Most of us know about the true purpose Margaret Sanger had for creating Planned Parenthood.  But I had never heard of this memo written by the man in charge of the "Population Control" division.

The document revealed how the organization planned to reduce the birth rates and promote selectivity in terms of who would be giving birth. Planned Parenthood had a division called "Population Control" that Frederick Jaffe was in charge of, and his memo laid out specific goals on how to prevent certain women from having more children.

Under "social constraints," there was a clear goal to restructure the family and this was meant to be done by postponing marriage or avoiding it altogether and altering the "image of the ideal family size." Compulsory education of children was another measure taken in order to provide a social constraint on pregnancy and birth, which really makes you stop and wonder why so many people on the left advocate for more funding for public schools rather than focusing on school choice or providing resources for charter schools or even homeschooling. The other suggestions included:

Encourage increased homosexuality

Educate for family limitation

Fertility control agents in water supply

Encourage women to work

When people have pointed to the increased encouragement of homosexuality and the push for women to join the workforce as factors that have diminished the nuclear family, they have been called conspiracy theorists, and yet Planned Parenthood explicitly stated that these were used as tools to curb the birth rate and destroy the nuclear family.

The article also talks about the "economic deterrents/incentives," and "social controls."  Very interesting.  Toy

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/planned-parenthoods-1969-jaffe-memo-aimed-to-curb-american-population-abortion-on-demand-increased-homosexuality

Quote from: Solars Toy on October 22, 2022, 08:26:23 AMMost of us know about the true purpose Margaret Sanger had for creating Planned Parenthood.  But I had never heard of this memo written by the man in charge of the "Population Control" division.

The document revealed how the organization planned to reduce the birth rates and promote selectivity in terms of who would be giving birth. Planned Parenthood had a division called "Population Control" that Frederick Jaffe was in charge of, and his memo laid out specific goals on how to prevent certain women from having more children.

Under "social constraints," there was a clear goal to restructure the family and this was meant to be done by postponing marriage or avoiding it altogether and altering the "image of the ideal family size." Compulsory education of children was another measure taken in order to provide a social constraint on pregnancy and birth, which really makes you stop and wonder why so many people on the left advocate for more funding for public schools rather than focusing on school choice or providing resources for charter schools or even homeschooling. The other suggestions included:

Encourage increased homosexuality

Educate for family limitation

Fertility control agents in water supply

Encourage women to work

When people have pointed to the increased encouragement of homosexuality and the push for women to join the workforce as factors that have diminished the nuclear family, they have been called conspiracy theorists, and yet Planned Parenthood explicitly stated that these were used as tools to curb the birth rate and destroy the nuclear family.

The article also talks about the "economic deterrents/incentives," and "social controls."  Very interesting.  Toy

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/planned-parenthoods-1969-jaffe-memo-aimed-to-curb-american-population-abortion-on-demand-increased-homosexuality

I would say they were pretty darn successful.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 22, 2022, 09:38:33 AMI would say they were pretty darn successful.

The article goes further into taking over the education system and of course limiting the number of children you can have.

Finally, the memo laid out measures that would prevent certain women from giving birth, including:

Payments to encourage sterilization

Payments to encourage abortion

Abortion and sterilization on demand

Make contraception truly available and accessible

QuoteEducate for family limitation

I agree with this. Women need to keep their legs closed. There is no reason to have that many kids nor that many baby daddies.

However it has gone past Planned Parenthood into other evil ideologies. Gay is one thing, but they are trying to tranny little kids.

Women working isn't a problem, but the radical feminists only want positions of authority, power, and control. They don't want to work for a living. Let them be bricklayers.

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on October 22, 2022, 10:18:19 AMI agree with this. Women need to keep their legs closed. There is no reason to have that many kids nor that many baby daddies.

However it has gone past Planned Parenthood into other evil ideologies. Gay is one thing, but they are trying to tranny little kids.

Women working isn't a problem, but the radical feminists only want positions of authority, power, and control. They don't want to work for a living. Let them be bricklayers.

Women working is a problem when all women HAVE to work and no longer have a choice.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 22, 2022, 02:48:41 PMWomen working is a problem when all women HAVE to work and no longer have a choice.

I agree.  Years ago I wrote an opinion piece on another forum about how feminism has damaged women.  The greatest job a woman can have is raising their children and being the caretaker of their home. 

Working a full time job and having others "raise" my children was not fulfilling in any way.  Toy

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on October 22, 2022, 10:18:19 AMI agree with this. Women need to keep their legs closed. There is no reason to have that many kids nor that many baby daddies.

However it has gone past Planned Parenthood into other evil ideologies. Gay is one thing, but they are trying to tranny little kids.

Women working isn't a problem, but the radical feminists only want positions of authority, power, and control. They don't want to work for a living. Let them be bricklayers.

My father was a mason (bricklayer) and all of us got a turn working with him.  His best helpers were my brother Ted and my sister Karen.  I did one day with him but all I could do was carry bricks over to him.  I couldn't carry the cinderblock nor could I mix the mud. 

He told me he appreciated my help but I was to small to do the work.  Toy

Quote from: T Hunt on October 22, 2022, 02:48:41 PMWomen working is a problem when all women HAVE to work and no longer have a choice.

And so went the plan. Destroy the American Dream.

Quote from: Solars Toy on October 23, 2022, 07:38:32 AMMy father was a mason (bricklayer) and all of us got a turn working with him.  His best helpers were my brother Ted and my sister Karen.  I did one day with him but all I could do was carry bricks over to him.  I couldn't carry the cinderblock nor could I mix the mud. 

He told me he appreciated my help but I was to small to do the work.  Toy

2:50

I agree with Jordan Peterson. Feminists want positions of authority, control, fame, influence, and power. They don't want to be a blue collar worker. Bricklaying was just his example. That feminazi inadvertently told us that there is a difference between men and women.

You are probably a different breed of women. You helped out, did your best, and it helped the common goal. I am not against women working. But, they better do their job.

I understand about the women and the home roll. I don't disagree with it. A "proper" housewife/mother is essential for family life. That is one reason why I am against people having children because they don't raise them correctly (too many Obama's sons out there), or raise them with evil intentions (like raising a boy as a girl).

Quote from: Solar on October 23, 2022, 09:09:45 AMAnd so went the plan. Destroy the American Dream.

You know something I noticed? Around the same time that so many women left the home and went into the workforce was the same time that children and the elderly started working alot less.

What I mean is, that in the past, kids would do ALOT more around the home, or if on a farm would be full workers. Nowadays childhood is expected to be early retirement, free from any work or labor at least until you are 15 or 16 and even then most dont.

Likewise the elderly. Nowadays grandma gets too old, off to the Home! But in the old days the elderly tended to move in with their relatives and would continue to help out around the house and were a great help with the kids.

Both of those groups were able to contribute something to society in the old days, but now they have been removed completely, at the same time women cant even stay home anymore cuz so many need 2 paychecks to survive, while their kids waste their time doing nothing and their elderly grandparents waste away in a home doing nothing constructive, having no purpose.

How much the left has destroyed!

Quote from: T Hunt on October 23, 2022, 01:04:45 PMYou know something I noticed? Around the same time that so many women left the home and went into the workforce was the same time that children and the elderly started working alot less.

What I mean is, that in the past, kids would do ALOT more around the home, or if on a farm would be full workers. Nowadays childhood is expected to be early retirement, free from any work or labor at least until you are 15 or 16 and even then most dont.

Likewise the elderly. Nowadays grandma gets too old, off to the Home! But in the old days the elderly tended to move in with their relatives and would continue to help out around the house and were a great help with the kids.

Both of those groups were able to contribute something to society in the old days, but now they have been removed completely, at the same time women cant even stay home anymore cuz so many need 2 paychecks to survive, while their kids waste their time doing nothing and their elderly grandparents waste away in a home doing nothing constructive, having no purpose.

How much the left has destroyed!

Exactly!!!
The Marxists literally destroyed 10 thousand years of society in 3 generations.
It will be work reversing it, but like righting a train on the tracks, once back in place, things will progress naturally.

Like rerouting a river, it takes constant work keeping it in one place, but rivers are like society, it finds its own path and tends to stay the path forever
Sure it meanders a bit, but not far without cataclysmic change. What we suffered was not a cataclysm, but just a brief a disruption and will quickly right itself.

I know, a lot of metaphors. But isn't that life in general, always seeking the Right path when left alone.
Our Founders knew that and that's why they gave us a restricted Government. Evil Scum found work arounds.

Quote from: Solar on October 23, 2022, 01:16:52 PMExactly!!!
The Marxists literally destroyed 10 thousand years of society in 3 generations.
It will be work reversing it, but like righting a train on the tracks, once back in place, things will progress naturally.

Like rerouting a river, it takes constant work keeping it in one place, but rivers are like society, it finds its own path and tends to stay the path forever
Sure it meanders a bit, but not far without cataclysmic change. What we suffered was not a cataclysm, but just a brief a disruption and will quickly right itself.

I know, a lot of metaphors. But isn't that life in general, always seeking the Right path when left alone.
Our Founders knew that and that's why they gave us a restricted Government. Evil Scum found work arounds.

No thats a pretty good metaphor. Out here on the plains I know a bit about rivers and their courses. They have a big river valley and while they will change a little within it, they never jump outside it without a major flood.

The dems tried to be that flood but trump had the sandbags at the ready.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 23, 2022, 01:25:05 PMNo thats a pretty good metaphor. Out here on the plains I know a bit about rivers and their courses. They have a big river valley and while they will change a little within it, they never jump outside it without a major flood.

The dems tried to be that flood but trump had the sandbags at the ready.

           

They created single Moms.
The fathers were ran off by the states helping.
The states would treat them like royalty.
Pay all their bills, give them plenty of spending money.
They would expect the dem vote.
The bars were full of women that wanted to retire young.

Quote from: Solar on October 23, 2022, 09:09:45 AMAnd so went the plan. Destroy the American Dream.

There was a time when a guy could work at the local service station and afford to get married to a stay at home mom and have kids. Then the women went to work that's when prices for everything went up bigly.