https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/10/heart-failure-deaths-in-may-hit-44-higher-than-pre-pandemic-why-is-government-refusing-to-investigate/



Heart Failure Deaths in May Hit 44% Higher Than Pre-Pandemic. Why is Government Refusing to Investigate?

If gun deaths were up 44% the government would be all over it. If driving deaths were up 44%, the government would be all over it.

Have to ask, was there anything during the pandemic and afterward that people were taking???????

If it were a new type of transportation, not only would it have been shut down, they'd have been sued out of existence.
Times are changing. They've stolen from people, sold a dangerous product, knowing it was deadly and injurious to offspring's genetics.

I hope we can bankrupt the majority of them and put new laws in place that there is no such thing as immunity with the exception of those with life ending diseases.

This is an odd story in a number of ways, but the most odd is why they didn't use registered deaths from 2020 rather than expected.  Expected sounds like an estimate.  Registered sounds like an actual data point.

Quote from: ZenMode on July 12, 2023, 09:53:17 AMThis is an odd story in a number of ways, but the most odd is why they didn't use registered deaths from 2020 rather than expected.  Expected sounds like an estimate.  Registered sounds like an actual data point.

The article did explain.

QuoteBut why am I comparing the level of heart failure deaths in 2023 to the expected level of heart failure deaths in 2020? It's because since 2020 the 'expected' level of deaths has been inflated by high levels of deaths since then. For a more detailed explanation of what's happened please see a previous piece that was published in the Daily Sceptic on May 18th.

QuoteTable 1 illustrates how heart failure deaths in 2021 and 2022 being incorporated into the level of 'expected' deaths in 2023 has skewed the data. In 2020 we expected 973 heart failure deaths during week 21, in 2023 we appear to expect 1,209, an increase of 24%.

Put it another way; no excess deaths at all would be reported unless heart failure deaths in 2023 were more than 24% greater than in the same week in 2020. Nothing to see here, move along please!

Table 1 shows the issue:

Let me try to sum it up. By overinflating the "expect deaths" from heart failure, it will look as if the "actual" number is NOT HIGHER than expected, that the number is "normal". In other words, they are using the forecasted "expected" deaths to show everyone there is nothing to see here, the deaths are what "they expected to see". To put it bluntly, they are lying to you by not telling you WHY they have inflated the number. The expected deaths are now higher because they are linked to the jab!!!

Quote from: Possum on July 12, 2023, 11:23:47 AMThe article did explain.

The authors explanation explains why he used expected deaths for 2020 and not subsequent years but, again, why not compare ACTUAL deaths to ACTUAL deaths?

QuoteLet me try to sum it up. By overinflating the "expect deaths" from heart failure, it will look as if the "actual" number is NOT HIGHER than expected, that the number is "normal". In other words, they are using the forecasted "expected" deaths to show everyone there is nothing to see here, the deaths are what "they expected to see". To put it bluntly, they are lying to you by not telling you WHY they have inflated the number. The expected deaths are now higher because they are linked to the jab!!!

You assume they're overinflating expected deaths.  Why?  Is there any evidence for that?

Quote from: ZenMode on July 12, 2023, 01:33:09 PMThe authors explanation explains why he used expected deaths for 2020 and not subsequent years but, again, why not compare ACTUAL deaths to ACTUAL deaths?
You assume they're overinflating expected deaths.  Why?  Is there any evidence for that?

THAT IS WHAT THE DAMN ARTICLE IS ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!