Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => All Headlines => Topic started by: Solar on June 27, 2025, 09:40:45 AM

Title: GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!
Post by: Solar on June 27, 2025, 09:40:45 AM
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard. It had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process. Congratulations to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Solicitor General John Sauer, and the entire DOJ. News Conference at the White House, 11:30 A.M. EST.
Title: Re: GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!
Post by: Solar on June 27, 2025, 09:42:38 AM
(https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/114/755/957/220/824/394/original/b921451094d7a50a.jpg)
Title: Re: GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!
Post by: patentlymn on June 27, 2025, 11:56:02 AM

I did not read the case. I think it means that while Jun Valdez may win his case on birthright citizenship, the win only applies to him and not every such person in the US.
Title: Re: GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!
Post by: Solar on June 27, 2025, 01:59:59 PM
Quote from: patentlymn on June 27, 2025, 11:56:02 AMI did not read the case. I think it means that while Jun Valdez may win his case on birthright citizenship, the win only applies to him and not every such person in the US.
No, it's far broader than that; it stops lower courts from interfering with a Presidents' agenda for the people.
Title: Re: GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!
Post by: Possum on June 27, 2025, 02:24:57 PM
To tie into this ruling, there is one more to be announced next month,
QuoteThe U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is set to rule on whether immigrants in the country illegally should be counted in the census for reapportionment purposes. This decision will address a constitutional question regarding the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states that representatives should be apportioned among the states according to their respective numbers, counting the "whole number of persons in each state".

We know congressional seats are at stake here and states that follow the laws are the ones getting hurt. Here is one of the best ways to put it,

QuoteCritics contend the government's powers come from "We the people" – citizens or eligible voters – a government established before tens of millions of migrants resided in the country illegally. They also say the practice dilutes the representation of American citizens while incentivizing localities to promote illegal immigration.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/06/trump_s_bid_to_end_inclusion_of_illegals_in_the_census_may_win_in_the_supreme_court_this_time.html


Here's hoping the SCOTUS has one more right answer in it.