He's one of my faves, and he is getting the liberal assault for suggesting taxes are too high and he needs to move:
http://aol.sportingnews.com/sport/story/2013-01-22/phil-mickelson-apology-taxes-retirement-california-1-percent-millionaire (http://aol.sportingnews.com/sport/story/2013-01-22/phil-mickelson-apology-taxes-retirement-california-1-percent-millionaire)
Also, Tiger admits that's the reason he moved to FL years ago:
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-tiger-woods-torrey-pines-20130122,0,878458.story (http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-tiger-woods-torrey-pines-20130122,0,878458.story)
Live in a state with higher taxes, or lower taxes? It's a no-brainer.
The tax-happy crowd constantly ignores the fundamentals of human behavior.
He caved. He apologized for being "greedy" and complaining about turning over his income (that's PROPERTY) to Obama and Dingy Harry.
I have asked EVERY LIBERAL on every forum I have ever been on to explain to me why the GOVERNMENT should take OUR HARD EARNED money when they squander it on PARTIES like Tuesday or just give it away for votes, I have never been given an answer yet. I think it's criminal for ANYONE to pay so much in taxes.
Quote from: The Stranger on January 23, 2013, 03:49:50 AM
I have asked EVERY LIBERAL on every forum I have ever been on to explain to me why the GOVERNMENT should take OUR HARD EARNED money when they squander it on PARTIES like Tuesday or just give it away for votes, I have never been given an answer yet. I think it's criminal for ANYONE to pay so much in taxes.
In their warped minds they don't think it is FAIR that some people are more successful than others.
Quote from: supsalemgr on January 23, 2013, 04:44:30 AM
In their warped minds they don't think it is FAIR that some people are more successful than others.
What the worshipers of big Godvernment don't get (or don't care about), is that out of the ONE MILLION DOLLARS he may "contribute," nearly $800,000 will go to already overpaid bureaucrats in Washington, and about $200,000 will actually go to the "needy greedy" who will vote for anyone who promises to rob the "rich." That's $200,000 out of ONE MILLION. A private charity would be committing a CRIME if they operated that way.
Quote from: supsalemgr on January 23, 2013, 04:44:30 AM
In their warped minds they don't think it is FAIR that some people are more successful than others.
But then we can all be equal! :rolleyes: