Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?

Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!

Fuck off, pipsqueak.

And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!

Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.

Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?

If there is solid evidence, you betcha!

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:33:24 PM

Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?

Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!

Fuck off, pipsqueak.

And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!

Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.

Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?

If there is solid evidence, you betcha!

;D

Just watch your PM's...

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.

Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:29:25 PMBecause I don't want my tax dollars going towards the irresponsibility of someone else.

Tishtosh. It already does, for example, to people who would start preemptive wars.

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:34:59 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.

Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.

And your proof that O'Donnell will do this is what?

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:32:02 PM

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:23:57 PMExample?

Sure. Abortion. Arguments against abortion that aren't religious at root are nearly nowhere to be found. O'Donnell, I think we can safely say, doesn't think that Roe v. Wade was a good decision, based on her religious beliefs (devout Roman Catholic, and all).. But she has to ask herself before voting to overturn Roe v. Wade: "Is it right for me to try to impose my personal religious beliefs on everyone in America?" If she's ethical, her answer must be no.

One can be non-religious and still be against RvW.

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:35:59 PM

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:29:25 PMBecause I don't want my tax dollars going towards the irresponsibility of someone else.

Tishtosh. It already does, for example, to people who would start preemptive wars.

It already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:36:48 PMOne can be non-religious and still be against RvW.

I agree. But do you really think Christine O'Donnell opposes abortion based on any nonreligious objection? But while we're on the subject - quick - give me an example of an objection to abortion that isn't based on a religious precept.

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:34:59 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.

Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.

The people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.

Why does this stuff go over your head?

Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:34:35 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:33:24 PM

Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?

Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!

Fuck off, pipsqueak.

And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!

Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.

Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?

If there is solid evidence, you betcha!

;D

Just watch your PM's...

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:39:22 PM

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:36:48 PMOne can be non-religious and still be against RvW.

I agree. But do you really think Christine O'Donnell opposes abortion based on any nonreligious objection? But while we're on the subject - quick - give me an example of an objection to abortion that isn't based on a religious precept.

I object abortion, and I'm not religious.

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.

You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:41:33 PM

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.

You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.

I would be dictator.

Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PMThe people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.

Why does this stuff go over your head?

Once a person is elected to office his constituents are everyone he represents. Why does this go over your head? Oh ...right ... because you're a stupid motherfucker.

Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:41:33 PM

Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.

You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.

Actually he does. He votes...