Yes sir time to lawyer up..............

DOJ to Propose Rolling Back Big Tech's Legal Immunity

The Department of Justice is preparing proposals to roll back the legal immunities enjoyed by Big Tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), in measures that will be announced as early as Wednesday, sources told the Wall Street Journal.

READ MORE HERE........
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/06/17/report-doj-to-propose-rolling-back-big-techs-legal-immunity/

Details of the proposed legislation were still being worked out and could change. But in general the plan aims to prevent companies from removing content they find objectionable without providing explanations and adhering to their content-moderation policies, said the official.

It also would limit protections when companies allow third-party content that's deemed harmful or illegal, the official said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-17/justice-to-propose-curbs-on-legal-protections-for-social-media


In the end these platforms may just become bland if this move works. I think it would silence more voices than it will help.

Quote joesixpack:  In the end these platforms may just become bland if this move works. I think it would silence more voices than it will help.

In my opinion Bland would be preferable to biased

Quote from: Dirtbomb on June 17, 2020, 10:49:15 AM
Quote joesixpack:  In the end these platforms may just become bland if this move works. I think it would silence more voices than it will help.

In my opinion Bland would be preferable to biased

I agree. That's why I love PBS



Just saw this report:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABg3AzvaaPk

If it requires an act from Congress I don't think this is going to amount to anything.

Quote  joe... I agree. That's why I love PBS

No surprise there, you impress me as the type person that would like Bland and biased on the same sandwich

Quote from: Dirtbomb on June 17, 2020, 11:12:08 AM
Quote  joe... I agree. That's why I love PBS

No surprise there, you impress me as the type person that would like Bland and biased on the same sandwich

What's a bland conservative alternative?

Things that require an act of Congress? You mean like that time Obummer wanted to shield 5 million illegals from deportation and allow them to work and the United States legally? Well, we all know how that turned out. It set the stage for Trump and his border wall and his stand on illegal immigration to win the presidency.

The decision was just nine words long: "The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court."

But its consequences will be vast, said Walter Dellinger, who was acting solicitor general in the Clinton administration. "Seldom have the hopes of so many been crushed by so few words," he said.


https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject
.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2016/06/24/us/supreme-court-immigration-obama-dapa.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D
#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&aoh
=15924178920569&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F06%2
F24%2Fus%2Fsupreme-court-immigration-obama-dapa.html

Quote from: Dirtbomb on June 17, 2020, 11:30:03 AM
Things that require an act of Congress? You mean like that time Obummer wanted to shield 5 million illegals from deportation and allow them to work and the United States legally? Well, we all know how that turned out. It set the stage for Trump and his border wall and his stand on illegal immigration to win the presidency.

The decision was just nine words long: "The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court."

But its consequences will be vast, said Walter Dellinger, who was acting solicitor general in the Clinton administration. "Seldom have the hopes of so many been crushed by so few words," he said.


https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject
.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2016/06/24/us/supreme-court-immigration-obama-dapa.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&aoh=15924178920569&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F06%2
F24%2Fus%2Fsupreme-court-immigration-obama-dapa.html

When responding to a specific post I suggest using the quote function at the top right of posts. Glad to have you here.

Quote from: supsalemgr on June 17, 2020, 11:48:42 AM
When responding to a specific post I suggest using the quote function at the top right of posts. Glad to have you here.

Thanks I will start doing that. I'm still having trouble with a few functions but I hope to get it worked out soon