This part leaps out....

QuoteWhoever wins this election will be the most unpopular person ever elected President. This will make it very difficult for that person to govern. However, unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has no charisma. The result will be a regime that is deeply unpopular and distrusted, and will remain that way.

While Donald Trump may be able to use his powers of persuasion effectively, Hillary Clinton has no such powers. The media will certainly be on her side, but the media is already overwhelmingly distrusted and declining in influence rapidly. The proof is in the money. "Journalists" barely sell books, and Hillary Clinton couldn't even sell 3,000 in its launch week. For a presidential candidate of a major party with a united establishment behind her, this is utterly embarrassing.

Time and again, the pattern has been: the more the public sees of Hillary, the more it dislikes her. Truthfully, there's no better symbol to discredit the establishment than Hillary Clinton, whose incompetence, corruption, and lack of charisma and persuasive abilities will be symbolic of its moral and intellectual bankruptcy.

http://www.returnofkings.com/97575/what-would-happen-if-hillary-clinton-wins

Of course, in balance I remind folks that Donnie "The Hair" Trump remarked in Art of the Deal that we should "prepare for the downside and the upside will take care of itself."

Who's the downside in THIS abomination?

The only good thing I can see about a Hillary Victory is that in four years Ted Cruz might have a real shot at the WH, however, we'll be so over run with illegals and foreign terrorists it wont matter. BLM will be stopping all white people at the polls.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 03, 2016, 05:40:10 AM
The only good thing I can see about a Hillary Victory is that in four years Ted Cruz might have a real shot at the WH, however, we'll be so over run with illegals and foreign terrorists it wont matter. BLM will be stopping all white people at the polls.

By 2020 we will know why Cruz did what he's done. You may be overly-optimistic. On the other hand, by that time Republican stalwarts won't care and independents will have larger fish to fry, hating who's most leftist or supporting who hasn't gotten us nuked.

Hillary will name Alan (Flew on Lolita Express) Dershowitz to the Supremes. I am 100% sure of this. That evil crone might want to name Saul Alinsky but in lieu of that I'm guessing her #2 nomination would be whoever tosses all charges against her, (legality phrase follows:) "with prejudice." Slap a lid on Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the IRS targeting conservatives and of course the e-mail scandal....you get a justice slot. Support her right to a lifetime term...chief justice. (Roberts probably wouldn't mind.)

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on October 03, 2016, 05:40:10 AM
The only good thing I can see about a Hillary Victory is that in four years Ted Cruz might have a real shot at the WH, however, we'll be so over run with illegals and foreign terrorists it wont matter. BLM will be stopping all white people at the polls.

If HilLIARy wins,
she will give the left a majority on the Supreme Court.
They will strike down every voter ID law nationwide.
Every illegal alien will be voting...
and voting and voting and voting!  Many times each!
It will be impossible to EVER have an honest election, ever again!
Letting HilLIARy win would be the FINAL nail in America's coffin!

Quote from: je_freedom on October 04, 2016, 12:51:43 PM
If HilLIARy wins,
she will give the left a majority on the Supreme Court.
They will strike down every voter ID law nationwide.
Every illegal alien will be voting...
and voting and voting and voting!  Many times each!
It will be impossible to EVER have an honest election, ever again!
Letting HilLIARy win would be the FINAL nail in America's coffin!

So IF Trump gets in there will no differences it will just take longer. 

First day in office Hillary will pardon herself from passed crimes she has committed and the future crimes she's going to commit.

Quote from: Bronx on October 04, 2016, 01:54:26 PM
First day in office Hillary will pardon herself from passed crimes she has committed and the future crimes she's going to commit.

Obama would be more marginally more likely to pardon Shrill (as Bubba did for Marc Rich) in return for big money, or else Shrill then pardoning Obama once she's in power. I expect to be trampled by runaway unicorns before that vile hag keeps her word. If Hussein is even a tenth as bright as the dimwit he appears, he will of course consider this a very bad risk because Clintons are involved and a doublecross is guaranteed to follow.

To force Shrill to honor that sort of deal would involve documented proof the likes of which even Sandy Berger cannot steal and make to go away. (p)Resident Limpwrist would still be a total fool to pardon her first...simply because, what can he do once she reneges? 

Stated differently, it will be Shrill's Supreme Court deciding whether Hussein can pardon himself. Good luck there, Numbnuts of Nairobi.....

Matters not who wins. The GOP have been helping the Marxists for decades, and a Trump win is a loss for Conservatives in that it only enforces the GOP'e and their grip on the party.

Quote from: Solar on October 04, 2016, 04:32:12 PM
Matters not who wins. The GOP have been helping the Marxists for decades, and a Trump win is a loss for Conservatives in that it only enforces the GOP'e and their grip on the party.

This was the year with very few yard signs, almost no bumper stickers, and an insane deluge of media freakouts railing against Trump or anyone not in thrall to The Hag.

One new wrinkle I spotted tonight was a claim that Ohio has a less important role in the 2016 campaign. Maybe I'm reading too much into the following, but it sounds like the media says it's not that important solely because their favored candidate won't win there in Buckeye Country.

https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/10/03/is-hillary-clinton-abandoning-ohio-media-downplays-buckeye-states-importance-for-her-electoral-calculus/

Whether it's true or not, also consider the general trends in the last 60 years or so, where one party holds office for eight years and the other party gets it for the next eight. (Carter thankfully the exception and Reagan unfortunately limited to just eight.)

It's Trump's turn. He's a Republican, at least in name only. Will that be good enough for Ohio, or are they likely to go the way of Michigan and vote for criminality beyond all imagining? Oy and vey, this is one harrowing long campaign!

Quote from: walkstall on October 04, 2016, 01:45:55 PM
So IF Trump gets in there will no differences it will just take longer.

If Trump wins, the outcome is uncertain.
(I wish I could be certain, but he's taken positions all over the map.)
Unlike HilLIARy, whose positions are always focused like a laser
on destroying freedom and handing all power to the handful of billionaires who own her.
If  HilLIARy wins, the game is over.  We lose.  Forever.
If Trump wins, we MIGHT get to keep fighting.

If I was in a state where either candidate had a big lead,
I would feel free to write in whomever.
But in a state where it's a close race,
I want to do everything I can to stop the greater evil from winning.

Quote from: quiller on October 04, 2016, 08:21:50 PM
This was the year with very few yard signs, almost no bumper stickers, and an insane deluge of media freakouts railing against Trump or anyone not in thrall to The Hag.

One new wrinkle I spotted tonight was a claim that Ohio has a less important role in the 2016 campaign. Maybe I'm reading too much into the following, but it sounds like the media says it's not that important solely because their favored candidate won't win there in Buckeye Country.

https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/10/03/is-hillary-clinton-abandoning-ohio-media-downplays-buckeye-states-importance-for-her-electoral-calculus/

Whether it's true or not, also consider the general trends in the last 60 years or so, where one party holds office for eight years and the other party gets it for the next eight. (Carter thankfully the exception and Reagan unfortunately limited to just eight.)

It's Trump's turn. He's a Republican, at least in name only. Will that be good enough for Ohio, or are they likely to go the way of Michigan and vote for criminality beyond all imagining? Oy and vey, this is one harrowing long campaign!

There is a comical sider to all of this. I believe Trump is trying to lose, he runs block for Hillary constantly, doesn't do a thing to attack her or help his chances, yet there's a good chance he might win this thing.
The reluctant POTUS? I swear, I picture Keenan Wynn in office looking for the first chance to escape.

Quote from: Solar on October 05, 2016, 05:19:29 AM
There is a comical sider to all of this. I believe Trump is trying to lose, he runs block for Hillary constantly, doesn't do a thing to attack her or help his chances, yet there's a good chance he might win this thing.
The reluctant POTUS? I swear, I picture Keenan Wynn in office looking for the first chance to escape.

I've seen both Trump lovers and Hairzilla haters say that Trump simply forgets to take his Ritalin, explaining his behavior. If only one side says it, I doubt it. When both say it, I look at what he does and doesn't do. Ritalin deficiency actually could explain a lot.

Anybody at the New York Slimes ready to explain how they broke federal law to get hands on Trump's tax returns? Or are they too busy explaining how the Slimes used the same tax loopholes just like Trump? Nothing says comedy like them writing a FAVORABLE story on something and then doing three and four corrections, but then they stay 100% quiet about errors (errors? what errors?!?) regarding The Mouth.

Quote from: quiller on October 05, 2016, 06:03:05 AM
I've seen both Trump lovers and Hairzilla haters say that Trump simply forgets to take his Ritalin, explaining his behavior. If only one side says it, I doubt it. When both say it, I look at what he does and doesn't do. Ritalin deficiency actually could explain a lot.

Nah, that's now how Ritalin effects people, I know, I took it for years.

QuoteAnybody at the New York Slimes ready to explain how they broke federal law to get hands on Trump's tax returns? Or are they too busy explaining how the Slimes used the same tax loopholes just like Trump? Nothing says comedy like them writing a FAVORABLE story on something and then doing three and four corrections, but then they stay 100% quiet about errors (errors? what errors?!?) regarding The Mouth.

Weren't those tax records 20 years old? I heard Marla was responsible.

Quote from: Solar on October 05, 2016, 06:13:29 AM
Nah, that's now how Ritalin effects people, I know, I took it for years.
Weren't those tax records 20 years old? I heard Marla was responsible.

Marla's been mentioned, but the Slimes will profess First Amendment rights until someone goes to jail, which in this case will happen only two full journalistic working days after the Sweet Meteor of Death delivers us from a Clinton presidency. I mean, this is the same IRS that investigated conservatives and got its hands on health data.