Like the rest of you, I too have been avoiding talking about this Bull Shit, simply because the LSM is using it to distract from the fact that Mueller's so called "investigation" was all about proving Trump was in cahoots with Russians.
But as you all know, it is the Dims that not only colluded with Russians, but benefited monetarily from the process.
But to get to the point of the title, Levin nails it down Constitutionally.
1. A sitting president CANNOT be indicted. That's official DOJ policy since 1973. Neither the Special Counsel nor the Southern District of New York (SDNY) nor Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein can defy that 45-year-old policy.
2. SDNY is NOT expert in campaign finance violations and neither is the Clinton appointed district judge. They rarely handle campaign finance cases. The left-wing media and politicians are regurgitating what the prosecutors have merely filed in their own self-serving brief. The media and others intentionally refuse to look at the actual rules and context. They refuse to even question what these prosecutors have thrown together.
3. The actual campaign rules and context do NOT include Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or infinite other contracts, payments, arrangements, acts of a private nature, etc. as campaign contributions. This is normal human behavior and was never intended to be regulated or reported.
5. As for impeachment, NDAs involving wholly private matters occurring before the president was even a candidate and completely unrelated to his office cannot legitimately trigger the Constitution's impeachment clause.
More~~~~
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-levin-a-time-for-truth
And by the way, Q sent me to Levins article.. :thumbup:
Quote from: Solar on December 11, 2018, 01:36:38 PM
Like the rest of you, I too have been avoiding talking about this Bull Shit, simply because the LSM is using it to distract from the fact that Mueller's so called "investigation" was all about proving Trump was in cahoots with Russians.
But as you all know, it is the Dims that not only colluded with Russians, but benefited monetarily from the process.
But to get to the point of the title, Levin nails it down Constitutionally.
1. A sitting president CANNOT be indicted. That's official DOJ policy since 1973. Neither the Special Counsel nor the Southern District of New York (SDNY) nor Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein can defy that 45-year-old policy.
2. SDNY is NOT expert in campaign finance violations and neither is the Clinton appointed district judge. They rarely handle campaign finance cases. The left-wing media and politicians are regurgitating what the prosecutors have merely filed in their own self-serving brief. The media and others intentionally refuse to look at the actual rules and context. They refuse to even question what these prosecutors have thrown together.
3. The actual campaign rules and context do NOT include Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or infinite other contracts, payments, arrangements, acts of a private nature, etc. as campaign contributions. This is normal human behavior and was never intended to be regulated or reported.
5. As for impeachment, NDAs involving wholly private matters occurring before the president was even a candidate and completely unrelated to his office cannot legitimately trigger the Constitution's impeachment clause.
More~~~~
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-levin-a-time-for-truth
I'm guessing all this talk about indictments must mean hillary and the lsm is panicking over her investigation.
Quote from: s3779m on December 11, 2018, 02:31:31 PM
I'm guessing all this talk about indictments must mean hillary and the lsm is panicking over her investigation.
Yep, the heat is finally getting turned up on all of them, and they are freaking out. :thumbsup:
Dim's always overplay their hands. I have no Doubt they will impeach him in the house but their is no way they can get 2/3rd majority in the senate to remove him. If they do an unfair political move like that the Dim's will kill any chance of keeping the house or winning the presidency in 2020 and it will be all out political war on the Hill for the next 2 years!! :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Trump won't be impeached but I do believe they will try. The base demands it and there are enough democrats for an attempt. They are blind with their rage and bound by their rhetoric and promises to their voters. As bat shit crazy as Pelosi is she is saner than Mad Max and knows impeachment would be a disaster. The democrats are going to destroy themselves next year.
Truth is, it's not about Impeaching him, it's about damaging him for 2020, and they will fail miserably.
Quote from: Solar on December 11, 2018, 06:22:57 PM
Truth is, it's not about Impeaching him, it's about damaging him for 2020, and they will fail miserably.
Yeah. So far most of the country does not care or they see it as sour grapes because Captain Pantsuit lost. If they start impeachment without real reasons why it will be a disaster because it will be televised. Much like the Kavanaugh hearing it will be speeches and pontification about things they don't know, know nothing about or does not actually exist. They cannot win but the slow motion train wreck will be more fun than Disney world on acid. Speech after speech demanding Trump be impeached and no actual reasons why.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on December 11, 2018, 08:54:47 PM
Yeah. So far most of the country does not care or they see it as sour grapes because Captain Pantsuit lost. If they start impeachment without real reasons why it will be a disaster because it will be televised. Much like the Kavanaugh hearing it will be speeches and pontification about things they don't know, know nothing about or does not actually exist. They cannot win but the slow motion train wreck will be more fun than Disney world on acid. Speech after speech demanding Trump be impeached and no actual reasons why.
Disney on acid. Classic. :biggrin:
I can see all the Dims doing the stompy feet frustration dance, because that's all this will amount to, flailing in frustration.
The Dems knew this when the concocted this nonsense. This whole farce is about damaging Trump and making his admin less effective and of course preventing his re-election in 2020.
Have they figured out a crime yet, or are they still working on that?
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2018, 08:23:17 AM
Have they figured out a crime yet, or are they still working on that?
Nope, it''s all about how they "Feel".
Quote from: taxed on December 12, 2018, 08:23:17 AM
Have they figured out a crime yet, or are they still working on that?
Oh, they know the crime, Trump one the election. He beat Captain Pantsuit.
The payment to Daniels was before he was a candidate?
Quote from: mrclose on December 14, 2018, 12:18:36 PM
From very liberal ... Alan Dershowitz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snDcaO0alc4
The Dims are about to watch all this unfold into a pile of ashes. They never had anything but smoke and mirrors, and now Trump is proceeding with Clinton investigations that will expand to include Obozo himself in this witch hunt, where they tried to destroy a political candidate..
Trump won't be indicted or impeached. They have nothing to indict or impeach him for ..... no crimes other that winning the election. Their hope is to brow beat him so bad that in 2020 they can catch everyone asleep and some stay home and not vote. Plus, we all know they cheat, at least here in NC they do. What really gets me hot is the way they carry on every day...seven days a week ..24 hours per day all lies. Yet, they say nothing of Hillary and Obama that have infact broken laws that would give them prison time. These people are idiots and no more than modern day Bolsheviks here in the US. The Democat Party is there only in name....your grandpa's Democrat party has been blown away by the winds of time and never to return...and really they never were what they pretended to be.
I want to see some people pay because they have broken laws that other people have gone to jail for and we have to maintain a one tier judicial system in this country for us to survive as the nation we were intended to be. If some changes aren't made there is going to be trouble.
seax :thumbup:
Yeah, I remember when the party used to say, "I may not like what you say, but I'll fight to protect your Right to say it".
Now look at them, they ban any opposing voice they don't like.
"I may not like what you say, so I'll fight to suppress your Right to say it".