NY Times Publishes Offensive Picture of Pope - But Not Of Muhammad

Started by walkstall, July 01, 2015, 07:20:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

walkstall

July 01, 2015, 07:20:53 AM
I think the NYT does not wish to lose their heads. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mkmIVXBOzUU
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Dori

#1
July 01, 2015, 08:07:21 AM
Quote from: walkstall on July 01, 2015, 07:20:53 AM
I think the NYT does not wish to lose their heads.

Exactly.  There's more than one reason the NYT's is called "Yellow" journalism.  They're also cowards. 
The danger to America is not Barack Obama but the citizens capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.

red_dirt

#2
July 01, 2015, 08:30:24 AM
Quote from: Dori on July 01, 2015, 08:07:21 AM
Exactly.  There's more than one reason the NYT's is called "Yellow" journalism.  They're also cowards.

My observation is that Pope Benedict was run out of office by the rabid left wing. It has been alleged by many sources that the communists in the Vatican are flexing their power in many ways. The Obama connection would be hard to overlook.

So, what did they get?  A Jesuit social activist from South America pushing the anti-industrial "sustainable" agenda; i.e. the global governing body. The penny that has not yet dropped is that sustainable development is aimed at stopping this "nonsense" of lifting the world's mass out of poverty and misery. Wouldn't you think the Pope would be all for that? Funny thing, that.

So, there is an opinion of why the NYT jumped on board. Dumping Benedict was a left wing project. NYT is there.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions