Quote from: Possum on March 06, 2025, 07:17:25 AMRight thar in the open where nobody looks.

Several decades ago the media ran the narrative of how wonderful Europe was, that we should emulate their system, everyone is safe, no guns, all these languages, and yet they get along? How beautiful is that?
I even had friends and associates regurgitate that bullshit.

Well, say, last few years, they all woke up, and none of them even liked the idea of the mess the EU had.
Sure, it's anecdotal, but it's also representative of a public shift in awareness, where no one listens to the LSM any longer, they think for themselves now. It all started with TEA!

Quote from: Possum on March 06, 2025, 07:16:10 AMEach floor weighed 4,500 tons of concrete and steel, and covered 43,000 square feet. If adding another 100 tons caused the collapse, why did it not collapse when the plane first hit? If, as we have been told, it was the fire from the fuel, this would be one theory the government could have proved in the first week. They could show how thick the steel was, how much concrete encased it, and how high the temperature would have to get to weaken it. A quick google search, from day one, tells us yes, jet fuel can weaken steel, but does not give the facts. Why? 

I think your a little high on floor weight. It cascaded, slowly picking up speed. You do know the floor was only attached at the central column. It only had a 10 ton limit.

I'm not saying the whole thing is not hinkey, just the "steel doesn't burn" meme is a distraction.

Quote from: Rick on March 06, 2025, 08:10:12 AMI think your a little high on floor weight. It cascaded, slowly picking up speed. You do know the floor was only attached at the central column. It only had a 10 ton limit.

I'm not saying the whole thing is not hinkey, just the "steel doesn't burn" meme is a distraction.

Exactly my point, nobody is saying the steel caught fire. What is and has been said is the heat from jet fuel burning weakened the steel. No where have I seen that it was the weight of the jet itself. (no idea why, but you're right that sould have been in the discussion) So, if it was the heat from the jet fuel it should be easy to prove that that is what absolutely happened. Jet fuel burns at around a thousand degrees, it should be easy to show that the same thickness of steel in the trade centers could be weakened by that temp. The government's official theory, or rather one of them, is it was the office fires that weakened the steel, could be, but high rises are built with fire retardant material. So what exactly is the government saying that was in the office fires that could burn hotter than the jet fuel? And if the collapse was the result of office fires, why have we not seen that is other high rise fires?

Just throwing this out. I guess I should have thrown it out this way, why has it not been proven beyond a doubt exactly what caused the buildings to collapse. By now we should see diagrams, formulas, etc. 

The weight of the floors came from a google search,

QuoteWeight of Twin Towers Floors
Each floor of the Twin Towers was nearly an acre in size and weighed approximately 4,545 tons, considering the total weight of each tower was around 500,000 tons and they each had 110 floors.

But looking further, there are also sites that show they weighed half of that. There are also sites showing the elevators themselves could lift 50 tons, which just leads again to the question why all the different numbers and why no proof?

I just read this. Probably one of the most lucid explanations of US involvement in wars since Korea, including the current mess in Ukraine, from a Vietnam War Combat Veteran. Worth the read:
https://x.com/sater_terry/status/1898421881025302735?s=43

Truth is, Europe wants Russia's resources, about 75 trillion, without it, the EU implodes.
This is why Trump will dump NATO, leave the EU to their own demise, and make a deal with Russia.
That's it in a nutshell, and by the way, Zelenskyy is about to be replaced.

Trump is America First, which means a peaceful partner in Russia, not Europe. The EU has been the breeding ground for war for centuries, and we're no longer going to be a participant.
The US can lead the world into peace, it just won't include the EU!

Why did the left create the Co2 Lie we needed to reduce at all costs?
I follow a lot of science articles about other periods in time, especially when the dinosaur transition took place.
researchers are finding out that it wasn't so much a mass extinction event, considering they had a 100 million year long run, that's a long time on man's scale of existence. It was a slow process, and probably took years.

What they're finding out is when the asteroid hit, it was massive, it blew tons of shit in the air, in turn, blocking out the sun for a very long time.
This had a residual effect in that it started killing off forests and creating even more CO2/less oxygen.
The oxygen rate in the time before was around 30% concentration, man would have had trouble during this period, during the event it dropped as low as 15%, which was too low for the dinosaur. Man would have thrived.

Why am I telling you this? The left knew about this for several decades, they knew from the past that limiting Co2 had a devastating effect on plant life.
This meant less food because plants need this gas not only to function but survive.
In other words, the left was trying to starve out the population. We know this because of the books they've written about culling humans, the Jabb is proof positive of this including what they did in nursing homes.

Anyway, I just wanted to get that off my chest, it's been bugging me for months. So Fuck em, burn coal!

Words found on liberals/rabid dogs tshirts.
 
Tshirt says
"Peace" what it means.... Peace, but only if you agree with me.
Tshirt says
"Be Nice" what it means.....Be nice, or I'll punch you in the face.
Tshirt says
"Co-Exist" what it means.....Co-exist or you will be exterminated.

everything about liberals fails the honesty test.
 

This was my response to a post claiming Russia doesn't owe us anything. They were talking about peace in context with Ukraine. McGregor said: "Putin doesn't owe us anything". I wanted to remind him it was the USR that created the world we live in today, so yeah, Putin owes us a lot for the history of the USSR.

AS a Cold War observer/survivor of Duck and Cover, I am quite aware the Marxist movement in the US was a product of the USSR as evidenced in the Communist Papers 1963. (Also research Harry Hay)
With that said, having watched both the Dim and GOP parties take up the mantle of supporting Marxists over the decades since the USSR' collapse, it's obvious Russia has abandoned the idea of global leadership, and aligned with the values of the American people.
An acceptance and apology for the Marxist incursion of the 50s and 60s would go a long way in repairing the hatred we once had for Russia. Most of us just want to move on and get along, but many still hold a grudge.
An acceptance of blame would bring an end to this long-held animosity! There is no reason we can be friends and allies!

My money says the mini-dictator does something to break peace with Russia, then blames Russia within 3 weeks...
What do you think?

Quote from: Solar on March 13, 2025, 01:31:14 PMMy money says the mini-dictator does something to break peace with Russia, then blames Russia within 3 weeks...
What do you think?

Trump needs to make sure he only gets enough weapons for protection and not enough to wage war. Any money sent over needs to go to the government and not to the mini dictator and only spent on recovery. And for once, audit what goes!

Quote from: Possum on March 13, 2025, 02:07:26 PMTrump needs to make sure he only gets enough weapons for protection and not enough to wage war. Any money sent over needs to go to the government and not to the mini dictator and only spent on recovery. And for once, audit what goes!

I doubt he'll get anything in a timely manner, Trump will promise and delay, at least for a full month, because he knows Zel is a snake for the highest bidder.

Wish I had thought of this, move the U.N. to Gaza. Let the terrorist who run the U.N live with the terrorist in Gaza. We could house illegals in the U.N. building while they await deportation.

https://hotair.com/generalissimo/2025/03/13/another-reason-to-move-the-united-nations-to-gaza-n3800721

Quote from: Possum on March 14, 2025, 06:13:58 AMWish I had thought of this, move the U.N. to Gaza. Let the terrorist who run the U.N live with the terrorist in Gaza. We could house illegals in the U.N. building while they await deportation.

https://hotair.com/generalissimo/2025/03/13/another-reason-to-move-the-united-nations-to-gaza-n3800721

Good idea, I've long been in favor of kicking out that nest of spies AKA the U.N. out of that building and turn it into a home for disabled veterans. Staffed of course by Hooters girls...Or Donut Dollies Anybody who was "in country" knew who the Donut Dollies were. (often referred to, fondly of course, as "biscut bitches)

If I ever need a hole dug I am hiring the democrat party. They sure know how to dig'em. And fast. Course it would have to stay there awhile, doesn't look like they know how to fill the hole back up.


Wonder if they have realized it yet, it's going to be worse for them after the midterms.


Trump, if you're listening, you need to get Cornyn primaried.

Captured Ukrainian soldiers tell their stories of how some of them were captured off the streets of home and thrown on the frontlines.