He's also fond of waiting until someone signs out, before posting garbage he can't prove, to people who know better than to listen. Ricky is a disease. He should be tossed off a mountain, soonest.

Did you know that Ricky actually has a picture of Bert's ass tattooed on his own as.  :o :o :o

Did you know Dan actually keeps a piece of my cock in his mouth at all times? He chews it like Wrigley's.

Quote from: Darwinist on October 17, 2010, 03:20:21 PM
Did you know Dan actually keeps a piece of my cock in his mouth at all times? He chews it like Wrigley's.

Try staying above the fray, you not only lowered yourself with that one, you actually laid in the mud for that shot.
I know you are better than that, but if you can't go toe to toe, it only exposes your inability for debate.

Quote from: Darwinist on October 17, 2010, 03:20:21 PM
Did you know Dan actually keeps a piece of my cock in his mouth at all times? He chews it like Wrigley's.

I'm sure Lin would do it if you got a job...

Quote from: crepe05 on October 16, 2010, 08:40:38 AM
For heaven's sake, don't forget that 'white guilt' thingy that we white people are supposed to all be afflicted or inflicted with.  I believe that our collective white guilt helped to elect Obama.  I can only hope that we're over that by 2012.

Says a lot about how voters think regarding women Presidents, when they can elect a nobody with no discernable past (or political reputation) get elected over someone competent.

God help us all, but Hillary Rodham Clinton would be an improvement, and even the Dems are now catching on to that. Bubba is out campaigning SOLELY for the pols who supported Shrill's campaign. The juggernaut is leaving the station, and Obama will not be onboard.

Quote from: Solar on October 17, 2010, 03:37:35 PM
Try staying above the fray, you not only lowered yourself with that one, you actually laid in the mud for that shot.
I know you are better than that, but if you can't go toe to toe, it only exposes your inability for debate.

If you look, Neither Dan nor Bert nor quiller has contributed anything but attack in this thread. If they want to attack me, then fine, I'll be happy to step up and give back as good and better than they can.

You and I have done something different: we've been talking about ideas; and so far we've kept things civil (whereas Dan, Bert, and quiller haven't even tried to keep things civil because they all know they can't hold a candle to me in an honest debate). Don't forget, Solar, that what you and I are doing is different and separate from what I'm doing with them. In other words, I'll remain civil with you as long as you remain civil with me.

Quote from: Darwinist on October 17, 2010, 06:27:41 PM
If you look, Neither Dan nor Bert nor quiller has contributed anything but attack in this thread. If they want to attack me, then fine, I'll be happy to step up and give back as good and better than they can.

You and I have done something different: we've been talking about ideas; and so far we've kept things civil (whereas Dan, Bert, and quiller haven't even tried to keep things civil because they all know they can't hold a candle to me in an honest debate). Don't forget, Solar, that what you and I are doing is different and separate from what I'm doing with them. In other words, I'll remain civil with you as long as you remain civil with me.

My first few posts tell a different story as they had nothing to do with you or were directed at you.

Now now Darwinist.  Does taxed have to grab a paddle?

Quote from: taxed on October 17, 2010, 07:02:18 PM
Now now Darwinist.  Does taxed have to grab a paddle?

Why should he expect me to lower myself to his level of debate, when clearly his immorality and psychosis would prevent cogent exchanges? He claims victory when none was achieved. He is outclassed, and knows it. And that stings worst of all for such a patent self-marginalizer.

Quote from: Cryptic Bert on October 17, 2010, 06:32:26 PM
My first few posts tell a different story as they had nothing to do with you or were directed at you.

My first post to you, in response to your first post in this thread, was a short series of questions pertaining to what you posted.

My second post to you, a response to your second post, was a countering observation to that post. Ditto for both our third posts.

Your fourth post was a knee-jerk, liberal bashing sound-bite, and that's what I said about it in a cuttingly sarcastic way.

Your fifth and sixth posts were oblique sarcastic references to waiting for me to reply to someone else's post, which I was in the process of doing while you put your bandwidth-wasting posts out. And after I posted my response, I sarcastically addressed your previous two posts.

In Reply 73 you finally addressed me directly, and then only to make a sarcastic and inaccurate observation, which I ignored.

In my Reply 79, I addressed, sarcastically, your semi-witty remark to Dan about your own nice ass.

And then, no longer able to restrain yourself, you went after my family in Reply 94, thinking, I guess, you were "protecting" Dan.


And that's how thinngs have played out in this thread.

Quote from: quiller on October 17, 2010, 07:08:05 PM
Why should he expect me to lower myself to his level of debate, when clearly his immorality and psychosis would prevent cogent exchanges? He claims victory when none was achieved. He is outclassed, and knows it. And that stings worst of all for such a patent self-marginalizer.

How is it that you can slap him around without using vulgarity?  Can you maybe write up some debate pointers so strangers on the internet don't get him upset?

Quote from: taxed on October 17, 2010, 07:02:18 PM
Now now Darwinist.  Does taxed have to grab a paddle?

Would you pleeeeeeeeease!? Oh, Mummy, it's been so long since I've had a right smart paddling!

Quote from: Darwinist on October 17, 2010, 07:11:03 PM
Would you pleeeeeeeeease!? Oh, Mummy, it's been so long since I've had a right smart paddling!

You asked for it...

Quote from: Darwinist on October 17, 2010, 07:09:24 PM
My first post to you, in response to your first post in this thread, was a short series of questions pertaining to what you posted.

My second post to you, a response to your second post, was a countering observation to that post. Ditto for both our third posts.

Your fourth post was a knee-jerk, liberal bashing sound-bite, and that's what I said about it in a cuttingly sarcastic way.

Your fifth and sixth posts were oblique sarcastic references to waiting for me to reply to someone else's post, which I was in the process of doing while you put your bandwidth-wasting posts out. And after I posted my response, I sarcastically addressed your previous two posts.

In Reply 73 you finally addressed me directly, and then only to make a sarcastic and inaccurate observation, which I ignored.

In my Reply 79, I addressed, sarcastically, your semi-witty remark to Dan about your own nice ass.

And then, no longer able to restrain yourself, you went after my family in Reply 94, thinking, I guess, you were "protecting" Dan.


And that's how thinngs have played out in this thread.

Your posts toward me were baiting and got more aggressive when I did not respond..