Just heard on Rush where Caddell said the GOP establishment(Rubioites) want the IRS to take  out the Tea Party. Rush seems to agree with Caddell.

Nice hearsay oppinion, but I have a feeling you'll eat those words, Rush is not aligned with the RINO, rather, like Rand, he's trying not to insult either side.

Maybe I misread what you were saying, it sounded like you claimed Rush was with the RINO in wanting the TEA investigated by the RINO.
This is why I said you would eat those words.

"The lobbying-consultant class of the Republican Party and Republican leadership, who have been attacking the Tea Party and alienating them, they want the IRS to do this. That's why there hasn't been any establishment Republican pushback on the IRS. It's almost safe to say the Republican establishment might be willing to lose a couple of elections if it meant getting rid of the Tea Party; because it's clear, folks, they don't want to win any elections the Tea Party can claim any credit for." -Rush

I agree with Limbaugh. Rather eight more years under the boot-heel than having their go-along surrender-artist brand damaged by fiscal sense and less toadyism.

Quote from: Solar on February 17, 2014, 01:13:47 PM
Maybe I misread what you were saying, it sounded like you claimed Rush was with the RINO in wanting the TEA investigated by the RINO.
This is why I said you would eat those words.

"The lobbying-consultant class of the Republican Party and Republican leadership, who have been attacking the Tea Party and alienating them, they want the IRS to do this. That's why there hasn't been any establishment Republican pushback on the IRS. It's almost safe to say the Republican establishment might be willing to lose a couple of elections if it meant getting rid of the Tea Party; because it's clear, folks, they don't want to win any elections the Tea Party can claim any credit for." -Rush

Rush agrees with what Caddell was saying that the establishment wants to destroy the Tea Party.

Quote from: dashvinny on February 17, 2014, 02:54:13 PM
Rush agrees with what Caddell was saying that the establishment wants to destroy the Tea Party.

What a stupid concept! To destroy the Tea Party they have to attack the conservative base. The most reliable branch of the party. This will bring about an implosion of the party and a split at a critical time when the republicans have a real chance to take back control of the senate.
This in fighting in the party must stop. only winner that can come out of this is the lib's and their agenda.
The Tea Party stands to gain this as does the more northern moderate republicans. This is a good thing. if conservatives win more house and senate seats we can stop the RINOs on budgetary matters while stopping Obamas agenda by defunding his over the top programs, But we have to be patent and work together of we will see at least 2 more years of the Dirty Harry Reid Obama tag team taking down this country and turning it into their idea of a liberal utopia!!
The infighting has to STOP!!

Rush says the establishment might not mind losing a few elections  if it gets rid  of the tea party.

Quote from: dashvinny on February 17, 2014, 07:29:33 PM
Rush says the establishment might not mind losing a few elections  if it gets rid  of the tea party.

I tend to agree with Rush that the GOP leadership in the senate has mixed emotions about taking the senate. I think they want to be in the majority, but understand the only way they will be is if TEA/conservative candidates get elected. This might put their leadership status in jeopardy.

Here's exactly what he said.

Pat Caddell: The GOP establishment "WANT the IRS to go after the Tea Party"

I am so tired of politicians whose only goal is being relected and holding on to their power no matter how it might affect the country.  Boehner is a perfect example--that is when he isn't turning himself orange. 

IMO the only hope to save this country is to elect TEA party candidates.  Our Constitution needs defending and I see no one else in authority even attempting to save it. Otherwise, we will not have the freedoms we have had and which were handed down by the Founding Fathers--among them freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of association.  The UN is attempting to make criticism of Islam internationally illegal and our government in the person of Barack Obama would agree with this violation of our most cherished freedom.  Hillary Clinton agreed with this concept and I don't know how John Kerry feels about it, but probably agrees.

Quote from: Charliemyboy on February 18, 2014, 09:03:38 AM
The UN is attempting to make criticism of Islam internationally illegal

With respect, thats not actually quite true. the 'UN' is doing no such thing. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has proposed a bill in the UN general assembly banning "condemning the stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of people based on their religion." Thats all reluigion, not just islam.

Dont get me wrong, its a stupid proposal which violates one of the most basic freedoms of not just the US but most first world states. Also, the US didnt 'push this through', but in fact forced a rider guarenteeing freedom of speech in fighting religious extremism.


Full disclosure: I'm actually something of a fan of the UN as an entity, but mostly because my sister works there.