FOX News has gone full Trump

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/01/23/3742238/how-fox-news-became-a-glorified-infomercial-for-donald-trump/

Quote from: daidalos on January 23, 2016, 12:48:38 PM
I know you can't find a single news source anymore that tells you the facts, and lets you make up your own damned mind.

It's always, always, filled with the authors own biased opinions.

And some of em are pretty slick at sticking what is their own biased opinion, into an article, making it appear as if it's part of the facts.

It should be noted however, that while it's typical of libbers to do this. It happens on the other side of the aisle too. Just look no further than some of the Trump coverage to see that.

I know what you're saying and agree, but it's just an illusion, the other side is the Trump side, the leftist side, the Establishment, Leftist media, RINO, Dims, are all on the dame team/side.
They've merely kept an illusion of division alive as a cover. The Omnibus Bill should be all the evidence necessary.
It's the very reason this nation is in a war for it's very existence, and Trump is the puppet they're backing as their vehicle.

As useful as this is, I have a further suggestion -- how about a list of the individual opinion journalists shilling for Trump? That would be TV, radio, print, or electronic print. Whatever, these are the people with enough knowledge, and presumably enough intelligence to know better. They are also, in my opinion, the critical factor in putting Trump over the top in the nomination process. In other words, it's principally their fault if Trump goes on to win the nomination.

Of course they'll weasel and backtrack after the damage becomes undeniable, but I'd like a longstanding and comprehensive list of those who sold us out. I'd like to brand them with a scarlet 'T' for the endurance of their journalistic careers. Just give the thumbs up if you think this is worthwhile, and I'll contribute names as they come to mind or otherwise become evident.

Both Fox and CNN today had nothing but Trump for over 45 minutes. Then a little blurb about the snowstorm of the century in N.Y. and back to Trump.

Looks to me like both networks, with the exception of Megyn Kelly's show, are in the tank for Trump.

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 24, 2016, 01:26:36 PM
As useful as this is, I have a further suggestion -- how about a list of the individual opinion journalists shilling for Trump? That would be TV, radio, print, or electronic print. Whatever, these are the people with enough knowledge, and presumably enough intelligence to know better. They are also, in my opinion, the critical factor in putting Trump over the top in the nomination process. In other words, it's principally their fault if Trump goes on to win the nomination.

Of course they'll weasel and backtrack after the damage becomes undeniable, but I'd like a longstanding and comprehensive list of those who sold us out. I'd like to brand them with a scarlet 'T' for the endurance of their journalistic careers. Just give the thumbs up if you think this is worthwhile, and I'll contribute names as they come to mind or otherwise become evident.

That's an excellent idea.

Quote from: Solar on January 24, 2016, 04:50:35 PM
That's an excellent idea.

OK then, what to do about the details? Post them in here, in a different thread? What about disagreements we have? How clear cut are the criteria?

What about documentation? I would suggesting posting at least one link of an exemplary writing or video, where applicable. But how do we document somebody like Sean Hannity or Lou Dobbs, who are just Trump cheerleaders generally?

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 24, 2016, 01:26:36 PM
As useful as this is, I have a further suggestion -- how about a list of the individual opinion journalists shilling for Trump? That would be TV, radio, print, or electronic print. Whatever, these are the people with enough knowledge, and presumably enough intelligence to know better. They are also, in my opinion, the critical factor in putting Trump over the top in the nomination process. In other words, it's principally their fault if Trump goes on to win the nomination.

Of course they'll weasel and backtrack after the damage becomes undeniable, but I'd like a longstanding and comprehensive list of those who sold us out. I'd like to brand them with a scarlet 'T' for the endurance of their journalistic careers. Just give the thumbs up if you think this is worthwhile, and I'll contribute names as they come to mind or otherwise become evident.

Go back to MoveOn.org.   

What's with the sheep in wolves' clothing act? 

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 25, 2016, 02:34:28 PM
OK then, what to do about the details? Post them in here, in a different thread? What about disagreements we have? How clear cut are the criteria?

What about documentation? I would suggesting posting at least one link of an exemplary writing or video, where applicable. But how do we document somebody like Sean Hannity or Lou Dobbs, who are just Trump cheerleaders generally?

Great.  More speech-police rhetoric.

Kit --

You done posting non-sequitors, or you got more?

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 25, 2016, 02:34:28 PM
OK then, what to do about the details? Post them in here, in a different thread? What about disagreements we have? How clear cut are the criteria?

What about documentation? I would suggesting posting at least one link of an exemplary writing or video, where applicable. But how do we document somebody like Sean Hannity or Lou Dobbs, who are just Trump cheerleaders generally?

Post them here. The guide lines are pretty basic, if they're supporting Chump, they're Establishment, if they're backing Cruz, who cares, they're backing cruz.

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 25, 2016, 02:34:28 PM
OK then, what to do about the details? Post them in here, in a different thread? What about disagreements we have? How clear cut are the criteria?

What about documentation? I would suggesting posting at least one link of an exemplary writing or video, where applicable. But how do we document somebody like Sean Hannity or Lou Dobbs, who are just Trump cheerleaders generally?

They both, have video's as well as audio recordings on their sites online as well. Post the links to them.

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 25, 2016, 03:04:45 PM
Kit --

You done posting non-sequitors, or you got more?

Yeah, you spelled 'sequitur' wrong.  -You any good at anything besides divisionist-theory?

What isn't relevant about what I've slung at you?  You gonna go Missouri Prof on me, and start calling for muscle to throw me out?

Quote from: kit saginaw on January 25, 2016, 03:21:45 PM
Yeah, you spelled 'sequitur' wrong.  -You any good at anything besides divisionist-theory?

What isn't relevant about what I've slung at you?  You gonna go Missouri Prof on me, and start calling for muscle to throw me out?

Oh, the irony of a Trumpette trying to throw conservative cred at me.

At some point ridicule needs to be lobed at Buzzfeed. They have less credibility than those late night penis pill infomercials.

Quote from: Cali Contrarian on January 25, 2016, 03:38:41 PM
Oh, the irony of a Trumpette trying to throw conservative cred at me.

Read my posts.  Go back as far as you want.  If I wanna quote somebody, I'll quote 'em.  You'll see I virtually never quoted from Breitbart anyway.