QuoteI'm asking you one more time to prove it.

Yawn, you'll just say that those Republicans are not "real" cons. Sorry, we live in the world where winners, not wishers, create the definitions.

QuoteSolar proved it is a liberal town.  You have not posted any data on the town...

In 2008, with weak GOP candidates that flopped everywhere. In 2012, with comparable candidates, the only data we have points towards moderate/con.

Plus, the issue is that supsalemgr had no data at all other than it being in MA. By that silly standard Asheville and Chapel Hill are con burgs. Obviously, you're not badgering him for his far sketchier claim solely because you don't want to believe you were duped.

QuoteThe revilement is a derivative of your posts, when you say ignorant things, you can expect it to be followed by a harassing post.

I can hack your immaturity, but we both know what happens if I reply in kind. That's why you and especially supsalemger and Reality have chosen a con-censored forum.

QuoteThe libs I speak of are in the guest list, to assume only Conservatives read this forum is just another of your ignorant posts, which I will not follow up with an insult.
Do you seriously think all of those 97 guests, currently on, (97 Guests, 16 Users) or the 20104 that were on today were all Conservative?

They're not in this thread, I haven't looked at the others. Do you seriously think even one of them, if there are any left, thinks you speak for them? It's adorable that you do.

QuoteAnd John, people only get banned here for a few reasons, one is trolling, posting for the sake of getting a rise, and not acting like adults.

You and your buddies have all done that in posting to me, admit it. And, we both know that if I'd used the exact same words I'd already be gone. Do you think the off-topic accusations about my supposed identity were an "accident"? C'mon, you aren't that naive, are you?

QuoteWe have no issue with people not being Conservative on this site...

Could be, but if a lefty posts like you cons do, it's the axe.

QuoteJust keep posting, no one wants you banned, anyway, I don't.

Sure, as long as I accept the double standard. I know both myself and this forum's censors, it won't last.

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 07:54:30 PM
You and your buddies have all done that in posting to me, admit it. And, we both know that if I'd used the exact same words I'd already be gone. Do you think the off-topic accusations about my supposed identity were an "accident"? C'mon, you aren't that naive, are you?
Could be, but if a lefty posts like you cons do, it's the axe.
Sure, as long as I accept the double standard. I know both myself and this forum's censors, it won't last.

If you are so unhappy just leave. Your whining is getting tiresome...

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 07:54:30 PM
You and your buddies have all done that in posting to me, admit it. And, we both know that if I'd used the exact same words I'd already be gone. Do you think the off-topic accusations about my supposed identity were an "accident"? C'mon, you aren't that naive, are you?
Could be, but if a lefty posts like you cons do, it's the axe.
Sure, as long as I accept the double standard. I know both myself and this forum's censors, it won't last.

Congrats John, you nailed the quote function.

But John, show me where in http://conservativepoliticalforum.com it say Lib.

We are a forum for Conservatives, you are here only because we accept opposing views, but because we are not a lib site, you and others like you are not afforded the privileges or leniency that Conservatives are, it's no different than any other site that caters to a certain group.
In fact we are more lenient than most lib sites, there, they simply ban you for having an opposing view, I know, being an expert in the alternative energy field, libs simply couldn't handle the truth being presented in a calm manner, so without explanation I've been banned repeatedly, and in every case with no explanation.

So if you don't like it, find another forum, we really don't give a damn about the sensibilities of liberals.
Is that clear enough?

The Boo Man, you are confused again, just as you were in believing the misstatement by taxed of what I posted about Falmouth and then in creating your own befuddlement on "corporate welfare" - both of which you ran away from.

I'm neither unhappy nor whining, just stating facts about this censor-enforced echo chamber y'all have created. I find it to be too pathetic to get worked up about.

In fact, it's my pleasure to be posting here for 10 pages about how supsalemgr flubbed with his thread-starter (Warren barely won in the city [51%] and did measurably worse than in the state, 3 Republicans ran unopposed and far fewer than half are registered Dem), how he duped several cons that didn't bother to check, and how none can admit it. Sooner or later I'll get banned for doing so and that will just highlight their disgrace and need for protection. It's a win-win for me.

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 08:40:56 PM
The Boo Man, you are confused again, just as you were in believing the misstatement by taxed of what I posted about Falmouth and then in creating your own befuddlement on "corporate welfare" - both of which you ran away from.

I'm neither unhappy nor whining, just stating facts about this censor-enforced echo chamber y'all have created. I find it to be too pathetic to get worked up about.

In fact, it's my pleasure to be posting here for 10 pages about how supsalemgr flubbed with his thread-starter (Warren barely won in the city (51%) and did measurably worse than in the state, 3 Republicans ran unopposed and far fewer than half are registered Dem), how he duped several cons that didn't bother to check, and how none can admit it. Sooner or later I'll get banned for doing so and that will just highlight their disgrace and need for protection. It's a win-win for me.

It's not a win win for you. You're a moron. You have been consistently wrong on everything. Then you whine about censorship. Not to mention you refuse to back up anything you claim. Why are you liberals so cowardly?

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 08:40:56 PM
The Boo Man, you are confused again, just as you were in believing the misstatement by taxed of what I posted about Falmouth and then in creating your own befuddlement on "corporate welfare" - both of which you ran away from.

I'm neither unhappy nor whining, just stating facts about this censor-enforced echo chamber y'all have created. I find it to be too pathetic to get worked up about.

In fact, it's my pleasure to be posting here for 10 pages about how supsalemgr flubbed with his thread-starter (Warren barely won in the city (51%) and did measurably worse than in the state, 3 Republicans ran unopposed and far fewer than half are registered Dem), how he duped several cons that didn't bother to check, and how none can admit it. Sooner or later I'll get banned for doing so and that will just highlight their disgrace and need for protection. It's a win-win for me.

So, you still have a city that voted for Warren, but are really conservatives?  You're now admitting it was a city that voted for a far left liberal who even got busted lying about her heritage.  I'll also go out on a limb and say Ted "The Chauffeur" Kennedy maybe carried the city once or twice.

I'm still waiting for you to show me some tangible shred of evidence of Tea Party conservatives supporting government subsidies. If you decline again, I'll take it you aren't serious about discussing and will move on...

QuoteCongrats John, you nailed the quote function.

I always have known it, you are confused. It's the ridiculous contortions y'all unnecessarily go though to keep the author's name attached to it or to include one or more other quotes that I don't get. It's not like most other forums work that silly way.

QuoteWe are a forum for Conservatives, you are here only because we accept opposing views, but because we are not a lib site, you and others like you are not afforded the privileges or leniency that Conservatives are, it's no different than any other site that caters to a certain group.

Ah, so you were not being fully honest when you posted:

QuoteAnd John, people only get banned here for a few reasons, one is trolling, posting for the sake of getting a rise, and not acting like adults.

That's what I thought. It's libs that get banned for those things while cons need the protection.

QuoteIn fact we are more lenient than most lib sites, there, they simply ban you for having an opposing view, I know, being an expert in the alternative energy field, libs simply couldn't handle the truth being presented in a calm manner, so without explanation I've been banned repeatedly, and in every case with no explanation.

Could be though I suspect there's more to the story, but the forum I'm most familiar with is run by a lib who never censors. Ask "Reality", supsalemgr and The Stranger, they couldn't hack it. That's why they're here.

QuoteSo if you don't like it, find another forum, we really don't give a damn about the sensibilities of liberals.
Is that clear enough?

You misunderstand, I love it here! It says so much about cons these days, they live in their own rapidly shrinking magical world.

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 08:57:40 PM
I always have known it, you are confused. It's the ridiculous contortions y'all unnecessarily go though to keep the author's name attached to it or to include one or more other quotes that I don't get. It's not like most other forums work that silly way.
Ah, so you were not being fully honest when you posted:That's what I thought. It's libs that get banned for those things while cons need the protection.
Could be though I suspect there's more to the story, but the forum I'm most familiar with is run by a lib who never censors. Ask "Reality", supsalemgr and The Stranger, they couldn't hack it. That's why they're here.
You misunderstand, I love it here! It says so much about cons these days, they live in their own rapidly shrinking magical world.

You are clearly here to start trouble...

QuoteIt's not a win win for you.

Keep telling yourself that.

You're a moron.

That, too.

You have been consistently wrong on everything.

You flubbed the two examples you tried, then ran away from them. Try again, please.

Then you whine about censorship.

You are confused. I appreciate having my opinion of cons confirmed, as I said. Thank you.

Not to mention you refuse to back up anything you claim.

It's more fun watching y'all demand citations for the obvious. Thank you. But, as you know, my inspiration for being here is that supasalemgr started a thread with a premise that not only couldn't he back up but was actually flat-out wrong.

Why are you liberals so cowardly?

Why did you run away from your Falmouth and corporate welfare flubs?

QuoteYou are clearly here to start trouble...

Gee, seems to me that supsalemgr did that when he posted hooey and duped a bunch of you cons. It's not like I'm the one that diverted then ran away when it was pointed out or tried to deceive you. All I've done is debunk supsalemgr and post my opinions, which you can accept or reject.

But, I hear you loud and clear. "here to start trouble" is code for imminent censorship, right?

Quote from: John Barth on February 27, 2013, 09:18:20 PM
Gee, seems to me that supsalemgr did that when he posted hooey and duped a bunch of you cons. It's not like I'm the one that diverted then ran away when it was pointed out or tried to deceive you. All I've done is debunk supsalemgr and post my opinions, which you can accept or reject.

But, I hear you loud and clear. "here to start trouble" is code for imminent censorship, right?

Yeah, I guess you're right.  24 hour ban.

Quote from: taxed on February 27, 2013, 09:24:26 PM
Yeah, I guess you're right.  24 hour ban.

What?  Only 24 hours?  Supersales, Reality, Stranger and I know full well that the attitude of this trouble maker will only get worse.  The need of this poster to be heard and accepted over conservative adults will be greater than his willingness to act like he/she has any sense. 

Quote from: keyboarder on February 28, 2013, 03:54:35 AM
What?  Only 24 hours?  Supersales, Reality, Stranger and I know full well that the attitude of this trouble maker will only get worse.  The need of this poster to be heard and accepted over conservative adults will be greater than his willingness to act like he/she has any sense.

It will be back with another forum name most likely, I do believe she is the one who has bragged about being banned here already, over their they teach all how to use a proxy that's the M.O.
It can never ever be wrong and HER opinion is always right just like I described earlier. Next she will go and resurrect an old post of a foe edit it to make you sound as though you said something you didn't.  Sort of like a child living in momma's basement would do. Then you will show she is a liar so she will be hell bent on finding your real name and starting threads about you and putting it out here, then she will find where you work and put that out here also.
This is a seriously sick individual to be involved in this kind of stalking. Oh and she claims she knows deputies so it's OK most likely how she get her info and she has admitted to being a snitch also.
This is why NO ONE post any longer on forums she's at not even other libs, she thinks it's because she is always right but she just runs them off with this kind of baby stuff. She is some kind of administrator on her home lib. site so has access to info folks but out there.
Good luck and love all my fellow man, but remember she is a real loon.