It seems the libbies are celebrating again at some supposed comment by bill barr to the AP stating that the DOJ found no voter fraud that wld overturn the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i7okfljAxo
Here is the story on FOX
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/william-barr-doj-fbi-voter-fraud-2020-election
The thing is I cant seem to find Barrs actual comments anywhere so it seems at this moment all we have is APs word on it.
Also I didnt know the DOJ had even opened any investigations since Barr told them to investigate any voter fraud a month ago.
Either way it seems the libs have fallen for fake news yet again.
Good catch T... Par for the fake news course....
https://twitter.com/MikayesFiona/status/1333861868096647174
Good call T, I heard the same thing but hadn't the time to investigate. :thumbup:
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the AP.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-elections-william-barr-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 12:25:13 PM
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the AP.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-elections-william-barr-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
"To date".
Do you even know what that means?
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 12:25:13 PM
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the AP.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-elections-william-barr-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
Suck it up Cup Cake, I gave you several sites proving fraud and you ignored it!
Here's another! Are you afraid to see the truth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOwbJqPlXHI&feature=emb_logo
https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1333870785899839490
https://twitter.com/TweetWordz/status/1333871813793898497
https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-william-barr-doj-voting-fraud-20201201-ynlvqo5utvhoxa4w6d7phj3wua-story.html
https://www.oregonlive.com/nation/2020/12/attorney-general-william-barr-no-evidence-of-fraud-thatd-change-election-outcome.html
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/01/attorney-general-barr-no-evidence-widespread-election-fraud/3783305001/
Doesn't surprise me, but doesn't dishearten me either. This thing has become bigger than the corruptocrats.
Statement from the President's legal team.
https://media.thedonald.win/post/sKr92nno.jpeg
Quote from: Rebecca on December 01, 2020, 12:45:22 PM
Statement from the President's legal team.
https://media.thedonald.win/post/sKr92nno.jpeg
Who delivered evidence to the DOJ? Please name them.
Trump's lawyers said there no evidence of a Justice Department Investigation. I haven't seen anything that resembles a DOJ inquiry. We haven't had an honest Justice Department in decades. If he truly said that, he's as good as gone.
Quote from: taxed on December 01, 2020, 12:46:10 PM
Who delivered evidence to the DOJ? Please name them.
Apparently no one.
Quote from: supsalemgr on December 01, 2020, 12:27:29 PM
"To date".
Do you even know what that means?
It means he hasn't found much but won't stop looking.
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 12:56:25 PM
It means he hasn't found much but won't stop looking.
I wonder when he'll start looking....
Quote from: Rebecca on December 01, 2020, 12:45:22 PM
Statement from the President's legal team.
https://media.thedonald.win/post/sKr92nno.jpeg
A respectable response from Rudy.
Hopefully going forward he actually alleges fraud in court. The legal team has been asked directly about it and they haven't alleged fraud.
https://twitter.com/MikayesFiona/status/1333865627652665344
Quote from: Rebecca on December 01, 2020, 12:54:50 PM
Apparently no one.
Correct... and what was that three letter word that was omitted? Hint: it begins with "y", ends with "t".
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 12:25:13 PM
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the AP.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-elections-william-barr-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
But what proof do you have that he ever said that?
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 12:56:25 PM
It means he hasn't found much but won't stop looking.
It means the DOJ is not "YET" involved.
Quote from: ModelCitizen on December 01, 2020, 01:08:49 PM
A respectable response from Rudy.
Hopefully going forward he actually alleges fraud in court. The legal team has been asked directly about it and they haven't alleged fraud.
Why would he do that before he got to the SC? He doesnt want a big win in the lower courts to stop this.
Quote from: taxed on December 01, 2020, 01:16:00 PM
https://twitter.com/MikayesFiona/status/1333865627652665344
Going thru civil court is the best way to do this, Civil court requires only a PREPONDERANCE of Evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Plenty of time for prosecutions later.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 01, 2020, 02:31:08 PM
Going thru civil court is the best way to do this, Civil court requires only a PREPONDERANCE of Evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Plenty of time for prosecutions later.
Absolutely!
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 01, 2020, 02:31:08 PM
Going thru civil court is the best way to do this, Civil court requires only a PREPONDERANCE of Evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Plenty of time for prosecutions later.
Good thing they dont have a preponderance of evidence.
Quote from: Friendlyneiborhoodlib on December 01, 2020, 04:28:02 PM
Good thing they dont have a preponderance of evidence.
Biden has nothing...there's not a single thing he can do to stop Trump from winning....
Quote from: Solar on December 01, 2020, 01:51:02 PM
It means the DOJ is not "YET" involved.
Barr, as good as he is, would not be the guy on the ground looking. He would get that from a US Attorney. The witness testimony from hundreds given under oath will have to be investigated, sooner or later, unless the demented pedophile pulls off the heist before the job of elector(s) goes to the House.
DOJ would need years. Dominion left town and has gone underground. At this point we need the new Barrett Supreme Court to step in and invalidate the election.
I wish my memory was better, yesterday and today I heard two "brainiacs" talking about the fraud and why Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia were chosen to play around with the votes. I just can't remember the names of the two guys. Both were interviewed by Glenn Beck, I can't find the story, maybe someone else heard one of the two?
https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1333937357385584641
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333922899116355584
Quote from: Friendlyneiborhoodlib on December 01, 2020, 04:28:02 PM
Good thing they dont have a preponderance of evidence.
But they do tho.
Quote from: taxed on December 01, 2020, 05:19:28 PM
https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1333937357385584641
And the media just ignores this.
https://twitter.com/RoscoeBDavis1/status/1334184319787687937
Quote from: taxed on December 02, 2020, 10:36:40 AM
https://twitter.com/RoscoeBDavis1/status/1334184319787687937
"Election Fraud" is too nice a word for what these Marxists have done. This should qualify as a treasonable offense!
Be it "voter fraud" or "election fraud", BOTH are illegal and BOTH jeopardize the validity of the election. Whether there is enough "fraud" to overturn the election or not, an illegal act should be pursued, investigated and prosecuted. What may not initially seem like "enough" right now, may actually turn out to be significant later on. There have been other cases of fraud, ballot tampering and election rigging in many of these "swing states" that casts a shadow on EVERY election IMO.