17% of people aged 18-29 believe America should be ruled by a monarch, as opposed to 1% for senior citizens. 25% do not care either way. This is similar for support of freedom of speech, the younger the person, the less likely to support freedom of speech. This is largely because of what is being taught in schools. "Hate speech" is the most  emphasized in schools, including private.

The American Revolution is hardly taught in school anymore. https://www.unz.com/anepigone/monarchy-seniors-malarkey/

Quote from: unver on March 25, 2021, 05:29:55 PM
17% of people aged 18-29 believe America should be ruled by a monarch, as opposed to 1% for senior citizens. 25% do not care either way. This is similar for support of freedom of speech, the younger the person, the less likely to support freedom of speech. This is largely because of what is being taught in schools. "Hate speech" is the most  emphasized in schools, including private.

The American Revolution is hardly taught in school anymore. https://www.unz.com/anepigone/monarchy-seniors-malarkey/

Public school, university and college brainwashing has been quite effective for the radical Dems.

Wait a second...

I thought America was a "bad place"? So now, we are are supposed to have royalty?

It's a yougov poll.

Young people being stupid doesn't surprise me but 13% of Hispanics supporting this does.  

when they say "Monarch" what they really mean is a "President for life" (Dictator) like Idi Ami, Mugabe,Castro or one of the . Korea Kim boys...you know somebody really smart like that.  All hail Queen Hilary

Just what did Betsy DeVos do exactly???

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on March 26, 2021, 05:49:16 AM
when they say "Monarch" what they really mean is a "President for life" (Dictator) like Idi Ami, Mugabe,Castro or one of the . Korea Kim boys...you know somebody really smart like that.  All hail Queen Hilary

OK...

TRUMP 4 EVA!!!

Quote from: Owebo on March 26, 2021, 06:15:44 AM
Just what did Betsy DeVos do exactly???

Why is she interjected into this thread?

Quote from: unver on March 25, 2021, 05:29:55 PM
17% of people aged 18-29 believe America should be ruled by a monarch, as opposed to 1% for senior citizens. 25% do not care either way. This is similar for support of freedom of speech, the younger the person, the less likely to support freedom of speech. This is largely because of what is being taught in schools. "Hate speech" is the most  emphasized in schools, including private.

The American Revolution is hardly taught in school anymore. https://www.unz.com/anepigone/monarchy-seniors-malarkey/

Wouldn't it be entertaining to hear from these folks why they favor a monarchy?

Quote from: supsalemgr on March 26, 2021, 08:37:02 AM
Wouldn't it be entertaining to hear from these folks why they favor a monarchy?

You would here a lot of "um"s and "because my professors said it is good".  I can already feel my IQ dropping thinking about it.

Speaking out both sides of their mouths. I guaran-damn-tee you that these same fools were besmirching Trump by calling him a dictator.

Democraps don't need a monarchy they're all in lockstep anyway, like the brainwashed lemmings that they are.

England has had 58 monarchs in the last 1150 years (Alfred the Great.) Of those 58, three can be viewed as bad. Edward II, Richard II, Bloody Mary. There were three others who were disappointments. Henry VI, George IV, and Edward VIII. How many Presidents of the US can meet that record. The list of outstanding Monarchs is too long to list here. Lets just name a few. Alfred, Athelstan, Edward the Elder, Henry II, Edward I, Edward III, Charles II, Anne, Elizabeth, George III, Victoria, George V, Edward VII, and Elizabeth II. I have missed many but can you name any Presidents of the US just in the 20th century who were outstanding?
The monarch is non-political and does not have power, but has enormous Authority. The one area where the Queen has no authority is over taxes. This means the Prime Minister has political power but only at the pleasure of the Crown and Parliament. No Prime Minister can legally become a dictator, nor can a Judge or a General. The Queen has the same role and authority as the Presidents of Germany and Israel. She is normally a figurehead but has a vital role in a crisis.
The entire Royal Family costs the British taxpayer less than the UK Embassy in Paris.
The Queen was trained for the job for 16 years before she assumed the role and was trained by people like Churchil. The POTUS can take office without any training. The UK's next King has already been in training for over 60 years.
The US could (and has) done a lot worse than rejoining the Commonwealth and adopting the Queen as your head of State...or does President Biden look that great to you.

Quote from: Tory Potter on March 26, 2021, 12:26:37 PM
England has had 58 monarchs in the last 1150 years (Alfred the Great.) Of those 58, three can be viewed as bad. Edward II, Richard II, Bloody Mary. There were three others who were disappointments. Henry VI, George IV, and Edward VIII. How many Presidents of the US can meet that record. The list of outstanding Monarchs is too long to list here. Lets just name a few. Alfred, Athelstan, Edward the Elder, Henry II, Edward I, Edward III, Charles II, Anne, Elizabeth, George III, Victoria, George V, Edward VII, and Elizabeth II. I have missed many but can you name any Presidents of the US just in the 20th century who were outstanding?
The monarch is non-political and does not have power, but has enormous Authority. The one area where the Queen has no authority is over taxes. This means the Prime Minister has political power but only at the pleasure of the Crown and Parliament. No Prime Minister can legally become a dictator, nor can a Judge or a General. The Queen has the same role and authority as the Presidents of Germany and Israel. She is normally a figurehead but has a vital role in a crisis.
The entire Royal Family costs the British taxpayer less than the UK Embassy in Paris.
The Queen was trained for the job for 16 years before she assumed the role and was trained by people like Churchil. The POTUS can take office without any training. The UK's next King has already been in training for over 60 years.
The US could (and has) done a lot worse than rejoining the Commonwealth and adopting the Queen as your head of State...or does President Biden look that great to you.

As Americans we're not used to hearing arguments for the re-establishment of the Monarchy . Biden has already been a complete total disaster just thinking about what kind of damage an idiot like him could do if he had a lifetime in the highest office boggles the mind. I'm not certain if there would be a country left for another king to fix.