Pentagon Training Materials Targeting Conservatives in the Military

Started by Solar, March 24, 2021, 09:55:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Solar

I have obtained a copy of all the materials regarding the sudden new threat of "Extremism" used for training in the United States military. Throughout the services, service members have been shocked at the Biden blitz to root out ideas and people who stand in the way of the administration's transformative agenda.

One individual in the training told me, "The military is one of the last institutions left that hasn't been radicalized by the progressives. That's why it is being targeted now."

All personnel are being subjected to a PowerPoint presentation packed with progressive ideology and misstatements of the Constitution. Designated officers are conducting the training on bases, stations, and ships at sea. The slides contain misstatements of the law and warped characterizations of fellow citizens who believe in constitutional principles.

The document crafted by the Pentagon for the Navy is called "Extremism Stand Down – Commander Engagements With All Service Members. Discussion Guide 19FEB21." I have obtained both the slides shown to service members and the training guide for the officers presenting the training.

"Extremism in the Ranks" is a capitalized proper noun in the document.

"The Navy's leadership plays a significant role in preventing Extremism in the Ranks, particularly in the creation and sustainment of command climates which discourage and hold accountable such behavior and promote a culture of respect, trust and professionalism in the Force."



https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2021/03/22/read-the-pentagon-training-materials-targeting-conservatives-in-the-military-n1434071
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

RV

Maybe the Transgendered Military could just throw sticks and rocks at an invading army. This would go along with the liberals gun bans and defunding law enforcement...
RV

"Trust in the Lord with all of your heart and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him and He shall direct thy path."

dickfoster

Quote from: RV on March 24, 2021, 10:21:53 AM
Maybe the Transgendered Military could just throw sticks and rocks at an invading army. This would go along with the liberals gun bans and defunding law enforcement...
Or maybe counter attack using their purses as deadly weapons.
Crazy but not stupid!

Mimsy

In ten years we won't be able to tell the difference between a military parade and pride day. :mad:

Bluepig

We received our demand today to rat out ANYONE who could possibly be an offender, offensive, or in any way extremist. After sitting through a mask or shill of an hour long meeting, ALL employees, civilian and military were indoctrinated with a follow-on 45 minutes of the base commander and a video of the SECDEF, both blabbering on about the Constitution, it's limits, and our requirement to defend those limits on free speech, its practice, and how we all have to do our part. All of this was done under the cover of Extremism. They came up a bit short of handing out gold stars that we could issue to any group believed to be, or associated with white supremacists' (modern shock and awe code for white people who enjoy the color of their birth and have no say in the matter).

We, in short, were told about the limits of our Constitutional Rights, how they have to be controlled, and how we should forego them. We kept hearing Constitution, which was nothing less than an attempt to tell us our rights were given by and subject to the constraints of government. While I can't talk about our mission, I feel compelled to talk about the live stream lecture, and how anti-Constitution, more over, Anti-Bill of Rights it was. No mention of an NDA was spoken, on the contrary, the outreach by the overreach of the meeting (re-programming) often strayed into how we conduct ourselves on social media, and how doing anything in our personal lives that could be considered contrary could, and would likely result in termination.

Ours was to the department of the Army, but I read the Navy had the same discussion, so I went and read the minutes. Their larger focus was not about White Supremacists', but about protecting LGBTQI+ monsters. One of the questions asked of Naval leadership was something like this; paraphrased - one of our managers is always talking in support of BLM issues and protests, would that be considered offensive? The answer was counterintuitive to the instruction of the day, which largely pulled the mask off of all the undertones. The Naval command response was; paraphrased - we all have outside beliefs and activates, as long as they don't support extremists views or promote violence, then such discussions are permissible. So if you talk about your family outing to Hawaii, Disney, Six Flags, etc., and all of the members of your family are white, you are probably supremacists', but if you are in a professional environment and wield influence over others, as such promote or demand acceptance of a BLM movement, that would be legal? I guess when you support a group that calls for the killing of all white people, that is not extreme, but constructive in support of a long term agenda?

Forgive me all, but FUCK THEM! It is so easy to factually dismiss it as woefully unconstitutional, the only problem is that most of our kids were programmed by the Marxist Public School system, are serving in the Armed Forces, I bet more than half buy into this brain washing.

RV

Quote from: Bluepig on March 24, 2021, 07:54:04 PM
We received our demand today to rat out ANYONE who could possibly be an offender, offensive, or in any way extremist. After sitting through a mask or shill of an hour long meeting, ALL employees, civilian and military were indoctrinated with a follow-on 45 minutes of the base commander and a video of the SECDEF, both blabbering on about the Constitution, it's limits, and our requirement to defend those limits on free speech, its practice, and how we all have to do our part. All of this was done under the cover of Extremism. They came up a bit short of handing out gold stars that we could issue to any group believed to be, or associated with white supremacists' (modern shock and awe code for white people who enjoy the color of their birth and have no say in the matter).

We, in short, were told about the limits of our Constitutional Rights, how they have to be controlled, and how we should forego them. We kept hearing Constitution, which was nothing less than an attempt to tell us our rights were given by and subject to the constraints of government. While I can't talk about our mission, I feel compelled to talk about the live stream lecture, and how anti-Constitution, more over, Anti-Bill of Rights it was. No mention of an NDA was spoken, on the contrary, the outreach by the overreach of the meeting (re-programming) often strayed into how we conduct ourselves on social media, and how doing anything in our personal lives that could be considered contrary could, and would likely result in termination.

Ours was to the department of the Army, but I read the Navy had the same discussion, so I went and read the minutes. Their larger focus was not about White Supremacists', but about protecting LGBTQI+ monsters. One of the questions asked of Naval leadership was something like this; paraphrased - one of our managers is always talking in support of BLM issues and protests, would that be considered offensive? The answer was counterintuitive to the instruction of the day, which largely pulled the mask off of all the undertones. The Naval command response was; paraphrased - we all have outside beliefs and activates, as long as they don't support extremists views or promote violence, then such discussions are permissible. So if you talk about your family outing to Hawaii, Disney, Six Flags, etc., and all of the members of your family are white, you are probably supremacists', but if you are in a professional environment and wield influence over others, as such promote or demand acceptance of a BLM movement, that would be legal? I guess when you support a group that calls for the killing of all white people, that is not extreme, but constructive in support of a long term agenda?

Forgive me all, but FUCK THEM! It is so easy to factually dismiss it as woefully unconstitutional, the only problem is that most of our kids were programmed by the Marxist Public School system, are serving in the Armed Forces, I bet more than half buy into this brain washing.

Ok, so how is the ideology of defunding the Police, open borders, voter fraud, gun bans, endless investigations of Conservatives and big government not extreme or unconstitutional?
RV

"Trust in the Lord with all of your heart and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him and He shall direct thy path."

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: RV on March 25, 2021, 05:26:27 AM
Ok, so how is the ideology of defunding the Police, open borders, voter fraud, gun bans, endless investigations of Conservatives and big government not extreme or unconstitutional?

It is.

We just have lefties in positions of power and influence to cover for it.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street I'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.
This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.
How come nobody was interested in educating people about these rights until online videos got monetization?