https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZdWD5uGaVo
QuoteFree Speech is free speech
"Five points:
1) What that faculty member is doing, is shutting down free speech, by way of calling the speech "violent".
The left is intolerant of anything outside of their unicorn land. Any challenge to their rhetoric is deemed violent, and is therefore prohibited.
2) Since violence must be met with violence, she sends the message that the speaker must be shut down by any means -- even by force (by violence upon the speaker).
If she could press a button, and have the police use force to remove that speaker, she would. She is the one advocating for violence, under the guise of having the moral high ground.
3) At best, she could argue that a speaker, with whom she disagrees, is committing "incitement to violence". But that is laughable, she knows it, and therefore skips straight to "speech = violence".
4) She equates free speech, with which she disagrees, as a reason people of color are targeted by police.
How demeaning she is, without realizing it, to people of color? Where is her cape, so that she can fly in to save otherwise helpless victims?
She wants to keep people of color subjugated, so that she and her ilk can remain in positions of authority, to protect the helpless (in her mind) victims.
Rather than calling people of color entrepreneurs, innovators, self-sufficient, she, instead, groups them like cattle into her victim camp. How disgusting she is?
5) Hate speech is protected by the first amendment. Our founding fathers knew that people like her existed, and would try to shut down speakers, by falsely calling their speech hate speech.
We do not need a first amendment for speech that we agree with. We need it due to people like her, who would, if she could, deny others their opportunity to voice their positions.
She is a text book example of a cancer within our educational system."