www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMlOQsu2zM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMlOQsu2zM)
Hilarious and educational :laugh:
He has a point that Stalin had a better grasp of Big Brother tactics than did Hitler: instead of burning books, Iron Joe ordered them rewritten to agree with Party policy. "This is a warning for ALL mankind," he adds. That's enduring truth.
Quote from: quiller on August 21, 2014, 09:21:44 PM
He has a point that Stalin had a better grasp of Big Brother tactics than did Hitler: instead of burning books, Iron Joe ordered them rewritten to agree with Party policy. "This is a warning for ALL mankind," he adds. That's enduring truth.
He makes a few good points, but a stars-and-stripes dew-rag and a few hand gestures don't hide the fact that the man actually speaks well-constructed English sentences. He ain't no home-boy, no matter how hard he tries to look like one.
Go back and listen carefully to what he says. No street nigger wrote those words.
Quote from: TboneAgain on August 21, 2014, 09:30:23 PM
He makes a few good points, but a stars-and-stripes dew-rag and a few hand gestures don't hide the fact that the man actually speaks well-constructed English sentences. He ain't no home-boy, no matter how hard he tries to look like one.
Go back and listen carefully to what he says. No street nigger wrote those words.
A gimmick is a gimmick is a gimmick. If it gets even one "legitimate" homeboy to read a given book, it's
not a gimmick wasted. It also gets cute with white liberal mindset which would find it Politically Significant that there was a black parody of some PBS book-review show. Libs would gobble this stuff up, although they'd sorely miss the point he makes about where our society is headed. The libs can't get us there fast enough.
As for this guy's authenticity, those tattoos sure helped convince me he's seen his share of what his image implies. (*shrugs*) This was higher-budget than I was expecting: some of the close-ups show a far better camera than this type of thing usually employs.
Quote from: quiller on August 21, 2014, 09:55:32 PM
A gimmick is a gimmick is a gimmick. If it gets even one "legitimate" homeboy to read a given book, it's not a gimmick wasted. It also gets cute with white liberal mindset which would find it Politically Significant that there was a black parody of some PBS book-review show. Libs would gobble this stuff up, although they'd sorely miss the point he makes about where our society is headed. The libs can't get us there fast enough.
As for this guy's authenticity, those tattoos sure helped convince me he's seen his share of what his image implies. (*shrugs*) This was higher-budget than I was expecting: some of the close-ups show a far better camera than this type of thing usually employs.
I can't get all gushy about a ridiculous 'me-be-black' parody This little presentation could never get past anything BUT the typical PBS freak. Yeah, libs will gobble this stuff up. It's a kumbaya moment! It's a black man speakin' the Queen's English! (Yes, I'll borrow a g-less riff from our precious POTUS.)
Just out of curiosity, how does a "far better camera than this type of thing usually employs" justify such tripe? I mean, couldn't you make the exact same crap video with, say, a $200,000 camera? And wouldn't it still be crap? Just wonderin'..... (There I go, droppin' my g's again.)
Quote from: TboneAgain on August 21, 2014, 10:46:15 PM
I can't get all gushy about a ridiculous 'me-be-black' parody This little presentation could never get past anything BUT the typical PBS freak. Yeah, libs will gobble this stuff up. It's a kumbaya moment! It's a black man speakin' the Queen's English! (Yes, I'll borrow a g-less riff from our precious POTUS.)
Just out of curiosity, how does a "far better camera than this type of thing usually employs" justify such tripe? I mean, couldn't you make the exact same crap video with, say, a $200,000 camera? And wouldn't it still be crap? Just wonderin'..... (There I go, droppin' my g's again.)
Most of the parodies these days seem to have been shot with cameras costing well under $10K, not $200K. As for what is crap, the Kardashians have fans and so does Rachel Madcow.
Quote from: quiller on August 22, 2014, 05:39:05 AM
Most of the parodies these days seem to have been shot with cameras costing well under $10K, not $200K. As for what is crap, the Kardashians have fans and so does Rachel Madcow.
He is quite the capitalist, sells merchandize in conjunction with the show :thumbup:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITKfr1qOZ0w (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITKfr1qOZ0w)
Heres the animal farm thug analysis, I think this homeboy got it figured out, but like Tbone said, he aint no "home boy" lol