Investigative reporters, Barry Levine and Leon Wagener,
at the highly respected "National Enquirer" report that America's
favorite twosome, the suave and smooth Barack Obama and his
sidekick, the glitzy Michelle, are planning to divorce.

Inquiring minds need to know...

Quote from: actionblock on January 22, 2014, 05:14:49 AM
Investigative reporters, Barry Levine and Leon Wagener,
at the highly respected "National Enquirer" report that America's
favorite twosome, the suave and smooth Barack Obama and his
sidekick, the glitzy Michelle, are planning to divorce.

Inquiring minds need to know...

No. She needs him for whatever political ambitions she has.

Quote from: mdgiles on January 22, 2014, 05:16:37 AM
No. She needs him for whatever political ambitions she has.

Michelle is quite the shrewd schemer. She knows the Obama surname
is quickly losing political value and will be going back to her maiden
name of Robinson. In early 2017, following the divorce, she and
Valerie Jarrett plan to announce they are gay, will go to California
and get married. Michelle will then run for and be elected Governor...
A great springboard for a Presidential run.

Quote from: mdgiles on January 22, 2014, 05:16:37 AM
No. She needs him for whatever political ambitions she has.

Yep, he could walk away from the whole family thing, narcissists love nothing but themselves.
Michelle is the one that needs him, shes proven worthless, even the media tolerates her fat ass.

Obozo is married out of need for power, nothing more, he is incapable of love.

Don't get too excited, people.  Remember how these types of divorce stories occasionally popped up during W's Presidency?  Five years later, he and Laura are still married and seemingly happy.  It's just something that comes with the territory, I guess.

Quote from: crepe05 on January 22, 2014, 06:34:48 AM
Don't get too excited, people.  Remember how these types of divorce stories occasionally popped up during W's Presidency?  Five years later, he and Laura are still married and seemingly happy.  It's just something that comes with the territory, I guess.

When did "W" go anywhere - except a war zone - and leave Laura behind? Separate vacations?

Quote from: crepe05 on January 22, 2014, 06:34:48 AM
Don't get too excited, people.  Remember how these types of divorce stories occasionally popped up during W's Presidency?  Five years later, he and Laura are still married and seemingly happy.  It's just something that comes with the territory, I guess.

Really? I never heard one.

Quote from: Solar on January 22, 2014, 06:18:14 AM
Yep, he could walk away from the whole family thing, narcissists love nothing but themselves.
Michelle is the one that needs him, shes proven worthless, even the media tolerates her fat ass.

She's just big-boned.

Quote from: TboneAgain on January 22, 2014, 06:54:48 AM
She's just big-boned.

And they're all in her ass.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The polls aren't credible, but National Enquirer is? 

Quote from: JRP1990 on January 22, 2014, 07:07:19 AM
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The polls aren't credible, but National Enquirer is? 

Think again.

http://www.businessinsider.com/national-enquirer-stories-that-were-true-2013-2?op=1

Quote from: Solar on January 22, 2014, 07:13:43 AM
Think again.

http://www.businessinsider.com/national-enquirer-stories-that-were-true-2013-2?op=1

That's the kind of thing that should be judged by percentage of accuracy, though -- statistical evidence, not anecdotal. That article lists 13 stories -- NatEnq has been around since 1926.

Quote from: JRP1990 on January 22, 2014, 07:07:19 AM
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The polls aren't credible, but National Enquirer is? 

The polls are sometimes flawed. The National Enquirer
broke the John Edwards "Love Child" scandal. NE stories are correct
about 1 out of 6,213,142 times.

Quote from: JRP1990 on January 22, 2014, 07:18:30 AM
That's the kind of thing that should be judged by percentage of accuracy, though -- statistical evidence, not anecdotal. That article lists 13 stories -- NatEnq has been around since 1926.

Those are just recent stories, meaning topical.
But do you really want to include in that mix "Elvis's alien baby"? 

Quote from: Solar on January 22, 2014, 07:21:52 AM
Those are just recent stories, meaning topical.
But do you really want to include in that mix "Elvis's alien baby"? 

Hey, if they run a story and pass it off as a legitimate news story (as long as it's not satirical like The Onion, of course), it's on the table as evidence of credibility!