Quote from: SueAnn on January 05, 2018, 04:31:56 AM
The fire was not in the main house.  It was in the Secret Service cottage.  It is not connected to the main house.  In what way could this have been a way to destroy evidence?

Who would you have destroy evidence (by fire) after it went thru the shredder?   Burning it would be the best way, shredded documents can be reconstructed. Having the SS burn it would be a logical step. Then again I shudder to think what else might be burned that is evidence and not paper.

Jerome Corsi started decoding Q's posts.  This the one from yesterday.  Amazing.

https://www.scribd.com/document/368487371/QANON-DECODE-Message-Jan-4-2018-238914-Who-is-Matlock-Vers-11-0

Quote from: taxed on January 05, 2018, 08:19:23 AM
Jerome Corsi started decoding Q's posts.  This the one from yesterday.  Amazing.

https://www.scribd.com/document/368487371/QANON-DECODE-Message-Jan-4-2018-238914-Who-is-Matlock-Vers-11-0

That's the thing about hindsight, Q' has been proven to not only be real, but planted squarely within the trump Administration for disseminating the truth as it is played out.
This is genius on Trump's part.

Quote from: Solar on January 05, 2018, 08:31:03 AM
That's the thing about hindsight, Q' has been proven to not only be real, but planted squarely within the trump Administration for disseminating the truth as it is played out.
This is genius on Trump's part.

That part about Admiral Rodgers blew my mind.  The timing makes total sense.

Quote from: taxed on January 05, 2018, 08:47:08 AM
That part about Admiral Rodgers blew my mind.  The timing makes total sense.

I saw that, but question this remark:

"FBI and DOJ Deep State operatives could never get FISA court permission to conduct electronic surveillance."

What bars them from acquiring a warrant?

QuoteThe White House is not a secure facility. Quite the contrary, the White House is particularly vulnerable to leaks.

You can not stop people form talking once out side of the WH.

Quote from: Solar on January 05, 2018, 08:56:20 AM
I saw that, but question this remark:

"FBI and DOJ Deep State operatives could never get FISA court permission to conduct electronic surveillance."

What bars them from acquiring a warrant?

Dunno.  I'm intrigued.

He dropped more today.  If I'm reading like it seems, it doesn't sound good for Hussein:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7oc8jv/another_new_q_post_here_we_go_folks/

Quote from: taxed on January 05, 2018, 09:26:38 AM
Dunno.  I'm intrigued.

He dropped more today.  If I'm reading like it seems, it doesn't sound good for Hussein:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7oc8jv/another_new_q_post_here_we_go_folks/

Did you get a chance to skim that email I sent you?
Personally, I want verification, as in a Q' type individual, but if what was written is true, the Dim party is pretty much going to prison.
One can hope.

Breaking!!

WASHINGTON (CBS NEWS) –  The FBI is conducting an investigation into the Clinton Foundation and whether any donations made to the foundation are tied to actions carried out by the U.S. government, CBS News' Andres Triay has confirmed.

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/fbi-investigating-donations-made-to-clinton-foundation/

I have a question about Q.  I just learned about this phenomena this week and I have been intrigued ever since.  Without resorting to canned rhetoric, can someone tell me what the purpose of his communications are, please?  I have a small theory but would like to hear what other theories are out there.

Quote from: taxed on January 05, 2018, 09:26:38 AM
Dunno.  I'm intrigued.

He dropped more today.  If I'm reading like it seems, it doesn't sound good for Hussein:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7oc8jv/another_new_q_post_here_we_go_folks/

Not sure what this means...
https://twitter.com/B75434425/status/949364627808366599

Quote from: SueAnn on January 05, 2018, 11:50:31 AM
I have a question about Q.  I just learned about this phenomena this week and I have been intrigued ever since.  Without resorting to canned rhetoric, can someone tell me what the purpose of his communications are, please?  I have a small theory but would like to hear what other theories are out there.

Yes, he's been straightforward in telling everyone, "Keep the faith Patriots, we're winning".
His sole purpose is to keep the public informed, through somewhat coded messages, where he drops keywords to watch for in either Trump's tweets or the news.

Quote from: taxed on January 05, 2018, 12:00:35 PM
Not sure what this means...
https://twitter.com/B75434425/status/949364627808366599

Looks like she should hjave justy kept silenty.

Tweets Tweets, current page. Tweets & replies  Media

B
‏

@B75434425
7m7 minutes ago
More
When Q posted about 'one post today' he was referring to the someone ELSE who had posted once above him. Q was letting us know not to follow their bad information that was causing the board to go in different directions with their research.

1 reply 15 retweets 26 likes
Reply 1   Retweet 15   Like 26   Direct message
Show this thread

B
‏

@B75434425
7m7 minutes ago
More
Q was absent, "dark" from 12/25-1/4. Someone ELSE had been posting during that time with info. The someone ELSE had NOT been claiming to be Q. All Q posts tweeted on this account have been verified by multiple people involved with the CBTS board, Q, and securing tripcodes.

If anyone wants to get a handle on the timing of the ops Q and the teams are running, along with the DOJ events with Rosenstein/Nunes, this twitter is a MUST read.  Amazing.  He breaks them down into multiple tweets because of the character limit, but he numbers them.  Just start at 1, find 2, etc.  This guy clearly familiar with the legal and process stuff with the DOJ.

https://twitter.com/DaveNYviii