There has been a great deal of secret experimentation by the Military with the use of Sound as a weapon.
Very Low frequencies particularly of 7 Hz and 3.5 Hz and cause organ damage or death with enough decibels

Quotehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_weapon
Noise-induced neurologic disturbances in humans exposed to continuous low frequency tones for durations longer than 15 minutes has involved in some cases the development of immediate and long term problems affecting brain tissue. The symptoms resembled those of individuals who had suffered minor head injuries. One theory for a causal mechanism is that the prolonged sound exposure resulted in enough mechanical strain to brain tissue to induce an encephalopathy

The Wind Turbine generate a very low frequency sound in the sound produce by the Turbines. How come no one has ever seen the alleged exhaustive studies that were done to make sure there were no acoustic audio damage to animals or humans!
I fully believe the couple that said they became Ill.

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 08:31:04 PM
Got it, in your bizarre world people that vote GOP are liberals when they screw up. That's a hoot!

No son, in the real world, those that vote emotionally are liberal.
And anyone that believes Green energy is even remotely viable is a bleeding heart Idiot, it is a Stand Alone energy source when no other is available.

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 08:42:12 PM
Learn to quote what you're replying to, it really is easy. Instead you quoted a sentence about supsalemgr's Falmouth civics flub while replying about energy.Others have made the case, try Google. All I've done is say that I think so. However, given the huge direct and indirect corporate welfare that so-called cons have long supported, you can't prove that it won't.

See, this is where you've failed miserably, Republicans may in some cases and RINO in every case back corporate subsidy, however on this forum we are Conservatives and want Govt completely out of the Free mkt.
Your lib misconceptions are tantamount to to your belief that emotion is equivalent to thinking.
It's akin to me claiming all libs wear pink panty's, even though all of you do get them in a knot when proven wrong, at least we know they aren't all pink.

Quote from: Cyborg on February 26, 2013, 10:08:26 PM
There has been a great deal of secret experimentation by the Military with the use of Sound as a weapon.
Very Low frequencies particularly of 7 Hz and 3.5 Hz and cause organ damage or death with enough decibels

The Wind Turbine generate a very low frequency sound in the sound produce by the Turbines. How come no one has ever seen the alleged exhaustive studies that were done to make sure there were no acoustic audio damage to animals or humans!
I fully believe the couple that said they became Ill.

They've been done and buried for obvious reasons, Husein's Green Agenda.

Quote"The four investigating firms are of the opinion that enough evidence and hypotheses have been given herein to classify LFN and infrasound as a serious issue, possibly affecting the future of the industry. It should be addressed beyond the present practice of showing that wind turbine levels are magnitudes below the threshold of hearing at low frequencies."
http://docs.wind-watch.org/schomer-shirley.pdf

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 04:35:45 PM
Actually, Barnstable County, MA:And, 2012:Obama got the same percentage he did nationally, 51%, and the Republican, Brown, trounced Warren in a state that Warren won. It's exactly as stupid as a MA resident "making the assumption the great majority of the people in" Asheville are cons "considering the (NC) location." Didn't anyone in this echo chamber think to check?

Irony.   

All energy sources other than reasonable conservation have their downsides. If there are minor negatives in Falmouth, at least they're being experienced by the energy consumers. Supsalemgr and many cons are consistent advocates for others having to suffer majorly for their consumption.

This is Vrede from the BRD forum. She posted the same post on that board trying to bait me into responding. The administratoer of that board posted two posts from this board.

Quote from: supsalemgr on February 27, 2013, 05:50:55 AM
This is Vrede from the BRD forum. She posted the same post on that board trying to bait me into responding. The administratoer of that board posted two posts from this board.

I have no idea who this person is, but their every post supports my argument even further.

Quote from: Solar on February 27, 2013, 05:54:43 AM
I have no idea who this person is, but their every post supports my argument even further.

She is one of the libs with many names. In reading the posts and style it is very clear who it is. Eventually she will evolve into disparaging remarks as her posts are debunked.

Quote from: supsalemgr on February 27, 2013, 05:50:55 AM
This is Vrede from the BRD forum. She posted the same post on that board trying to bait me into responding. The administratoer of that board posted two posts from this board.

The master of a hundred or so Forum Names from a Liberal websites. And has been banned from nearly everyone at least a dozen times and keeps coming back until the site closes down.
Wow to have a mental illness and access to the internet.
Yea it's her, first thing will be the denial then the lies then the insults and name calling when she is proven wrong, which is usually with every post.
They are so desperate they come here and steal post (they have a few of mine over their I see) to put over at their liberal site because no one visits it anymore not even their own lib friends.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes many or at least the last of the libs who still post there have bragged about being banned and having their post deleted. It was all potty mouth stuff no substance.

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 07:33:23 PM
If you are unaware of the many, many, many direct and indirect subsidies (I only listed a few) enjoyed by nukes and fossil fuels and supported by cons, I'm afraid that I don't have enough time to help you. Have you heard of Google?

Barth, can you please try and generate enough brain power to figure out the quoting functionality?  It really isn't that hard.  We'll discuss your responses, one at a time.

A few things. First, government subsidies are never supported by conservatives.  Please show us where conservatives or conservative policy is for government subsidies.  You brought it into the discussion, so please elaborate on your supporting points.

We are still waiting for you to answer Solar's question instead of hiding behind your go-to "heard of Google" response, like you did with me.  You put it into play, so back it up.  This is where libs, like yourself, fail 100% of the time; just try not to fail so hard, please.

Reagrding the sound weapons, I've always been partial to the "crap-your-pants-gun".

What a nasty little development, lol.  I'd pay to see that rolled out on an OWS gaggle.  Not that watching them all shit their pants would be a whole lot different than ther previously demonstrated habits, but it would be funny.

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 07:41:51 PM
Actually, what I clearly did was debunk supsalemgr's uninformed and false assumption that Falmouth is liberal, along with pointing out that every other poster here, including Solar, was gullible enough to believe him. At best it is moderate, though the vote for Brown over Warren might suggest that it leans con.

No you didn't.  Even if we were to assume your assertion that the city is "conservative" because more voted for Brown, you would be shooting yourself in the foot, because Brown is a lib RINO.  I know you want to have your circular reference cake and eat it too, but you must accept that if a Republican behaves like a liberal, that makes them liberal.  People are defined by their actions, and Brown is a lib; he just wasn't as radical and more palatable to the liberal town when they voted Brown, apparently.  That doesn't place the blame of the support for wind, solar, and other failed experiments on conservatives.  Please try to be more creative than that.

Quote
It's not my problem that supsalemgr and the others chose to ridicule a place that votes GOP, take it up with them.

He posted about the town, who if I had to guess, was probably misled by some state entity promising them all sorts of liberal goodies if they take on the windmills.

Quote from: AndyJackson on February 27, 2013, 09:58:51 AM
Reagrding the sound weapons, I've always been partial to the "crap-your-pants-gun".

What a nasty little development, lol.  I'd pay to see that rolled out on an OWS gaggle.  Not that watching them all shit their pants would be a whole lot different than ther previously demonstrated habits, but it would be funny.

Hahahaha

They should build a little OWS town right under those things and let them build a little community there, then make it into a reality show!

You can tell the lib by their incessant recitations of how everyone else is ignorant, stupid, gullible, dumb, racist, etc.

Now keep in mind, said liberal is probably from 15 to 25, still a child or minimally an adult who has avoided college, jobs, and having a family, like the plague.

The only other variant is an older failed person, who never got past this 15-25 mentality.

And they know it all  !  Classic Obama voter.

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 08:42:12 PM
Learn to quote what you're replying to, it really is easy. Instead you quoted a sentence about supsalemgr's Falmouth civics flub while replying about energy.Others have made the case, try Google. All I've done is say that I think so. However, given the huge direct and indirect corporate welfare that so-called cons have long supported, you can't prove that it won't.

No....that is what we call a lie...
First you claimed you were confident, now you want us to believe "You think so"?

Let's put your words on display so others know what were talking about.
You claimed:

Quote from: John Barth on February 26, 2013, 07:49:48 PM
Despite my posting it very coherently, you remain confused. hahahaha

I'm confident that green energy will do just fine in the free market.

So for the third time, I'll repeat my question.

Quote from: Solar on February 26, 2013, 08:03:44 PM
OK, back that confidence up with proof.
I'll add, meaning in full competition with accepted energy, like comparing cost of watt and let the customer decide which they want, the cheap cost of nuclear, hydro, or the cost per watt of solar, wind.

Now, quote this page and study how the quote function actually works.

On another point, Hydro is a renewable source, but EIA refused to include it as an renewable energy with solar, wind, biomass etc, because... Wait for it....
We haven't built a new dam since before Husein was born, so he does not get credit for it.
But shock of all shocks, he insisted EIA include it anyway and it backfired.

Now I know this is a lot for a lib to absorb, but let me put up some pretty pics that you might be able to grasp.

Quote
The graph below illustrates the history of the production of electricity by renewables during the last decade. Hydro, at 41 GW in 1997 and 28 GW in 2007, is not included because the other renewables would not be distinguishable on that scale. Electricity delivered from all renewables combined decreased from 49 GW in 1997 to 34 GW in 2007 mainly because of the drop in hydro and despite the illustrated increase in wind-derived electricity. For comparison, while renewables' contribution declined, overall electricity consumption in the US grew from 403 GW in 1997 to 440 GW in 2007.

[b]Now lets see how all this wonderful Green energy compares to real energy production, shall we?[/b]




I really hope none of this was over your head, if it was, just ask and I'll happily go into more detail.