Elon to Release Damning Info on Biden Laptop

Started by T Hunt, December 02, 2022, 03:28:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

T Hunt

Quote from: Solar on December 03, 2022, 08:08:59 AMYep, whether LSM likes it or not, they've been forced to concede the narrative for possibly all of December. :thumbsup:

Now we see what kanyes escapade was supposed to distract us from.
"Let's Go Brandon, I agree!"  -Biden

Solar

Quote from: T Hunt on December 03, 2022, 08:43:49 AMNow we see what kanyes escapade was supposed to distract us from.
Fascinating observation.  :thumbup:
Now Ye has a shitload to answer for.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

yrunvs

What better way to take the focus off of recently stolen elections.
I'm no Gynecologist but hey I'll take a look.

Solar

Quote from: yrunvs on December 03, 2022, 08:55:37 AMWhat better way to take the focus off of recently stolen elections.

Think of this as a double frontal attack against the Marxists. We've only just begun to fight.

This will only enhance Lakes chances of success.

What Musk is exposing goes further than the massive Hunter Biden scandal. It reveals the breadth and depth of the corruption and total disregard for free speech.

James Woods is filing suit against the WH for removing his First Amendment Right to unfettered Free Speech.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Solar

Yep, looks like this will be news for a long time to come. :thumbsup:

Comer stated, "Well, in January, Jason, when I take your old position as Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, I can promise you this, every employee at Twitter who was involved in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story will have an opportunity to come before Congress and explain their actions to the American people. This was a huge story. ... But this story's just beginning, Jason, because we're going to have every single person at Twitter that was involved in this in front of the House Oversight Committee as soon as possible."

He added, "[W]e knew that the Democratic National Committee was communicating with Twitter. We knew the Biden campaign was communicating with Twitter. That's why, in April of this year, we, on the House Oversight Committee, requested that Twitter preserve all documents and correspondence between Twitter executives and the Democratic National Committee and the Biden campaign with respect to the Hunter Biden laptop story."

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/12/03/comer-every-twitter-employee-involved-in-squelching-hunter-laptop-story-will-testify-before-congress/
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

ZenMode

#20
Twitter granted requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign to remove content in 2020, report says

Twitter in 2020 granted requests from both President Donald Trump's White House and candidate Joe Biden's campaign to remove content, according to a thread published Friday by independent journalist Matt Taibbi.

The long Twitter thread, dubbed "The Twitter Files," was hyped up by Elon Musk, the social media platform's billionaire owner and self-styled "free speech absolutist." The thread primarily included internal communications and other details about Twitter's controversial decision to suppress a New York Post report concerning the laptop of Biden's son Hunter in October 2020.


https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-granted-requests-from-trump-white-house-biden-remove-posts-2022-12
"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide that proves they should value evidence."

Solar

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 05:40:55 AMTwitter granted requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign to remove content in 2020, report says

Twitter in 2020 granted requests from both President Donald Trump's White House and candidate Joe Biden's campaign to remove content, according to a thread published Friday by independent journalist Matt Taibbi.

The long Twitter thread, dubbed "The Twitter Files," was hyped up by Elon Musk, the social media platform's billionaire owner and self-styled "free speech absolutist." The thread primarily included internal communications and other details about Twitter's controversial decision to suppress a New York Post report concerning the laptop of Biden's son Hunter in October 2020.


https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-granted-requests-from-trump-white-house-biden-remove-posts-2022-12
Still under the illusion we have a two party system I see.
Twitturd Offered the Marxist DNC the same thing offered to the Uniparty Establishment!
We'll attack Conservatives on your behalf!

Are you really that Obtuse? Your lack of intellectual acuity is akin to that of a black hole vs light.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 05:40:55 AMTwitter granted requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign to remove content in 2020, report says

Twitter in 2020 granted requests from both President Donald Trump's White House and candidate Joe Biden's campaign to remove content, according to a thread published Friday by independent journalist Matt Taibbi.

The long Twitter thread, dubbed "The Twitter Files," was hyped up by Elon Musk, the social media platform's billionaire owner and self-styled "free speech absolutist." The thread primarily included internal communications and other details about Twitter's controversial decision to suppress a New York Post report concerning the laptop of Biden's son Hunter in October 2020.


https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-granted-requests-from-trump-white-house-biden-remove-posts-2022-12
I couldn't help but notice that nowhere in the article does it show what Trump asked to be blocked or how that could have affected the election. Yet it should be obvious to anyone, including some of our posters that the media, including twitter, blocking the news story about all the corruption and fraud found on Hunters laptop did influence the election by BLOCKING THE TRUTH. The laptop is not just someone's comment, it is just not someone's opinion, it is Hunter writing down about all the corruption, the blackmail, and the selling of the U.S to China that surrounds and includes Biden.

Come on Zen, can you see the difference?

ZenMode

Quote from: Possum on December 04, 2022, 06:00:49 AMI couldn't help but notice that nowhere in the article does it show what Trump asked to be blocked or how that could have affected the election. Yet it should be obvious to anyone, including some of our posters that the media, including twitter, blocking the news story about all the corruption and fraud found on Hunters laptop did influence the election by BLOCKING THE TRUTH. The laptop is not just someone's comment, it is just not someone's opinion, it is Hunter writing down about all the corruption, the blackmail, and the selling of the U.S to China that surrounds and includes Biden.

Come on Zen, can you see the difference?

Twitter has the right to allow/disallow anything they want. The team of the sitting US President should not be asking Twitter, Facebook,  etc to do anything. That is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.
"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide that proves they should value evidence."

Solar

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 06:04:09 AMTwitter has the right to allow/disallow anything they want. The team of the sitting US President should not be asking Twitter, Facebook,  etc to do anything. That is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.
So your claim that both party's were afforded the same deal, somehow makes it a wash?
You are all over the map here. Either we arrest all party's involved or we pretend it never happened.

The left interfered with the election, is that too hard to admit?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 06:04:09 AMTwitter has the right to allow/disallow anything they want. The team of the sitting US President should not be asking Twitter, Facebook,  etc to do anything. That is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.
Wrong on two accounts, but nice try. Way back it was shown to you how the government helped Twitter, facebook, google, among others get started by giving them incentives, among them tax incentives. Part of the "strings" attached to these incentives was that they would not censure. Period. Two, the president can ask, that is not the same as demanding. A good example of what a government official can not do is to demand like this, "stop investigating my son for corruption or you will not get the millions in government dollars".  See the difference?

ZenMode

Quote from: Solar on December 04, 2022, 06:15:47 AMSo your claim that both party's were afforded the same deal, somehow makes it a wash?
You are all over the map here. Either we arrest all party's involved or we pretend it never happened.

The left interfered with the election, is that too hard to admit?
Any private entity can make a request to any other private company. Kraft foods can legally ask Twitter to take down a disparaging Tweet. Twitter can decide what they want to do with that requesr. The true issue begins when the team of the sitting US President is making requests. That is a direct infringement of free speech rights.
"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide that proves they should value evidence."

Sauce

#27
Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 06:21:26 AMAny private entity can make a request to any other private company. Kraft foods can legally ask Twitter to take down a disparaging Tweet. Twitter can decide what they want to do with that requesr. The true issue begins when the team of the sitting US President is making requests. That is a direct infringement of free speech rights.

Guess we'll see if you feel the same way later this week when co shadow president Obama and Rice are called out for for outright colluding with twitter in the name of the cardboard cutout

Solar

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 06:21:26 AMAny private entity can make a request to any other private company. Kraft foods can legally ask Twitter to take down a disparaging Tweet. Twitter can decide what they want to do with that requesr. The true issue begins when the team of the sitting US President is making requests. That is a direct infringement of free speech rights.
So what was your point in stating both party's were involved?
It was still election interference by the left, which is a treasonable offense!
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Possum

Quote from: ZenMode on December 04, 2022, 06:21:26 AMAny private entity can make a request to any other private company. Kraft foods can legally ask Twitter to take down a disparaging Tweet. Twitter can decide what they want to do with that requesr. The true issue begins when the team of the sitting US President is making requests. That is a direct infringement of free speech rights.
You have missed the main point of this discussion. By taking government incentives, they gave up their right to censure. That is what this discussion should focus around. You are making a false claim that twitter can censure who they want, they gave up that right when they crawled into the incentive trap. Why can you not get this????????