Latest VAERS estimate: 388,000 Americans killed by the COVID vaccines
My estimate of the VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) at 41 was based on anaphylaxis rates reported in the Blumenthal paper published in JAMA.
I have argued that the anaphylaxis rate is an appropriate number to use to (under) estimate deaths because I believed that deaths would be less reported than anaphylaxis to VAERS for two reasons: 1) usually lacks the time proximity to vaccination, 2) the person seeing the death may not know the vaccination status of the victim and may not technically be required to report the death.
Some people have quibbled with that assumption, including my friend Professor John Ioannidis, who argued that there is no evidence that that is true and it could be the other way around. It's a fair point and I told John it's only an estimate and I'm happy to modify it when we have more data.
That day has arrived courtesy of Wayne at VAERS Analysis.
(https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1100,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0efee00f-d015-4837-b614-3133e2df1b62_649x767.png)
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/latest-vaers-estimate-388000-americans
These stats are out there and the "govt" knows damn well the numbers....thats why they are hiding/blocking them etc etc. 388K may be a low ball number, then what of all the people who do not die but are struck ill by the vax or develop some sort of medical condition etc etc.
Somebody somewhere is compiling this data...has to be
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on December 16, 2021, 10:39:34 AMThese stats are out there and the "govt" knows damn well the numbers....thats why they are hiding/blocking them etc etc. 388K may be a low ball number, then what of all the people who do not die but are struck ill by the vax or develop some sort of medical condition etc etc.
Somebody somewhere is compiling this data...has to be
Exactly Billy! These numbers are low, they are just the ones reported, but what about those who died at home of old age, only to have it exacerbated by the Jab, or those hidden to protect the jab?
Quote from: Solar on December 15, 2021, 06:44:45 AMFor all who have been paying attention, it should be widely known by now that VAERS significantly underreports adverse event data. However, the million dollar question is always - "What is the exact under-reporting factor?"
I was listening to the radio one night a month or two ago.
The guest on that show (I think it might have been RFK Jr.)
was saying that there was a study published in a medical journal that found that
VAERS was capturing only ONE PERCENT of actual Vaccine Adverse Events.
Maybe this was the study to which he was referring?
Quote from: je_freedom on January 27, 2022, 06:31:22 PMI was listening to the radio one night a month or two ago.
The guest on that show (I think it might have been RFK Jr.)
was saying that there was a study published in a medical journal that found that
VAERS was capturing only ONE PERCENT of actual Vaccine Adverse Events.
Maybe this was the study to which he was referring?
Yeah, not only is it voluntary, they make you give up a lot of personal information.
That would explain the low reporting.