Aftermath of the sham Impeachment.

[Yuriy the Loader]

What this means is TRUMP 2024

Trump will be 78 in 2024. He's a tough guy, but it's time to retire.

Have you all forgotten how we laughed at the old donkey who wanted to become president at this age?

We want new Republicans, not old bitches. We need a new understanding of Conservativisms that will not alienate young people from our ranks.

We still need to deal with the traitors Cheyney Murkowski and the scoundrels who have joined them like Romney.

[Billy's bayonet]

TRUMP JR 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[yrunvs]

TRUMP JR 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He'd have a great mentor. Pop's could use his clout to push for election reform and get non rino republicans elected in 2022 then he could secure some conservative media outlets including social media outlets to get the truth out.

But something tells me D Trump knows the perils of the task and wouldn't want to subject his son to it. He may just do this thing again but this time with the knowledge and support he needs to get it done.

[Sick Of Silence]

Donald Trump: White House Press Secretary



He ignores CNN.

[Yuriy the Loader]

TRUMP JR 2024!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't create dynasties.

Least of all, here in the US, we need people who are "Noble" by birth.

In addition, the example of the dad of the war hero and the son of a half-ass should alarm us all.

[MichaelJ]

For those of you who thought Manchin would vote with Republicans on the Filibuster rule change, the adding of DC and PR as states, or packing the SCOTUS, check out how he voted on the Trump impeachment. Even if he does vote for one of those changes with Reps, Mitt Wrongly will cancel his vote out

[taxed]

Before getting to the serious stuff, a little celebration:





Be sure to rub their faces in it.

Now, getting to the serious part:

The Republicans who voted for conviction were:
Richard Burr of North Carolina
Bill Cassidy of Louisiana
Susan Collins of Maine
Mitt Romney of Utah
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania
Ben Sasse of Nebraska.

The vote was 43 not guilty to 57 guilty -- short of the 67 guilty votes needed to convict Trump.

Burr and Toomey are retiring in 2022, so they don't matter. Collins represents Maine and I think has to act like a leftist to keep her seat but there is no excuse for someone representing Alaska, Louisiana, Nebraska, or Utah to have voted for this. These four definitely deserve to be primaried. But there will still be the problem of voter fraud, without solving which, we cannot teach these 4 a lesson.

Moving on:

With the result of the second impeachment charade a forgone conclusion in Washington, let us now turn to the final partisan tool remaining in Democrats' torture closet: The 14th Amendment.


This amendment allows Congress to banish from future federal office any current or former politician deemed by congress to have "engaged in insurrection." Its adoption after the Civil War was designed to prevent officers or political leaders of the Confederate regime from being elected to Congress or the presidency.

As far as I have read, invoking the 14th Amendment of the Constitution to keep Trump from office in itself would require a simple-majority vote. If Democrats and Republicans vote along party lines in the current 50-50 Senate makeup, Vice President Kamala Harris could cast a tiebreaking vote. It might not even come to that, considering the 7 piece of shit RINOs present in the Senate.

Several Democrats have already expressed approval for taking this route. Whether or not it would come to pass is uncertain. It would be subject to a 60-vote filibuster. So, 10 Republicans would have to join the cause if all 50 Democrats vote in support. Taking in account the 7 RINOs, only 3 Republicans (actually 2, considering what the Turtle said after the acquittal) would stand in the way.

Of course, this is all assuming that the Dems would even keep the filibuster and not end it, as they have expressed their desire to, or even neatly sidestep it.

Not to mention, it would raise a lot of constitutional questions. Not that the Democrats care about the law or the Constitution anymore, but still.

For example, if you are tried for something you can't be tried again for the same thing/incident. Does that fall under the double jeopardy law?

The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, includes a section saying Congress can bar people who "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. from holding office. But as we saw, the Senate has ACQUITTED President Trump of insurrection. If President Trump isn't convicted of insurrection, he can't be barred for insurrection. Again, not that the Dems are going to give two shits about this.

Oh and by the way, lest you forget:

McConnell is calling for Trump's criminal prosecution. "President Trump is still liable for everything he did while in office as an ordinary citizen. He didn't get away with anything. Yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country."

This only 10 minutes after he voted to find Trump "not guilty". You've probably heard it before, the Turtle is a scumbag.



This is his spirit animal.

Anyway, I left a message for him calling him a traitor. In any case, we can only hope that now Congress would say, "That was a waste of time. Let's get to real work". But knowing them, that won't happen. No, I know what's going to happen next. They are probably going to impeach him again

Still, it was a good day for us. Even though we have all been cheated and had the election stolen from us and have had to suffer all kinds of horrible decisions, we have still triggered the Dems yet again, even while not in power I'm drinking a bottle of Jack Daniels while reading the triggered tweets of the Lefties. It's beautiful.

I appreciate you not glossing over this....