Now you know why the RINO wanted Ken Paxton out so badly.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Texas on Tuesday, permitting the enforcement of a law that authorizes local police to detain migrants suspected of illegally crossing the border, representing a pivotal but provisional victory for Texas in its ongoing efforts to manage illegal immigration.

The Biden administration had previously sought to block this law, known as Senate Bill 4, arguing that it encroached on federal immigration enforcement authority.

This clash over state versus federal jurisdiction in immigration control echoes previous legal battles, notably the Supreme Court's 2012 decision concerning a similar Arizona law.

"The United States brings this action to preserve its exclusive authority under federal law to regulate the entry and removal of noncitizens," the DOJ lawsuit, initiated in January, articulated. "Texas cannot run its own immigration system. Its efforts, through SB 4, intrude on the federal government's exclusive authority to regulate the entry and removal of noncitizens, frustrate the United States' immigration operations and proceedings, and interfere with U.S. foreign relations."

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton celebrated the Supreme Court's decision, emphasizing the state's right to defend its sovereignty and enforce immigration law.

https://resistthemainstream.com/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-texas-immigration-enforcement-law/

SCOTUS places indefinite hold on Texas immigration law

Quick Hit:

The U.S. Supreme Court has placed an indefinite hold on Texas' SB4 Immigration Law, with Justice Samuel Alito issuing an order to prevent its immediate implementation, affecting law enforcement actions against migrants entering Texas illegally.

Key Details:

The Supreme Court's intervention came just after a 4 p.m. deadline, pausing Texas SB4 without a set timeframe.
Texas SB4 would authorize state and local law enforcement to arrest and prosecute migrants entering illegally, with provisions for their removal from the U.S.
The law has faced legal challenges, including a block by Senior U.S. District Judge David Ezra, and has been the subject of multiple Supreme Court pauses.
Diving Deeper:

In a critical legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court has indefinitely halted the enforcement of Texas SB4, a contentious immigration law that was poised to significantly empower state and local law enforcement in immigration matters. This decisive action by Justice Samuel Alito followed shortly after the expiry of a key deadline, signaling the ongoing legal complexities surrounding the law.

Texas SB4, if implemented, would have authorized state and local law enforcement to actively participate in the detention and prosecution of migrants illegally entering the state through Texas. This included stringent penalties for illegal entry and mechanisms for the removal of migrants as part of their sentencing. However, the law's journey through the federal court system has been fraught with challenges. Earlier, Senior U.S. District Judge David Ezra had put a stop to the law's implementation, underlining the federal government's primacy in immigration enforcement, a decision that Texas subsequently appealed.

The appeal led to a temporary reversal by a federal appeals court, setting the stage for the law to take effect on March 9. However, the Supreme Court's intervention has once again put the law on hold. This legal tug-of-war mirrors the situation faced by Arizona's SB 1070 a decade earlier, a law that was ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court for infringing upon federal immigration authority.

Given this historical context and the Biden administration's less rigorous pursuit of the federal statute paralleled by Texas SB4, the law is expected to face significant challenges at the Supreme Court. The crux of the issue lies in the delicate balance of state versus federal jurisdiction in immigration enforcement, a topic that continues to generate heated legal and political debates. This indefinite hold by the Supreme Court thus marks another pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of immigration law in the United States.

https://mxmnews.com/article/637a2571-6e52-4cc2-8ec9-2f3b46027f6e?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ncl_amplify&utm_campaign=240319-31924_mxm_news_newsletter&utm_content=ncl-76t8FKtQac&_nlid=76t8FKtQac&_nhids=ncWrYUKKUY5kls

Quote from: Solar on March 19, 2024, 09:00:56 PMSCOTUS places indefinite hold on Texas immigration law

Quick Hit:

The U.S. Supreme Court has placed an indefinite hold on Texas' SB4 Immigration Law, with Justice Samuel Alito issuing an order to prevent its immediate implementation, affecting law enforcement actions against migrants entering Texas illegally.

Key Details:

The Supreme Court's intervention came just after a 4 p.m. deadline, pausing Texas SB4 without a set timeframe.
Texas SB4 would authorize state and local law enforcement to arrest and prosecute migrants entering illegally, with provisions for their removal from the U.S.
The law has faced legal challenges, including a block by Senior U.S. District Judge David Ezra, and has been the subject of multiple Supreme Court pauses.
Diving Deeper:

In a critical legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court has indefinitely halted the enforcement of Texas SB4, a contentious immigration law that was poised to significantly empower state and local law enforcement in immigration matters. This decisive action by Justice Samuel Alito followed shortly after the expiry of a key deadline, signaling the ongoing legal complexities surrounding the law.

Texas SB4, if implemented, would have authorized state and local law enforcement to actively participate in the detention and prosecution of migrants illegally entering the state through Texas. This included stringent penalties for illegal entry and mechanisms for the removal of migrants as part of their sentencing. However, the law's journey through the federal court system has been fraught with challenges. Earlier, Senior U.S. District Judge David Ezra had put a stop to the law's implementation, underlining the federal government's primacy in immigration enforcement, a decision that Texas subsequently appealed.

The appeal led to a temporary reversal by a federal appeals court, setting the stage for the law to take effect on March 9. However, the Supreme Court's intervention has once again put the law on hold. This legal tug-of-war mirrors the situation faced by Arizona's SB 1070 a decade earlier, a law that was ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court for infringing upon federal immigration authority.

Given this historical context and the Biden administration's less rigorous pursuit of the federal statute paralleled by Texas SB4, the law is expected to face significant challenges at the Supreme Court. The crux of the issue lies in the delicate balance of state versus federal jurisdiction in immigration enforcement, a topic that continues to generate heated legal and political debates. This indefinite hold by the Supreme Court thus marks another pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of immigration law in the United States.

https://mxmnews.com/article/637a2571-6e52-4cc2-8ec9-2f3b46027f6e?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ncl_amplify&utm_campaign=240319-31924_mxm_news_newsletter&utm_content=ncl-76t8FKtQac&_nlid=76t8FKtQac&_nhids=ncWrYUKKUY5kls

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/03/19/new-fifth-circuit-schedules-wednesday-hearing-on-stay-in-texas-immigration-case-n2171619

Lot of reporting going on. The 5th is going to hear the case April 3th. Today, they will decide, again, if Texas can enforce the law while waiting on a judgement, which the SCOTUS, by their ruling, pretty much forced the 5th into action, which will then get appealed by the losing side. Which then means another ruling on whether Texas will be allowed to enforce the law while waiting to see if the SCOTUS will take the case. Right now we have rulings on the stay going back and forth.


This was not written to make no sense, it just came out that way.

Quote from: Possum on March 20, 2024, 06:50:37 AMhttps://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/03/19/new-fifth-circuit-schedules-wednesday-hearing-on-stay-in-texas-immigration-case-n2171619

Lot of reporting going on. The 5th is going to hear the case April 3th. Today, they will decide, again, if Texas can enforce the law while waiting on a judgement, which the SCOTUS, by their ruling, pretty much forced the 5th into action, which will then get appealed by the losing side. Which then means another ruling on whether Texas will be allowed to enforce the law while waiting to see if the SCOTUS will take the case. Right now we have rulings on the stay going back and forth.


This was not written to make no sense, it just came out that way.

   

Is this not crazy?

You literally have to check the time stamp on articles to know where and when they bounced the ball...

IMO, Texas should tell the US, Fuck You, do one damn thing, and we'll secede!!!!
We need Texas more than it needs the US.