These people have no idea the problems they are creating for themselves and society at large.



http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/09/02/gun-control-advocates-encourage-supporters-to-call-the-cops-on-open-conceal-gun-carriers/

The cops should arrest them for wasting their time.

Quote from: tac on September 03, 2015, 07:44:51 PM
The cops should arrest them for wasting their time.

Hit them where it will hurt with a 5.000 dollar find.  We don't need more people in jail getting 3 squares a day and a cot. 

Filing a false police report is a felony.  It's time they started prosecuting. See how those (BLEEEEEPS) like having a felony conviction on their records.

1. It's not a false police report if they claim that they genuinely believed their safety was in peril.

2. The police don't generally handle these situations well. They are too eager to shoot, and then claim . . .  their safety was in peril.

3. Activist judges and DAs will almost always give the benefit of doubt to the caller and the cops; never to the victim of these hoaxes (should they survive).

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 04:45:19 AM
1. It's not a false police report if they claim that they genuinely believed their safety was in peril.

2. The police don't generally handle these situations well. They are too eager to shoot, and then claim . . .  their safety was in peril.

3. Activist judges and DAs will almost always give the benefit of doubt to the caller and the cops; never to the victim of these hoaxes (should they survive).

Bull Shit! I hope to Hell you never get to sit on ant jury.

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 04:45:19 AM
1. It's not a false police report if they claim that they genuinely believed their safety was in peril.

2. The police don't generally handle these situations well. They are too eager to shoot, and then claim . . .  their safety was in peril.

3. Activist judges and DAs will almost always give the benefit of doubt to the caller and the cops; never to the victim of these hoaxes (should they survive).

This is the chaos I was talking about.

You have to prove intent in a false report, some of these idiots are actually afraid and intimidated by guns to the point they panic if they see someone carrying, in my area of virginia it is no big deal but you have yuppies, urban liberals and the wine and cheese crowd who venture forth into the countryside and freak any time they see a rifle rack in a 4x4

Now if the 911 dispatcher is doing his/her job they can put it in a proper perspective if a unit is summoned. Then you get into the problem of crying wolf.....when the real bad guys show up intent on an armed robbery or something....

I would say that some of these calls are going to INVOLVE OFF DUTY POLICE or plainclothesmen/detectives etc. The cops aren't going to like it and hold the caller responsible.

Last if any legit carry is killed or injured it is lawsuit time against the caller and possibly even this organization vicariously for starting into motion this stupid and dangerous practice.

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 04:45:19 AM
1. It's not a false police report if they claim that they genuinely believed their safety was in peril.

2. The police don't generally handle these situations well. They are too eager to shoot, and then claim . . .  their safety was in peril.

3. Activist judges and DAs will almost always give the benefit of doubt to the caller and the cops; never to the victim of these hoaxes (should they survive).

It would be interesting to see links to back up those claims! 

The internet is rife with verifiable accounts of people legally carrying guns who are
tackled, handcuffed, pawed, tased or shot. These are people who were doing nothing suspicious, nothing threatening. They just simply were carrying a gun. In a holster.

When people hysterically call 911, why does the dispatcher never ask the obvious question: is the gun in a holster?  And why when cops arrive, do they never simply walk up to the person (who isn't brandishing the weapon) and ask to see a CCW permit?

Instead, we have severe over-reaction by the caller and by the responding police.

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 07:32:22 AM
The internet is rife with verifiable accounts of people legally carrying guns who are
tackled, handcuffed, pawed, tased or shot. These are people who were doing nothing suspicious, nothing threatening. They just simply were carrying a gun. In a holster.

When people hysterically call 911, why does the dispatcher never ask the obvious question: is the gun in a holster?  And why when cops arrive, do they never simply walk up to the person (who isn't brandishing the weapon) and ask to see a CCW permit?

Instead, we have severe over-reaction by the caller and by the responding police.

Hmm...  IF a gun is out in plain site and in a holster.  Why would a officer ask for a CCW permit?  As it is not a concealed weapon.

Quote from: walkstall on September 04, 2015, 07:57:21 AM
Hmm...  IF a gun is out in plain site and in a holster.  Why would a officer ask for a CCW permit?  As it is not a concealed weapon.

Good point, walks!!!!   

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 07:32:22 AM
The internet is rife with verifiable accounts of people legally carrying guns who are
tackled, handcuffed, pawed, tased or shot. These are people who were doing nothing suspicious, nothing threatening. They just simply were carrying a gun. In a holster.

When people hysterically call 911, why does the dispatcher never ask the obvious question: is the gun in a holster?  And why when cops arrive, do they never simply walk up to the person (who isn't brandishing the weapon) and ask to see a CCW permit?

Instead, we have severe over-reaction by the caller and by the responding police.

No, it is not rife with examples.
However, this may explain why it appears that way, because activists, in their attempt to desensitize the public over guns, are creating more issues than their goal accomplishes.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2015/06/10/open-carry-laws-michigan-courts-legislature-gun-rights/71042518/

Quote from: walkstall on September 04, 2015, 07:57:21 AM
Hmm...  IF a gun is out in plain site and in a holster.  Why would a officer ask for a CCW permit?  As it is not a concealed weapon.

He wouldn't. But you could expect to be frisked as though you were a common criminal.

We used to have an "open carry" gun club around here.  (in CA no less)

You would see them around occasionally, at restaurants and there were several at the local fair.  Haven't seen them in about three years.  I'll have to research why that is.  They probably got too many complaints I'm guessing.

Quote from: Bluetick on September 04, 2015, 10:13:50 AM
He wouldn't. But you could expect to be frisked as though you were a common criminal.

Well, we just got open carry, and you still need a permit to carry. Your conceal permit allows you to open carry, so guessing here you would be asked to show your permit. Can't really see anyone making it a big deal.