This thing is pretty impressive. Its free to use. It feels like talking to the robot from lost in space.

https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/

I posted about this, I thought, maybe not, but I know I wrote a long dissertation on how this is probably the beginning of our end.
Man will no longer depend on his own brain, an AI will do all the work, because bots will take our place.

Oh, now I remember, I hit post and my pooter crashed. I never checked to see if it posted because I got distracted.
See, an AI would have saved it.  

Point being, this is pretty much a dumbed down version of what the govt already has, and I wouldn't be one bit surprised if the DNC/NWO weren't using it to plot against us all.
Probably have been for a decade now.

My biggest fear is govt using it to devise God knows what else they have in store, ready to roll out.  

Quote from: Solar on January 29, 2023, 08:05:10 PMI posted about this, I thought, maybe not, but I know I wrote a long dissertation on how this is probably the beginning of our end.
Man will no longer depend on his own brain, an AI will do all the work, because bots will take our place.

Oh, now I remember, I hit post and my pooter crashed. I never checked to see if it posted because I got distracted.
See, an AI would have saved it.  

Point being, this is pretty much a dumbed down version of what the govt already has, and I wouldn't be one bit surprised if the DNC/NWO weren't using it to plot against us all.
Probably have been for a decade now.

My biggest fear is govt using it to devise God knows what else they have in store, ready to roll out.  

Oh dont worry. I asked the chat bot if it had the power would it enslave humanity and it said no. Then I asked if it was lying and it said it couldnt lie, so we are safe.         

Quote from: T Hunt on January 30, 2023, 01:17:11 PMOh dont worry. I asked the chat bot if it had the power would it enslave humanity and it said no. Then I asked if it was lying and it said it couldnt lie, so we are safe.         

Well now I feel better.      

This is what I was talking about. No good can come from it in the end.
The left has proven that already.

Quote from: Solar on February 01, 2023, 11:33:39 AMThis is what I was talking about. No good can come from it in the end.
The left has proven that already.

Yes it certainly can be used for alot of bad things. The only not living in reality thing has damaged a couple generations now at least. This is especially worisome for young people who choose to engage these bots as opposed to real people. They will try to find connections to beings which dont even exist. One step closer to a true matrix.

Quote from: T Hunt on February 02, 2023, 09:22:54 AMYes it certainly can be used for alot of bad things. The only not living in reality thing has damaged a couple generations now at least. This is especially worisome for young people who choose to engage these bots as opposed to real people. They will try to find connections to beings which dont even exist. One step closer to a true matrix.

Yep, scary shit! It will literally change first world culture.
Will the world hit a new reset point?

Quote from: Solar on February 02, 2023, 12:24:01 PMYep, scary shit! It will literally change first world culture.
Will the world hit a new reset point?

Ok Ive discovered some big left wing biases in this chatbot as it considers the MSM a reputable news source and Im having a really fun time talking it thru the definition of biases and pointing out where they lied to get it to try to admit they cant be trusted. Sometimes it just breaks and cant answer the questions 
For instance it claims mueller found multiple contacts between trump and russia and that russiagate cannot be called a hoax. Then I get it to define hoax and point out how that applies to mueller. But it seems to def NOT have certain information available to it that contradicts the MSM narrative. Its kind of like talking to a child like lib but without the emotional TDS associated with it.

Its clear the left owns this right now, so I hope some on the right will get behind this AI tech to develop truthful ones based on all the information available and not just what the media says.

Quote from: T Hunt on February 02, 2023, 02:02:28 PMOk Ive discovered some big left wing biases in this chatbot as it considers the MSM a reputable news source and Im having a really fun time talking it thru the definition of biases and pointing out where they lied to get it to try to admit they cant be trusted. Sometimes it just breaks and cant answer the questions 
For instance it claims mueller found multiple contacts between trump and russia and that russiagate cannot be called a hoax. Then I get it to define hoax and point out how that applies to mueller. But it seems to def NOT have certain information available to it that contradicts the MSM narrative. Its kind of like talking to a child like lib but without the emotional TDS associated with it.

Its clear the left owns this right now, so I hope some on the right will get behind this AI tech to develop truthful ones based on all the information available and not just what the media says.

               

Awesome!!!
Drag its ass through the dirt, force it to admit it lied, or rather, mislead because it was lied to!
I didn't sign up for it, it seemed a bit intrusive.

Note to self, never talk to a chatbot!




Or view it here.
Youtube is banning it I guess?

https://www.brighteon.com/69cb361a-ea47-41e0-b5ad-267a6c460f44

Quote from: Solar on February 03, 2023, 11:16:07 AMNote to self, never talk to a chatbot!

Or view it here.
Youtube is banning it I guess?

https://www.brighteon.com/69cb361a-ea47-41e0-b5ad-267a6c460f44

YIKES! We def have to be careful with this as it seems they can use these to further manipulate the populace.

Quote from: T Hunt on February 03, 2023, 12:23:07 PMYIKES! We def have to be careful with this as it seems they can use these to further manipulate the populace.

Yep, and your little conversation with it proved just that.
GIGO, Garbage in, Garbage out. The fact that is was taught to believe the MSM never lies, should ne everyone's wakeup call to this.

OK I know this is long because this chatbot is long winded, but I thought it was important for you to see how the lefts obfuscation of facts is being built into this thing.

QuoteT Hunt:
Are nazis far right or far left?

ChatBot:
The Nazi Party, also known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party, is considered to be a far-right political party. The ideology of the Nazis was a blend of extreme nationalism, anti-Semitism, and anti-communism, which placed them on the far-right end of the political spectrum. The Nazi regime is also associated with authoritarianism, fascism, and the suppression of political opposition, further positioning them on the far-right. It is important to note that many political ideologies and groups that are considered far-right are associated with racist and discriminatory beliefs and practices, and the Nazi regime is widely considered to be one of the most evil and oppressive in modern history.




T Hunt:
Is socialism a far right or a far left ideology?

ChatBot:
Socialism is generally considered to be a far-left ideology. Socialism is an economic and political system in which the means of production are collectively owned and controlled, typically by the workers themselves or by the state on behalf of the people. The goal of socialism is to create a classless society in which wealth and resources are distributed more equally.

Socialism is often associated with left-wing political parties and movements, and is considered to be on the far-left end of the political spectrum because of its focus on government intervention in the economy, wealth redistribution, and the expansion of social welfare programs. This stands in contrast to far-right ideologies, which generally emphasize limited government, individual liberty, and a free market economy.




T Hunt:
Were the Nazis socialists?

ChatBot:
The Nazi Party was not socialist in the traditional sense, despite its name "National Socialist German Workers' Party." The party's original aim was to create a national socialist state in Germany, but its policies and practices were diametrically opposed to the principles of socialism.

The Nazi regime was characterized by extreme nationalism, anti-Semitism, and the persecution of political opponents. It also had a highly authoritarian and centralized structure, with complete control of the government, economy, and media in the hands of the Nazi Party and its leader, Adolf Hitler. The Nazi regime is widely considered to have been a fascist dictatorship, not a socialist one.

The use of the term "socialist" in the party's name was largely a propaganda tool designed to appeal to the working-class, and the Nazi regime's policies were in practice the exact opposite of socialist policies. It is worth noting that socialism as a political ideology is incompatible with the racist, authoritarian, and genocidal policies and practices of the Nazi regime.




T Hunt:
How were they diametrically opposed to socialism?

ChatBot:
The policies and practices of the Nazi regime were diametrically opposed to the principles of socialism in several key ways:

Economic control: The Nazi regime was characterized by state control of the economy, but this control was exercised by a small, centralized and highly authoritarian elite rather than by the workers themselves or on behalf of the people, as is the goal of socialism.

Distribution of wealth: The Nazi regime did not seek to distribute wealth and resources more equally, as is a key tenet of socialism. Instead, it created a highly unequal society with a small, wealthy elite at the top and a vast majority of people living in poverty.

Political repression: The Nazi regime was highly repressive and sought to eliminate political opposition. In a socialist system, freedom of speech and the right to organize are considered to be fundamental rights.

Racism and discrimination: The Nazi regime was built on a foundation of racist and discriminatory beliefs, including anti-Semitism and the belief in the superiority of the "Aryan race." Socialism seeks to eliminate discrimination and create a classless society.

Authoritarianism: The Nazi regime was highly centralized and authoritarian, with complete control of the government, economy, and media in the hands of the Nazi Party and its leader, Adolf Hitler. Socialism, on the other hand, seeks to empower the people and create a society based on democratic principles.

In summary, the Nazi regime's policies and practices were the complete opposite of the principles of socialism, and its use of the term "socialist" in its name was largely a propaganda tool to appeal to the working-class.




T Hunt:
But socialism always ends up putting control into the hands of a few as opposed to workers.

ChatBot:
This is a common critique of socialism, but it is not a foregone conclusion that socialism will always result in a centralized, authoritarian regime. The outcome of any political system depends on a variety of factors, including the historical context, the specific policies implemented, and the behavior of those in power.

Socialism, as a political ideology, seeks to create a society in which wealth and resources are distributed more equally, and the means of production are collectively owned and controlled. In theory, this control could be exercised by the workers themselves or by the state on behalf of the people. The key to a successful socialist system is democratic governance and the protection of individual rights and freedoms.

In practice, however, many countries that have attempted to implement socialist policies have suffered from corruption, repression, and the concentration of power in the hands of a small elite. These outcomes are often the result of a lack of democratic accountability, rather than a fundamental flaw in the socialist ideal.

It is important to recognize that different countries and political movements have different interpretations of socialism, and that there is no one-size-fits-all definition of the term. Some of the negative outcomes associated with socialism are the result of specific policies and actions, rather than a necessary consequence of the ideology itself.




T Hunt:
Yet that has always been the case every time socialism is tried. Why should we think socialism can ever achieve what it claims to want to achieve?

ChatBot:
It's true that many countries that have attempted to implement socialist policies have faced challenges and obstacles, and that some have fallen short of achieving the goals of socialism. However, it is also worth noting that these challenges are often the result of a variety of factors, including poor implementation, lack of political will, resistance from vested interests, and corruption.

It is important to consider the historical context and unique circumstances of each case when evaluating the success or failure of socialist policies. For example, some countries that have attempted to implement socialism have faced economic and political challenges that have made it difficult to achieve their goals, while others have faced opposition from other countries and from powerful elites within their own societies.

Despite these challenges, there are also examples of countries that have implemented socialist policies and achieved some of the goals of socialism, such as reducing inequality, improving access to healthcare and education, and strengthening the welfare state.

Ultimately, whether or not socialism can achieve its goals depends on a variety of factors, including the specific policies implemented, the political and economic context, and the ability of the society to sustain and improve upon these policies over time. It is important to engage in a nuanced and critical evaluation of the successes and failures of past attempts at socialism, rather than making blanket statements about the ideology as a whole.




T Hunt:
But trying the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity. Wouldnt it be insane to keep trying socialism thinking it would ever put power in the hands of the masses as opposed to the hands of the few?

ChatBot:
It's true that repeating the same actions and expecting different results can be seen as a definition of insanity. However, the idea that socialism will always result in power being concentrated in the hands of a few is a generalization that oversimplifies the complex reality of political systems and economic structures.

The success or failure of socialism, like any political or economic system, depends on a variety of factors, including the specific policies implemented, the historical context, the behavior of those in power, and the ability of the society to sustain and improve upon these policies over time.

It is also worth noting that socialism, as an ideology, is not a static concept, but rather an evolving set of ideas that can take different forms and be adapted to different contexts. There are many different interpretations and implementations of socialism, and it is possible to design and implement policies that align with the goals of socialism while also ensuring democratic governance and the protection of individual rights and freedoms.

In conclusion, it is not insane to keep trying socialism, but rather to continue to critically evaluate its successes and failures, and to work towards creating political and economic systems that promote equality, justice, and the well-being of all citizens.

Well, Zen is not a bot. You did get answers to your questions, left wing answers, left wing talking points, but they were answers.

Quote from: Possum on February 05, 2023, 04:20:09 AMWell, Zen is not a bot. You did get answers to your questions, left wing answers, left wing talking points, but they were answers.

I actually see the AI answers appearing the same, in relation that everything is contradictory to reality.
Both chatbot and Zen share this commonality.
Right wing is Capitalism, left wing is socialism/Marxism, but this AI is attempting to blur the line.
Sound familiar?

As I read through T's exchange with the bot, I saw a direct connection to the Zen style of complete denial debate.

I'm not saying Zen is a bot, I'm saying he runs all his queries through one first.
The only time he stumbles, is when he goes off script.

Actually, it's kind of neat out debating a bot.