I'm really glad this is happening. Kudos to Crowder.
https://magadc.substack.com/p/more-on-steven-crowder-vs-little
QuoteWhat he did to his friends though by airing it publicly was really a d-move.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 19, 2023, 09:18:56 PM
I agree, but sounds like they weren't that good of friends. Maybe just industry friends.
Here is a link to crowders initial shot across the bow.
https://rumble.com/v260f88-its-time-to-stop....html (https://rumble.com/v260f88-its-time-to-stop....html)
Here is Daily Wires response to crowder.
https://youtu.be/NyCc5o1KDHU (https://youtu.be/NyCc5o1KDHU)
Here is his reveal of the phone call and response to Daily Wire.
https://rumble.com/v26c2hu-i-didnt-want-to-do-this....html (https://rumble.com/v26c2hu-i-didnt-want-to-do-this....html)
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 19, 2023, 09:18:56 PM
To be fair tho, crowder did warn them it was coming if they challenged him and was keeping names secret until they came out.
Quote from: taxed on January 19, 2023, 08:43:30 PMI'm really glad this is happening. Kudos to Crowder.
https://magadc.substack.com/p/more-on-steven-crowder-vs-little
Yes, I see this as part of a larger civil war with the RINOs right now. Part of taking back the right from RINO Inc.
I also notice that there are alot of trolls out attacking crowder and siding with big tech.
I think this was a genius move by crowder cuz it really exposes who the tru conservatives are and who are just making a buck while bowing to the overlords, becoming controlled opposition.
And good article Taxed. It is important to call out these never trumpers who are just taking advantage of the right to make a buck. Im glad you pointed out that stuff about walsh and peterson. Ive mostly ignored digging too much into people supposedly on the right. But now is the time to start cutting off the fat.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 20, 2023, 10:28:54 AMYes, I see this as part of a larger civil war with the RINOs right now. Part of taking back the right from RINO Inc.
I also notice that there are alot of trolls out attacking crowder and siding with big tech.
I think this was a genius move by crowder cuz it really exposes who the tru conservatives are and who are just making a buck while bowing to the overlords, becoming controlled opposition.
And good article Taxed. It is important to call out these never trumpers who are just taking advantage of the right to make a buck. Im glad you pointed out that stuff about walsh and peterson. Ive mostly ignored digging too much into people supposedly on the right. But now is the time to start cutting off the fat.
I agree with the comment I quoted. It was a dick move. You don't air dirty laundry like that. It makes our movement look bad. He could have not said anything about it at all, or simple state that there were discussions and a deal could not be made.
And, I don't look at Daily Wire as "big tech". I look at as an organization growing itself with big names (Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, etc - regardless of what you think of them individually). The CEO guy breaking down the letter discussed the reality living in a real big tech world on how YouTube and the like censor, demonetize, or ban those who dare speak out against the narrative.
It can't be that bad of a place because look at the talent there. $50 million for four years, plus extras if he does fuck up? How much is he getting for his "mug club" and demonetized YouTubing?
Just saying.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 20, 2023, 11:04:09 AMI agree with the comment I quoted. It was a dick move. You don't air dirty laundry like that. It makes our movement look bad. He could have not said anything about it at all, or simple state that there were discussions and a deal could not be made.
And, I don't look at Daily Wire as "big tech". I look at as an organization growing itself with big names (Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, etc - regardless of what you think of them individually). The CEO guy breaking down the letter discussed the reality living in a real big tech world on how YouTube and the like censor, demonetize, or ban those who dare speak out against the narrative.
It can't be that bad of a place because look at the talent there. $50 million for four years, plus extras if he does fuck up? How much is he getting for his "mug club" and demonetized YouTubing?
Just saying.
Ok well heres where we differ...
I see ben shapiro as controlled opposition, a RINO. Anyone who denies 2020 was stolen I see as working for the enemy.
From what Im hearing matt walsh and others over there are the same way, tho I have never really paid attention to those smaller names.
Also it def seems that DW was trying to put restrictions and censorship onto crowder, and thats a BIG no-no for anyone trying to bring down this corrupt system. Golden handcuffs as they are being called.
To many on the right say the right things without doing the right things and its very sad that so many of them are bowing to big tech like this.
But Im also glad that not everyone here agrees with me. :biggrin:
Thanks for the push back.
I think this self reflection on the right is a very good thing, and agree with him or not, crowder just got this conversation rolling.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 20, 2023, 11:04:09 AMI agree with the comment I quoted. It was a dick move. You don't air dirty laundry like that. It makes our movement look bad. He could have not said anything about it at all, or simple state that there were discussions and a deal could not be made.
And, I don't look at Daily Wire as "big tech". I look at as an organization growing itself with big names (Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, etc - regardless of what you think of them individually). The CEO guy breaking down the letter discussed the reality living in a real big tech world on how YouTube and the like censor, demonetize, or ban those who dare speak out against the narrative.
It can't be that bad of a place because look at the talent there. $50 million for four years, plus extras if he does fuck up? How much is he getting for his "mug club" and demonetized YouTubing?
Just saying.
How did you feel about the twenty house members not supporting McCarthy until he wrote down his promises in writing? Personally, I think that was the best thing that has happened for the republican party in a long time.
Quote from: Possum on January 20, 2023, 12:06:25 PMHow did you feel about the twenty house members not supporting McCarthy until he wrote down his promises in writing? Personally, I think that was the best thing that has happened for the republican party in a long time.
We can't compare politicians versus political pundits. It's great that it is documented. We can nitpick about details like how it is approached.
We, on this forum, have already made up our minds about political issues. So, political pundits opinions ain't gonna change that. We watch them more for entertainment than anything else. I don't put all my attention into Ben Shapiro. I also skip him on certain subjects that I don't care about. There are things be does right, things he does wrong, and things he needs to do differently. I can say that about any political pundit (big time or small time).
The damage is done: Trump was cheated out of a second term, and no amount of small fry convictions really matter because the main players will not be punished. Justice will be granted for the patriots who patriotically trespassed on that day.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 20, 2023, 02:19:50 PMWe can't compare politicians versus political pundits. It's great that it is documented. We can nitpick about details like how it is approached.
We, on this forum, have already made up our minds about political issues. So, political pundits opinions ain't gonna change that. We watch them more for entertainment than anything else. I don't put all my attention into Ben Shapiro. I also skip him on certain subjects that I don't care about. There are things be does right, things he does wrong, and things he needs to do differently. I can say that about any political pundit (big time or small time).
The damage is done: Trump was cheated out of a second term, and no amount of small fry convictions really matter because the main players will not be punished. Justice will be granted for the patriots who patriotically trespassed on that day.
Edit: justice will not be granted to those patriots.
(this is why we need an edit function)
Some more on this, with new information (which makes me double down on supporting Crowder)...
https://magadc.substack.com/p/lauren-chen-reaffirms-my-take-on
Lauren Chen reaffirms my take on Crowder vs Daily Wire (and some math on why $50mm was an insult)
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 20, 2023, 11:04:09 AMI agree with the comment I quoted. It was a dick move. You don't air dirty laundry like that.
Maybe sometimes you do.
QuoteIt makes our movement look bad.
Crowder blowing this open impacts conservatism in no way.
QuoteHe could have not said anything about it at all, or simple state that there were discussions and a deal could not be made.
I think he was screwed over by the Daily Wire.
QuoteAnd, I don't look at Daily Wire as "big tech".
Of course not. They just implement their rules and promote their ToS.
QuoteI look at as an organization growing itself with big names (Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, etc - regardless of what you think of them individually).
How are you growing an organization by limiting growth to what Silicon Valley platforms allow you to do? Crowder's company is growing.
QuoteThe CEO guy breaking down the letter discussed the reality living in a real big tech world on how YouTube and the like censor, demonetize, or ban those who dare speak out against the narrative.
Pretty sure Crowder knows this.
QuoteIt can't be that bad of a place because look at the talent there. $50 million for four years, plus extras if he does fuck up? How much is he getting for his "mug club" and demonetized YouTubing?
About $42mm PER YEAR with Mug Club alone.
QuoteJust saying.
Sure you are.
If that is true, and he get's $42 million a year in subscriptions, why would you even consider working for someone else and demanding/only wanting $30 million a year? It doesn't sound right. It also doesn't add up on the time frame of leaving "The Blaze", asking for the job, creating that website, and putting out the fake outrage.
I call bullshit.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 21, 2023, 06:01:57 PM
It just seems like all these people have to say about crowder is they dont like his style here and then they attack him personally. They never seem to have a valid defense for their supporting big tech censorship.
Plus we now know, from the contract, that candace and ben HAVE to say what they are saying, they dont have a choice in the matter. So how can we take them as sincere?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 21, 2023, 10:11:18 PMIt just seems like all these people have to say about crowder is they dont like his style here and then they attack him personally. They never seem to have a valid defense for their supporting big tech censorship.
Plus we now know, from the contract, that candace and ben HAVE to say what they are saying, they dont have a choice in the matter. So how can we take them as sincere?
Sounds like Candice's experience with Crowder wasn't good. To invite Candice, and say that she refused when she didn't is suspect. All these things are just painting a negative picture of Crowder.
I'm a bit split on this. I most definitely see Crowders POV, but I also see that DW as slime now.
Being in business all my life, I would never have created a contractual system like DW did.
What they have is the lowest of the low, a literal trap for the unsuspecting entry level talent.
Crowder is a proven talent, and they treated him as if he were shit.
Instead of calling this "Just business", Crowder exposed it for the shit it is, and for that I applaud him.
I like DW and the content they create, and I also like Crowder for his genius, I also applaud him for standing his ground over predatory contracts.
Contracts are designed to protect one another's best interests, 50/50 where both find equity in coming together, but to stack the deck the way DW did, is most definitely an insult.
Never in my life would I have created a contract that penalized my employees simply for existing and wanting to create.
This is not how you generate creativity in business, if that's all it really is. This is starting from a boss/adversary position that stifles the very product you're selling.
Did Crowder take it personally? Did he whine publicly and stomp his feet? Was that Conservative behavior?
Oh Hell No! I would have shown up personally and punched Ben out.
DW starts from a position of forcing one to sell their soul, then claims "It's Just Business".
This is why so many hated Jews, the money changers throughout history, the greed side of doing business.
And yeah, that's how I see Shapiro, as a greedy little fuck, who has no issue with hurtling the Conservative movement.
Fuck Shapiro, he is no Conservative! And Crowder, grow a set and move on!
I don't have a horse in this race, I don't watch this stuff. But about 2 minutes is all I could stand to listen to Ben that guy has a very quirky and irritating speaking style.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 21, 2023, 10:44:01 PMSounds like Candice's experience with Crowder wasn't good. To invite Candice, and say that she refused when she didn't is suspect. All these things are just painting a negative picture of Crowder.
When in the world did that happen? Can anyone prove that?
We cant trust candice's word since we know she is contractually obligated to lie for DW.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 21, 2023, 10:07:01 PMIf that is true, and he get's $42 million a year in subscriptions,
Last numbers were >300k members, at $10 per month... Is the math really that hard?
Quotewhy would you even consider working for someone else and demanding/only wanting $30 million a year?
Because it's a steady paycheck and all he'd have to do is work on his show. When you're in business for yourself, it's a lot more work to keep the cash coming in, versus working for someone and taking off a lot of stress, obligations, and liabilities. Or perhaps they were talking partnerships at one point... it could be any number of reasons.
QuoteIt doesn't sound right.
Yes it does.
QuoteIt also doesn't add up on the time frame of leaving "The Blaze", asking for the job, creating that website, and putting out the fake outrage.
You have no idea about any specifics, so you don't have enough information to say "it doesn't add up."
QuoteI call bullshit.
I understand. You're welcome to be a fan of Silicon Valley tech platform censorship. I just differ in that a conservative outlet shouldn't anchor its business model to Silicon Valley's terms of services.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 22, 2023, 10:15:15 AMWhen in the world did that happen? Can anyone prove that?
We cant trust candice's word since we know she is contractually obligated to lie for DW.
I am just going off her word. Crowder ultimately has to say what is true and what is false. Supposedly invited her. She supposedly accepted. She should have been on the show. She wasn't on the show, what happened?
I am of the impression that he was never intending on going to Daily Wire at all. You make $42 million in subscriptions so you got plenty of cash to to do your own thing and nobody to answer to. You inquire about working for/with a company, and you fake outrage over things that are unfortunately a fact of life. Big tech is controlled by lefties. He is wanting them to foot the bill if he puts his foot in his mouth. That isn't being a fan of big tech. Twitter just got rescued. YouTube needs the same treatment. We still should be making out own media, social media, and financial avenues. He could have responded to exclude certain things and just have his show part of the deal. Have them control the show. Keep all the mug club benefits. He did not.
Daily Wire is probably better off investing in another up and coming superstar anyway. Someone who can have a similar "What Is A Woman" type phenomenon.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 12:04:59 PMI am just going off her word. Crowder ultimately has to say what is true and what is false. Supposedly invited her. She supposedly accepted. She should have been on the show. She wasn't on the show, what happened?
I am of the impression that he was never intending on going to Daily Wire at all. You make $42 million in subscriptions so you got plenty of cash to to do your own thing and nobody to answer to. You inquire about working for/with a company, and you fake outrage over things that are unfortunately a fact of life. Big tech is controlled by lefties. He is wanting them to foot the bill if he puts his foot in his mouth. That isn't being a fan of big tech. Twitter just got rescued. YouTube needs the same treatment. We still should be making out own media, social media, and financial avenues. He could have responded to exclude certain things and just have his show part of the deal. Have them control the show. Keep all the mug club benefits. He did not.
Daily Wire is probably better off investing in another up and coming superstar anyway. Someone who can have a similar "What Is A Woman" type phenomenon.
You're right. He better water down his show and brand and do exactly what the social media execs say.
You're also missing the entirely other point he was trying to do, which is get them to change their business model so they DON'T do that.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 12:04:59 PMI am just going off her word. Crowder ultimately has to say what is true and what is false. Supposedly invited her. She supposedly accepted. She should have been on the show. She wasn't on the show, what happened?
I am of the impression that he was never intending on going to Daily Wire at all. You make $42 million in subscriptions so you got plenty of cash to to do your own thing and nobody to answer to. You inquire about working for/with a company, and you fake outrage over things that are unfortunately a fact of life. Big tech is controlled by lefties. He is wanting them to foot the bill if he puts his foot in his mouth. That isn't being a fan of big tech. Twitter just got rescued. YouTube needs the same treatment. We still should be making out own media, social media, and financial avenues. He could have responded to exclude certain things and just have his show part of the deal. Have them control the show. Keep all the mug club benefits. He did not.
Daily Wire is probably better off investing in another up and coming superstar anyway. Someone who can have a similar "What Is A Woman" type phenomenon.
He did warn them first. He didnt name names at first. He gave them a chance but they outed themselves.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 22, 2023, 12:30:20 PMHe did warn them first. He didnt name names at first. He gave them a chance but they outed themselves.
How is SoS so confused? I thought he was Mr. anti-big tech?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 22, 2023, 12:30:20 PMHe did warn them first. He didnt name names at first. He gave them a chance but they outed themselves.
If you are going to expose a phone call, don't exclude things that will expose the truth. The phone call was cordial and was mainly two friends talking. Crowder pulled the left-wing media move to edit it to try to make the CEO look like a bad guy. A Conservative should have enough integrity to not do that. That is why I never believe any clip put out there. You see the police strike the skateboarder, but you don't see the events leading up to that. We all need to hate that.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 01:35:51 PMIf you are going to expose a phone call, don't exclude things that will expose the truth. The phone call was cordial and was mainly two friends talking.
Incorrect. That term sheet was not one of respect or "friendship". I wish you'd read my last Substack on that because I thought I drilled that point home.
QuoteCrowder pulled the left-wing media move to edit it to try to make the CEO look like a bad guy.
Then you can blame Lauren Chen too for completely outing them as well.
QuoteA Conservative should have enough integrity to not do that.
I think they were trying to screw him over, hence why he did that. Remember, also, THEY outed themselves and lied in their rebuttal video.
QuoteThat is why I never believe any clip put out there. You see the police strike the skateboarder, but you don't see the events leading up to that. We all need to hate that.
In this case, you don't know the events that lead up to Crowder doing what he did. FACT: DW outed themselves, lied about the contracts, and are dying on the hill of taking a knee to Silicon Valley.
Quote from: yrunvs on January 22, 2023, 08:36:32 AMI don't have a horse in this race, I don't watch this stuff. But about 2 minutes is all I could stand to listen to Ben that guy has a very quirky and irritating speaking style.
Some people's style isn't appealing to others. That's OK. Some people's style isn't appealing to me. You take the good with the bad.
But, at least they are not left-wingers where their style is the least of what's wrong with them.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 02:05:55 PMSome people's style isn't appealing to others. That's OK. Some people's style isn't appealing to me. You take the good with the bad.
But, at least they are not left-wingers where their style is the least of what's wrong with them.
They're anti-Trump, who think Trump lost the 2020 election, and are an extension of Silicon Valley social media.
With friend like that, who needs enemies?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 01:35:51 PMIf you are going to expose a phone call, don't exclude things that will expose the truth. The phone call was cordial and was mainly two friends talking. Crowder pulled the left-wing media move to edit it to try to make the CEO look like a bad guy. A Conservative should have enough integrity to not do that. That is why I never believe any clip put out there. You see the police strike the skateboarder, but you don't see the events leading up to that. We all need to hate that.
Was the full recording ever released? Do we know it was deliberately taken out of context?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 22, 2023, 05:12:54 PMWas the full recording ever released? Do we know it was deliberately taken out of context?
As far as we know, the CEO hasn't recorded the phone call. Crowder obviously recorded the phone call and played a small bit of it on his show. At least one time before, Crowder has pulled a stunt like this. While on his show, he spoke with somebody "on the phone".
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 22, 2023, 08:58:19 PMAs far as we know, the CEO hasn't recorded the phone call. Crowder obviously recorded the phone call and played a small bit of it on his show. At least one time before, Crowder has pulled a stunt like this. While on his show, he spoke with somebody "on the phone".
Sick Of Silence: "It's bad to record and play back a conservative outlet who is under control of satanic Silicon Valley social media platforms..."
I suppose you'd rather us not know for certain how DW implements their business model.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 21, 2023, 10:11:18 PMIt just seems like all these people have to say about crowder is they dont like his style here and then they attack him personally. They never seem to have a valid defense for their supporting big tech censorship.
Plus we now know, from the contract, that candace and ben HAVE to say what they are saying, they dont have a choice in the matter. So how can we take them as sincere?
It seems like that was genuine anger towards Crowder from both of them.
The offer letter might not had been the greatest. To some people, they would love to work for that type of an organization. I still don't believe Crowder's plan was to go work for them.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 23, 2023, 11:02:33 AMIt seems like that was genuine anger towards Crowder from both of them.
The offer letter might not had been the greatest. To some people, they would love to work for that type of an organization. I still don't believe Crowder's plan was to go work for them.
Crowder knocked out DW last night on Tim Fool's show. They tried to poach employees from Crowder? They use traffic assignment?
DW is a real piece of work. Once he gets it up I'm joining Mug Club.
Full show from last night:
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 19, 2023, 09:18:56 PM
I watched the YouTube video and I don't see any issue with what Daily Wire did.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 03:33:13 PMI watched the YouTube video and I don't see any issue with what Daily Wire did.
Poaching employees from "friends" or using traffic assignment?
Quote from: taxed on January 25, 2023, 03:34:41 PMPoaching employees from "friends" or using traffic assignment?
Poaching? Crowder was a free agent or soon to become a free agent and taking offers. Do you not support the right of people to shop for the best opportunity available to them?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 03:36:22 PMPoaching? Crowder was a free agent or soon to become a free agent and taking offers. Do you not support the right of people to shop for the best opportunity available to them?
You said you watched the video. You've been caught in a lie.
Quote from: taxed on January 25, 2023, 03:36:51 PMYou said you watched the video. You've been caught in a lie.
Really? I'd love to know how I lied given that Crowder himself said he went into free agency
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 04:53:47 PMReally? I'd love to know how I lied given that Crowder himself said he went into free agency
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Everyone who watched the video is laughing at you right now...
Quote from: taxed on January 25, 2023, 05:05:40 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Everyone who watched the video is laughing at you right now...
I watched the Crowder video and DW's response. How am I lying?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 05:14:48 PMI watched the Crowder video and DW's response. How am I lying?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No you didn't...
(for those following, ZM is trying to slip in the previous Boreing video to act like he was confused about the video to which I'm referring, which was the Pool video)
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 03:33:13 PMI watched the YouTube video and I don't see any issue with what Daily Wire did.
Ya but we also showed you all the people dying from the vax and you dont thing thats an issue either. So your reputation for absorbing information is quite lacking at the moment...
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 03:33:13 PMI watched the YouTube video and I don't see any issue with what Daily Wire did.
So you are cool with the govt using big tech to remove free speech from its own citizens like DW does?
Quote from: taxed on January 25, 2023, 05:46:50 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No you didn't...
I did. So, again how am I lying?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 25, 2023, 06:13:29 PMSo you are cool with the govt using big tech to remove free speech from its own citizens like DW does?
Crowder was not ever planning to go to Daily Wire. It did not make financial sense, nor did it make compatibility sense. Crowder's style is too brash versus Matt Walsh or Jordan Peterson or anybody else who has that calm style.
Hopefully, you can understand the difference between being silenced by YouTube or Twitter, and knowing when to mind your P's and Q's if you were to work for an organization like Daily Wire.
Crowder should have responded that he would not give up certain perks, or just license his show to be broadcast on DW, or something. He used Daily Wire for his own gain. However, people now see what Crowder is like. Nobody will trust him to do business with. You don't burn bridges.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 25, 2023, 06:32:18 PMI did.
No you didn't.
QuoteSo, again how am I lying?
Not very well. I give you a 2/10, but a 10/10 for effort.
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 09:30:25 AMNo you didn't.
Not very well. I give you a 2/10, but a 10/10 for effort.
I watched them both. Crowder specifically said he was a free agen. I used the SAME terminology as Crowder. So again what am I lying about?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 25, 2023, 06:40:13 PMCrowder was not ever planning to go to Daily Wire.
Complete unfounded speculation on your part.
QuoteIt did not make financial sense,
Not at the disrespectful offer.
Quotenor did it make compatibility sense. Crowder's style is too brash versus Matt Walsh
Sure. Matt Walsh, who did an excellent job demolishing the trannie woke crap (even with the best selling trannie book), or Owens, who completely exposed BLM. Nothing hotbutton over there happening at all.
I'm sure Crowder's skits or "Change my Mind" would just be crickets with the DW audience.
Quoteor Jordan Peterson or anybody else who has that calm style.
I'm no fan of Peterson, but they're sending him to a reeducation camp, so he must not be that "calm".
QuoteHopefully, you can understand the difference between being silenced by YouTube or Twitter, and knowing when to mind your P's and Q's if you were to work for an organization like Daily Wire.
You really aren't getting this at all. You're not faking.
QuoteCrowder should have responded that he would not give up certain perks, or just license his show to be broadcast on DW, or something. He used Daily Wire for his own gain. However, people now see what Crowder is like. Nobody will trust him to do business with. You don't burn bridges.
You really don't understand what's happening, and I can tell you didn't watch the Pool video either.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 09:34:49 AMI watched them both. Crowder specifically said he was a free agen. I used the SAME terminology as Crowder. So again what am I lying about?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No you didn't!
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 09:37:23 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No you didn't!
Yes, I did.
SO, AGAIN, what am I lying about?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 09:39:15 AMYes, I did.
SO, AGAIN, what am I lying about?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
If you watched it and went back over the posts, you'd know how I know that you didn't watch it...
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 09:41:37 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
If you watched it and went back over the posts, you'd know how I know that you didn't watch it...
I don't need to go back over it. I said that nobody was attempting to poach anyone because Crowder was a free agent - his own words. You then accused me of lying about watching the videos, even though I was the one using the same phrase as Crowder.
So, again, what am I lying about?
If you think I'm going to stop asking, you're wrong.
I know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it.
When I was referencing "poaching", which in the business world means stealing another's employees, I was referring to what Crowder brought up multiple times on Pool's show and was a big revelation, which is after their negotiations, DW tried to poach multiple employees. One employee (Gary, his social media guy) let Crowder show the emails on Pool's show, but there's other employees they went after.
"Poaching" had absolutely nothing to do with Crowder.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 09:51:45 AMI know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it.
When I was referencing "poaching", which in the business world means stealing another's employees, I was referring to what Crowder brought up multiple times on Pool's show and was a big revelation, which is after their negotiations, DW tried to poach multiple employees. One employee (Gary, his social media guy) let Crowder show the emails on Pool's show, but there's other employees they went after.
"Poaching" had absolutely nothing to do with Crowder.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
More BS from you. So, now we know your claims of lying were lies in themselves. What did you bust me for?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 09:59:02 AMMore BS from you. So, now we know your claims of lying were lies in themselves. What did you bust me for?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:00:01 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yep... all you can do is laugh because you're full of shit.
Maybe know what you're talking about before accusing someone of lying.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 10:02:32 AMYep... all you can do is laugh because you're full of shit.
Maybe know what you're talking about before accusing someone of lying.
I busted you. You didn't even know about a major issue Crowder and Pool discussed about DW.
You shouldn't tell lies.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:05:33 AMI busted you. You didn't even know about a major issue Crowder and Pool discussed about DW.
You shouldn't tell lies.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
For the second time, I watched the Crowder video and the DW video. So, again what did I lie about and what did you bust me for? You think that your assumptions are the same as me lying or you busting me?
I just told you re: poaching.
You didn't even know about it.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:12:26 AMI just told you re: poaching.
You didn't even know about it.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Because I didn't watch that specific video. I never claimed I watched that specific video. So, AGAIN, what did I lie about and what did you bust me on?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 10:14:42 AMBecause I didn't watch that specific video. I never claimed I watched that specific video. So, AGAIN, what did I lie about and what did you bust me on?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:17:21 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
exactly. You've got nothing but lol emojis. You're the liar here. Not me.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 10:25:06 AMexactly. You've got nothing but lol emojis. You're the liar here. Not me.
Go back to post #51...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:28:16 AMGo back to post #51...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Done. And?
I watched Crowder's youtube video on Rumble, where he specifically referred to himself as a free agent and I watched DW's response to Crowder's youtube video. That is two videos.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 10:59:15 AMDone. And?
I watched Crowder's youtube video on Rumble, where he specifically referred to himself as a free agent and I watched DW's response to Crowder's youtube video. That is two videos.
I can't believe this BS is over different videos.
:thumbdown:
Hell, I watched other people's videos, and they seem to point out that Crowder did some poaching of himself.
Honestly, it is all about the individual person. Should I stay or should I go? Yes. The offer could have been presented differently. But, it's no different if I don't work. I have to take a vacation day if I am not sick or injured.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 10:59:15 AMDone. And?
I watched Crowder's youtube video on Rumble, where he specifically referred to himself as a free agent and I watched DW's response to Crowder's youtube video. That is two videos.
Now check the first sentence of post #55.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 26, 2023, 11:19:20 AMI can't believe this BS is over different videos.
:thumbdown:
Hell, I watched other people's videos, and they seem to point out that Crowder did some poaching of himself.
Honestly, it is all about the individual person. Should I stay or should I go? Yes. The offer could have been presented differently. But, it's no different if I don't work. I have to take a vacation day if I am not sick or injured.
Crowder brought hard evidence.
Try again.
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 11:48:22 AMNow check the first sentence of post #55.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"I was referring to what Crowder brought up multiple times on Pool's show and was a big revelation...."
Ok. So, AGAIN, where did I lie and what did you bust me on?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 12:30:56 PM"I was referring to what Crowder brought up multiple times on Pool's show and was a big revelation...."
Ok. So, AGAIN, where did I lie and what did you bust me on?
You said you watched the videos... I knew you didn't and caught you in a lie. You're a liar.
Again, it's why you botched "poaching", because you don't know what that is, and didn't know Crowder proved that DW was doing that on Pool's show, which again, YOU DIDN'T WATCH!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 10:00:01 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
He doesnt even know the subject at hand and thinks he can spout off about it and make a point!
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 01:01:41 PMYou said you watched the videos... I knew you didn't and caught you in a lie. You're a liar.
Again, it's why you botched "poaching", because you don't know what that is, and didn't know Crowder proved that DW was doing that on Pool's show, which again, YOU DIDN'T WATCH!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yes, it's called a misunderstanding or miscommunication, not lying. To any reasonable person, which I'm clearly not dealing with, it would be clear by my second post that we were probably talking about different videos, you're just too big of a prick to acknowledge it.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 26, 2023, 11:19:20 AMI can't believe this BS is over different videos.
:thumbdown:
Hell, I watched other people's videos, and they seem to point out that Crowder did some poaching of himself.
Honestly, it is all about the individual person. Should I stay or should I go? Yes. The offer could have been presented differently. But, it's no different if I don't work. I have to take a vacation day if I am not sick or injured.
You seem to keep ignoring the fact that DW and the rest of the like are supporting big tech censorship, and forcing it on young conservatives. Thats the crux here that you dont want to address.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:27:51 PMYes, it's called a misunderstanding or miscommunication, not lying. To any reasonable person, which I'm clearly not dealing with, it would be clear by my second post that we were talking about different videos, you're just too big of a prick to acknowledge it.
:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
But you have a history of lying on this site. This is just another example.
You tried to say crowder was in the wrong and then taxed proved you wrong and you still cant admit that he was right and you were wrong. Even if it was a mistake you could at least admit that much, right?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 01:30:08 PM:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
But you have a history of lying on this site. This is just another example.
You tried to say crowder was in the wrong and then taxed proved you wrong and you still cant admit that he was right and you were wrong. Even if it was a mistake you could at least admit that much, right?
I never said Crowder was wrong. I said Crowder was a free agent and that DW did nothing wrong by trying to hire him.
I swear I'm in the freaking Twilight Zone here.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:37:09 PMI never said Crowder was wrong. I said Crowder was a free agent and that DW did nothing wrong by trying to hire him.
I swear I'm in the freaking Twilight Zone here.
Are you 12? If you claim DW did nothing wrong then you are indirectly claiming crowder was wrong. :bigl :bigl :bigl
Billy was right, no amount of deductive reasoning in you libbies.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 01:39:22 PMAre you 12? If you claim DW did nothing wrong then you are indirectly claiming crowder was wrong. :bigl :bigl :bigl
Billy was right, no amount of deductive reasoning in you libbies.
"Are you 12?"
Irony as thick and rich as the thickest, blackest tar ever to exist.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:41:00 PM"Are you 12?"
Irony as thick and rich as the thickest, blackest tar ever to exist.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
See, you did claim crowder was wrong and you got proven wrong and now you cant even admit you were wrong. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Plus you got caught lying about claiming crowder was wrong and now you are pissed. :bigl
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 01:45:07 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
See you did claim crowder was wrong and you got proven wrong and now you cant even admit you were wrong. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Crowder said nothing about poaching in his video so I wouldn't say Crowder was wrong, because it would make no sense.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:46:57 PMCrowder said nothing about poaching in his video so I wouldn't say Crowder was wrong, because it would make no sense.
BRO YOU JUST DID IT AGAIN!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ok since you are only 12 ill try and explain in small words...
Watch the video taxed told you to, then you can talk on the subject.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 01:48:36 PMBRO YOU JUST DID IT AGAIN!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ok since you are only 12 ill try and explain in small words...
Watch the video taxed told you to, then you can talk on the subject.
I'll spell this out as clearly as I can. I watched both videos. DW and Crowder's description of events proved that DW was not poaching Crowder. The ONLY issue here is that I was talking about A and others were talking about B. The only lying going on it Taxed's claim that it's a fact that I was lying.
Again, I feel like I'm in the God damn Twilight Zone.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:54:30 PMI'll spell this out as clearly as I can. I watched both videos.
Moot point. Until you watch the video taxed provided as proof of his claims then you are in no position to discuss with the educated adults on this topic.
QuoteDW and Crowder's description of events proved that DW was not poaching Crowder.
:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
Gotta watch the vid bro, or you will continue to make yourself look the fool by making such foolish claims.
QuoteThe ONLY issue here is that I was talking about A and others were talking about B. The only lying going on it Taxed's claim that it's a fact that I was lying.
No its not. You keep claiming taxed lied about poaching without actually looking at his proof of poaching. Thats why you are the butt of so much humor right now. :bigl
Thank you. I needed that right now.
QuoteAgain, I feel like I'm in the God damn Twilight Zone.
Thats your fairytale land delusion falling apart. Your information bubble is being popped.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 02:01:42 PMMoot point. Until you watch the video taxed provided as proof of his claims then you are in no position to discuss with the educated adults on this topic.
:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
Gotta watch the vid bro, or you will continue to make yourself look the fool by making such foolish claims.No its not. You keep claiming taxed lied about poaching without actually looking at his proof of poaching. Thats why you are the butt of so much humor right now. :bigl
Thank you. I needed that right now.
Thats your fairytale land delusion falling apart. Your information bubble is being popped.
You are delusional. I'm quickly reminded why interacting with you is an exercise in futility.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:27:51 PMYes, it's called a misunderstanding or miscommunication, not lying. To any reasonable person, which I'm clearly not dealing with, it would be clear by my second post that we were probably talking about different videos, you're just too big of a prick to acknowledge it.
You mean before or after you were caught lying?
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 01:26:13 PM:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
He doesnt even know the subject at hand and thinks he can spout off about it and make a point!
Thankfully he's so dumb that it's funny....
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:37:09 PMI never said Crowder was wrong. I said Crowder was a free agent and that DW did nothing wrong by trying to hire him.
I swear I'm in the freaking Twilight Zone here.
How is Poaching the owner of the company trying to hire a free agent? Please, do explain for the class.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 01:46:57 PMCrowder said nothing about poaching in his video so I wouldn't say Crowder was wrong, because it would make no sense.
Yes he did. He PROVED that DW tried to poach his employees.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 02:03:48 PMYou are delusional. I'm quickly reminded why interacting with you is an exercise in futility.
See, you run away from the conversation as soon as your lack of counter evidence is exposed. :bigl
Dont be mad just because we exposed your lies.
(https://i.postimg.cc/MZ5RSY9B/324a70867aa5e62a46d2cbc94e398ebbed6ba65156e84cf2f7fdc0f45253346e-1.jpg)
Reminder...
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 09:51:45 AMI know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it.
When I was referencing "poaching", which in the business world means stealing another's employees, I was referring to what Crowder brought up multiple times on Pool's show and was a big revelation, which is after their negotiations, DW tried to poach multiple employees. One employee (Gary, his social media guy) let Crowder show the emails on Pool's show, but there's other employees they went after.
"Poaching" had absolutely nothing to do with Crowder.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 02:40:22 PMReminder...
"I know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it."
I don't even know what it is that you think I won't watch.
I never said I knew about it. In fact, I have already said that I did not know about whatever video it is you are referring to.
You started off that post 0-2, yet continue to claim that you know I was lying. You are going to believe whatever you want to believe, I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince somebody that is not going to be convinced.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 02:55:58 PM"I know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it."
I don't even know what it is that you think I won't watch.
I never said I knew about it. In fact, I have already said that I did not know about whatever video it is you are referring to.
You started off that post 0-2, yet continue to claim that you know I was lying. You are going to believe whatever you want to believe, I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince somebody that is not going to be convinced.
Did you watch Crowder on Pool's show? Yes or no?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 02:55:58 PM"I know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it."
I don't even know what it is that you think I won't watch.
I never said I knew about it. In fact, I have already said that I did not know about whatever video it is you are referring to.
You started off that post 0-2, yet continue to claim that you know I was lying. You are going to believe whatever you want to believe, I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince somebody that is not going to be convinced.
Good Lord! I can't believe he just said that! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think he's running out of leftist talking points. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Possum on January 26, 2023, 03:02:11 PMGood Lord! I can't believe he just said that!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think he's running out of leftist talking points. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
He's pretty embarrassed after being exposed in his lie.
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 03:08:04 PMHe's pretty embarrassed after being exposed in his lie.
Well, it did take more than just lack of knowledge. He gives the chess playing pigeon a run for his money. :lol:
Quote from: Possum on January 26, 2023, 03:12:34 PMWell, it did take more than just lack of knowledge. He gives the chess playing pigeon a run for his money. :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
...until the poor pigeon has him in a checkmate and Zen flips the board over...
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 02:55:58 PM"I know you won't watch it and after I bust you here, you'll attempt to conflate and say you knew about it."
I don't even know what it is that you think I won't watch.
I never said I knew about it. In fact, I have already said that I did not know about whatever video it is you are referring to.
You started off that post 0-2, yet continue to claim that you know I was lying. You are going to believe whatever you want to believe, I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince somebody that is not going to be convinced.
Wow youre an idiot :bigl
Go back to post #35.
https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/steven-crowder-demolishes-little-person-ben-and-daily-wire/msg501200/#msg501200
Taxed posted the crowder/tim pool video and then you posted a response to SoS saying you watched the video and didnt have a problem with DW. Thus implying you had watched all the videos posted to that point, much less the video posted immediately above yours, post #34.
Here it is again, crowder proving poaching...
Now watch, you will pivot and claim you didnt see it. :lol:
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 03:20:17 PMWow youre an idiot :bigl
Go back to post #35.
https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/steven-crowder-demolishes-little-person-ben-and-daily-wire/msg501200/#msg501200
Taxed posted the crowder/tim pool video and then you posted a response to SoS saying you watched the video and didnt have a problem with DW. Thus implying you had watched all the videos posted to that point, much less the video posted immediately above yours, post #34.
Here it is again, crowder proving poaching...
Now watch, you will pivot and claim you didnt see it. :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 03:01:23 PMDid you watch Crowder on Pool's show? Yes or no?
No. I watched the two videos in the first few posts and then replied to the claim about poaching, THINKING it was in regard to one of the first two videos.
These are things to clarify BEFORE calling someone a liar.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 04:19:32 PMNo. I watched the two videos in the first few posts and then replied to the claim about poaching, THINKING it was in regard to one of the first two videos.
These are things to clarify BEFORE calling someone a liar.
:bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl :bigl
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 04:19:32 PMNo. I watched the two videos in the first few posts and then replied to the claim about poaching, THINKING it was in regard to one of the first two videos.
These are things to clarify BEFORE calling someone a liar.
QuoteNow watch, you will pivot and claim you didnt see it. :lol:
CALLED IT!
Quote from: ZenMode on January 26, 2023, 04:19:32 PMNo. I watched the two videos in the first few posts and then replied to the claim about poaching, THINKING it was in regard to one of the first two videos.
These are things to clarify BEFORE calling someone a liar.
I know. That's what I've been trying to tell you.
Quote from: T Hunt on January 26, 2023, 03:20:17 PMWow youre an idiot :bigl
Go back to post #35.
https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/political-discussion-and-debate/steven-crowder-demolishes-little-person-ben-and-daily-wire/msg501200/#msg501200
Taxed posted the crowder/tim pool video and then you posted a response to SoS saying you watched the video and didnt have a problem with DW. Thus implying you had watched all the videos posted to that point, much less the video posted immediately above yours, post #34.
Here it is again, crowder proving poaching...
Now watch, you will pivot and claim you didnt see it. :lol:
Quoting me was at least was discussing the Daily Wire video. I never viewed his post as anything else. My comment was about Crowder, and Zen's comment was about Daily Wire.
Regardless how the offer was presented, it was interesting information. I see as "glass half empty" in nature (focused on penalties), when it should have been "glass half full" (focused on rewards). I am looking at this not as a political mindset, but a business mindset.
I don't necessarily see recruiting as poaching. It ultimately comes down to the person. Money, or loyalty. What is personally important to you. It's like the wife blaming the hooker when the husband cheats.
QuoteRegardless how the offer was presented, it was interesting information. I see as "glass half empty" in nature (focused on penalties), when it should have been "glass half full" (focused on rewards). I am looking at this not as a political mindset, but a business mindset
With all due respect, it's not about how you look at it, it's about how Crowder thinks of it. Its not about penalties verses rewards to him, it's about how they do business, cow towing to Big Tech and more specifically "Big Social" handicapping the growth of the conservative movement.
Quote from: taxed on January 26, 2023, 01:01:41 PMYou said you watched the videos... I knew you didn't and caught you in a lie. You're a liar.
Right, I said I watched the videos because I THOUGHT I watched ALL the videos. Me believing I watched all the videos, and being wrong, doesn't make me a liar. It makes me wrong. If you weren't so obtuse you'd see that.
QuoteAgain, it's why you botched "poaching", because you don't know what that is, and didn't know Crowder proved that DW was doing that on Pool's show, which again, YOU DIDN'T WATCH!
Well, no shit. I didn't watch the third video because I only got a few posts into the thread, watched what I believed to be all related videos, and replied.
YOU said poaching had nothing to do with Crowder. The fact that I clearly thought it did SHOULD have been a clear sign that something was missing. That "something" was me not watching the third video.
QuoteQuote:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Sauce on January 27, 2023, 04:06:27 AMWith all due respect, it's not about how you look at it, it's about how Crowder thinks of it. Its not about penalties verses rewards to him, it's about how they do business, cow towing to Big Tech and more specifically "Big Social" handicapping the growth of the conservative movement.
EXACTLY!!!
Quote from: Sauce on January 27, 2023, 04:06:27 AMWith all due respect, it's not about how you look at it, it's about how Crowder thinks of it. Its not about penalties verses rewards to him, it's about how they do business, cow towing to Big Tech and more specifically "Big Social" handicapping the growth of the conservative movement.
Daily Wire, as their representative mentioned in the video, isn't a non-profit. They are a business that has to be concerned about financial stability. As a result, they rely their talent's social media presence, as described in the offer to Crowder, to pay their bills. If Crowder does something dumb, and gets kicked off of Twitter, Youtube, etc, there's a business impact.
That is completely separate from the anti-censorship aspect.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 26, 2023, 11:05:34 PMQuoting me was at least was discussing the Daily Wire video. I never viewed his post as anything else. My comment was about Crowder, and Zen's comment was about Daily Wire.
Regardless how the offer was presented, it was interesting information. I see as "glass half empty" in nature (focused on penalties), when it should have been "glass half full" (focused on rewards). I am looking at this not as a political mindset, but a business mindset.
I don't necessarily see recruiting as poaching. It ultimately comes down to the person. Money, or loyalty. What is personally important to you. It's like the wife blaming the hooker when the husband cheats.
It must be sad to live in a world where you have no respect for others. DW had zero respect for Crowder, hence why they give him an insulting, disrespectful deal, and tried to steal employees behind his back.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 04:36:28 AMRight, I said I watched the videos because I THOUGHT I watched ALL the videos.
No. I caught you in a lie.
QuoteMe believing I watched all the videos, and being wrong, doesn't make me a liar. It makes me wrong. If you weren't so obtuse you'd see that.
You never batted an eye when I said you didn't watch the video... you doubled and tripled down and continued to lie and assume "poaching" was in reference to Crowder.
QuoteWell, no shit. I didn't watch the third video because I only got a few posts into the thread, watched what I believed to be all related videos, and replied. YOU said poaching had nothing to do with Crowder. The fact that I clearly thought it did SHOULD have been a clear sign that something was missing. That "something" was me not watching the third video.
You lied and got caught. That's all. You are famous for not knowing the material or information, yet arguing it anyway, which is what you attempted to do here.
You're a liar. At no time did you attempt to clarify, but instead doubled down on your lie.
Stop lying. Life will be better for you.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 07:41:12 AMDaily Wire, as their representative mentioned in the video, isn't a non-profit.
Neither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content and Mug Club revenue in perpetuity isn't a serious deal, and they disrespected and wasted Crowder's time... THEN went after his employees.
QuoteThey are a business that has to be concerned about financial stability.
That's very nice of you to be concerned for them to find that stability with Silicon Valley terms of service.
QuoteAs a result, they rely their talent's social media presence,
Crowder was already demonetized on YouTube. Care to try again?
Quoteas described in the offer to Crowder, to pay their bills. If Crowder does something dumb, and gets kicked off of Twitter, YouTube, etc, there's a business impact.
You forgot about the Mug Club revenue he brings to DW that MORE than makes up for revenue that wouldn't be lost because he's demonetized. Care to try again?
QuoteThat is completely separate from the anti-censorship aspect.
You really don't get this, do you?
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 08:42:10 AMNeither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content and Mug Club revenue in perpetuity isn't a serious deal, and they disrespected and wasted Crowder's time... THEN went after his employees.
Oh, this is exciting. Turnabout is fair play, right? With that being said, you are a LIAR! The contract stated, if you actually watched the DW response, that DW owns Crowders back catalog (things DW didn't produce)
during the term of the contract only, not perpetuity.QuoteThat's very nice of you to be concerned for them to find that stability with Silicon Valley terms of service.
I'm not concerned. I don't work for DW and don't benefit financially by their existence.
QuoteCrowder was already demonetized on YouTube. Care to try again?
I'm aware of that. It was just an example of a media platform mentioned in the contract
QuoteYou forgot about the Mug Club revenue he brings to DW that MORE than makes up for revenue that wouldn't be lost because he's demonetized. Care to try again?
Even if true, which is not a guarantee, that's part of the negotiations. Per the DW video, which you apparently didn't watch, Crowder didn't even know how many subscribers he had.
QuoteYou really don't get this, do you?
Says the known liar :rolleyes:
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 10:03:05 AMOh, this is exciting. Turnabout is fair play, right? With that being said, you are a LIAR! The contract stated, if you actually watched the DW response, that DW owns Crowders back catalog (things DW didn't produce) during the term of the contract only, not perpetuity.
Why do you keep lying?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyJBb_ddp5Q
QuoteI'm not concerned. I don't work for DW and don't benefit financially by their existence.
You are correct, you don't financially benefit from being informed about ANY news or current events.
QuoteI'm aware of that. It was just an example of a media platform mentioned in the contract
Wow.
QuoteEven if true, which is not a guarantee, that's part of the negotiations. Per the DW video, which you apparently didn't watch, Crowder didn't even know how many subscribers he had.
Crowder does know a minimum number of subscribers he has, which is at least 350k.
That means he has more than that. I'll score that as half a lie, as it's technically correct, but your attempt to imply he has no idea at all to even leverage in negotiations is a lie.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 10:51:31 AMWhy do you keep lying?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyJBb_ddp5Q
Sorry, but it appears that Crowder is as much a liar as you.
DW shows the offer each step of the way, so it's clear as day.
If the video doesn't automatically do it, just skip to 14:20.
https://youtu.be/NyCc5o1KDHU?t=838
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 11:20:29 AMSorry, but it appears that Crowder is as much a liar as you.
DW shows the offer each step of the way, so it's clear as day.
If the video doesn't automatically do it, just skip to 14:20.
https://youtu.be/NyCc5o1KDHU?t=838
No. Daily Wire would take Mug Club rev IN PERPETUITY, just as The Blaze is/has been doing. That's why Crowder doesn't know his actual Mug Club numbers. That's why Crowder is so valuable, because he brings those paying members.
It's really odd you don't understand or grasp that.
You may not know this, but when Crowder/Gerald says "100% of the company", that actually includes 100% of the company, including Mug Club, which is part of the company.
Boering also contradicted himself when he said Crowder likes to produce his own content, and in your clip, he'd own content because DW produced it (...but they said the deal was tailored to Crowder doing his own production??).
Try again.....
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 11:37:16 AMNo. Daily Wire would take Mug Club rev IN PERPETUITY, just as The Blaze is/has been doing. That's why Crowder doesn't know his actual Mug Club numbers. That's why Crowder is so valuable, because he brings those paying members.
It's really odd you don't understand or grasp that.
You may not know this, but when Crowder/Gerald says "100% of the company", that actually includes 100% of the company, including Mug Club, which is part of the company.
Boering also contradicted himself when he said Crowder likes to produce his own content, and in your clip, he'd own content because DW produced it (...but they said the deal was tailored to Crowder doing his own production??).
Try again.....
Why do you keep lying. You didn't say Mug Club revenue. You said ALL content and mug club revenue:
Neither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content and Mug Club revenue in perpetuity isn't a serious deal, and they disrespected and wasted Crowder's time... THEN went after his employees.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 11:57:51 AMWhy do you keep lying. You didn't say Mug Club revenue. You said ALL content and mug club revenue:
Neither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content and Mug Club revenue in perpetuity isn't a serious deal, and they disrespected and wasted Crowder's time... THEN went after his employees.
It's almost as if there was a reason Crowder didn't move forward with the deal. Care to guess why that was?
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 12:18:17 PMIt's almost as if there was a reason Crowder didn't move forward with the deal. Care to guess why that was?
So, why did you lie about DW keeping all of Crowder's content when they weren't going to?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 01:21:06 PMSo, why did you lie about DW keeping all of Crowder's content when they weren't going to?
Pop quiz: Who owns "What is a women?" forever in perpetuity, just like they wanted to do with Crowder's content?
(hint: not Matt Walsh)
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 04:15:18 PMPop quiz: Who owns "What is a women?" forever in perpetuity, just like they wanted to do with Crowder's content?
(hint: not Matt Walsh)
Doubling down on the lies. Nice! Had you actually watched the DW video to under stand the offer, which you clearly did not, anything Crowder made BEFORE signing on with DW, he gets back when/if he leaves DW.
Yes, anything a DW employee makes, while employed at DW, DW owns the rights to.
Of course, you lied and said ALL content.
Why do you keep lying??
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 04:31:40 PMDoubling down on the lies. Nice! Had you actually watched the DW video to under stand the offer, which you clearly did not, anything Crowder made BEFORE signing on with DW, he gets back when/if he leaves DW. Yes, anything a DW employee makes, whole employed at DW, DW owns the rights to.
Of course, you lied and said ALL content.
Why do you keep lying??
DW said they know Crowder does his own production.
Care to try again?
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 04:33:31 PMDW said they know Crowder does his own production.
Care to try again?
There is no "try again". Anything an employee makes, whether it's Matt Walsh, Candace Owens, etc, is owned by the company. Do you think Jerry Seinfeld owns the Seinfeld show? Do you think Harrison Ford owns the Star Wars movies he starred in?
Either way, the offer SPECIFICALLY says Crowder gets back EVERYTHING he made, before he was at DW, if he leaves DW.
That is not DW keep "ALL" content.
So, again, why do you keep lying?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 04:41:55 PMThere is no "try again". Anything an employee makes, whether it's Matt Walsh, Candace Owens, etc, is owned by the company. Do you think Jerry Seinfeld owns the Seinfeld show? Do you think Harrison Ford owns the Star Wars movies he starred in?
Either way, the offer SPECIFICALLY says Crowder gets back EVERYTHING he made, before he was at DW, if he leaves DW.
That is not DW keep "ALL" content.
So, again, why do you keep lying?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Correct! Now, tell us for how long?
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 04:43:35 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Correct! Now, tell us for how long?
Forever. But AGAIN, anything Crowder made BEFORE coming to DW he gets back. Again, you said all content. So you tell me if DW keeps all content or not.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 04:46:11 PMForever. But AGAIN, anything Crowder made BEFORE coming to DW he gets back. Again, you said all content. So you tell me if DW keeps all content or not.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
And they said I couldn't teach you any new tricks...
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 04:47:04 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
And they said I couldn't teach you any new tricks...
does DW keep all of Crowders content or just the content he makes while employed at DW?
Would you like me to copy and paste your exact words again, liar?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 04:51:09 PMdoes DW keep all of Crowders content or just the content he makes while employed at DW?
License his back catalog, and own all other content during DW term, and Mug Club rev.
QuoteWould you like me to copy and paste your exact words again, liar?
That would be great! It will save me time.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:12:51 PMLicense his back catalog, and own all other content during DW term, and Mug Club rev.
That would be great! It will save me time.
Here's your quote:
"Neither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content and Mug Club revenue in perpetuity isn't a serious deal, and they disrespected and wasted Crowder's time... THEN went after his employees."
Yes or no, does DW keep
all of Crowders content in perpetuity?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:15:54 PMHere's your quote:
"Neither is Crowder. Paying DW for the rights to own all Crowder's content
Correct. Crowder, if he did that DW contract, would be producing content. That's actually what he does, and what DW would pay him for. Not sure why that's confusing to you.
QuoteYes or no, does DW keep all of Crowders content in perpetuity?
Yes. They'd also own the license to his catalog.
I'm waiting for you to give me the punchline you believe you have...
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:19:06 PMCorrect. Crowder, if he did that DW contract, would be producing content. That's actually what he does, and what DW would pay him for. Not sure why that's confusing to you.
Yes. They'd also own the license to his catalog.
I'm waiting for you to give me the punchline you believe you have...
You are a liar. I posted the YouTube video and gave you the exact time where you can see the wording of the offer sheets. It's specifically says Crowder gets everything back that he made before signing with DW.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:24:05 PMYou are a liar. I posted the YouTube video and gave you the exact time where you can see the wording of the offer sheets. It's specifically says Crowder gets everything back that he made before signing with DW.
When did I say he gives up his back catalog forever? Please post where I said he'd lose his back catalog forever.
He'd lose Mug Club rev and content created under DW forever.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:26:23 PMWhen did I say he gives up his back catalog forever? Please post where I said he'd lose his back catalog forever.
He'd lose Mug Club rev and content created under DW forever.
when you said "all content" you damn liar!
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:27:40 PMwhen you said "all content" you damn liar!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
That's not his back catalog license you dimwit!
Why did I use the example of Owens' and Walsh's docs under DW to pin you down on perpetuity? All content under DW, which is what the contract is about, is what DW would own in perpetuity.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:30:23 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
That's not his back catalog license you dimwit!
Why did I use the example of Owens' and Walsh's docs under DW to pin you down on perpetuity? All content under DW, which is what the contract is about, is what DW would own in perpetuity.
You use those examples after the
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:30:23 PM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
That's not his back catalog license you dimwit!
Why did I use the example of Owens' and Walsh's docs under DW to pin you down on perpetuity? All content under DW, which is what the contract is about, is what DW would own in perpetuity.
You use the example of Walsh after the fact to try and cover your lying ass. All content means all content. You don't get to manipulate the meaning of words to try and cover for your dishonesty.
And where did you mention Candace Owens?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:35:29 PMYou use those examples after the You use the example of Walsh after the fact to try and cover your lying ass.
If that makes you feel better, I won't ruin your hope.
QuoteAll content means all content. You don't get to manipulate the meaning of words to try and cover for your dishonesty.
I'm sorry. I thought you knew the difference between all content created under DW vs Crowder's catalog. I do apologize for not taking into consideration your idiocy.
QuoteAnd where did you mention Candace Owens?
Oh, my bad, I didn't... YOU DID! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 05:46:24 PMIf that makes you feel better, I won't ruin your hope.
I'm sorry. I thought you knew the difference between all content created under DW vs Crowder's catalog. I do apologize for not taking into consideration your idiocy.
I do know the difference and I watched the DW video to know that the different types of content were being handled differently. As such, I am not a liar like you.
QuoteOh, my bad, I didn't... YOU DID! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Sorry. There are no mistakes or misunderstandings. This is another clear example of you being a liar. Own it.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 06:08:20 PMI do know the difference and I watched the DW video so I knew how the different types of content were being handled.
No, you're confused. It's not your fault. I blame your parents.
QuoteYou are the liar to claim that all of Crowders content was going to be owned, in perpetuity, by DW.
I know the difference between content created under DW and Crowder's license to his catalog. Those aren't the same thing, and is also distinguished in the DW term sheet, read by Boreing in the video YOU posted.
QuoteNope. Sorry. There are no mistakes or misunderstandings. This is just another example of you being a liar. Own it.
You brought up Owens, backing up my argument against you. I'd thank you for doing so, but I didn't need your help in debunking your own argument... you were already flailing.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 06:16:19 PMNo, you're confused. It's not your fault. I blame your parents.
I know the difference between content created under DW and Crowder's license to his catalog. Those aren't the same thing, and is also distinguished in the DW term sheet, read by Boreing in the video YOU posted.
You brought up Owens, backing up my argument against you. I'd thank you for doing so, but I didn't need your help in debunking your own argument... you were already flailing.
If you know the difference, then it's odd that you would lie about DW owning the rights to all content and perpetuity.
Again, you lied and said that you referenced Candice Owens. Own the lie. There are no mistakes here.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 06:26:01 PMIf you know the difference, then it's odd that you would lie about DW owning the rights to all content and perpetuity.
Again, you lied and said that you referenced Candice Owens. Own the lie. There are no mistakes here.
OK. You've had a long day. I need you to get some rest so you're nice and feisty tomorrow as I continue to spank you.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 06:29:58 PMOK. You've had a long day. I need you to get some rest so you're nice and feisty tomorrow as I continue to spank you.
more lies as expected.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 06:38:55 PMmore lies as expected.
I know you will have more lies, and is indeed expected. That's actually the first truthful thing you've said in this thread.
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 06:41:46 PMI know you will have more lies, and is indeed expected. That's actually the first truthful thing you've said in this thread.
de·lu·sion·aladjective
characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition.
Hopefully I made my point regarding your accusations of "lying" .
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 07:25:30 AMHopefully I made my point regarding your accusations of "lying" .
You really aren't very good at this, are you. Rhetorical fact, not a question.
Quote from: Solar on January 28, 2023, 08:33:31 AMYou really aren't very good at this, are you. Rhetorical fact, not a question.
I'm very good at it. "It" being the calling out of people who throw around liar and lying in such an ignorant and irresponsible manner, then deflects when their blatant hypocrisy is exposed.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 10:34:17 AMI'm very good at it. "It" being the calling out of people who throw around liar and lying in such an ignorant and irresponsible manner, then deflects when their blatant hypocrisy is exposed.
WE ALL SAW WHAT HAPPENED AND YOU GOT CAUGHT!
Moving the goal post has gotten old, so move on, no one gives a shit, never really did, it's the kind of things we expect from libs.
Taxed decided he'd make an example out of you; it happens from time to time as a reminder to others you can't get away with it.
Your need to claim ignorance turned into a lie very quickly, you should have just dropped it, but no, you tried to defend it and turned it into a lie.
Everyone saw it, so drop it, it really doesn't matter when placed against the backdrop of Biteme's impending WWIII.
Quote from: Solar on January 28, 2023, 10:42:01 AMWE ALL SAW WHAT HAPPENED AND YOU GOT CAUGHT!
Moving the goal post has gotten old, so move on, no one gives a shit, never really did, it's the kind of things we expect from libs.
Taxed decided he'd make an example out of you; it happens from time to time as a reminder to others you can't get away with it.
Your need to claim ignorance turned into a lie very quickly, you should have just dropped it, but no, you tried to defend it and turned it into a lie.
Everyone saw it, so drop it, it really doesn't matter when placed against the backdrop of Biteme's impending WWIII.
You're equally irresponsible. I wasn't caught doing anything, other than responding before reading every post and watching every video. That's not lying. If I said "I watched the TMI (or whatever it was called) video, that would very likely be kying. Of course, honest people can acknowledge that. Dishonest people can't and won't.
However, as requested, I will let this go. Clearly everything I'm saying is falling on deaf, or simply dishonest, ears.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 10:54:00 AMYou're equally irresponsible. I wasn't caught doing anything, other than responding before reading every post and watching every video. That's not lying. If I said "I watched the TMI (or whatever it was called) video, that would very likely be kying. Of course, honest people can acknowledge that. Dishonest people can't and won't.
Nope, denial and getting caught is the epitome of lying.
Quote from: Solar on January 28, 2023, 11:07:44 AMNope, denial and getting caught is the epitome of lying.
....
Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 08:38:23 AMYou never batted an eye when I said you didn't watch the video... you doubled and tripled down and continued to lie and assume "poaching" was in reference to Crowder.
At any point in the conversation you would think he would have gone back to check the post RIGHT BEFORE HIS OWN that had the relevant information.
But no, he just drove forward into idiocy without a second thought. :bigl
Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:35:29 PMYou use those examples after the You use the example of Walsh after the fact to try and cover your lying ass. All content means all content. You don't get to manipulate the meaning of words to try and cover for your dishonesty.
And where did you mention Candace Owens?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT(before and after joining DW)" and not "ALL CONTENT(made while with DW)". But instead of asking for clarification you just made a knee jerk assumption and ran with it thinking you could get even for your earlier embarrassment.
You know what they say about making ass-u-mptions....
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 10:54:00 AMYou're equally irresponsible. I wasn't caught doing anything, other than responding before reading every post and watching every video. That's not lying. If I said "I watched the TMI (or whatever it was called) video, that would very likely be kying. Of course, honest people can acknowledge that. Dishonest people can't and won't.
Ok I guess we can let you slide with the dumbest dunce award instead of the lying award if thats what you really want...
I mean seriously, it was the post right above your own and at no point in the conversation did you ever go back and even look. You would still be in the dark about it if I hadn't pointed it out to you.
(https://i.postimg.cc/m2Wj5Yfv/sdgfwerh.jpg)
Quote from: T Hunt on January 28, 2023, 11:36:09 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT(before and after joining DW)" and not "ALL CONTENT(made while with DW)". But instead of asking for clarification you just made a knee jerk assumption and ran with it thinking you could get even for your earlier embarrassment.
You know what they say about making ass-u-mptions....
"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....
This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!
Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT" actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!
(https://media.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.gif)
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 12:33:45 PM"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....
This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!
Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT" actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!
(https://media.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.gif)
You have obviously not dealt with contracts and lawyers. Yes, when discussing contracts, words can have different meaning from everyday speaking. Get over it.
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 06:25:32 AMde·lu·sion·al
adjective
characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition.
What to know what our definition of village idiot is?
Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 12:33:45 PM"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....
This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!
Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT" actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!
(https://media.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.gif)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Im glad you can be good natured enough to laugh at yourself. Too many they send here would get embarrassed and run away after that large of a mistake. At least you havent completely fallen off the boat.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 21, 2023, 10:07:01 PMIf that is true, and he get's $42 million a year in subscriptions, why would you even consider working for someone else and demanding/only wanting $30 million a year? It doesn't sound right. It also doesn't add up on the time frame of leaving "The Blaze", asking for the job, creating that website, and putting out the fake outrage.
I call bullshit.
In the infamous 3rd video, he said it's standard to not know how many subscribers you have, so there's no reason to believe he knows. The DW guy said the same
^^^I responded to the wrong post^^^