is often an underhanded way of changing the law.
However, once you get activist judges, all bets are off.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 25, 2017, 07:33:16 PM
In theory, law is based on precedent.
What do we do about something? How have we handle it before.
What do we do about this new situation? What's it like? How have we handled that?
Changing the precedent is often an underhanded way of changing the law.
However, once you get activist judges, all bets are off.
There are millennia of precedent which our country and culture are based upon. Then there's precedent as in a decade of policy. The Marxists have just had a decade of rule, and they would happily claim that era is the precedent, despite previously enacted actual law to the contrary.
It's why we hold to the constitution as the law of the land and the left rely on adjudicating from the bench in hopes of creating a precedent.
Did I ever mention just how much I hate liberals?
Quote from: Solar on January 26, 2017, 05:54:57 AM
There are millennia of precedent which our country and culture are based upon. Then there's precedent as in a decade of policy. The Marxists have just had a decade of rule, and they would happily claim that era is the precedent, despite previously enacted actual law to the contrary.
It's why we hold to the constitution as the law of the land and the left rely on adjudicating from the bench in hopes of creating a precedent.
Did I ever mention just how much I hate liberals?
This decade of rule, we would be best to just skip over it. It's been more of a decade of resetting precedents to a Marxist agenda, getting away from the precedents that make America America.
As the gulf between the TEA party and Occupy shows:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsheikyermami.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2F1379390703985-thumb_1370713172943_occupycartoon.jpg&hash=c17147c381881981b4c2975e67b7cdacb7f05d0b)
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 26, 2017, 06:24:08 AM
This decade of rule, we would be best to just skip over it. It's been more of a decade of resetting precedents to a Marxist agenda, getting away from the precedents that make America America.
As the gulf between the TEA party and Occupy shows:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsheikyermami.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2F1379390703985-thumb_1370713172943_occupycartoon.jpg&hash=c17147c381881981b4c2975e67b7cdacb7f05d0b)
Sadly, the depiction is a perfect example of the latest generation.
They never experienced the America that came before their generation, they only know what the media taught them, overtly or subliminally, they only know that they aren't being treated fairly regardless of the Constitution, and seeing how the left has planted the seed that capitalism equals greed, capitalism must be the menace that needs expunged from Western Culture.
Reagan warned us about freedom's loss at the hands of a single generation.