Your Thoughts?

119TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. J. RES. ll
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide
that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more
than three times.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. OGLES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on

JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that no person shall be elected to
the office of the President more than three times.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled
3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:56 Jan 13, 2025 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:\USERS\MLCHASNOFF\APPDATA\ROAMING\SOFTQUAD\XMETAL\11.0\GEN\C\OGLES
January 13, 2025 (1:56 p.m.)
G:\M\19\OGLES\OGLES_006.XML
g:\VHLC\011325\011325.071.xml (959891|4)
2
1 States within seven years after the date of its submission
2 for ratification:
3 ''ARTICLE—
4 ''No person shall be elected to the office of the Presi5 dent more than three times, nor be elected to any addi6 tional term after being elected to two consecutive terms,
7 and no person who has held the office of President, or
8 acted as President, for more than two years of a term to
9 which some other person was elected President shall be
10 elected to the office of the President more than twice.''.

https://ogles.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/ogles.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/PIH-OGLES_006%20%28Constitutional%20Amendment%29.pdf

No. We had experience with that about 100 years ago and it was a disaster. Leave well enough alone. A better exercise would be term limits on congress critters.

Quote from: supsalemgr on January 25, 2025, 04:44:37 AMNo. We had experience with that about 100 years ago and it was a disaster. Leave well enough alone. A better exercise would be term limits on congress critters.

    While we're at it, every politician must have an audit when they leave to see where the money came from. We had to earn ours the hard way, with the IRS poking into everything. Let the American people poke into the politicians for a change.

Jump ahead to the 10:45 time mark.

Mixed emotions on this one. I believe Trump was cheated out of his second term in an illegal coup by the Marxists. So technically I suppose this is his 3rd term, HOWEVER, I believe Patel and Bondi must initiate a REAL investigation into the matter once appointed. I would want to see proof positive which I am sure there is of the fact Trump won and J6 was part an parcel of an engineered coup.

I would support a third term under these conditions.

BUT...it could set a dangerous precedent, in the future should we have anymore Carters, Clintons, Obamaos or Bidens.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on January 26, 2025, 05:01:15 AMMixed emotions on this one. I believe Trump was cheated out of his second term in an illegal coup by the Marxists. So technically I suppose this is his 3rd term, HOWEVER, I believe Patel and Bondi must initiate a REAL investigation into the matter once appointed. I would want to see proof positive which I am sure there is of the fact Trump won and J6 was part an parcel of an engineered coup.

I would support a third term under these conditions.

BUT...it could set a dangerous precedent, in the future should we have anymore Carters, Clintons, Obamaos or Bidens.

I too have mix emotions. He is going to be beat up pretty badly these four years, what shape will he be in for the next. And yes there is a dangerous precedent set.

Quote from: Rick on January 26, 2025, 07:30:58 AMI too have mix emotions. He is going to be beat up pretty badly these four years, what shape will he be in for the next. And yes there is a dangerous precedent set.

Beat up, by who?        

I am all for a trump third term. One reason is that it would trigger lefties SO bad.

Quote from: Solar on January 25, 2025, 03:59:36 AMYour Thoughts?

119TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. J. RES. ll
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide
that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more
than three times.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. OGLES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on

JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that no person shall be elected to
the office of the President more than three times.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled
3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:56 Jan 13, 2025 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:\USERS\MLCHASNOFF\APPDATA\ROAMING\SOFTQUAD\XMETAL\11.0\GEN\C\OGLES
January 13, 2025 (1:56 p.m.)
G:\M\19\OGLES\OGLES_006.XML
g:\VHLC\011325\011325.071.xml (959891|4)
2
1 States within seven years after the date of its submission
2 for ratification:
3 ''ARTICLE—
4 ''No person shall be elected to the office of the Presi5 dent more than three times, nor be elected to any addi6 tional term after being elected to two consecutive terms,
7 and no person who has held the office of President, or
8 acted as President, for more than two years of a term to
9 which some other person was elected President shall be
10 elected to the office of the President more than twice.''.

https://ogles.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/ogles.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/PIH-OGLES_006%20%28Constitutional%20Amendment%29.pdf

Unfortunately trump will be pretty old at the end of this term. Im sure he will still be involved with things but with less of a workload than being president. I think a better move would be for him to be the vice president of whomever he annoints to be the next president. Because whomever he picks will be the next president.