Yes, yes, we get it. Democrats fear citizens who own weapons to defend against our government. But when Ted Cruz asks Feinstein a Constitutional question, watch her do a Ginger Rogers and dance all up the walls trying to evade.

Then blithering idiots Patrick Leahy and Dick Durban join the fun, when Cruz wants to know if the Donks believe it's OK to limit just some books and not others under the First Amendment (what Leahy burbles is a Texas issue). See, logic was never a strong suit among the gun-grabbers.

Explosive Exchange at Gun Hearing Between Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein

Quote from: quiller on July 19, 2014, 12:02:41 AM
Yes, yes, we get it. Democrats fear citizens who own weapons to defend against our government. But when Ted Cruz asks Feinstein a Constitutional question, watch her do a Ginger Rogers and dance all up the walls trying to evade.

Then blithering idiots Patrick Leahy and Dick Durban join the fun, when Cruz wants to know if the Donks believe it's OK to limit just some books and not others under the First Amendment (what Leahy burbles is a Texas issue). See, logic was never a strong suit among the gun-grabbers.

Explosive Exchange at Gun Hearing Between Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein

Dianne didn't have to remind us how long she'd been around Washington-heck she's about ready to be classified as antique and Leahy talks as if he just tied one on, so to speak.  Too funny

It's yet another issue where liberals put their stupidity on display.  They are always looking out for the criminals.

That's why I like Cruz.  He stays cooly refined and as focused as a laser. 

And finally we know that Feinstein isn't a 6th-grader.  Though it's hard to tell, as she let P&D rescue her like drunken sexist Renaissance Fair reenactors. 

Ahh yes, Feinstein/rumplestiltskin, the "Laws are for little people, not for me", which is why she packs a peace across state lines into her district, where concealed carry is illegal.

Quote from: Solar on July 19, 2014, 05:49:40 AM
Ahh yes, Feinstein/rumplestiltskin, the "Laws are for little people, not for me", which is why she packs a peace across state lines into her district, where concealed carry is illegal.

Liberalism can't exist without hypocrisy, since those who push it never want it for themselves.

Quote from: taxed on July 19, 2014, 06:01:14 AM
Liberalism can't exist without hypocrisy, since those who push it never want it for themselves.

So true, but whats really sad, is there are actual people out there willing to support these idiots in taking away their Rights.

Quote from: Solar on July 19, 2014, 06:06:34 AM
So true, but whats really sad, is there are actual people out there willing to support these idiots in taking away their Rights.

How stupid is that?  Libs line up like lemmings to support policies the lawmakers exempt themselves from.  I can't fathom that.

Quote from: taxed on July 19, 2014, 06:09:52 AM
How stupid is that?  Libs line up like lemmings to support policies the lawmakers exempt themselves from.  I can't fathom that.

Definitely exposes the fact that half the Nation is stupid who think only of themselves when it comes to spending other peoples money, as long as it benefits them personally.

Durbin summed it up right at the end.  He said that NONE of these rights are absolute.  That is the epitome of the liberal view.

I love it when liberals who probably have ARMED security are against the rest of us being allowed to protect ourselves!

DaisyJane     

Gotta love Ted Cruz ... love to see him in 2016 ... and seated in the oval office in 2017!

Dinosaur Feinstein, "the answer is obvious no" ok so if the answer is no, it's not ok for Congress to specify which books are protected by the first amendment, why is she pushing this bill?

The answer to her bill is obvious too then, NO.

Mwhahahaha