This thread is for Econ4Every1
Now we'll see if he's sincere.
:thumbup:
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 01, 2017, 11:45:24 AM
This thread is for Econ4Every1
Now we'll see if he's sincere.
It's really rather simple. Capitalism runs on sales. The greater the income disparity in an economy between those at the top (let's say 10% of income and wealth holders) and those in the rest of the economy, the lower the demand for goods and services.
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 01, 2017, 01:06:42 PM
It's really rather simple. Capitalism runs on sales. The greater the income disparity in an economy between those at the top (let's say 10% of income and wealth holders) and those in the rest of the economy, the lower the demand for goods and services.
Wrong.
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 01, 2017, 01:06:42 PM
It's really rather simple. Capitalism runs on sales. The greater the income disparity in an economy between those at the top (let's say 10% of income and wealth holders) and those in the rest of the economy, the lower the demand for goods and services.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Basic Marxism entry level introduction.
Ok, great, I'm glad we had this conversation. I have to admit that your responses to my claims were unassailable. I'll spend weeks contemplating how I could have been so wrong.
Warmest regards,
The Marxist.
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 01, 2017, 07:26:17 PM
Ok, great, I'm glad we had this conversation. I have to admit that your responses to my claims were unassailable. I'll spend weeks contemplating how I could have been so wrong.
Warmest regards,
The Marxist.
No son, it's not over yet. Admitting you have a problem (Marxist) is only the first step. We're here to help, elucidate and educate.
Now, make your case for income equality.
The first step is to debate principles of economics.
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 02, 2017, 07:27:55 AM
The first step is to debate principles of economics.
No, your first step is to debate principles of economics. Our first step is you defending your there is a case to be made for income equality claim
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 02, 2017, 07:27:55 AM
The first step is to debate principles of economics.
Soooo, no one is stopping you from making your case, so get to it!
So quit fuckin stalling!
Again, I made my claim. No one has refuted it.
Are you saying that capitalism doesn't run on sales? That it's possible to grow an economy without people transacting business?
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 02, 2017, 08:47:40 AM
Again, I made my claim. No one has refuted it.
Are you saying that capitalism doesn't run on sales? That it's possible to grow an economy without people transacting business?
Fuck off troll, I gave you every chance to make your case and all you've done is obfuscate and claim no one wants to debate, and even after Ghoulardi made the thread you had requested.
So yeah, your time is up, you're out of here!
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 02, 2017, 08:47:40 AM
Again, I made my claim. No one has refuted it.
Are you saying that capitalism doesn't run on sales? That it's possible to grow an economy without people transacting business?
So are yoy saying capitalisn runs exclusively on sales?
Because so does every country with an economy, be thet socialist, communist, ,,,
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 08:56:44 AM
So are yoy saying capitalisn runs exclusively on sales?
Because so does every country with an economy, be thet socialist, communist, ,,,
I saw no reason to enable his delusions any further. He's gone.
Quote from: Solar on January 02, 2017, 08:58:31 AM
I saw no reason to enable his delusions any further. He's gone.
You got to wonder what some people think.
They refuse to answer questions, they are smug with others, then they expect peple to be nice to them
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 09:03:34 AM
You got to wonder what some people think.
They refuse to answer questions, they are smug with others, then they expect peple to be nice to them
:biggrin:
It's funny, whenever I boot someone, I picture the kind of removal being done, be it a giant boot, or shot out of a cannon, I believe this is the first time I ever pictured myself with a garden hose spraying stray cats out of the garden he was using as a toilet.
Says a lot about how I see these little turds. :biggrin:
Where I stand on income equality?
I'm a firm believer in the theory that if you gave everybody in the country the same amount of money, within six months everything would be the way it is now.
It's a sad reality of life: People who know how to make money, make money. People who know how to lose money, lose money--no matter how much you try to adjust the figures.
Quote from: Solar on January 02, 2017, 08:54:49 AM
Fuck off troll, I gave you every chance to make your case and all you've done is obfuscate and claim no one wants to debate, and even after Ghoulardi made the thread you had requested.
So yeah, your time is up, you're out of here!
After everything we still have no clue what is vocation is, if he has one.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 09:12:17 AM
Where I stand on income equality?
I'm a firm believer in the theory that if you gave everybody in the country the same amount of money, within six months everything would be the way it is now.
It's a sad reality of life: People who know how to make money, make money. People who know how to lose money, lose money--no matter how much you try to adjust the figures.
Yep, and those that can't make money, troll forums hoping for a chance to convince others they aren't actually failures, that they're victims of capitalism despite evidence to the contrary.
Quote from: supsalemgr on January 02, 2017, 09:13:23 AM
After everything we still have no clue what is vocation is, if he has one.
People proud of their trade usually let others know of their expertise within the first few threads, it's human nature.
Obviously he's a lowly govt flunky about to feel the back of Trump's hand. :laugh:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.memecreator.org%2Fstatic%2Fimages%2Fmemes%2F4375538.jpg&hash=f0f71e59388d62e9930e19cc0dd4dd5ec08ffb3b)
Quote from: ObamaIsSocialist on January 02, 2017, 12:54:18 PM
I'm in IT so I know how to get around site bans.
So does my 15 year old grandson. :biggrin:
Quote from: ObamaIsSocialist on January 02, 2017, 12:54:18 PM
I'm in IT so I know how to get around site bans.
You know if you'd been that open when asked, you probably wouldn't have been banned,
However, you show how sad your life is as you have nothing better to do than haunt sites from which you've been banned
Quote from: Solar on January 02, 2017, 12:41:08 PM
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.memecreator.org%2Fstatic%2Fimages%2Fmemes%2F4375538.jpg&hash=f0f71e59388d62e9930e19cc0dd4dd5ec08ffb3b)
Cool. You should keep it for the next Marxist that goes strolling by.
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 01:08:51 PM
Cool. You should keep it for the next Marxist that goes strolling by.
Good idea, I'll have Taxed put it in the line up.
Quote from: ObamaIsSocialist on Today at 12:54:18 PM
Quote
I'm in IT so I know how to get around site bans.
Econ4Every1 or whatever your next aka is:
(https://i.imgflip.com/ipby5.jpg)
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
Quote from: ObamaIsSocialist on Today at 12:54:18 PM
Econ4Every1 or whatever your next aka is:
(https://i.imgflip.com/ipby5.jpg)
H may think he has a First Amendment, but by God, my Second Amendment overrules his First, in that I have the right to shut down his Marxist shit.
Libs hate it when my Rights trump theirs. :smile:
Quote from: Solar on January 02, 2017, 02:31:16 PM
H may think he has a First Amendment, but by God, my Second Amendment overrules his First, in that I have the right to shut down his Marxist shit.
Libs hate it when my Rights trump theirs. :smile:
Being Marxist, they're attempting to subvert the constitution, so where do they get to claim first amendment rights from a document they don't believe in?
Quote from: Ghoulardi on January 02, 2017, 02:35:14 PM
Being Marxist, they're attempting to subvert the constitution, so where do they get to claim first amendment rights from a document they don't believe in?
That's the problem. The left has always used our laws against us, and why I have no issue in using them back against them as a weapon.
The ACLU is a perfect example of communists subverting our Constitution through illegal precedent, and the main reason I want the GOP purged for helping them achieve their goals.
Quote from: Econ4Every1 on January 02, 2017, 08:47:40 AM
Again, I made my claim. No one has refuted it.
Are you saying that capitalism doesn't run on sales? That it's possible to grow an economy without people transacting business?
No. That's a stupid thing to say. It shows you're even dumber than I could have imagined. You need to wash that Bernie crap out of your head and start from the beginning.
Granted the troll made a broad brush statement, but let's focus on the feminazi aspect, shall we?
"There Is No Male-Female Wage Gap"
Carrie Lukas, "Opinion," The Wall Street Journal online, April 12, 2011.
A study of single, childless urban workers between the ages of 22 and 30 found that women earned 8% more than men.
Tuesday is Equal Pay Day — so dubbed by the National Committee for Pay Equity,
which represents feminist groups including the National Organization of Women, Feminist
Majority, the National Council of Women's Organizations and others. The day falls
on April 12 because, according to feminist logic, women have to work that far into a calendar
year before they earn what men earned the year before.
In years past, feminist leaders marked the occasion by rallying outside the U.S. Capitol
to decry the pernicious wage gap and call for government action to address systematic
discrimination against women. This year will be relatively quiet. Perhaps feminists feel
awkward protesting a liberal-dominated government — or perhaps they know that the
recent economic downturn has exposed as ridiculous their claims that our economy is
ruled by a sexist patriarchy.
The unemployment rate is considerably higher among men than among women. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 9.3% of men over the age of 16 are currently out
of work. The figure for women is 8.3%. Unemployment fell for both sexes over the past
year, but labor force participation (the percentage of working age people employed) also
dropped. The participation rate fell more among men ( to 70.4% today from 72.4% in
March 2010) than women (to 58.3% from 58.8%). That means much of the improvement
in unemployment numbers comes from discouraged workers—particularly male
ones—giving up their job searches entirely.
Men have been hit harder by this recession because they tend to work in fields like construction,
manufacturing and trucking, which are disproportionately affected by bad
economic conditions. Women cluster in more insulated occupations, such as teaching,
health care and service industries.
Yet if you can accept that the job choices of men and women lead to different unemployment
rates, then you shouldn't be surprised by other differences—like differences in average
pay.
Feminist hand-wringing about the wage gap relies on the assumption that the differences
in average earnings stem from discrimination. Thus the mantra that women make
only 77% of what men earn for equal work. But even a cursory review of the data proves
this assumption false.
The Department of Labor's Time Use survey shows that full-time working women spend
an average of 8.01 hours per day on the job, compared to the 8.75 hours for full-time
working men. One would expect that someone who works 9% more would also earn
more. This one fact alone accounts for more than a third of the wage gap.
A short second page at the link.
http://emp.byui.edu/MarrottR/101_Female%20Wage%20Gap_Lukas-WSJ.pdf