Quote from: quiller on May 10, 2015, 10:34:50 AM
 

They'll probably steal the walls and flooring on their way out. And the Oval Office, intact. Something for Hussein's library in Chicago.

ROFL  Now that's some funny! Well, not that they were stealing, but the context in which you bring it up.

Refresher background, the 1996 San Jose Mercury crack cocaine expose, Gary Webb, rescued from oblivion by the Seattle Times.
http://www.mega.nu/ampp/webb.html
They'v come a long way.

Quote from: daidalos on May 14, 2015, 03:29:49 PM
  ROFL  Now that's some funny! Well, not that they were stealing, but the context in which you bring it up.

Giles is gonna whack me for saying this, but everybody knows that any Ivy League-educated looter waits until he can score the most with the least effort expended.

Mayflower, do yo' thang!

I have to say, I have been reading Breitbart, Blaze, WND, JW, and this thread, and hearing Mark Levin and his associates on talk lay out stories of  the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. There is a book out named "Cinton Cash." That author is making the circuit.  Factor in the emails and the expected candidacy, and we have the makings of the story of the decade.

Here is a NYT Review piece.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html

This prediction was made by the author of  the article,
"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"
Indeed , the author, former Bush speech writer Peter Schweitzer, walked into an "interview" with ABC's George Stephanopolis, and interview that was actually an ambush, an interrogation, and an attack planned at discrediting the author. This backfired on ABC because, one, it was obvious, and two, it has come out that George is not only a substantial "contributor" to the "foundation," but some kind of charter director whose position at ABC is nothing more than a front for the Clinton organization.

Of course, many New Yorkers are thrilled that Bill Clinton has chosen to run his operation out of Harlem, which is in itself, a flagrant flaunt. However, there remains that quiet but influential element in NY society whose roots predate LBJ and Mayor Lindsay. That element has not been especially thrilled with the presence of the Clinton organization, or the bold use of the Political Machine to further the ambitions of one, Hillary. This NYT article should come as no big surprise, considering that the Clintons have pushed their luck in New York just about as far as it
can go.

Let the quote I put in bold stand as a warning to all conservative voices to expect an influx of paid comments, fake clicks, faked up You Tube views, and an unusual influx of trolls and provocateurs on forums and panels. This one, the Clinton Rich story, must have them worried, if they are paying attention at all.

Quote from: red_dirt on May 16, 2015, 10:15:31 AM
I have to say, I have been reading Breitbart, Blaze, WND, JW, and this thread, and hearing Mark Levin and his associates on talk lay out stories of  the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. There is a book out named "Cinton Cash." That author is making the circuit.  Factor in the emails and the expected candidacy, and we have the makings of the story of the decade.

Here is a NYT Review piece.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html

This prediction was made by the author of  the article,
"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"
Indeed , the author, Schweitzer, walked into an "interview" with ABC's George Stephanopolis, and interview that was actually an ambush, an interrogation, and an attack planned at discrediting the author. This backfired on ABC because, one, it was obvious, and two, it has come out that George is not only a substantial "contributor" to the "foundation," but some kind of charter director whose position at ABC is nothing more than a front for the Clinton organization.

Of course, many New Yorkers are thrilled that Bill Clinton has chosen to run his operation out of Harlem, which is in itself, a flagrant flaunt. However, there remains that quiet but influential element in NY society whose roots predate LBJ and Mayor Lindsay. That element has not been especially thrilled with the presence of the Clinton organization, or the bold use of the Political Machine to further the ambitions of one, Hillary. This NYT article should come as no big surprise, considering that the Clintons have pushed their luck in New York just about as far as it
can go.

Let the quote I put in bold stand as a warning to all conservative voices to expect an influx of paid comments, fake clicks, faked up You Tube views, and an unusual influx of trolls and provocateurs on forums and panels. This one, the Clinton Rich story, must have them worried, if they are paying attention at all.

Eventually the pendulum does reach it's outer extremity and is forced by shear gravity to recoil at the pressure!

Quote from: red_dirt on May 16, 2015, 10:15:31 AM
I have to say, I have been reading Breitbart, Blaze, WND, JW, and this thread, and hearing Mark Levin and his associates on talk lay out stories of  the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. There is a book out named "Cinton Cash." That author is making the circuit.  Factor in the emails and the expected candidacy, and we have the makings of the story of the decade.

Here is a NYT Review piece.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html

This prediction was made by the author of  the article,
"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"
Indeed , the author, former Bush speech writer Peter Schweitzer, walked into an "interview" with ABC's George Stephanopolis, and interview that was actually an ambush, an interrogation, and an attack planned at discrediting the author. This backfired on ABC because, one, it was obvious, and two, it has come out that George is not only a substantial "contributor" to the "foundation," but some kind of charter director whose position at ABC is nothing more than a front for the Clinton organization.

Of course, many New Yorkers are thrilled that Bill Clinton has chosen to run his operation out of Harlem, which is in itself, a flagrant flaunt. However, there remains that quiet but influential element in NY society whose roots predate LBJ and Mayor Lindsay. That element has not been especially thrilled with the presence of the Clinton organization, or the bold use of the Political Machine to further the ambitions of one, Hillary. This NYT article should come as no big surprise, considering that the Clintons have pushed their luck in New York just about as far as it
can go.

Let the quote I put in bold stand as a warning to all conservative voices to expect an influx of paid comments, fake clicks, faked up You Tube views, and an unusual influx of trolls and provocateurs on forums and panels. This one, the Clinton Rich story, must have them worried, if they are paying attention at all.

"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"

This is actually good news. It indicates they are on the defensive. Exactly where we want her. With all her baggage it will make Biubba's "Bimbo Control Unit" look like amateurs.

 

Quote from: kroz on May 16, 2015, 10:20:35 AM
Eventually the pendulum does reach it's outer extremity and is forced by shear gravity to recoil at the pressure!

The political spetrum pendulum has always gone from left to right and vise versa in American politics.

There's a name for it even, it's called "clinton fatigue", but I like to call it, liberal bullshit limit. There's only so much liberal bull shit Americans who are at their core still freedom loving, Constitution supporting folks can and will tolerate.

Obama's administration made sure we reached that point by 2012, as not one but two elections have now shown us. This is why we saw Georgie Porgie on the news "apologizing" for something which those of us who knew who he was to start with already knew, that being he's a front man for the Clintons in particular, and the DNC in general.

Quote from: daidalos on May 16, 2015, 10:53:10 AM

There's a name for it even, it's called "clinton fatigue", but I like to call it, liberal bullshit limit. There's only so much liberal bull shit Americans who are at their core still freedom loving, Constitution supporting folks can and will tolerate.
Obama's administration made sure we reached that point by 2012, as not one but two elections have now shown us. This is why we saw Georgie Porgie on the news "apologizing" for something which those of us who knew who he was to start with already knew, that being he's a front man for the Clintons in particular, and the DNC in general.

Those points are consistent with my observations. I have been saying for some time that we have in this country a law enforcement problem; therefore my Ted Cruz sticker.
I am definitely getting the impression the much maligned right wing, which I am pleased to be a part of, has  more than picked up the scent, here, it smells the blood. By that I mean the active opposition senses it may be on to another Watergate, another Monica Lewinsky; meaning, revelations the entire nation can get behind. 
The sale of Uranium rights flows in perfect sequence of influence peddling and more, much more.

Quote from: red_dirt on May 16, 2015, 11:24:07 AM
Those points are consistent with my observations. I have been saying for some time that we have in this country a law enforcement problem; therefore my Ted Cruz sticker.

To state it clearly,  I mean to say our problems are problems that should be turned over to law enforcement. Ted Cruz has the will, the courage,  and the knowledge to lead that effort. All he needs is the permission of the voters.

Quote from: red_dirt on May 16, 2015, 10:15:31 AM
I have to say, I have been reading Breitbart, Blaze, WND, JW, and this thread, and hearing Mark Levin and his associates on talk lay out stories of  the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. There is a book out named "Cinton Cash." That author is making the circuit.  Factor in the emails and the expected candidacy, and we have the makings of the story of the decade.

Here is a NYT Review piece.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html

This prediction was made by the author of  the article,
"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"
Indeed , the author, former Bush speech writer Peter Schweitzer, walked into an "interview" with ABC's George Stephanopolis, and interview that was actually an ambush, an interrogation, and an attack planned at discrediting the author. This backfired on ABC because, one, it was obvious, and two, it has come out that George is not only a substantial "contributor" to the "foundation," but some kind of charter director whose position at ABC is nothing more than a front for the Clinton organization.

Of course, many New Yorkers are thrilled that Bill Clinton has chosen to run his operation out of Harlem, which is in itself, a flagrant flaunt. However, there remains that quiet but influential element in NY society whose roots predate LBJ and Mayor Lindsay. That element has not been especially thrilled with the presence of the Clinton organization, or the bold use of the Political Machine to further the ambitions of one, Hillary. This NYT article should come as no big surprise, considering that the Clintons have pushed their luck in New York just about as far as it
can go.

Let the quote I put in bold stand as a warning to all conservative voices to expect an influx of paid comments, fake clicks, faked up You Tube views, and an unusual influx of trolls and provocateurs on forums and panels. This one, the Clinton Rich story, must have them worried, if they are paying attention at all.

The Left really loved Bill, but they haven't had the same feeling about Hillary.  There is a split between thems that do and thems what don't, within their own Party.  Bill and Hillary are one in the same politically, but Bill Clinton has a certain charisma (for the Lefties) that the HildaBeast lacks.

Now, even some Liberal sources are begining to dig into Hillary's corruption.  They are not Happy Campers!  These are the same folk that hate the 1% and are outraged about the apparent corrupt system which allows people (like the Clintons) to enrich themselves beyond what "is fair".


article:
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2015/05/vox-hillary-clinton-personally-took-money-from-companies-that-sought-to-influence-her/

Few people knew much about the obscure Gov. of Arkansas when Bill Clinton was trailing the known Democrats in the polls.  He rose from obscurity to become head of their paprty and twice elected President.

Martin O'Malley may be the new face that some Democrats are looking for.  COuld it be therre is a push to take Hillary out of the running?  Or is this just part of the game?  If so, how so????

Quote from: red_dirt on May 16, 2015, 10:15:31 AM
I have to say, I have been reading Breitbart, Blaze, WND, JW, and this thread, and hearing Mark Levin and his associates on talk lay out stories of  the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. There is a book out named "Cinton Cash." That author is making the circuit.  Factor in the emails and the expected candidacy, and we have the makings of the story of the decade.

Here is a NYT Review piece.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/new-book-clinton-cash-questions-foreign-donations-to-foundation.html

This prediction was made by the author of  the article,
"And the newly assembled Clinton campaign team is planning a full-court press to diminish the book as yet another conservative hit job,"
Indeed , the author, former Bush speech writer Peter Schweitzer, walked into an "interview" with ABC's George Stephanopolis, and interview that was actually an ambush, an interrogation, and an attack planned at discrediting the author. This backfired on ABC because, one, it was obvious, and two, it has come out that George is not only a substantial "contributor" to the "foundation," but some kind of charter director whose position at ABC is nothing more than a front for the Clinton organization.

Of course, many New Yorkers are thrilled that Bill Clinton has chosen to run his operation out of Harlem, which is in itself, a flagrant flaunt. However, there remains that quiet but influential element in NY society whose roots predate LBJ and Mayor Lindsay. That element has not been especially thrilled with the presence of the Clinton organization, or the bold use of the Political Machine to further the ambitions of one, Hillary. This NYT article should come as no big surprise, considering that the Clintons have pushed their luck in New York just about as far as it
can go.

Let the quote I put in bold stand as a warning to all conservative voices to expect an influx of paid comments, fake clicks, faked up You Tube views, and an unusual influx of trolls and provocateurs on forums and panels. This one, the Clinton Rich story, must have them worried, if they are paying attention at all.

I hope it's the arrest of the decade too! Want to send a message to the innercity, fine, put this high and mighty in an orange jumpsuit and let her have her day in court. As I think, the biggest motivator in all these riots (aside from Obama's help) is that there is a perception there's one set of laws for us, and make it up as you go along for the rich and powerful. Arresting and Prosecuting a Clinton would be a good start to show that no, it's one set of laws, applicable to everyone.

Quote from: daidalos on May 21, 2015, 04:00:40 PM
I hope it's the arrest of the decade too! Want to send a message to the innercity, fine, put this high and mighty in an orange jumpsuit and let her have her day in court. As I think, the biggest motivator in all these riots (aside from Obama's help) is that there is a perception there's one set of laws for us, and make it up as you go along for the rich and powerful. Arresting and Prosecuting a Clinton would be a good start to show that no, it's one set of laws, applicable to everyone.

It would be a morale booster. It would also confirm the worst fear of the other top dogs of the American underworld -- and you know this has to be true -- that you never let the women loose with the long reins of power in any criminal enterprise. They are just old fashioned in that way. What could she possibly have been thinking when she gave a thumbs up to this Uranium deal?

I though Hillary, according to unproven charges out of Arkansas, worked in the money laundering department; really, doing more like the clerical work, arranging state contracts through Rose that made money legitimate. Bill had the job of keeping everyone happy. Apparently he was good at it. Clearly, it is all conjecture, or was, until this book came out.

If there is any truth to any of this, the racket is like people proving themselves in the minors, the states, before moving on to the big show. Once the rackets are in place, and the money is rolling in, how on earth do they ever stop it?  I mean, April 15th is Christmas, and it comes every year.

Quote from: red_dirt on May 23, 2015, 01:27:45 PM
It would be a morale booster. It would also confirm the worst fear of the other top dogs of the American underworld -- and you know this has to be true -- that you never let the women loose with the long reins of power in any criminal enterprise. They are just old fashioned in that way. What could she possibly have been thinking when she gave a thumbs up to this Uranium deal?

I though Hillary, according to unproven charges out of Arkansas, worked in the money laundering department; really, doing more like the clerical work, arranging state contracts through Rose that made money legitimate. Bill had the job of keeping everyone happy. Apparently he was good at it. Clearly, it is all conjecture, or was, until this book came out.

If there is any truth to any of this, the racket is like people proving themselves in the minors, the states, before moving on to the big show. Once the rackets are in place, and the money is rolling in, how on earth do they ever stop it?  I mean, April 15th is Christmas, and it comes every year.

Four two year terms in Arkansas in the 80's gave them plenty of practice at graft and corruption. In those days the state was totally controlled by democrats. But look now, it is one of the most "red" states.

Quote from: supsalemgr on May 23, 2015, 03:34:31 PM
Four two year terms in Arkansas in the 80's gave them plenty of practice at graft and corruption. In those days the state was totally controlled by democrats. But look now, it is one of the most "red" states.

True!  No one thought the TEA could unseat Arkansas Senator Blanche Lincoln because she had a huge war chest.  Guess what?  She lost.

Then, no one thought the TEA could unseat Arkansas Senator Mark Pryor...... but Tom Cotton blew him away!

Both democrat Senators gone in subsequent elections!!!  Total flip of the State at every level..!!!

Michigan could use that kind of overhaul.