Solar was the driving force behind getting this site started and did all the work.
Thanks buddy. You did a great job.
Im not throwing any bouquets at him yet...:P he'll get a big head like bambam >:(
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:22:08 AM
Im not throwing any bouquets at him yet...:P he'll get a big head like bambam >:(
Well I'm pretty sure he's had worse things thrown at him.
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:40:00 AM
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
You people don't seriously want Darwinist (Ricky) here. You will regret it to your dying day.
I can't wait till we get some liberal trolls here. I've got a very funny surprise for them. Of course my sense of humor is childish, but I still think you will find it to be funny.
Quote from: quiller on September 26, 2010, 06:41:37 AM
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:40:00 AM
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
You people don't seriously want Darwinist (Ricky) here. You will regret it to your dying day.
EagleforceGigglefarts isnt ricky isnt Condotierre ricky now
Quote from: Dan on September 26, 2010, 06:02:34 AM
Solar was the driving force behind getting this site started and did all the work.
Thanks buddy. You did a great job.
Thanks Dan, but ST deserves the credit, I merely delegated.
Fuddling with websites as a dyslexic can be a hazard, I need a live person, so ST dealt with all the bull shit, and it was a bit of a headache.
But here we are, and now all that's missing is the opposition, you guys need to go and rustle some livestock. :D
Quote from: quiller on September 26, 2010, 06:41:37 AM
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:40:00 AM
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
You people don't seriously want Darwinist (Ricky) here. You will regret it to your dying day.
I thought about it, and it really doesn't matter, he knows he can't best me ion any topic, so he tends to back down when confronted.
My only concern is the crap he pulled on admin at LNF, posting disgusting pics.
We definitely need to lure some lefty moonbats in here so we can do some "gang-tackling".
I would suggest offering Condo and Gigglefarts and Walter and RC and the other moonbats the same kind of stuff they receive from the government, and the same stuff they buy and sell on the side.
Maybe some free food, free housing, free medical care, free weed, free meth, and some really fat smelly hookers.
On second thought, all of us who work are already supplying those things to those losers. Never mind. ;)
Someone needs to go to the Huffington Post to insult their intelligence, question their sexuality and leave a trail of bread crumbs back to this site.
Any volunteers?
Quote from: Dan on September 26, 2010, 09:13:01 AM
Someone needs to go to the Huffington Post to insult their intelligence, question their sexuality and leave a trail of bread crumbs back to this site.
Any volunteers?
OKAY, I volunteer...
You my friend, the last time I went there, I had to use a topical creme and take 8 showers before I felt anywhere near clean again... ;D
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 07:40:20 AM
Quote from: quiller on September 26, 2010, 06:41:37 AM
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:40:00 AM
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
You people don't seriously want Darwinist (Ricky) here. You will regret it to your dying day.
EagleforceGigglefarts isnt ricky isnt Condotierre ricky now
Clarity was not among my strong points today on the above.
The LNF poster now calling himself Truth (aka Gigglefarts to you hard cores) is probably
NOT the vile Ricky. You're correct: Condotierre is Ricky, aka Darwinist (the earliest and longest-running name for that bowel-waste). I mistakenly forgot to add that Ricky would probably get tipped off to this place via "Truth." (That or some
other mental firefly-trying-to-light-an-airport.)
My overall INTENDED original point is, once Darwinist finds people to seriously irritate, you'll have him here forever.
I've waged more wars with Darwinist than with any other LNF troll, over what's now roughly a six-year chunk out of the last eight years. He's a bad bloodstain on a white shag rug --- a raw oozing pus-filled wound that refuses to let itself be healed. I know his writing style, know his tactics, know his worthlessness, and
never under
ANY circumstances will I forget that essentially, Darwinist shares the same broken personality as does Rob Larrikin.
Naturally, that opens this up to a broader subject of trolls and how to deal with them. I speak as a former admin myself over two opinion blogs, where LNF trolls pursued me and waged constant battles there.
Any good opinion forum will likely offer a broad spectrum of opinion. Under most circumstances, the conservative forums do tend to offer more POLITE exchanges than do the foulmouthed spew at many leftist sites. Ricky works differently, acid burning through titanium armor, always through sock-puppets and very rarely with anything that can get his main-identity's posts "removed-for-cause." He is relentless, but he's also predictable.
Darwinist/Ricky was LNF admin's single greatest tactical error EVER, in my time at that forum. Desperate for page-hits and people clicking on ads --- against the pleas of myself and MANY other members, he decided to let Ricky remain.
This isn't exactly news. He's heard me say it before. When you rely more on controversy (rather than on maintaining good order), then as a site admin you really shouldn't be surprised when people get tired of that one-sidedness, and concurrent non-responsiveness to OTHER members.
I didn't care then and don't care now for being deliberated pitted against someone for the sake of boosting page-hits. I've said so on public LNF boards before, so I'm not concerned saying it here as well. That gladiator mentality is
NOT conducive toward building trust with your own membership, at
ANY forum --- not just LNF or here.
(*deep breath*) Yes, this started out in fun talking about inviting the brainless twits in here, to bash hell out of when we get bored. (I myself like bashing twits just as much as the
next internet thug and moral degenerate, so don't get me wrong
there!)You want to troll for trolls, and invite them in? I say, let them find you, with creative front-loading of your meta-data section of your .INDEX page, adding specific keywords intended to hike your presence in Google or Bing searches. (Get into Bing and you've got the Microsoft-lovers.)
It's just that I feel you need to avoid the
WORST of the batch. Don't recruit your idiots from places where Ricky is likely to see a reference to here. This guy isn't a monomaniac like Old Socialist. Ricky is a walking disease.
Yes, Thanks Solar and whomever helped. This is a very interesting site.
Let the trolls come. So long as they wish to provide lively debate then they will be welcome with open arms. And when they stop being nice and start disrupting the board then we have a little surprise for them. Both me and Solar have admin capabilities and you guys will see how truly childish our senses of humor can be as we modify their posts to humor ourselves.
Quote from: crepe05 on September 28, 2010, 03:31:28 AM
Yes, Thanks Solar and whomever helped. This is a very interesting site.
We aim to please. ;)
Hi kids, how're ya'll doing?
Gotta say, I'm flattered by all this attention. It's gratifying to see that several of you measure yourselves by the Great Yardstick which is me. Solar measures himself against the fiction of how many arguments he's won against me. And Bob - oh Bob! - apparently measures his internet persona by my very existence! That's deeply touching, Bob. That long screed you wrote on the first page of this thread...? That's quite literally the longest piece of writing I've personally seen roll from your keyboard in ...well, it's gotta be at least 5 or 6 years, going back to when you were winging all those petty, tantrum-filled posts from your blog off into the vasty cyber-unknown. (Yeah, I watched your little act - you and your "weasel sitting at a typewriter" logo - and allowed you to believe you'd evaded me. By the way, wasn't it Rob Larrikan who designed that logo for you, back in the days when you and he were clandestine lovers under the virtual stars, with virtual waves sussurating at your virtual toes on that virtual beach?)
But, sorry Bob, enough of that stuff before I make everyone ill - although you're being piqued by nostalgic and bittersweet heart-warming memories over it.
Anyway, since I haven't had a chance to look around much yet, I think I'll do that ...and then decide whether this place is worth the time and hassle you halfwits will force me to endure.
By the way, you might want to get that bug fixed - the one that won't let a poster see what he typed below a certain point unless he keeps using the scroll-bar over and over.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:57:01 AM
Hi kids, how're ya'll doing?
Gotta say, I'm flattered by all this attention. It's gratifying to see that several of you measure yourselves by the Great Yardstick which is me. Solar measures himself against the fiction of how many arguments he's won against me. And Bob - oh Bob! - apparently measures his internet persona by my very existence! That's deeply touching, Bob. That long screed you wrote on the first page of this thread...? That's quite literally the longest piece of writing I've personally seen roll from your keyboard in ...well, it's gotta be at least 5 or 6 years, going back to when you were winging all those petty, tantrum-filled posts from your blog off into the vasty cyber-unknown. (Yeah, I watched your little act - you and your "weasel sitting at a typewriter" logo - and allowed you to believe you'd evaded me. By the way, wasn't it Rob Larrikan who designed that logo for you, back in the days when you and he were clandestine lovers under the virtual stars, with virtual waves sussurating at your virtual toes on that virtual beach?)
But, sorry Bob, enough of that stuff before I make everyone ill - although you're being piqued by nostalgic and bittersweet heart-warming memories over it.
Anyway, since I haven't had a chance to look around much yet, I think I'll do that ...and then decide whether this place is worth the time and hassle you halfwits will force me to endure.
By the way, you might want to get that bug fixed - the one that won't let a poster see what he typed below a certain point unless he keeps using the scroll-bar over and over.
Yeah, and we talk about Hussein and his commie cohorts in the Dim party, but they wouldn't find it quite so flattering, but an egotistical mutt such as yourself would.
We also talk about boils an bodily functions in the same way we invoke your name, so if you see the comparison as a sign of endearment, it's all yours my little pimple on the ass.
So let the games begin. ;)
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:57:01 AM
Hi kids, how're ya'll doing?
Gotta say, I'm flattered by all this attention. It's gratifying to see that several of you measure yourselves by the Great Yardstick which is me. Solar measures himself against the fiction of how many arguments he's won against me. And Bob - oh Bob! - apparently measures his internet persona by my very existence! That's deeply touching, Bob. That long screed you wrote on the first page of this thread...? That's quite literally the longest piece of writing I've personally seen roll from your keyboard in ...well, it's gotta be at least 5 or 6 years, going back to when you were winging all those petty, tantrum-filled posts from your blog off into the vasty cyber-unknown. (Yeah, I watched your little act - you and your "weasel sitting at a typewriter" logo - and allowed you to believe you'd evaded me. By the way, wasn't it Rob Larrikan who designed that logo for you, back in the days when you and he were clandestine lovers under the virtual stars, with virtual waves sussurating at your virtual toes on that virtual beach?)
But, sorry Bob, enough of that stuff before I make everyone ill - although you're being piqued by nostalgic and bittersweet heart-warming memories over it.
Anyway, since I haven't had a chance to look around much yet, I think I'll do that ...and then decide whether this place is worth the time and hassle you halfwits will force me to endure.
By the way, you might want to get that bug fixed - the one that won't let a poster see what he typed below a certain point unless he keeps using the scroll-bar over and over.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages54.fotki.com%2Fv1592%2Fphotos%2F1%2F1595431%2F8185187%2Fricky_changes_diaper-vi.jpg&hash=0d113c8b8de444e14111a085b8c4da869647dc5f)
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:17:47 AMYeah, and we talk about Hussein and his commie cohorts in the Dim party, but they wouldn't find it quite so flattering, but an egotistical mutt such as yourself would.
Oh Solar, dear Solar. Poor little dyslexic Solar. Poor slow, short-bus little Solar. You don't realize, do you? You've never engaged Obama and his buddies personally, have you? Well, then, you really have nothing of them to measure yourself against, do you?
QuoteWe also talk about boils an bodily functions in the same way we invoke your name, so if you see the comparison as a sign of endearment, it's all yours my little pimple on the ass.
Well it's only to be expected that you don't care much for me, as many times as I've hammered on you and your butt-buddies.
QuoteSo let the games begin. ;)
Don't let your puffed-up expectations of bringing down one of your betters run away with you, puppy. In all likelihood I won't be hanging around. After all, at the moment I see this hole in the wall as nothing but a collective of the very worst bunch of mindless white-boy circle-jerkers LNF had to offer - although I have to say it's pleasingly surprising to observe you've all leaned how to type with one hand while pulling each other's stubby puds with the other. But why in the heck would I want to stay here to engage you guys in anything even
resembling conversation when almost all of you have proved time and again that's not remotely what you want? You want blood in the water and not one goddamn thing more.
Hey Bob, get your mother's baby-picture off the thread, why don'cha? Damn, did she really eat shit? Or was she just practicing so she could teach you later?
Hmmm....where is the popcorn when you need it.
Holy Romper Room Batman!
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 11:53:24 AM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:17:47 AMYeah, and we talk about Hussein and his commie cohorts in the Dim party, but they wouldn't find it quite so flattering, but an egotistical mutt such as yourself would.
Oh Solar, dear Solar. Poor little dyslexic Solar. Poor slow, short-bus little Solar. You don't realize, do you? You've never engaged Obama and his buddies personally, have you? Well, then, you really have nothing of them to measure yourself against, do you?
QuoteWe also talk about boils an bodily functions in the same way we invoke your name, so if you see the comparison as a sign of endearment, it's all yours my little pimple on the ass.
Well it's only to be expected that you don't care much for me, as many times as I've hammered on you and your butt-buddies.
QuoteSo let the games begin. ;)
Don't let your puffed-up expectations of bringing down one of your betters run away with you, puppy. In all likelihood I won't be hanging around. After all, at the moment I see this hole in the wall as nothing but a collective of the very worst bunch of mindless white-boy circle-jerkers LNF had to offer - although I have to say it's pleasingly surprising to observe you've all leaned how to type with one hand while pulling each other's stubby puds with the other. But why in the heck would I want to stay here to engage you guys in anything even resembling conversation when almost all of you have proved time and again that's not remotely what you want? You want blood in the water and not one goddamn thing more.
I find it funny, how someone with no skills whatsoever thinks they could have ever bested me, you have never won one single debate with me.
But please stick around, we need a new mop for the forum, you will suffice quite well.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 12:15:34 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 11:53:24 AM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:17:47 AMYeah, and we talk about Hussein and his commie cohorts in the Dim party, but they wouldn't find it quite so flattering, but an egotistical mutt such as yourself would.
Oh Solar, dear Solar. Poor little dyslexic Solar. Poor slow, short-bus little Solar. You don't realize, do you? You've never engaged Obama and his buddies personally, have you? Well, then, you really have nothing of them to measure yourself against, do you?
QuoteWe also talk about boils an bodily functions in the same way we invoke your name, so if you see the comparison as a sign of endearment, it's all yours my little pimple on the ass.
Well it's only to be expected that you don't care much for me, as many times as I've hammered on you and your butt-buddies.
QuoteSo let the games begin. ;)
Don't let your puffed-up expectations of bringing down one of your betters run away with you, puppy. In all likelihood I won't be hanging around. After all, at the moment I see this hole in the wall as nothing but a collective of the very worst bunch of mindless white-boy circle-jerkers LNF had to offer - although I have to say it's pleasingly surprising to observe you've all leaned how to type with one hand while pulling each other's stubby puds with the other. But why in the heck would I want to stay here to engage you guys in anything even resembling conversation when almost all of you have proved time and again that's not remotely what you want? You want blood in the water and not one goddamn thing more.
I find it funny, how someone with no skills whatsoever thinks they could have ever bested me, you have never won one single debate with me.
But please stick around, we need a new mop for the forum, you will suffice quite well.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.batmania.com.ar%2Fimages%2Fimages_serie%2Fserie_kapow.jpg&hash=933d129b57b418bbb818bf4cbdb256388a6cc236)
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 12:15:34 PMI find it funny, how someone with no skills whatsoever thinks they could have ever bested me, you have never won one single debate with me.
But please stick around, we need a new mop for the forum, you will suffice quite well.
That's because you don't debate, you call your opponent stupid and then declare victory, with all your butt-buddies there immediately to shake your cock - er, hand - and tell you how brilliant you are.
You've never been beat by me, huh? Let's just begin with me catching you dead-to-rights plagiarizing a fistful of material about Sacajawea from (no less!) two sites meant for school children. And then, caught red-handed, you first denied you'd plagiarized the material, and then after I linked to the two sites to LNF, you tried to laugh it all off by saying you "forgot" to cite the material.
You are personally nothing but a halfwit who thinks he can cover his basic stupidity with an extra helping of belligerence. Honestly, I don't even give you credit for having 1/4 the brains Bert has, and he's dumber than a fence post.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 02:33:32 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 12:15:34 PMI find it funny, how someone with no skills whatsoever thinks they could have ever bested me, you have never won one single debate with me.
But please stick around, we need a new mop for the forum, you will suffice quite well.
That's because you don't debate, you call your opponent stupid and then declare victory, with all your butt-buddies there immediately to shake your cock - er, hand - and tell you how brilliant you are.
You've never been beat by me, huh? Let's just begin with me catching you dead-to-rights plagiarizing a fistful of material about Sacajawea from (no less!) two sites meant for school children. And then, caught red-handed, you first denied you'd plagiarized the material, and then after I linked to the two sites to LNF, you tried to laugh it all off by saying you "forgot" to cite the material.
You are personally nothing but a halfwit who thinks he can cover his basic stupidity with an extra helping of belligerence. Honestly, I don't even give you credit for having 1/4 the brains Bert has, and he's dumber than a fence post.
Someone got off on the wrong side of bed this morn... I mean, afternoon.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 02:33:32 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 12:15:34 PMI find it funny, how someone with no skills whatsoever thinks they could have ever bested me, you have never won one single debate with me.
But please stick around, we need a new mop for the forum, you will suffice quite well.
That's because you don't debate, you call your opponent stupid and then declare victory, with all your butt-buddies there immediately to shake your cock - er, hand - and tell you how brilliant you are.
You've never been beat by me, huh? Let's just begin with me catching you dead-to-rights plagiarizing a fistful of material about Sacajawea from (no less!) two sites meant for school children. And then, caught red-handed, you first denied you'd plagiarized the material, and then after I linked to the two sites to LNF, you tried to laugh it all off by saying you "forgot" to cite the material.
You are personally nothing but a halfwit who thinks he can cover his basic stupidity with an extra helping of belligerence. Honestly, I don't even give you credit for having 1/4 the brains Bert has, and he's dumber than a fence post.
ROFL!!!
I'm the one calling insults, yet what is this post if nothing but pure BS and insults on your part?
Come on little ricky, if you want to show off your intellect, join in a thread and show the folks just how versatile your knowledge base truly is.
I'm sure you must have held a job for more that 3 weeks in some field, or is house husband all you're capable of?
If that's the case, you may have me on folding clothes, nothing I know anything about, or ironing, but I run a mean vacuum, though you most likely can kick my butt when it come to cleaning windows.
So tell us my little halfwit, what are your skill sets, outside of gas station attendant?
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 01:30:54 PM
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
What's left to say?
He dropped out of college so he failed at school.
He is divorced so he failed at marriage
He is chronically unemployed so he failed at work
He has been estranged from his children so he failed as a father
he depends on his partner to support him so he failed as a man
He's simply a total failure and the internet is the only place he feels accomplished. And to accomplish that he had to fabricate an identity.
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 03:33:43 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 01:30:54 PM
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
What's left to say?
He dropped out of college so he failed at school.
He is divorced so he failed at marriage
He is chronically unemployed so he failed at work
He has been estranged from his children so he failed as a father
he depends on his partner to support him so he failed as a man
He's simply a total failure and the internet is the only place he feels accomplished. And to accomplish that he had to fabricate an identity.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 03:33:43 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 01:30:54 PM
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
What's left to say?
He dropped out of college so he failed at school.
He is divorced so he failed at marriage
He is chronically unemployed so he failed at work
He has been estranged from his children so he failed as a father
he depends on his partner to support him so he failed as a man
He's simply a total failure and the internet is the only place he feels accomplished. And to accomplish that he had to fabricate an identity.
But he is a damn good chess player.... on the internet... novice level...
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 03:39:07 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 03:33:43 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 01:30:54 PM
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
What's left to say?
He dropped out of college so he failed at school.
He is divorced so he failed at marriage
He is chronically unemployed so he failed at work
He has been estranged from his children so he failed as a father
he depends on his partner to support him so he failed as a man
He's simply a total failure and the internet is the only place he feels accomplished. And to accomplish that he had to fabricate an identity.
But he is a damn good chess player.... on the internet... novice level...
Everyone is famous, rich, beautiful and brilliant on the internet....
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 03:41:40 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 03:39:07 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 03:33:43 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 01:30:54 PM
;D ;D ;D
I can't wait to see Bert's response. ;)
What's left to say?
He dropped out of college so he failed at school.
He is divorced so he failed at marriage
He is chronically unemployed so he failed at work
He has been estranged from his children so he failed as a father
he depends on his partner to support him so he failed as a man
He's simply a total failure and the internet is the only place he feels accomplished. And to accomplish that he had to fabricate an identity.
But he is a damn good chess player.... on the internet... novice level...
Everyone is famous, rich, beautiful and brilliant on the internet....
Well, everyone except him. He failed at that too.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Darwinist, aka Ricky, seems to be very sexually oriented. Every insult he flings at other people involves some sort of sex act or sexual connotation. I have to wonder if he is on the sex offender list in whatever state he lives in.
The most amazing thing about Darwinist is that he is able to use his keyboard despite the fact that both of his hands are horribly chapped and blistered. ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: AmericanFlyer on September 28, 2010, 05:13:19 PM
Darwinist, aka Ricky, seems to be very sexually oriented. Every insult he flings at other people involves some sort of sex act or sexual connotation. I have to wonder if he is on the sex offender list in whatever state he lives in.
The most amazing thing about Darwinist is that he is able to use his keyboard despite the fact that both of his hands are horribly chapped and blistered. ;D ;D ;D
Darwinist is a special boy.
Quote from: AmericanFlyer on September 28, 2010, 05:13:19 PM
Darwinist, aka Ricky, seems to be very sexually oriented. Every insult he flings at other people involves some sort of sex act or sexual connotation. I have to wonder if he is on the sex offender list in whatever state he lives in.
The most amazing thing about Darwinist is that he is able to use his keyboard despite the fact that both of his hands are horribly chapped and blistered. ;D ;D ;D
You may have found his one single talent, ambidextrous. ;D
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 05:19:28 PM
Quote from: AmericanFlyer on September 28, 2010, 05:13:19 PM
Darwinist, aka Ricky, seems to be very sexually oriented. Every insult he flings at other people involves some sort of sex act or sexual connotation. I have to wonder if he is on the sex offender list in whatever state he lives in.
The most amazing thing about Darwinist is that he is able to use his keyboard despite the fact that both of his hands are horribly chapped and blistered. ;D ;D ;D
You may have found his one single talent, ambidextrous. ;D
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages17.fotki.com%2Fv530%2Fphotos%2F1%2F1595431%2F8185187%2Frickys_big_night_out-vi.jpg&hash=4ee3c4bc106bd6cd3ae5439bbbc9374e54de35b9)
Quote from: quiller on September 28, 2010, 05:26:20 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 05:19:28 PM
Quote from: AmericanFlyer on September 28, 2010, 05:13:19 PM
Darwinist, aka Ricky, seems to be very sexually oriented. Every insult he flings at other people involves some sort of sex act or sexual connotation. I have to wonder if he is on the sex offender list in whatever state he lives in.
The most amazing thing about Darwinist is that he is able to use his keyboard despite the fact that both of his hands are horribly chapped and blistered. ;D ;D ;D
You may have found his one single talent, ambidextrous. ;D
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages17.fotki.com%2Fv530%2Fphotos%2F1%2F1595431%2F8185187%2Frickys_big_night_out-vi.jpg&hash=4ee3c4bc106bd6cd3ae5439bbbc9374e54de35b9)
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Ouch!!!
Quote from: quiller on September 26, 2010, 06:41:37 AM
Quote from: zip on September 26, 2010, 06:40:00 AM
We have to get gigglefarts here dan so solar can spank him lol
You people don't seriously want Darwinist (Ricky) here. You will regret it to your dying day.
I regret someone even brought it up. ;)
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 05:28:10 PM
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages17.fotki.com%2Fv530%2Fphotos%2F1%2F1595431%2F8185187%2Frickys_big_night_out-vi.jpg&hash=4ee3c4bc106bd6cd3ae5439bbbc9374e54de35b9)
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Ouch!!!
I see I'm not the only one who noticed Ricky's unhealthy obsession with sex. At least now, he can take his parole officer (left, in cop car) when he's loose.
Quote from: quiller on September 28, 2010, 05:32:31 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 05:28:10 PM
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages17.fotki.com%2Fv530%2Fphotos%2F1%2F1595431%2F8185187%2Frickys_big_night_out-vi.jpg&hash=4ee3c4bc106bd6cd3ae5439bbbc9374e54de35b9)
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Ouch!!!
I see I'm not the only one who noticed Ricky's unhealthy obsession with sex. At least now, he can take his parole officer (left, in cop car) when he's loose.
Again, it is his sole talent, the boy knows no other subject.
lol.
It doesn't matter what you guys name yourselves; it doesn't matter what board you're posting at; as long as you're all together it's always the same: you have all the courage of a pack of feral dogs. Safety in numbers, eh, boys?
But I'll tell you what, Solar: as soon as one of you starts a thread I consider worth my time (I've done my looking around, and so far none of you has managed that), then I'll come back and do a little flexing. Until then, have fun stewing in your own juices knowing I'm here. You especially, Blobby.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 06:58:37 PM
lol.
It doesn't matter what you guys name yourselves; it doesn't matter what board you're posting at; as long as you're all together it's always the same: you have all the courage of a pack of feral dogs. Safety in numbers, eh, boys?
But I'll tell you what, Solar: as soon as one of you starts a thread I consider worth my time (I've done my looking around, and so far none of you has managed that), then I'll come back and do a little flexing. Until then, have fun stewing in your own juices knowing I'm here. You especially, Blobby.
You could start your own forum too and we can come post over there? That way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:00:43 PMYou could start your own forum too and we can come post over there?
Gawd! And then have to clean up after the lot of you? That'd be like having a house full of undiapered toddlers, all with explosive projectile-diarrhea. Thanks but no thanks.
QuoteThat way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Still not worth trying to keep the mess under control.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:08:43 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:00:43 PMYou could start your own forum too and we can come post over there?
Gawd! And then have to clean up after the lot of you? That'd be like having a house full of undiapered toddlers, all with explosive projectile-diarrhea. Thanks but no thanks.
QuoteThat way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Still not worth trying to keep the mess under control.
Seriously though, you should do a forum too!
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:09:56 PMSeriously though, you should do a forum too!
The thought crosses from time to time. Then I go take a cold shower, and it goes away.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:12:19 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:09:56 PMSeriously though, you should do a forum too!
The thought crosses from time to time. Then I go take a cold shower, and it goes away.
What would you call it?
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:15:13 PMWhat would you call it?
My putative forum? I dunno. I've never really given it much thought, since the whole idea just doesn't appeal that much to me.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:17:37 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:15:13 PMWhat would you call it?
My putative forum? I dunno. I've never really given it much thought, since the whole idea just doesn't appeal that much to me.
But you have been on so many forums, I figured you would have a name or a theme sort of in mind?
Oh wait! I know!
The "Spankin' Toofers Forum!" 8)
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:19:08 PM
Oh wait! I know!
The "Spankin' Toofers Forum!" 8)
I like it!
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:21:23 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:20:15 PMI like it!
Bob will too, when he sees it. ;)
Hey, start a thread with something that you know a lot about, so we can learn from you.
So much choice ....
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:27:40 PM
So much choice ....
How about the O'Donnell/Coons race? Are you an O'Donnell or Coons fan?
So, what do you guys think of Christine O'Donnell? Is she just the most screechingly embarrassing helium-brain to come down the pike since Sarah, or what?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:30:00 PM
So, what do you guys think of Christine O'Donnell? Is she just the most screechingly embarrassing helium-brain to come down the pike since Sarah, or what?
I like her. I think she has a lot of spunk, and is pretty intelligent. What do you not like about her?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:30:00 PM
So, what do you guys think of Christine O'Donnell? Is she just the most screechingly embarrassing helium-brain to come down the pike since Sarah, or what?
Don't care about Delaware's politics. But O'Donnell is about the most embarrassingly worthless piece of tail to come out of conservatism since at least 2008.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:30:00 PM
So, what do you guys think of Christine O'Donnell? Is she just the most screechingly embarrassing helium-brain to come down the pike since Sarah, or what?
Or is she a threat to your weekly check....
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:31:24 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:30:00 PM
So, what do you guys think of Christine O'Donnell? Is she just the most screechingly embarrassing helium-brain to come down the pike since Sarah, or what?
Don't care about Delaware's politics. But O'Donnell is about the most embarrassingly worthless piece of tail to come out of conservatism since at least 2008.
Really! She kicked Castle's RINO ass, and now she is going to smack up Coons, the bearded Marxist.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:31:07 PMI like her. I think she has a lot of spunk, and is pretty intelligent. What do you not like about her?
Of course you like her - she's cute, and it's fun to think about her polishing your knob ...while she's NOT masturbating, of course.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes)
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:09:56 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:08:43 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:00:43 PMYou could start your own forum too and we can come post over there?
Gawd! And then have to clean up after the lot of you? That'd be like having a house full of undiapered toddlers, all with explosive projectile-diarrhea. Thanks but no thanks.
QuoteThat way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Still not worth trying to keep the mess under control.
Seriously though, you should do a forum too!
That would take brains and effort...
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:34:49 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:31:07 PMI like her. I think she has a lot of spunk, and is pretty intelligent. What do you not like about her?
Of course you like her - she's cute, and it's fun to think about her polishing your knob ...while she's NOT masturbating, of course.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes)
So she is too religious?
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:40:06 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:34:49 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:31:07 PMI like her. I think she has a lot of spunk, and is pretty intelligent. What do you not like about her?
Of course you like her - she's cute, and it's fun to think about her polishing your knob ...while she's NOT masturbating, of course.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-13-dumbest-christine-odonnell-quotes)
;D ;D ;D ;D
More proof atheists usually ain't bright...
So she is too religious?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 06:58:37 PM
lol.
It doesn't matter what you guys name yourselves; it doesn't matter what board you're posting at; as long as you're all together it's always the same: you have all the courage of a pack of feral dogs. Safety in numbers, eh, boys?
But I'll tell you what, Solar: as soon as one of you starts a thread I consider worth my time (I've done my looking around, and so far none of you has managed that), then I'll come back and do a little flexing. Until then, have fun stewing in your own juices knowing I'm here. You especially, Blobby.
It's not my fault that you don't have any friends.
But the problem with starting a thread that is of interest to, is also of interest to other freaks and the Vice Squad, and the last thing we need here is a bunch of morally destitute freaks such as yourself posting, one village idiot is enough, and you filled that position, Old socialist is afraid to join..
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:36:14 PMThat would take brains and effort...
Explaining fully why all your posts are short and stupid.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:08:43 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:00:43 PMYou could start your own forum too and we can come post over there?
Gawd! And then have to clean up after the lot of you? That'd be like having a house full of undiapered toddlers, all with explosive projectile-diarrhea. Thanks but no thanks.
QuoteThat way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Still not worth trying to keep the mess under control.
What is it with you and bodily functions?
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:09:56 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:08:43 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:00:43 PMYou could start your own forum too and we can come post over there?
Gawd! And then have to clean up after the lot of you? That'd be like having a house full of undiapered toddlers, all with explosive projectile-diarrhea. Thanks but no thanks.
QuoteThat way, you could have just smart people there, and y'all could use us dumb people as muse!
Still not worth trying to keep the mess under control.
Seriously though, you should do a forum too!
It's State sponsored, it's called www.meganslaw.ca.gov/ (http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/)
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:40:06 PMSo she is too religious?
There are no people who are "too religious." There are, however, people who go too far with their religion. A person has a basic right to believe what they want. But just as your right to swing your fist ends at the point of contact with my nose, so too does a religious person's right to believe end with putting their beliefs into action - to wit, any attempt to compel, inculcate or indoctrinate another person with things they have not freely chosen to believe steps over the line from belief to action, and "makes contact with the nose" of what the other person believes.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 07:48:05 PMIt's not my fault that you don't have any friends.
But the problem with starting a thread that is of interest to, is also of interest to other freaks and the Vice Squad, and the last thing we need here is a bunch of morally destitute freaks such as yourself posting, one village idiot is enough, and you filled that position, Old socialist is afraid to join..
Whatever blows your dress over your head, red.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:53:23 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:40:06 PMSo she is too religious?
There are no people who are "too religious." There are, however, people who go too far with their religion. A person has a basic right to believe what they want. But just as your right to swing your fist ends at the point of contact with my nose, so too does a religious person's right to believe end with putting their beliefs into action - to wit, any attempt to compel, inculcate or indoctrinate another person with things they have not freely chosen to believe steps over the line from belief to action, and "makes contact with the nose" of what the other person believes.
So, she can't try to lobby you to her belief system?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:53:23 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:40:06 PMSo she is too religious?
There are no people who are "too religious." There are, however, people who go too far with their religion. A person has a basic right to believe what they want. But just as your right to swing your fist ends at the point of contact with my nose, so too does a religious person's right to believe end with putting their beliefs into action - to wit, any attempt to compel, inculcate or indoctrinate another person with things they have not freely chosen to believe steps over the line from belief to action, and "makes contact with the nose" of what the other person believes.
Her religion has nothing to do with her politics.
If you want to disprove Charles Darwin then it's really easy. Just stand in a checkout line at Wal-Mart for 10 minutes and I assure you that you will leave convinced Darwin got it wrong.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 07:48:05 PMIt's not my fault that you don't have any friends.
But the problem with starting a thread that is of interest to, is also of interest to other freaks and the Vice Squad, and the last thing we need here is a bunch of morally destitute freaks such as yourself posting, one village idiot is enough, and you filled that position, Old socialist is afraid to join..
Whatever blows your dress over your head, red.
OWWW Such a scalding retort, I can't take it!
What a loser, don't you have laundry to do, or house cleaning or some other womanly chore?
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:55:28 PMSo, she can't try to lobby you to her belief system?
Not without my direct consent, no; not on a personal level, and certainly not on a legislative level.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:03:46 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:55:28 PMSo, she can't try to lobby you to her belief system?
Not without my direct consent, no; not on a personal level, and certainly not on a legislative level.
Why can't she say "Darwinist, you really should stop wacking off so much. Why not put the D down and step away!"?
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:56:43 PMHer religion has nothing to do with her politics.
Only a fucking drooling idiot actually believes that. ...And look who wrote it! ::)
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:03:46 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 07:55:28 PMSo, she can't try to lobby you to her belief system?
Not without my direct consent, no; not on a personal level, and certainly not on a legislative level.
Well then thank God you're totally irrelevant. Otherwise this would be problematic.
Quote from: Dan on September 28, 2010, 08:00:25 PM
If you want to disprove Charles Darwin then it's really easy. Just stand in a checkout line at Wal-Mart for 10 minutes and I assure you that you will leave convinced Darwin got it wrong.
Nice to see you're as late and irrelevant as ever, Dan.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:56:43 PMHer religion has nothing to do with her politics.
Only a fucking drooling idiot actually believes that. ...And look who wrote it! ::)
Ah so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:07:18 PM
Quote from: Dan on September 28, 2010, 08:00:25 PM
If you want to disprove Charles Darwin then it's really easy. Just stand in a checkout line at Wal-Mart for 10 minutes and I assure you that you will leave convinced Darwin got it wrong.
Nice to see you're as late and irrelevant as ever, Dan.
Yeah, you're mom kept me busy.
Ah, see? Here we go already. Taxed and I are having an almost-civil discussion about O'Donnell and he pros and cons, and Bert and Dan and Solar all decide to jump in the wading pool with their dirty feet just to muddy things up. Do any of them have anything of value to add to the conversation? No. They're just here to see if they can find a little blood in the water.
Quote from: Dan on September 28, 2010, 08:10:33 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:07:18 PM
Quote from: Dan on September 28, 2010, 08:00:25 PM
If you want to disprove Charles Darwin then it's really easy. Just stand in a checkout line at Wal-Mart for 10 minutes and I assure you that you will leave convinced Darwin got it wrong.
Nice to see you're as late and irrelevant as ever, Dan.
Yeah, you're mom kept me busy.
She's innovative...
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:56:43 PMHer religion has nothing to do with her politics.
Only a fucking drooling idiot actually believes that. ...And look who wrote it! ::)
Are you saying Religion has a place in politics? ;D
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:56:43 PMHer religion has nothing to do with her politics.
Only a fucking drooling idiot actually believes that. ...And look who wrote it! ::)
Ah so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Maybe Darwinist is confused since he likes to hump tax code books.
Quote from: Dan on September 28, 2010, 08:12:32 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 07:56:43 PMHer religion has nothing to do with her politics.
Only a fucking drooling idiot actually believes that. ...And look who wrote it! ::)
Ah so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
He's not confused. He' desperate...
Maybe Darwinist is confused since he likes to hump tax code books.
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PMAh so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Not necessarily. But they'll certainly color her legislative views with regard to social policy, won't they, genius? And with that in mind they'll also color her views with regard to budgetary matters, such as whether Planned Parenthood centers continue to receive funding, just for example.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:10:48 PM
Ah, see? Here we go already. Taxed and I are having an almost-civil discussion about O'Donnell and he pros and cons, and Bert and Dan and Solar all decide to jump in the wading pool with their dirty feet just to muddy things up. Do any of them have anything of value to add to the conversation? No. They're just here to see if they can find a little blood in the water.
Back up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:13:35 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PMAh so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Not necessarily. But they'll certainly color her legislative views with regard to social policy, won't they, genius? And with that in mind they'll also color her views with regard to budgetary matters, such as whether Planned Parenthood centers continue to receive funding, just for example.
They shouldn't receive funding, though.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:13:35 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PMAh so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Not necessarily. But they'll certainly color her legislative views with regard to social policy, won't they, genius? And with that in mind they'll also color her views with regard to budgetary matters, such as whether Planned Parenthood centers continue to receive funding, just for example.
OHHHH The Horror, she has morals!
But then again, what would you know about that?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:13:35 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:10:21 PMAh so her views on sex before marriage will influence her vote on budgetary matters, foreign policy, or the economy, or taxes....
Not necessarily. But they'll certainly color her legislative views with regard to social policy, won't they, genius? And with that in mind they'll also color her views with regard to budgetary matters, such as whether Planned Parenthood centers continue to receive funding, just for example.
With only a yes or no vote her religious views will hardly be influential....
You are also basing your argument on assumption...
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:11:44 PMAre you saying Religion has a place in politics? ;D
To some extent it can't be avoided, Solar. Religious beliefs are part and parcel of the psychological identities of religious people: the truly religious live their lives according to the precepts of their beliefs; it's ingrained in them as much as covering their mouth when they sneeze or scratching when they itch. But a religious person who understands ethics, and right from wrong, and the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, also understands that imposing their religious beliefs on others especially through a process as impersonal and comprehensive as legislation, is simply not done without being unethical, and doing wrong, and violating both the meaning and the intent of the establishment clause. So a religious person (in or out of government) must ask himself a question on every vote: "Sure this might be good for me, but is it good for a country full of people who disagree about whether it's good
for them?"
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:22:33 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:11:44 PMAre you saying Religion has a place in politics? ;D
To some extent it can't be avoided, Solar. Religious beliefs are part and parcel of the psychological identities of religious people: the truly religious live their lives according to the precepts of their beliefs; it's ingrained in them as much as covering their mouth when they sneeze or scratching when they itch. But a religious person who understands ethics, and right from wrong, and the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, also understands that imposing their religious beliefs on others especially through a process as impersonal and comprehensive as legislation, is simply not done without being unethical, and doing wrong, and violating both the meaning and the intent of the establishment clause. So a religious person (in or out of government) must ask himself a question on every vote: "Sure this might be good for me, but is it good for a country full of people who disagree about whether it's good for them?"
Example?
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:14:39 PMThey shouldn't receive funding, though.
That's a subject for debate. Why'd you stop?
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:15:52 PMOHHHH The Horror, she has morals!
Everyone except psychpaths has morals, idjit. But not everyone's morals are dictated by religious beliefs.
QuoteBut then again, what would you know about that?
Yeah, what
would a plagiarist know about morals?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
We can do worse than that...
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/CDLE-Main/CDLE/1248095317089 (http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/CDLE-Main/CDLE/1248095317089)
BOO!
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Why would we ban you when ridiculing you is so much fun?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:22:33 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:11:44 PMAre you saying Religion has a place in politics? ;D
To some extent it can't be avoided, Solar. Religious beliefs are part and parcel of the psychological identities of religious people: the truly religious live their lives according to the precepts of their beliefs; it's ingrained in them as much as covering their mouth when they sneeze or scratching when they itch. But a religious person who understands ethics, and right from wrong, and the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, also understands that imposing their religious beliefs on others especially through a process as impersonal and comprehensive as legislation, is simply not done without being unethical, and doing wrong, and violating both the meaning and the intent of the establishment clause. So a religious person (in or out of government) must ask himself a question on every vote: "Sure this might be good for me, but is it good for a country full of people who disagree about whether it's good for them?"
Wrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:25:07 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:14:39 PMThey shouldn't receive funding, though.
That's a subject for debate. Why'd you stop?
Because I don't want my tax dollars going towards the irresponsibility of someone else.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:23:57 PMExample?
Sure. Abortion. Arguments against abortion that aren't religious at root are nearly nowhere to be found. O'Donnell, I think we can safely say, doesn't think that Roe v. Wade was a good decision, based on her religious beliefs (devout Roman Catholic, and all).. But she has to ask herself before voting to overturn Roe v. Wade: "Is it right for me to try to impose my personal religious beliefs on everyone in America?" If she's ethical, her answer must be no.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.
Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.
Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?
If there is solid evidence, you betcha!
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:33:24 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.
Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?
If there is solid evidence, you betcha!
;D
Just watch your PM's...
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.
Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:29:25 PMBecause I don't want my tax dollars going towards the irresponsibility of someone else.
Tishtosh. It already does, for example, to people who would start preemptive wars.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:34:59 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.
Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.
And your proof that O'Donnell will do this is what?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:32:02 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:23:57 PMExample?
Sure. Abortion. Arguments against abortion that aren't religious at root are nearly nowhere to be found. O'Donnell, I think we can safely say, doesn't think that Roe v. Wade was a good decision, based on her religious beliefs (devout Roman Catholic, and all).. But she has to ask herself before voting to overturn Roe v. Wade: "Is it right for me to try to impose my personal religious beliefs on everyone in America?" If she's ethical, her answer must be no.
One can be non-religious and still be against RvW.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:35:59 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:29:25 PMBecause I don't want my tax dollars going towards the irresponsibility of someone else.
Tishtosh. It already does, for example, to people who would start preemptive wars.
It already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:36:48 PMOne can be non-religious and still be against RvW.
I agree. But do you really think Christine O'Donnell opposes abortion based on any nonreligious objection? But while we're on the subject - quick - give me an example of an objection to abortion that isn't based on a religious precept.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:34:59 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:28:27 PMWrong!!!
Everyone votes their conscious, morals, core beliefs.
Ooops, there I go again, posting on something you know nothing about.
Right. Many are the people who vote against their consciences because they also believe they have no right to use their vote to represent only themselves, which is all "voting your conscience" is.
The people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.
Why does this stuff go over your head?
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:34:35 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:33:24 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:32:33 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:31:19 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:24:26 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:14:22 PMBack up Idiot, I was responding to your perverted posts.
Whats the matter, can't handle it, Punk?
Oh, and one other point, admin isn't here to protect your ass!
Fuck off, pipsqueak.
And do you think I need admin??? What can you jackholes do to me? Ban me? I'm quaking!
Oh no, you're stuck here mental midget, I have no intentions of banning you, I want you to stay and have your monthly meltdown, so all can see what a weakling you are.
Can we call the police when he starts talking about children?
If there is solid evidence, you betcha!
;D
Just watch your PM's...
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:39:22 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:36:48 PMOne can be non-religious and still be against RvW.
I agree. But do you really think Christine O'Donnell opposes abortion based on any nonreligious objection? But while we're on the subject - quick - give me an example of an objection to abortion that isn't based on a religious precept.
I object abortion, and I'm not religious.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.
You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:41:33 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.
You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.
I would be dictator.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PMThe people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.
Why does this stuff go over your head?
Once a person is elected to office his constituents are everyone he represents. Why does this go over your head? Oh ...right ... because you're a stupid motherfucker.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:41:33 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:37:52 PMIt already does, but it shouldn't, and I would end it.
You're not the President. And you have no say in how your taxes are allocated, save one exception: you can contribute a tax dollar to the Reelect the President campaign fund.
Actually he does. He votes...
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:43:08 PMI would be dictator.
I see you've already run out of intelligent things to contribute.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:43:19 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PMThe people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.
Why does this stuff go over your head?
Once a person is elected to office his constituents are everyone he represents. Why does this go over your head? Oh ...right ... because you're a stupid motherfucker.
You are a dumb ass, that is exactly what I said, moron!!!
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:43:53 PMActually he does. He votes...
When was the last time electing a President or congressmman changed the tax code, hm?
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:45:00 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:43:19 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PMThe people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.
Why does this stuff go over your head?
Once a person is elected to office his constituents are everyone he represents. Why does this go over your head? Oh ...right ... because you're a stupid motherfucker.
You are a dumb ass, that is exactly what I said, moron!!!
He is a Liberal robot. They support him and he defends them...
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:45:00 PMYou are a dumb ass, that is exactly what I said, moron!!!
Not quite. You're confusing
voters for
constituents. Unless we start having reps elected by margins of 100% to 0% there will always be people who didn't vote for their rep. But once he's elected, even the people who didn't vote for him become his constituents. See the difference?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:44:26 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:43:08 PMI would be dictator.
I see you've already run out of intelligent things to contribute.
I mean, I wouldn't vote to fund any abortion clinics. I think it hurts our society, and stealing my money to fund that and continue that cycle isn't that answer. Did I miss something?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:45:44 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:43:53 PMActually he does. He votes...
When was the last time electing a President or congressmman changed the tax code, hm?
The Bush tax cuts...
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:46:44 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:45:00 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:43:19 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PMThe people elect you based on your core beliefs, so if they vote their conscience, they are doing their constituents work.
Why does this stuff go over your head?
Once a person is elected to office his constituents are everyone he represents. Why does this go over your head? Oh ...right ... because you're a stupid motherfucker.
You are a dumb ass, that is exactly what I said, moron!!!
He is a Liberal robot. They support him and he defends them...
So hes double dipping? We support him through welfare, and Lin supports his unemployed ass with an allowance.
What a catch he must have been.
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:48:59 PMI mean, I wouldn't vote to fund any abortion clinics. I think it hurts our society, and stealing my money to fund that and continue that cycle isn't that answer. Did I miss something?
Possibly not. Although there are things in even a post as brief as yours to question. How does it hurt our society, specifically? How is funding abortion clinics (or anything else you don't like) "stealing" your money? Corollary question: If someone is against funding state-sponsored aggression and war, is taking their tax money for those purposes also "stealing?" Whay "cycle" is being continued?
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:49:35 PMThe Bush tax cuts...
Very good. How many years ago was that?
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:48:28 PM
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:45:00 PMYou are a dumb ass, that is exactly what I said, moron!!!
Not quite. You're confusing voters for constituents. Unless we start having reps elected by margins of 100% to 0% there will always be people who didn't vote for their rep. But once he's elected, even the people who didn't vote for him become his constituents. See the difference?
There is no difference, we are a Democratic Republic, whether they voted for them or not, they still represent the wishes of the people.
And since the majority voted for them, they will do as the majority demands.
Darwinist, you are tying yourself up in knots with your ridiculous statements, not to mention your potty mouth. NOW I understand why Solar wanted you in here. He wanted some entertainment, playground insults, and a shining example of what is WRONG with our country!
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:53:07 PM
Quote from: taxed on September 28, 2010, 08:48:59 PMI mean, I wouldn't vote to fund any abortion clinics. I think it hurts our society, and stealing my money to fund that and continue that cycle isn't that answer. Did I miss something?
Possibly not. Although there are things in even a post as brief as yours to question. How does it hurt our society, specifically? How is funding abortion clinics (or anything else you don't like) "stealing" your money? Corollary question: If someone is against funding state-sponsored aggression and war, is taking their tax money for those purposes also "stealing?" Whay "cycle" is being continued?
It hurts our society because it did not educate the parents, and the odds are they will do this again. If they keep their child and fight through being responsible parents, then that is better than dumping the kid like a used air filter.
When someone puts a gun to my head and forces me to hand over my money, then takes that money and funds a clinic devoted to enabling the irresponsibility of others and continue a continuous cycle of destroying unwanted children, then that is how my stolen money is making society worse.
Regarding the military, I am very happy to give my money, as I want us to have the largest, biggest, baddest, and most technologically sophisticated and advanced military in the solar system.
Quote from: Solar on September 28, 2010, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:48:28 PMThere is no difference, we are a Democratic Republic, whether they voted for them or not, they still represent the wishes of the people.
And since the majority voted for them, they will do as the majority demands.
Not everyone is a majoritarian. For example, I wouldn't be.
Quote from: Darwinist on September 28, 2010, 08:45:44 PM
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on September 28, 2010, 08:43:53 PMActually he does. He votes...
When was the last time electing a President or congressmman changed the tax code, hm?
Obamacare? Financial deform bill? Are you not aware of those?
Quote from: AmericanFlyer on September 28, 2010, 08:59:08 PM
Darwinist, you are tying yourself up in knots with your ridiculous statements, not to mention your potty mouth. NOW I understand why Solar wanted you in here. He wanted some entertainment, playground insults, and a shining example of what is WRONG with our country!
Nailed it!!!! ;D
Golly, he threatened to LURK!
Too funny. Too sad. Too useless. That's Darwinist.
Quote from: quiller on September 29, 2010, 05:19:52 AM
Golly, he threatened to LURK!
Too funny. Too sad. Too useless. That's Darwinist.
Is he really gone? I suggest we all wear our socks at half mast today as a sign of mourning.
I can assume the beating he received was just what he was looking for? The fuckin sadist!
Give it a couple of days and he'll stagger back for more sexual gratification.
Quote from: Solar on September 30, 2010, 06:21:45 AM
I can assume the beating he received was just what he was looking for? The fuckin sadist!
Give it a couple of days and he'll stagger back for more sexual gratification.
Unless he staggers too close to an elementary-school playground --- and then hopefully he won't be going anywhere at all, until the arraignment.
Quote from: quiller on September 30, 2010, 10:46:46 AM
Unless he staggers too close to an elementary-school playground --- and then hopefully he won't be going anywhere at all, until the arraignment.
Ahhh, violating parole. ;D ;D ;D
That "spanking toofers" bit refers to his love for being beaten in alleyways by drunks and hoboes. Funny how he gets it all turned around in that Sterno-soaked brain of his, as he stands in his overcoat at the school-yard playground fence, trying to not scare the children with what his hands are doing, or where.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on September 30, 2010, 04:26:22 PM
Wow . . . you have some strange and detailed fantasies. I also notice that they all seem to involve men
in some stage of undress or sexual stimulation. If I hadn't been avoiding your posts enough already,
I will be redoubling that avoidance forthwith because as well as being sad, sick and mean, you are also creepy.
You must be Darwhiner's sock-puppet. ANOTHER corksocker with a momma fetish.
"All" my posts? "Sad, sick and mean"? EXAGGERATE MUCH? I've hardly gotten started.
I'm talking about a worthless POS who has trolled numerous forums for YEARS, and is every bit as disgusting and sociopathic as Darwinist self-advertises.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on September 30, 2010, 04:26:22 PM
Wow . . . you have some strange and detailed fantasies.
I also notice that they all seem to involve men in some stage
of undress or sexual stimulation. If I hadn't been avoiding
your posts enough already, I will be redoubling that avoidance
forthwith because as well as being sad, sick and mean, you are also creepy.
This coming from a man with a fascination for naked men in magazines. ;D ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on September 30, 2010, 04:38:52 PM
Please tell me that you are not 'posing' as we speak.
What, and get you excited?
No Way!!! ;D