The Mark!

[RV]

I received a phone call from a lady the other day. Her call was two fold. She wanted some information on baptism and the conversation got to the "vaccine". She asked me point blank if I thought the "vaccine" is the Mark of the Beast talked about in the Bible.

Now I should mention at this point that this lady said that neither she nor anyone in her family were going to get the "vaccine". I admitted to her that both my wife and I had previously had the Wuhan virus and also that we were not going to get the shot either. I told her how I thought it was odd that the "vaccine" is being pushed 24/7 on every media source and that the media is also pushing out the narrative that somehow the "vaccine" is supposed to be "long-lasting" while our immunity from the actual virus is supposedly not.

I told her truthfully that I didn't believe that the Wuhan virus "vaccine" was the mark of the beast however, it could be part of the mark or a precursor to the mark. We discussed at length how first they got the population wearing masks for their "safety". Supposedly, for "two weeks" to "flatten the curve" yet, now that it's been a year, they are closing down businesses who don't follow or enforce their "mandate". Of course social media is censoring and deleting ANY comment, opinion or posting that would question ANYTHING about the election or the "vaccination"

I also told her truthfully that I thought it was also odd that no recourse could be taken against either the drug company, the media nor the government if something happens in five or ten years as a result of receiving the "vaccine". By that time, it would be difficult if not impossible to prove anyway.

So, is the "vaccine" the Mark of the Beast talked about in the Bible? Probably not however, it may be a precursor to the mark, part of the mark or pave the way for the mark. Regardless, neither I nor my wife will be taking it.

[Rick]

I don't see the "mark" as being anything high tech - RFID, nanotech- this would require white males to implement and maintain. Look to the bruising of the forehead on Muslims.

[Bluepig]

One opinion, but with some backing. The vaccine cannot be the mark because it is given in the arm, not marked on the hand or forehead. Is the virus evil and ill intended? Yes, but that does not tie it to the mark. If she asked me a different question, I would have said yes. That is, if she asked do I think this is a progression step to people accepting the mark. A modern example is Applied Digital Solutions Verichip, and the Jacobs family (Jeff, Leslie and Derek) in 2002,

RFID, NFC, and other implants cause cancer in pets at an alarming rate, but their lifespan is so short, the associated cancer is seldom the cause of their death. We had a male Rottweiler that we had implanted as a pup, and by the time he was 8 he had cancer in his neck. The tumor and the RFID were removed as one unit, and he lived to be 12, but a re-occurrence of the cancer is what took him, and it was fast. Not looking for tears (it was 8 years ago), but to give an actual example.

I don't know what the mark will be, but dealing with times and technologies of our time, I would have zero problems believing that it would be a "knows all, stores all, shares all" RFID implant that could be the mark. During the 1700's they thought it could have been tattoo's. I likewise would have no problem believing that the Internet is the Beast. 91% of all web searches are related to porn. I don't know that porn is evil, but I do know it has detrimental causal effects, exposes children and adults should not be exposed to, and by and large has turned MILLIONS of women into exhibitionist, and prostitutes (being paid for sex). It has lowered our inhibitions,  and perverted our thresholds of right and wrong. It has expanded the amount of vulgarities we use in common parlance, and I personally believe it has in some measure driven a wedge between men and women in both anticipation and intimacy. Can you imagine if someone described "hooking up" as to the 2000's to someone in the late 50's? Of course that could be said for a lot of things that would melt peoples frontal cortex's, but the general promiscuity of our age is or should be an embarrassment to most (setting aside the mentally ill).

This has been going on for years (since 2002 if I remember correctly), and will continue under different names, companies, and ideologies. Soon it will be promoted as "suggested" by government, then it will move to "Recommended," then "REQUIRED." The initial kick off will be simple and seemingly inane. If you want your tax return the same week, get the RFID chip for the sake of security, simplicity, and safety. Then it will be if you don't get the RFID it could take up to six months to get your return. Then it will move to tax returns will not be issued to anyone not able to verify their identity via RFID. While I am not attempting to be hyperbolic, I am trying to set a motivational expectation from my perspective as to how the government works. Our government NEVER has a net positive effect on our lives, and the only way they ever get our compliance is through intimidation, threat or force (at the end of a gun - i.e. You Will Comply).

Keep an eye our for Applied Digital Solutions Inc. (ADS), BioHax International, xNT, 32M, Impinj Inc., Microchip Technologies, Xmark, Roper, Destron Fearing (for those who followed this since the mid 2000's, they are owned by Digital Angel - and they also own ADS who build the Verichip). When Digital Angel first came out people went ballistic. So they started to hide behind sub companies like Verichip, ADS, Destron, and Xmark, but they are bigger and have more political buy-in then ever before.

Ps. I believe Derek died at 17 or 18 in a motorcycle crash, and both of his parents died of cancer (if I understand it correctly). His father had all manner of health issues, and his mother was older when they were chipped.