I have no clue why the anti gun people think an "assault rifle" is any more dangerous than any other semi automatic hunting rifle , other than clip capacity, and "looks" there is ABSOLUTLY no difference  .  This video is one reference i was almost cursing at the screen while i watched it , but its funny to hear him discribe why there so dangerous  .

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2050469411001/the-nra-speaks-out-in-the-wake-of-newtown-shooting/?playlist_id=938973798001





BTW for any one wanting to buy up as a just in case , better not wait too long , almost 99% of every online companie is sold out of high cap clips , and every local suplier i am awair of is sold out of "assualt rifles" , I order a bunch of high cap mags for my rifle selection and am hoping to pick up an AR-15 this weekend if i can one . 

Also to those who might have the mentality of "there is no need for a citizen to own a weapon like that " , 2 things.

A- From a recreational stand point there blast to shoot .

B- We have the right to bare arms in the constitution to make sure the citizens have the power to over throw a curupt government , not to protect ourselves from each other.

" ...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends [to secure the Rights of the People to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness... when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security."

Declaration of Independence - January 18, 1777  

"B" is part i really wonder if people have for forgotten about , or do they think it was put into the constatution to protect hobiest / hunters  ?

First of all, there is no such thing as an assault rifle and secondly, the 2nd was about the right to be a citizen military, one that would keep a corrupt Govt in check.
So it is an inherent duty to posses and bear military type weaponry as individuals.

The left have morphed it into being the right to hunt, sport, home protection, and claiming you don't need what the military has, because you'll never meet a burglar that well armed.

But that's where they're wrong, the Govt is the burglar and he is quite well armed.