https://azaudit.org/ (https://azaudit.org/)
You must click each camera to get it to turn on. You can view more than one at a time.
(What are the odds, though, that there's a "glitch" once the audit is underway?) :rolleyes:
Hmmm..... camera 8. Already, I'm concerned.
Only the government would change forklifts on the same pallet.
:rolleyes:
How long does it take to unload a truck?
:confused:
Three independent judges will sit at each table so I will hold back on any skepticism for now. I believe that there are many more people in the USA that want to know the truth of what happened.
Let's allow them prove to us that Arizona was stolen.
I can wait patiently as long as I know the truth is coming.
To be honest, I'm pretty encouraged, so far. This is vastly different from the situation in Michigan, where they boarded up their windows to keep people from seeing what was going on inside. :rolleyes:
Quote from: IAmGrammy on April 22, 2021, 03:32:01 PM
To be honest, I'm pretty encouraged, so far. This is vastly different from the situation in Michigan, where they boarded up their windows to keep people from seeing what was going on inside. :rolleyes:
The transparency is refreshing....I can't wait to see how much Trump won by...
Quote from: Owebo on April 22, 2021, 03:41:03 PM
The transparency is refreshing....I can't wait to see how much Trump won by...
Lin Wood says President Trump "flipped California". I do hope we will one day know the real numbers.
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 22, 2021, 04:54:12 PM
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
And when you're wrong?
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 22, 2021, 04:54:12 PM
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
Your predictions carry as much weight as your opinions.
Quote from: Solar on April 22, 2021, 05:01:34 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
And when you're wrong?
I will be glad that significant fraud was uncovered and hope that other states do a similar type of audit. The goal is to have elections where the correct people win, and there is not significant voter fraud.
Quote from: Possum on April 22, 2021, 05:04:15 PM
Your predictions carry as much weight as your opinions.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 22, 2021, 04:54:12 PM
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
I predict you liberals will got batshit insane when he does....lol
Huh....someone is terrified...
https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/politics/2021/04/22/democrats-sue-to-stop-maricopa-county-az-election-audit/
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 22, 2021, 04:54:12 PM
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
Yep that's why the democrat party is suing to stop this audit......... :lol: :lol: :lol:
https://therightscoop.com/breaking-democrats-sue-to-stop-arizona-senate-from-forensic-audit-of-2020-election/
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 22, 2021, 04:54:12 PM
I predict there will be a lot of disappointed people when Trump does not win Arizona.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
But we already know that he did win. You do acknowledge that the facts and evidence prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that trumps landslide was stolen by millions of votes right?
Quote from: T Hunt on April 23, 2021, 08:45:17 AM
https://hereistheevidence.com/
But we already know that he did win. You do acknowledge that the facts and evidence prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that trumps landslide was stolen by millions of votes right?
I haven't seen any proof of widespread voter fraud.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:19:26 AM
I haven't seen any proof of widespread voter fraud.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Its been nice knowing you....
Someone here has not watched a single Lindell documentary. (https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsitedabble.com%2Fcpf%2Fimages%2Fsmirk.png&hash=f4a248db8c66f3ca53e5db970f541afe25bbef29)
Camera 3.... Man, that's a lot of ballots!
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:19:26 AM
I haven't seen any proof of widespread voter fraud.
I haven't seen any "proof" of voter integrity either although THAT doesn't matter to the Marxists. The anomalies and statistical impossibilities don't bother Democrats apparently. Had the Republicans cheated, paid millions of tax dollars to Dominion, harvested illegal ballots, demanded mail in ballots and wanted absentee ballots favoring non-citizens, the Democrats would have a VERY different perspective. It's funny how the outcome of the election determines whether "proof" is seen or needed by Democrats...
Quote from: RV on April 23, 2021, 09:31:17 AM
I haven't seen any "proof" of voter integrity either although THAT doesn't matter to the Marxists. The anomalies and statistical impossibilities don't bother Democrats apparently. Had the Republicans cheated, paid millions of tax dollars to Dominion, harvested illegal ballots, demanded mail in ballots and wanted absentee ballots favoring non-citizens, the Democrats would have a VERY different perspective. It's funny how the outcome of the election determines whether "proof" is seen or needed by Democrats...
People are caught committing voter fraud all the time, but it's in small amounts. The largest instance I'm aware of, I believe, was about 250.
I'm sure I didn't see everything that was supposedly voter fraud, but the allegations, particularly from Trump & Co. were all proven to be false.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:50:54 AM
People are caught committing voter fraud all the time, but it's in small amounts. The largest instance I'm aware of, I believe, was about 250.
I'm sure I didn't see everything that was supposedly voter fraud, but the allegations, particularly from Trump & Co. were all proven to be false.
No they were not, the courts refused to see the evidence!
Quote from: Solar on April 23, 2021, 09:58:30 AM
No they were not, the courts refused to see the evidence!
Well, most of the lawsuits weren't focused on fraud. It was more questioning procedural items within the states like the legality of governors making changes outside of the state legislature, or questioning whether changes were constitutional. Because of that narrow scope, they weren't permitted to submit "fraud" evidence.
In two states where they were given standing (Michigan and Wisconsin), it didn't go well for Trump's attorneys.
THE (real) President has been briefed on audit. (https://protrumpnews.com/rudy-giuliani-trump-has-been-briefed-on-audit/)
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:50:54 AM
People are caught committing voter fraud all the time, but it's in small amounts. The largest instance I'm aware of, I believe, was about 250.
I'm sure I didn't see everything that was supposedly voter fraud, but the allegations, particularly from Trump & Co. were all proven to be false.
Well, that's the narrative anyway. Obviously the Democrats define "proven" differently than what's in the dictionary and vastly differently than millions of American voters define it as well. If there really was no wrongdoing then the courts should have heard the evidence and ruled on the cases. As it is, the cases were not heard, the evidence was not looked at and the cases were avoided by the courts altogether. The wrongdoing is compounded when the courts won't even LOOK at the evidence much less the MOUNTAINS of witness statements. It's basically telling WITNESSES that their testimony and statements mean nothing compared to the Democrat agenda.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 10:22:30 AM
Well, most of the lawsuits weren't focused on fraud. It was more questioning procedural items within the states like the legality of governors making changes outside of the state legislature, or questioning whether changes were constitutional. Because of that narrow scope, they weren't permitted to submit "fraud" evidence.
In two states where they were given standing (Michigan and Wisconsin), it didn't go well for Trump's attorneys.
Well good, you did some actual research and discovered you were wrong. You're learning.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:50:54 AM
People are caught committing voter fraud all the time, but it's in small amounts. The largest instance I'm aware of, I believe, was about 250.
No the largest instance was 2020, when many people, including rudy, caught the dems straight up cheating in the election with mountains and mountains of evidence presented at public hearings and online.
QuoteI'm sure I didn't see everything that was supposedly voter fraud, but the allegations, particularly from Trump & Co. were all proven to be false.
How can that be true when not a single court looked at the evidence? If you think any did then please show us proof here. But no, not a single court looked at the evidence. That is more proof of the deepstate.
Quote from: RV on April 23, 2021, 12:14:56 PM
Well, that's the narrative anyway.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Quote
Obviously the Democrats define "proven" differently than what's in the dictionary and vastly differently than millions of American voters define it as well.
Voter fraud cases are run through the courts just like any other crime.
Quote
If there really was no wrongdoing then the courts should have heard the evidence and ruled on the cases.
If the situation of alleged voter fraud is reviewed, as they all were, and there's no reason to suspect fraud, why waste the courts time? Imagine if every case, regardless of what the investigation turned up, was sent through the courts.
Quote
As it is, the cases were not heard, the evidence was not looked at and the cases were avoided by the courts altogether. The wrongdoing is compounded when the courts won't even LOOK at the evidence much less the MOUNTAINS of witness statements. It's basically telling WITNESSES that their testimony and statements mean nothing compared to the Democrat agenda.
There's a reality that many people see things that they believe are voter fraud, due to their lack of knowledge about the process. The example that comes to mind is the video of the woman sitting at a table, filling out ballot after ballot. That was supposedly the smoking gun of voter fraud when, in reality, it was nothing more than the normal processing of damaged ballots. The guy across from the woman was reading off what was on the damaged ballot, the woman was duplicating it and damaged one was put aside when finished.
I think we all saw the video of the "interesting" lady testifying with Giuliani in Michigan when Michigan gave Trump's legal team a chance to present their case. What was missed is what happened in Wisconsin when Trump's legal team was given standing:
A Stunning Passage from the Latest Court Rejection of Team TrumpThe most telling aspect of the Wisconsin federal district court's rejection of another Trump campaign lawsuit on Saturday is so obvious it is easy to miss. And no, it is not that the rejecting was done by a Trump-appointed judge, Brett H. Ludwig, or that it was done on the merits.
After all that's been said over the last six weeks, this fleeting passage near the start of the court's workmanlike, 23-page decision and order should take our breath away (my highlighting):
With the Electoral College meeting just days away, the Court declined to address the issues in piecemeal fashion and instead provided plaintiff with an expedited hearing on the merits of his claims. On the morning of the hearing,
the parties reached agreement on a stipulated set of facts and then presented arguments to the Court.
A "stipulated set of facts," in this context, is an agreement between the lawyers for the adversary parties about what testimony witnesses would give, and/or what facts would be established, if the parties went through the process of calling witnesses and offering tangible evidence at a hearing or trial.
In a real controversy, in which one or both of the parties are making hotly disputed factual claims, there are few if any stipulations. For example, a defendant who vehemently denies that he committed stock fraud may be willing to stipulate that 20,000 shares of XYZ Corp's common stock were sold on December 14; but other than that, the defendant will demand that the adversary call the fact witnesses who claim he defrauded them so he can cross-examine. He will call his own witnesses to show what really happened, and they will be aggressively questioned, too.
Publicly, the Trump campaign has been claiming there was extensive vote fraud and law-breaking. Specifically with respect to Wisconsin, President Trump tweeted on November 28: "The Wisconsin recount is not about finding mistakes in the count, it is about finding people who have voted illegally . . . We have found many illegal votes. Stay tuned!" The campaign further maintained that the recount it demanded would "show somewhere around 100,000 illegal ballots in the two counties that Biden carried" (i.e., Milwaukee and Dane).
This is in addition to the innumerable times the president and his surrogates have asserted that they were being systematically prevented from proving massive fraud and illegality. The courts and state officials, we've been told, have invoked legal technicalities, such as the supposed lack of standing to sue, in order to stop the campaign from calling witnesses and introducing voluminous documentary evidence.
So what happened in Wisconsin?Judge Ludwig denied the state's claims that the campaign lacked standing. Instead, he gave the campaign the hearing they asked for — the opportunity to call witnesses and submit damning exhibits. Yet, when it got down to brass tacks, the morning of the hearing, it turned out there was no actual disagreement between the Trump team and Wisconsin officials about the pertinent facts of the case. The president's counsel basically said: Never mind, we don't need to present all our proof . . . we'll just stipulate to all the relevant facts and argue legal principles.
In the end, after all the heated rhetoric, what did they tell the court the case was really about? Just three differences over the manner in which the election was administered — to all of which, as Ludwig pointed out, the campaign could have objected before the election if these matters had actually been of great moment.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/a-stunning-passage-from-the-latest-court-rejection-of-team-trump/
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 01:06:36 PM
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
Voter fraud cases are run through the courts just like any other crime.
If the situation of alleged voter fraud is reviewed, as they all were, and there's no reason to suspect fraud, why waste the courts time? Imagine if every case, regardless of what the investigation turned up, was sent through the courts.
There's a reality that many people see things that they believe are voter fraud, due to their lack of knowledge about the process. The example that comes to mind is the video of the woman sitting at a table, filling out ballot after ballot. That was supposedly the smoking gun of voter fraud when, in reality, it was nothing more than the normal processing of damaged ballots. The guy across from the woman was reading off what was on the damaged ballot, the woman was duplicating it and damaged one was put aside when finished.
I think we all saw the video of the "interesting" lady testifying with Giuliani in Michigan when Michigan gave Trump's legal team a chance to present their case. What was missed is what happened in Wisconsin when Trump's legal team was given standing:
A Stunning Passage from the Latest Court Rejection of Team Trump
The most telling aspect of the Wisconsin federal district court's rejection of another Trump campaign lawsuit on Saturday is so obvious it is easy to miss. And no, it is not that the rejecting was done by a Trump-appointed judge, Brett H. Ludwig, or that it was done on the merits.
After all that's been said over the last six weeks, this fleeting passage near the start of the court's workmanlike, 23-page decision and order should take our breath away (my highlighting):
With the Electoral College meeting just days away, the Court declined to address the issues in piecemeal fashion and instead provided plaintiff with an expedited hearing on the merits of his claims. On the morning of the hearing,
the parties reached agreement on a stipulated set of facts and then presented arguments to the Court.
A "stipulated set of facts," in this context, is an agreement between the lawyers for the adversary parties about what testimony witnesses would give, and/or what facts would be established, if the parties went through the process of calling witnesses and offering tangible evidence at a hearing or trial.
In a real controversy, in which one or both of the parties are making hotly disputed factual claims, there are few if any stipulations. For example, a defendant who vehemently denies that he committed stock fraud may be willing to stipulate that 20,000 shares of XYZ Corp's common stock were sold on December 14; but other than that, the defendant will demand that the adversary call the fact witnesses who claim he defrauded them so he can cross-examine. He will call his own witnesses to show what really happened, and they will be aggressively questioned, too.
Publicly, the Trump campaign has been claiming there was extensive vote fraud and law-breaking. Specifically with respect to Wisconsin, President Trump tweeted on November 28: "The Wisconsin recount is not about finding mistakes in the count, it is about finding people who have voted illegally . . . We have found many illegal votes. Stay tuned!" The campaign further maintained that the recount it demanded would "show somewhere around 100,000 illegal ballots in the two counties that Biden carried" (i.e., Milwaukee and Dane).
This is in addition to the innumerable times the president and his surrogates have asserted that they were being systematically prevented from proving massive fraud and illegality. The courts and state officials, we've been told, have invoked legal technicalities, such as the supposed lack of standing to sue, in order to stop the campaign from calling witnesses and introducing voluminous documentary evidence.
So what happened in Wisconsin?
Judge Ludwig denied the state's claims that the campaign lacked standing. Instead, he gave the campaign the hearing they asked for — the opportunity to call witnesses and submit damning exhibits. Yet, when it got down to brass tacks, the morning of the hearing, it turned out there was no actual disagreement between the Trump team and Wisconsin officials about the pertinent facts of the case. The president's counsel basically said: Never mind, we don't need to present all our proof . . . we'll just stipulate to all the relevant facts and argue legal principles.
In the end, after all the heated rhetoric, what did they tell the court the case was really about? Just three differences over the manner in which the election was administered — to all of which, as Ludwig pointed out, the campaign could have objected before the election if these matters had actually been of great moment.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/a-stunning-passage-from-the-latest-court-rejection-of-team-trump/
So you dont have a CREDIBLE source then?
Judge just ordered a halt on the audit from 5 PM Pacific Time today (Friday, April 23, 2021), until 12 PM Monday next week.
https://www.youmaker.com/v/nBej2xyMKngL
Quote from: T Hunt on April 23, 2021, 01:12:23 PM
So you dont have a CREDIBLE source then?
Credible sources for what? Trump's legal team was given exactly what they wanted in Wisconsin - a chance to present their fraud evidence. They discussed what Trump's legal team, and their witnesses, were going to present in a trial/hearing and, in the end, both sides agreed that there was no reason to move forward. There was no fraud. What the "witness" believed was fraud was simply the normal processing of ballots.
If Trump's legal team conceding isn't a credible source, what is?
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 09:19:26 AM
I haven't seen any proof of widespread voter fraud.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
Audit back on, after being halted.
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1385700226967736320?s=20
Also: https://t.me/disclosetv/1689
So this morning, at 5:57 CST, there is only one person in the whole building. One officer, who keeps falling asleep, standing up. Camera 1. :sad:
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 23, 2021, 01:26:16 PM
Credible sources for what? Trump's legal team was given exactly what they wanted in Wisconsin - a chance to present their fraud evidence. They discussed what Trump's legal team, and their witnesses, were going to present in a trial/hearing and, in the end, both sides agreed that there was no reason to move forward. There was no fraud. What the "witness" believed was fraud was simply the normal processing of ballots.
If Trump's legal team conceding isn't a credible source, what is?
Except that never happened, more fake news.
You have no credible source that trumps team showed all the evidence and conceded.
If so then show it here...
If not then you are forced to retract...
Quote from: IAmGrammy on April 24, 2021, 03:57:59 AM
So this morning, at 5:57 CST, there is only one person in the whole building. One officer, who keeps falling asleep, standing up. Camera 1. :sad:
And? There are eight live cameras blanketing the entire building. What is the concern?
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 24, 2021, 07:55:30 AM
And?
It's called an early morning observation. And it wasn't directed at you, troll.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 24, 2021, 07:55:30 AM
And? There are eight live cameras blanketing the entire building. What is the concern?
The concern is that the same people who managed to killed epstein and infiltrate every major institution are now trying to steal the election and cover it up. We know our enemy. The deepstate is more sinister than the mafia.
Quote from: p1tchblack on April 24, 2021, 11:57:37 AM
Well luckily there are eight live cameras so all of the junior detectives can keep an eye on that one cop and make sure he doesn't start burning ballots, peeing on machines or whatever he is supposed to be doing.
As I said, my observation wasn't directed at you, but if you must be made privy to what I was thinking, it was simply surprise that after watching for two hours, from 4:00 AM to 6:00 CST, only one person seemed to be providing security for what is regarded as quite an important event and that one person seemed unable to stay awake, even while standing.
It is
your silly little mind that conjured up visions of peeing on machines and burning ballots.
(https://321goodbye.com/Smileys/default/bored.gif)
Quote from: T Hunt on April 24, 2021, 11:24:21 AM
The concern is that the same people who managed to killed epstein and infiltrate every major institution are now trying to steal the election and cover it up. We know our enemy. The deepstate is more sinister than the mafia.
There were LOTS of "coincidences" that allowed Epstein to be murdered and miraculously, there just happened to be no video tape at that precise moment. Recounting fraudulent votes will not somehow negate what was done. I would agree that the deepstate is far more sinister and entrenched than the mafia EVER was. Look how they had to take down Al Capone...
So, the report "out there" is that they're testing the ballots for watermarks (something that President Trump said all real ballots would have).
Kind of gives a whole new perspective on "Watch the water" (for those of you who know about that). :smile:
EDIT TO ADD LINK: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-happening-arizona-election-workers-running-ultra-violet-ballot-testing-maricopa-ballots-video/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-happening-arizona-election-workers-running-ultra-violet-ballot-testing-maricopa-ballots-video/)
Just a little visual on the layout of the audit. (https://wearethene.ws/notable/218161)
A bit about the "yellow shirts"...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wavG15JLfmY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wavG15JLfmY)
Well, looks like crap is starting to pile up. And USPS shows up again!!!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/az-election-worker-list-azgop-just-told-google-eliminated-list-trying-keep-public-video/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/az-election-worker-list-azgop-just-told-google-eliminated-list-trying-keep-public-video/)
Scroll down the page and watch the video. :mad:
We already knew this conspiracy ran deep. By the time all of the lies are uncovered, I doubt anyone will be surprised at any name/company/organization that was complicit and ends up in prison.
Quote from: esbad63 on April 24, 2021, 09:47:42 PM
We already knew this conspiracy ran deep. By the time all of the lies are uncovered, I doubt anyone will be surprised at any name/company/organization that was complicit and ends up in prison.
My fear is that no one will end up in prison. I'm sure that many lies were told, I'm sure that many companies were complicit in the fraud, the courts were involved, the media was involved and I'm sure that many organization were involved as well. It is akin to what all happened in the mafia. It took a lot of Police work, a lot of bloodshed and it took income tax evasion rather than murder to bring ONE of the culprits to account. The many dead bodies that were casual casualties were never accounted for and justice was never served.
Quote from: RV on April 25, 2021, 04:46:50 AM
My fear is that no one will end up in prison. I'm sure that many lies were told, I'm sure that many companies were complicit in the fraud, the courts were involved, the media was involved and I'm sure that many organization were involved as well. It is akin to what all happened in the mafia. It took a lot of Police work, a lot of bloodshed and it took income tax evasion rather than murder to bring ONE of the culprits to account. The many dead bodies that were casual casualties were never accounted for and justice was never served.
The mafia has been involved in politics since at least the 50s if not sooner. Im thinking that its the deepstate itself which is responsible for the mafia never being fully brought to justice, wanting to protect such a useful tool.
The mafia got started and still has its power bases in blue cities, and have been buying off and controlling politicians ever since. Now the modern dem tactics look alot like mafia tactics....coincidence?
Quote from: T Hunt on April 25, 2021, 06:17:14 AM
The mafia has been involved in politics since at least the 50s if not sooner. Im thinking that its the deepstate itself which is responsible for the mafia never being fully brought to justice, wanting to protect such a useful tool.
The mafia got started and still has its power bases in blue cities, and have been buying off and controlling politicians ever since. Now the modern dem tactics look alot like mafia tactics....coincidence?
Hmmm, interesting thought. It's something that I will have to chew on but, it makes a whole lot of sense!
Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward weighs in on the ongoing audit and the efforts to thwart it:
https://twitter.com/AZGOP/status/1386172046795706371?s=20
:scared: :scared: :scared: :angry: :angry: :angry: :cursing: :cursing: :cursing:
Are you freakin' KIDDING me???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J66DB6lu-mg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J66DB6lu-mg)
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer
Around count 5:50
(Downloaded, in case YT removes it.)
THIS
https://thepalmierireport.com/arizona-auditor-files-for-emergency-hearing-security-plans-released/ (https://thepalmierireport.com/arizona-auditor-files-for-emergency-hearing-security-plans-released/)
https://rumble.com/vgflux-results-from-dominion-voting-machines.html (https://rumble.com/vgflux-results-from-dominion-voting-machines.html)
Sure would like to see the document(s) from which he is getting this detail!
It's probably safe to assume that the Ninja auditors won't proclaim whether it was Biden or Trump who benefited from the cheating. Their job ends with affirmed that there was cheating.
The question will then still remain on how exactly was the cheating done?
Quote from: VVet69 on May 03, 2021, 10:26:24 AM
Sure would like to see the document(s) from which he is getting this detail!
I would as well! I got this from Great Awakening's site this morning, but there doesn't seem to be anything else, as far as collaboration.
Quote from: Donald H on May 03, 2021, 10:51:39 AM
It's probably safe to assume that the Ninja auditors won't proclaim whether it was Biden or Trump who benefited from the cheating. Their job ends with affirmed that there was cheating.
The question will then still remain on how exactly was the cheating done?
The Jovan Pulitzer video (below on this thread) touches on that and then there are the Mike Lindell documentaries, which go into an enormous amount of detail. If you go to frankspeech.com and scroll down toward the bottom, there are links. :smile:
Quote from: VVet69 on May 03, 2021, 10:26:24 AM
Sure would like to see the document(s) from which he is getting this detail!
Yep, that's what I'm waiting for as well.
Quote from: Donald H on May 03, 2021, 10:51:39 AM
It's probably safe to assume that the Ninja auditors won't proclaim whether it was Biden or Trump who benefited from the cheating. Their job ends with affirmed that there was cheating.
The question will then still remain on how exactly was the cheating done?
If there was cheating which can be proven (I have no doubt), then the culprits should be prosecuted! Future U.S. election integrity has to be preserved, regardless of who benefitted from the cheating!
Just some information on the audit colors:
http://yipcabbage.com/11/colors.html (http://yipcabbage.com/11/colors.html)